43 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2017
  2. Mar 2017
    1. We should like to encourage presentations that introduce a broad audience to new topics, techniques, and technologies, and may have a pedagogical rather than a purely expository tone. The focus should of course include research topics of classical/historical/archaeological interest. We are inviting both students and established researchers involved in the application of the Digital Humanities to the study of the ancient world to come and introduce their work. The focus of this seminar series is in line with that of the Digital Classicist as a whole, in that the aim is to bring together scholars to address issues of collaborative work and the new methodologies enabled and in some cases necessitated by the digital academy. As we know, these digital methods are far from being marginal to traditional classical scholarship; they offer new perspectives and new ways to approach essential research questions, thus both underpinning and becoming central to the advancement of our discipline.

      dmProof

      Line on the side of block quote.

    2. other—or

      dmProof

      Missing dash

    3. person—an

      dmproof

      Missing dash

    1. Notes:

      dmProof Bodard 2008

      Most articles so far have had a difference in margin space between the article, and the notes/Works Cited.

    2. ?

      dmProof Bodard 2008

      Question mark at the end of every citation

    3. wm, sep. fr. ?sarc. 0.35 x 0.60 x c. 0.12. T.Aph. II/III; av. 0.022

      dmProof Bodard 2008

      What is the blue line on the side?

    4. degree—with

      dmProof Bodard 2008

    5. available—or

      dmProof Bodard 2008

    6. intervention—and

      dmProof Bodard 2008

      Dash missing.

    7. only—epigraphic

      dmProof Bodard 2008

      Dashes aren't showing up.

    8. systems—HTML

      dmProof Bodard 2008

      Missing dash

    9. major—but

      dmProof Bodard 2008

      Dashes aren't showing up.

    1. ?

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Every citation ends with "?"

    2. datastores—already

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Spelling mistake.

    3. federation—an

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Spelling mistake.

    4. documents—via

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Spelling mistake.

    5. objects—whether

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Spelling mistake.

    6. pottery—to

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Spelling mistake.

    7. gives '… life

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Spelling mistake.

    8. researcher—is

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Spelling mistake.

    9. teacher—even

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Spelling mistake.

    10. archives—a

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Spelling mistake.

    11. roviders—museums

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Spelling mistake.

    12. expenditure—visits

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Spelling mistake.

    13. above—constraints

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Spelling mistake.

    14. 'art'—is

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Spelling mistake.

    15. culture—real

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Spelling mistake.

    16. art—have

      dmProof Smith, Fuchs, and Isaksen 2008

      Spelling mistake.

    1. ?

      dmProof Stokes 2007

      Every entry in this "Works Cited" has a "?" after it. These should probably all be removed.

    2. ?2

      dmProof Stokes, 2007

    3. ?2,

      dmProof Stokes 2007