323 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. let page = document.getElementById('buttonDiv');

      duplication: As a result of duplication, they somehow ended with this line being present here but not in the downloadable file which is supposed to have the same contents as the snippet shown here.

      They should have updated their static page generation script/process so that their main document referenced options.js and their generator literally included the contents of the referenced file inline. Then there is no chance of the contents of the inline snippet and downloaded snippet diverging and not matching.

      Evidently, however, the contents of each are managed independently (in other words, there is duplication), easily leading to the contents diverging, as they did.

  2. Feb 2020
    1. as

      "as" is not necessary here. This is very minor mistake but since you are doing excellent job I am going to point out any mistake I find to contribute the project towards perfection.

    1. data is collected

      data that is collected, or data collected

    2. and applications to forecasting and estimation of dynamic causal effects.

      and its applications to forecasting and estimation of dynamic causal effects.

      The word "its" is necessary since it refers to the noun econometric techniques.

  3. Jan 2020
  4. Dec 2019
  5. Nov 2019
    1. ref={props.innerRef}

      Shouldn't this be ref={ref}? So that ref is actually used and the ref setter function in RefForm that sets refs actually gets passed the ref from the input?

  6. Sep 2019
  7. Aug 2019
    1. whereCdk

      you haven't defined \(\Delta\) in the statement of the theorem

  8. Jul 2019
    1. Don’t stop there, and get creative!

      Unnecessary comma. Maybe this would be better:

      Don't stop there. Get creative!

    2. Low calorie

      Should be Low-calorie

    3. ,

      This comma is unnecessary.

    4. --

      This should be a proper em dash.

  9. Jun 2019
  10. May 2019
  11. Apr 2019
  12. Mar 2019
  13. Feb 2019
  14. Jan 2019
  15. Dec 2018
  16. Nov 2018
    1. in principle each other

      in principle cancel each other

    1. At left, an image with surface depth cues at 100% and interior depth cues at 50%. The image on the right has surface depth cues at 100% and interior depth cues at 50%.

      According to the description both images have surface depth cues at 100% and interior depth cues at 50%. It's clearly a typo.

  17. Oct 2018
    1. the autoposts from Twitter to Facebook were

      a hanging thought? I feel like I do this on my site all too often...

  18. Sep 2018
    1. numbers


    2. the line

      "points on a line"

    3. “related”.

      Should these quotes be `` (double backtick) '' (double apostraphe)?

    4. collection




  19. Aug 2018
    1. π

      This \(\pi\) should be mix as at the end of the sentence

  20. Jul 2018
    1. they are using what proposition A.1 is saying, which has a typo, it should be \(\frac{\Delta_k (t_j - t_{j-1})}{4} \exp (-t_{j-1} \Delta^2/2)\)

    2. max1≤k≤MMXj=1∆ktj4exp(−tj−1∆2k/2)−1∆k

      The \(\sum_{j=1}^M\) should be inside the bracket. The \(-\frac{1}{\Delta_k}\) is not part of the sum.

    3. t

      This numerator should be \(t_j - t_{j-1}\)

    4. 1

      A \(\Delta\) is missing here

  21. Jun 2018
    1. x3yif and only ifdxù3e y

      Maybe x and y (at least y) should be said to be natural numbers here, but then again it is fairly obvious from the context.

    2. Writedzeforthe smallest natural number greater thanz2R, and writebzcfor the largest naturalnumber smaller thanz2R, e

      I think both of these definitions should include "or equal to", especially given the immediate following example of x <= 3y if and only if ...

    3. s

      Not really a typo, but slightly confusing since s is also used for a different funciton in the same example in the following paragraph.

  22. May 2018
  23. Apr 2018
  24. Mar 2018
  25. Jan 2018
  26. Dec 2017
  27. Nov 2017
  28. Oct 2017