Note that the CC licenses prohibit you from applying DRM to someone else’s CC licensed work without their permission.
Is this phrase really true? Why? I think this phrase only applies to CC BY-SA and not CC BY or CC BY ND.
I think it could be:
Note that some CC licenses (like CC BY-SA) prohibit you from applying DRM to someone else’s CC licensed work without their permission.
Law Library Stacks photo (cropped from original) from Unsplash by Malte Baumann/ CC0
Note that Unsplash DOES NOT release photos in CC0 as default! They are non-commercial. Moreover the link is 404 not found.
Public Knowledge resource
spoiler: there is also an example about licensing a T-Rex shower nozzle 3-D printed.
FAQ here relevant FAQ here
there is a typo here
.
I suggests to remove ". " from the link.
More tips from the World Wide Web Consortium:
CC by joining the #open-glam channel in CC’s Slack;
It would be nice to slowly migrate this channel from Slack (that cannot be accessed without Free/Libre or open source software) to RocketChat.
RocketChat is a Free/Libre chat platform that can replace RocketChat and give even more features, as long as give more ethical consistency to the CC movement.
Peers can help you go from No Open Access to some Open Access.
It's difficult to spread Open Access and Free cultural work licenses if blog posts about Open Access are not compatible with Open Access. The article by Anne Young has a non-commercial restriction. It would be nice to contact Anne Young to propose to release her blog post under CC BY-SA license or anyway under a Free cultural work license.
ways and means.
I suggest to make the word "OpenGLAM" the link, instead of having the words "ways and means" as a link. This increases the semantic of the link.
Other tips from the World Wide Web consortium:
Small typo: extra space
Small typo: extra space
Small typo: extra space
Small typo: extra space
Small typo: extra space
Small typo: extra space
Here I discovered two spaces :D Yeah! Typo ninja! Let's remove this extra space!
Read about the Smithsonian’s release of over 2.8 million images and data using CC0 in this CC blog post.
To increase the semantic weight of this link I suggest to make the link over the words "Smithsonian’s release of over 2.8 million images and data using CC0" instead of have the link over the words "blog post" (since this link does not explain what a generic blog post is).
More tips from the World Wide Web consortium here:
[2]
Maybe this reference could be moved in the paragraph above, just after the word "strategy".
Creative Commons embarked on a new strategy
I suggest to transform the whole "Creative Commons embarked on a new strategy" as a link, instead of having just the words "new strategy" as a link. This gives more semantic value to the link.
Other Tips from the World Wide Web Consortium:
Open source software is cited as the first domain where networked open sharing produced a tangible benefit
The phrase should be:
The Free Software and Open-source movements were the first domains where networked open sharing produced a tangible benefit.
Why?
Free Software movement started in 1983.
Open-source movement started in 1998.
CC’s Network Platforms are open to everyone
I don't think this network is "open to everyone".
I was not able to join since the registration process requires to have 2 friends already registered-in.
Today
It would be nice to have time context here (e.g. year).
CC BY-NC-SA
It's a shame that one of the most iconic videos of the Creative Commons movement has a license incompatible with Wikipedia. It would be helpful to do post-production on this video to overlay the slides with non-commercial content, and release the final product under CC BY-SA. Then you could upload it to Wikimedia Commons, and even include it in some Wikipedia pages related to Creative Commons.
internet
I think that Internet should be capitalized in this place since we are not talking about a generic network infrastructure but... the Internet, the widest network in the world.
Today
When? This phrase deserves an historical context. Maybe this phrase is not updated to 2021.
2 billion works online across 9 million websites
What is the source of this statement? I would like to deepen it.