1,778 Matching Annotations
  1. Feb 2024
    1. Clots also formed with the PPP with the addition of the spike protein, but not as disruptive as the COVID-19 PPP clots

      So this is saying….PPP of never infected people showed clotting when spike S1 was added, but it was worse in PPP (i.e. clear and clean of clots or masses) of prior COVID infected people? So meaning, not only is spike bad, but COVID adds/changes/induces introduction of something to or into the plasma (eg protein, antibody, altered protein, viral accessory protein, ions, molecules, etc)?

    2. Interestingly, these clots did not propagate much after the initial burst, indicating that most of the thrombin was consumed in a short period of time
    3. reaction between thrombin and PPP occurred rapidly, resulting in large clots after approximately 90 s
    4. disorderly clots that cover the bulk of the channel and often protruding into the center of the flow channel and disrupting flow
    5. PPP with added spike protein showed a combination of a fibrous laminar clot and disorderly clotted mass
    6. clot formation was also less frequent
    7. clot had orderly layers that did not disrupt flow through the centre of the channel
    8. Clots formed in healthy PPP were relatively small and were limited to the walls of the flow channel
    9. In healthy plasma, clot formation was a relatively slow and gradual process, resulting in the formation of a modest clot
    10. anomalous deposits that is amyloid in nature
    11. spontaneously formed fibrin network
    12. Whole blood sample of healthy volunteers, before and after exposure to spike protein
    13. formation of spontaneous and anomalous fibrin(ogen) deposits with an amyloid nature, were prominent in all the samples incubated with spike protein, without the addition of thrombin
    14. An increase in platelet hyperactivation, membrane spreading
    15. WB incubated with spike protein showed erythrocyte agglutination, despite the very low concentration of the spike protein
    16. targeting it directly, whether via vaccines or antibodies, is likely to be of therapeutic benefit.

      v

    17. conclude that the spike protein may have pathological effects directly, without being taken up by cells
    18. comparing naïve healthy platelet-poor plasma (PPP) samples, with and without added spike protein
    19. also determine if the spike protein may interfere with blood flow
    20. directly interact with platelets and fibrin(ogen) to cause fibrin(ogen) protein changes and blood hypercoagulation
    21. infected cells liberates free receptor binding domain-containing S1 particles
    22. Free spike protein can potentially be released due to spontaneous ‘firing’ of the S protein trimers on the surface of virions
    23. Free S1 particles may also play a role in the pathogenesis of the disease
    24. S1 proteins can also cross the blood–brain barrier
    25. Spike protein, can however be shed
    26. spike proteins are the key factors for virus attachment
    27. inflammatory biomarkers
    28. platelets
    29. numerous reports of damage to erythrocytes
    30. Plasma of COVID-19 patients also carries a massive load of preformed amyloid clots
    31. substantial deposition of microclots in the lungs
    32. Endotheliopathies are therefore a key clinical feature of the condition
    33. directly bind to endothelial receptors
    34. dysregulated inflammatory coagulation biomarkers,
    35. hypercoagulation and thrombosis
    36. Phenotypic vascular characteristics are strongly associated with various coagulopathies
    37. important clinical relevance in the treatment of hypercoagulability in COVID-19 patients.
    38. lytic impairment may result in the persistent large microclots
    39. cause substantial impairment of fibrinolysis
    40. we suggest that, in part, the presence of spike protein in circulation may contribute to the hypercoagulation in COVID-19
    41. roteins were substantially resistant to trypsinization, in the presence of spike protein S1
    42. prothrombin
    43. complement 3
    44. β and γ fibrin(ogen)
    45. Mass spectrometry also showed that when spike protein S1 is added to healthy PPP, it results in structural changes
    46. we show that spike protein may interfere with blood flow
    47. directly
    48. cause blood hypercoagulation
    49. investigate the potential of this inflammagen to interact with platelets and fibrin(ogen)
    50. effect of isolated SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit as potential inflammagen
    51. One of the most important pathologies, is hypercoagulation and microclots
    52. there is a significant difference in peptide structure before and after spike protein addition
    53. less resistant to trypsinization
    1. Is the Child’s Therapist Part of the Problem? What Judges, Attorneys, and Mental HealthProfessionals Need to Know About Court-related Treatment for ChildrenLYN R. GREENBERG, PH.D.*, JONATHAN W. GOULD,PH.D.**, DIANNA J. GOULD-SALTMAN, ESQ.***,PHILIP M. STAHL, PH.D.****I.

