302 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2019
  2. Aug 2019
    1. whereCdk

      you haven't defined \(\Delta\) in the statement of the theorem

  3. Jul 2019
    1. as

      "as" is not necessary here. This is very minor mistake but since you are doing excellent job I am going to point out any mistake I find to contribute the project towards perfection.

    1. Don’t stop there, and get creative!

      Unnecessary comma. Maybe this would be better:

      Don't stop there. Get creative!

    2. Low calorie

      Should be Low-calorie

    3. ,

      This comma is unnecessary.

    4. --

      This should be a proper em dash.

  4. Jun 2019
  5. May 2019
  6. Apr 2019
  7. Mar 2019
  8. Feb 2019
  9. Jan 2019
  10. Dec 2018
  11. Nov 2018
    1. in principle each other

      in principle cancel each other

    1. At left, an image with surface depth cues at 100% and interior depth cues at 50%. The image on the right has surface depth cues at 100% and interior depth cues at 50%.

      According to the description both images have surface depth cues at 100% and interior depth cues at 50%. It's clearly a typo.

  12. Oct 2018
    1. the autoposts from Twitter to Facebook were

      a hanging thought? I feel like I do this on my site all too often...

  13. Sep 2018
    1. numbers


    2. the line

      "points on a line"

    3. “related”.

      Should these quotes be `` (double backtick) '' (double apostraphe)?

    4. collection




  14. Aug 2018
    1. π

      This \(\pi\) should be mix as at the end of the sentence

  15. Jul 2018
    1. they are using what proposition A.1 is saying, which has a typo, it should be \(\frac{\Delta_k (t_j - t_{j-1})}{4} \exp (-t_{j-1} \Delta^2/2)\)

    2. max1≤k≤MMXj=1∆ktj4exp(−tj−1∆2k/2)−1∆k

      The \(\sum_{j=1}^M\) should be inside the bracket. The \(-\frac{1}{\Delta_k}\) is not part of the sum.

    3. t

      This numerator should be \(t_j - t_{j-1}\)

    4. 1

      A \(\Delta\) is missing here

    1. “pulls it back”

      minor quibble, maybe this should be surrounded by parantheses

  16. Jun 2018
    1. x3yif and only ifdxù3e y

      Maybe x and y (at least y) should be said to be natural numbers here, but then again it is fairly obvious from the context.

    2. Writedzeforthe smallest natural number greater thanz2R, and writebzcfor the largest naturalnumber smaller thanz2R, e

      I think both of these definitions should include "or equal to", especially given the immediate following example of x <= 3y if and only if ...

    3. s

      Not really a typo, but slightly confusing since s is also used for a different funciton in the same example in the following paragraph.

  17. May 2018
  18. Apr 2018
  19. Mar 2018
  20. Jan 2018
  21. Dec 2017
  22. Nov 2017
  23. Oct 2017
  24. Sep 2017
  25. Aug 2017
  26. Jul 2017
  27. May 2017
  28. Apr 2017
  29. Mar 2017
    1. published will

      published and will

    2. and trasfer

      and transfer

    3. return at

      back to

    4. set the

      sets the

    5. Agend


    6. externatlities


    7. healtcare


    8. pubic resources

      public ressources - pubic ressources sind was gaaanz anderes ;-)

    9. renats


      Inhaltlich: vgl. die Anmerkung auf S. 17 zu Big Data-Auswertungen in Berlin, die dort ebenfalls nach den "großen" kleinen gesucht haben.

    10. experimeng


    11. it ways

      it in ways

    12. arleady


    13. hegemoncy


    14. need to reformulated

      need to be reformulated

    15. That said, it just so happens that many political forces that do question many parts of the neoliberal agenda to have some influence in c

      That said, many political forces that do question many parts of the neoliberal agenda happen to have some influence in c

    16. themselves

      . [Punkt]

    17. a  popular

      Das muss wohl "app" statt "add" heißen hier.

    18. they  advanced

      they advance

    19. like  neutral


    20. bsolet


    21. exercises