Surprisingly, it appears that depth (z) is always smaller than length (x) or width (y). Length is less than width in more than half the observations, the opposite of expectations. I don’t know what’s going on. If this was not a widely used da
- If you look at this picture, it seems that depth is always smaller than either width or length. Maybe it is easier to plug it into a ring or other jewelry...
- Also you said "1. length is less than width, otherwise the width would be called the length". actually, it is the other way round.