      Family Law Quarterly

    1. parents are provided legal representation to address a range of civil legal problems that could create family instability
    1. There is an increased likelihood of psychotic symptoms with lifetime PTSD diagnoses
    2. nTrauma exposure leads to various psychiatric disorders including depression, anxiety, bipolar disorders, personality disorders, psychotic disorders, and trauma related disorders, especially posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD
    1. person with delusional disorder may be high functioning in daily life
    2. Apart from their delusion or delusions, people with delusional disorder may continue to socialize and function in a normal manner and their behavior does not necessarily generally seem odd.[
    3. Delusional disorder, traditionally synonymous with paranoia, is a mental illness in which a person has delusions, but with no accompanying prominent hallucinations, thought disorder, mood disorder, or significant flattening of affect.[7][8] Delusions are a specific symptom of psychosis. Delusions can be bizarre or non-bizarre in content;[8] non-bizarre delusions are fixed false beliefs that involve situations that could occur in real life, such as being harmed
    1. some children do not recover on their own.
    2. Explain to the child that he or she is not responsible for what happened. Children often blame themselves for events
    3. impact of child traumatic stress can last well beyond childhood.
    4. self-harming behaviors
    5. signs of traumatic stress are different in each child
    6. important to learn how traumatic events affect children
    7. reported experiencing multiple and repeated traumatic events
    8. violent loss of a loved one
    9. life-threatening illnes
    10. events overwhelm a child’s or adolescent’s ability to cope
    1. InvestigationReportDearMr.Furman:Asyouareaware,ourlawfirmservesasCountyAttorneyforWashingtonCounty,Colorado.Thisletterissenttoyouinyourcapacityas
    1. Andrea Marsh
    2. Alicia told me that the Bernhardts “can be victims, too.” Once the system “put this idea in their heads that adoption could be an achievable goal for them, it damaged our family, and my son, and the foster parents’ family.”

      Ridiculously "fit" and "capable". Something an ACTUAL EXPERT, could have assessed and testified to years ago, and would have done without competition as there wasn't 1 even nearly qualified provider involved, except for the one psychologist who was, who was not objecting the child be returned to the parents

    3. We didn’t do any of this for any reason other than to make sure that Carter has the best life,” J’Lyn told me later. “He deserves that.”

      Pathological. They were never assessed. Yet the biological and fit parents were repeatedly assessed by non-"experts"

    4. they’d paid around thirty-two thousand dollars to Eirich’s firm.
    5. he is on target developmentally, and even “potentially gifted.” When I mentioned to Baird that there is little sign of the attachment trauma she predicted, she said this just demonstrates that Carter knows he has to “hero on.”
    6. Can we tell Dad I slept so good?” he asked his mom with excitement one morning, and Alicia wondered if he knew or sensed that his sleep problems had been debated for years.
    7. could do anything about it.

      Not true. But the writer is trying to make a point. I get it

    8. February, the judge asked for an explanation of what, exactly, was still unfit about Alicia and Fred as parents

      JESUS FUCKING CHRIST. ....JUST NOW, SOMEONE IS ASKING THE QUESTION??!! RPC,ORPC, WHERE THE FUCK HAVE YOU BEEN??? WHY ISN'T THERE A MOTION EVERY 2 WEEKS FROM YOU ASKING THE ON THE RECORD?? AND IMMEDIATELY APPEALING IT?

    9. Two days later, a letter from an attorney representing Washington County revealed that an internal investigation had found improprieties in the handling of Carter’s case. (The investigative report is under a gag order, and neither Smith nor the new director would elaborate on the resignation.) The trial was cancelled
    10. director of the Department of Human Services, Grant Smith, resigned.
    11. Washington County had spent more than three hundred and ten thousand dollars on Carter’s case: on his brain-mapping and medical exams, on the many expert evaluations, on Baird’s travel to and from Denver, on payments to the Bernhardts, and so on
    12. They filed a Colorado Open Records Act request, and soon received dozens of invoices.

      RPC, why are your clients having to do this? Is that not a clue to you? And if this actually was necessary, why aren't you doing it? Why aren't you adding an investigator to your case?

    13. Last year, the Kempe Center’s director asked Baird in an e-mail to stop using the Kempe name to describe her protocol an

      Now that is what an expert would do, because....see above

    14. Baird has long called her technique for evaluating

      Experts don't "create" techniques, at the very least which can be testified to as evidence backed clinical standards of care

    15. had again brought in an expert—Diane Baird—to assess

      Omg. "Expert"

    16. the judge did little but say that he would await responses to a motion and schedule another hearing

      ....again. see above

    17. judge, for his part, lamented all the medical tests. “We’re going to turn this kid into a lab rat,” he said

      So judge, why aren't you taking control and asking for what you need, let alone holding the county accountable. RPC, why aren't you arguing this fact?

    18. they couldn’t hear, let alone counter, much of what the county’s lawyer was saying about them

      RPC, you didn't motion a response regarding this?

    19. sitting cross-legged on their living-room floor,

      RPC, you didn't advise them to not do that?

    20. Janina Fariñas, another clinical psychologist who evaluated him for the county, told me, “There was almost a need for Carter to not be O.K.”

      Now finally only the 2nd arguable ACTUAL EXPERT in a case that's mentioned "lots of experts". An actual Clinical Psychologist. And she's CALLING BULLSHIT.

      And AGAIN, RPC?!?! How do you not have the competence to obliterate this case with the autumn of this expert witness, HIRED BY THE OPPOSITION?

    21. therapist

      Neither an expert nor an "assessment". And lots of "screenings" and "tests" are developed by people who arguably could serve as experts in a case, but the tests they created are neither intended to serve as an expert best interests assessment nor are they meant to be conducted by others who have the credentials to give such an assessment. Just like x ray techs aren't doctors.

    22. A clinical psychologist found that he had normal social functioning for his age but that the fuzz-eating could be attributed to pica, a condition marked by eating non-food items, and that other signs of distress might be caused by “upbringing away from parents.”

      So 1 or more people failed here. RPC did not ask CP to assess for "as an expert, is it medically in the best interest for the child to return to the parents and be raised by them and why or why not, and support that with heavily cited evidence and clinical justification", or this psychologist was not the right specialty, or this psychologist was negligent and did not advise RPC regardless of they were asked what was the ultimate best interest of the child or the need and the how or how to get to that assessment evaluation"

    23. experts

      Again ORPC, are we seeing yet the weight that these people hold and the complete misuse of the application of non-"experts"? And where are the services the RPC is advocating for? Not only are those of great value to the parents, but those workers would supply an abundance of supporting training to reinforce an actual EXPERT assessment

    24. tests

      Tests are not experts. Tests require experts, who can expertly interpret them, and will include them in expert created assessment reports and expert recommendations and expertly speak to how the results apply as evidence to support their findings and the tests limitations and risks.

    25. Paul Spragg, a Colorado forensic psychologist

      A forensic licensed psychologist is not necessarily an expert, but is the only one who could be argued as one in this story so far other than the AAP, and he is raising the bullshit flag because he actually is trained and licensed and likely actually qualified to assess and make recommendations that are truly healthful and not ridiculously dangerous.

    26. Foster Source

      Fucking spooky

    27. veteran nurse practitioner

      Not even close to an expert. Neither of course is eirich an expert

    28. What is the process at this point?” she wrote. “Will I hear from you or should I expect to hear from someone else? Is there anything else I can/should be doing to be prepared for baby and court? Should I plan a visit to Colorado to meet [the child] or to meet persons involved?”

      Misconduct. Didn't meet reasonable Efforts Standards.

    29. She has significant experience,” the judge said,

      RPC, and ORPC, are you seeing yet the lever that determines a judges decisions??? EXPERT TESTIMONY. As in GET AN EXPERT. An ACTUAL EXPERT.

    30. only a preference under state laws. The judge rule

      They have WAY MORE THAN PREFERENCE. A judge is mandated to know this. An RPC should be a magician with this.

    31. , as Eirich underlined to me, though parents have a constitutional right to their child until such right is terminated

      Jesus Christ. The opposing attorney knows this, WHY DOESN'T THE RPC?

    32. but you’re also being blamed
    33. in reality, children may be dysregulated for any number of reasons—perhaps they miss their parent, feel confused, or are simply behaving as toddlers do.” Green used to employ the dysregulation claim in her own cases, she said. She now regrets it.

      Dude.......

    34. Allison Green, the legal director of the National Association of Counsel for Children,

      Dude... Allison Green....of the NACC....provider of THE CWLS CERTIFICATION

    35. gave his foster parents more time to make their central argument
    36. remained in foster care, with no transition home planned.

      RPC? Why?

    37. social worker had explained that Eirich and Baird “went around the state together,” arguing for the termination of birth-parents’ rights

      AND WITH THIS WITNESS?

    38. Another judge, recognizing Fred’s transformation, had recently granted him full custody of his other son, Robert, who was twelve years old.

      I mean what the fuck RPC, you can't win the case immediately armed with that alone?

    39. The problem was that Alicia and Fred would not give up.

      This is supposed to be, "the RPC would not give up and launched a storm of conditional law, judicial review, recruited actual experts, and complaints to oversight bodies and law enforcement....and the parents got their kids back immediately with funded ongoing support services and DHS responded they have begun a task force to review conduct and policy and the judges and caseworkers at a minimum in that district are on alert to not keep trying to pull this bullshit again and statewide all judges an attorneys know to get real serious when they see the names eirich or Baird"

    40. A healthy attachment trumps biology in the first three years of life, period,”

      Direct admission of unlawful intent!

    41. an attachment expert whom she has trained.

      A case worker is training an "attachment expert"? This is what an "attachment expert" is??? Holy shit

    42. intervenor-training sessions for judges and foster parents

      What??

    43. When the American Academy of Pediatrics reviewed

      This is an actual "expert"

    44. foster children were becoming a “hot commodity,” he said
    45. prominent local ranching family
    46. expert

      "Expert"? There are no experts

    47. saying that their visits with him were threatening his primary attachment and causing “a biologic hyperarousal that not only burns calories but self-perpetuates”—a state that becomes worrisome when a child spends “twenty-five to fifty-seven per cent of their time, or whatever,” in it. Rupturing a primary attachment could ultimately cause “sociopathy” in a child, she said.

      ?!! ....a judge heard this. A judge thought this person was a "credible expert". RPC did not pounce all over this which includes 1) arguing she is not only not an expert but that this is wildly anti-expert, 2) discrediting DHSs complete management competency at the very least in this case 3) realizing the need or having the knowledge ability to get a REAL EXPERT 4) petitioning immediately for judicial review and or change of venue or other mediatory discussions directly with the judge

    48. judge
    49. without having met them.
    50. hundreds
    51. as an expert
    52. Although hired as a consultant by Washington County in this case, Baird had a long-standing independent agenda: helping foster parents across Colorado succeed in intervening and permanently claiming the children they care for. Often working hand in hand with Tim Eirich
    53. Did Baird not understand how hard it is to bond with a baby you’ve been allowed to see for only a few hours a week, while masked, or in fifteen-minute stints on Zoom
    54. social worker named Diane Baird
    1. the sentence under this section for such offense shall include imprisonment for not less than 20 years
    2. Special Rule for Certain Offenses Involving Children
    3. c) If two or more persons conspire to violate this section and one or more of such persons do any overt act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life.
    4. shall be punished by imprisonment for any term of years or for life
    5. any person
    6. kidnaps
    7. ) Whoever unlawfully
    8. Kidnapping
    1. Kidnapping -- 18 U.S.C. § 1201
    2. Section 1201(d) prohibits attempts to kidnap
    3. Section 1201(c) prohibits conspiracy to kidnap and authorizes "imprisonment for any term of years or for life."
    4. no proof of harm to the victim is required to support any such sentence
    5. The maximum permissible punishment is imprisonment for any term of years or for life
    1. Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States
    2. penalties up to and including life in prison or death
    3. kidnapping
    4. A violation of the statute is a misdemeanor, unless prosecutors prove one of the statutory aggravating factors such as
    5. failing to protect someone in custody from constitutional violations committed by others
    6. The Department has also prosecuted public officials for
    7. Section 242 does not criminalize any particular type of abusive conduct.  Instead, it incorporates by reference rights defined by the Constitution, federal statutes, and interpretive case law.
    8. Those prosecuted under the statute typically include police officers, sheriff’s deputies, and prison guards.  However other government actors, such as judges, district attorneys, other public officials, and public school employees can also act under color of law and can be prosecuted under this statute.
    9. Section 241 is used in Law Enforcement Misconduct
    10. used
    11. in Human Trafficking prosecutions
    12. MISCONDUCT
    13. OTHER GOVERNMENT ACTORS
    14. This provision makes it a crime for someone acting under color of law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States
    15. Defendants act under color of law when they wield power vested by a government entity
    16. It is punishable by up to ten years imprisonment unless the government proves an aggravating factor (such as that the offense involved kidnapping
    17. The offense is always a felony, even if the underlying conduct would not, on its own, establish a felony violation
    18. Unlike most conspiracy statutes, §241 does not require, as an element, the commission of an overt act
    1. The offense is punishable by a range of imprisonment up to a life term, or the death penalty, depending upon the circumstances of the crime, and the resulting injury
    2. not necessary that the crime be motivated by animus toward the race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status
    3. others who are acting as public officials
    4. care providers
    5. judges
    6. include
    7. makes it a crime for a person acting under color of any law to willfully deprive a person of a right or privilege protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States.
    8. Deprivation Of Rights Under Color Of Law
    1. If the child is removed, request a copy of the family’s prevention plan to review what the agency offered and whether reasonable efforts have been made to prevent removal (if necessary, request through the discovery process). If reasonable efforts were not made, request a “no reasonable efforts” finding at the first hearing, and an order returning the child to the family with appro-priate services

      BOOOOOOMMMM....END OF STORY

      • complete failure by Haylie (and DHS, and magistrate)
      • concerned about costs? failure to not do your jobs and not stop these issues and fix problems at the door is why your costs and calendars and caseloads are out of control

      "request "no reasonable efforts" finding and order returning the child to family with appropriate services"

    1. discuss their roles in cancers, neurodegeneration, autoimmune, inflammation, infection and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs),

      Goodness. After 1000s of papers, is it not stupidly obvious these are all the same same disease. They always exist together. They all share the common underpinnings. .... if you see one, you start investigating the others.

    1. ncreases in rMSSD and HF over time were associated with a significant increase in survival
    2. The specific link between the autonomic ner-vous system and the immune system is through an anti-inflammatory circuit, the inflammatory reflex, surrounding the vagus nerve, which is an important component of the parasympathetic nervous system (Rosas-Ballina et al., 2011; Rosas-Ballina & Tracey, 2009; Tracey, 2002). The inflammatory reflex works by sensing the activity of proinflammatory cytokines through an afferent pathway (Olofsson, Rosas-Ballina, Levine, & Tracey, 2012) and informs the brain of malignancies. An efferent response is then elicited, in which signals from the brain, via the vagus nerve, stimulate acetylcholine-producing T cells. In turn, the T cells activate anti-inflammation processes by inhibiting proinflammatory cytokine production (Olofsson et al., 2012; Rosas-Ballina et al., 2011). The vagus nerve affects the maturation and reduction of cancerous tumor cells because of its role in immune system signaling and regulating (De Couck et al., 2013; De Couck, Mravec, & Gidron, 2012; Levy, Herberman, Lippman, D’Angelo, & Lee, 1991; Mravec, Gidron, & Hulin, 2008; Rosas-Ballina & Tracey, 2009)
    1. I will never forget Anna nor the lessons her courage andspirit have taught me about life and living.
    2. the avoidance behaviorsare ultimately what will cause fear
    3. What I have learned is that even though most of us mighttry to avoid thinking
    4. if we allow ourselves tomeet those around us as our equals, a natural sense of em-pathy, kindness, and connectedness starts to emerge
    5. felt a sincere sense of serenity as a resultof the relatedness I felt with the patients and mankind ingeneral
    6. I found myself faced with the poignantdefenselessness of these patients, and then I too was forced totake my fences down. And for me, when those boundaries felland I was confronted with life’s realities of suffering andmortality,
    7. this nat-ural tendency to shield ourselves from seemingly unbearablefeelings also prevents us from opening our hearts and genu-inely connecting with others
    8. sorrow and grief, thatwe, perhaps too often, try to avoid in our daily lives, as weassociate these feelings with discomfor
    9. they help us toavoid painful feelings, but thereby also deny us access toourselves and others
    10. Defensescan disconnect us from the rest of humanity
    11. ollowed were years of struggle thatfluctuated between living on the streets and living in home-less shelters.all with her five children. Then, as if lifewould never plan on giving this brave woman a break, shemost recently was diagnosed with desmoplastic small roundcell tumor, a rare form of incurable cancer
    12. inally broke free from her abusive homeat the age of 18

      Have you experienced or recognize the equal devastation that comes with making an equally severe error in abusive unwarranted overprotection?

    13. lived with her grandpar-ents, who made her feel responsible for her godfather’s re-lentless abuse.
    14. suffered horrendousabuse by her godfather throughout the better part of herchildhood and adolescence. Neglected and abandoned by hersubstance-dependent mother
    15. he Gift of Connection:A Personal Reflection on My Work with Cancer PatientsCaroline Scheiber, MA
    16. In brotherly love there is the experience of union with all men
    1. The Teenage Brain - Webinar April 27, 2020. Speakers: Caroline Scheiber, PhD and Leah Kaplan, LPC

      Almost every slide contains evidence that explains the start and progression of our story. Is very worth going back through recording and tagging and denoting each point of evidence.

    1. impaired cognitive functioning following cancer diagnosis and treatment may be the result of a preexisting vulnerability due to exposure to childhood trauma (Lupien et al., 2009; Miller, Chen, & Zhou, 2007). In that regard, trauma should be considered, among other factors, in treatments aiming to address difficulties with cognitive functioning
    2. Conceivably, cognitive functioning difficulties may not be attributable directly to the steepness or flatness of the cortisol slope, but instead to how the overall system responds to a particular endogenous or exogenous challenge
    3. The relationship between childhood trauma and cognitive functioning remained significant even after controlling for age, education, time since chemotherapy treatment, insomnia, anxiety, and depression.
    4. Multiple studies have shown that memory and learning are impaired
    5. restrict capacity for learning and memory formation
    6. hippocampus is particularly vulnerable
    7. exposure to childhood trauma may also put women at risk of cognitive functioning difficulties after breast cancer diagnosis and treatment.
    8. in the specific context of cancer
    9. overproduction of glucocorticoids, including cortisol, has a direct impact on cognitive functioning among people in general
    10. person’s age when exposed to trauma, he or she may develop long-term HPA suppression or hyperactivity, causing the HPA axis to be easily activated by stress and to continue to produce glucocorticoids even after a threat has passed
    11. result in persistent alteration of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) activity
    12. implement early interventions to improve long-term cognitive outcome