1836
I wonder why the organizers chose 1836 as the end date for this symposium. Any thoughts?
6 Matching Annotations
- Jul 2018
-
-
-
Docs: This page is for documents that can be collaboratively authored (similar to Google Docs).
I created a document for collaboration on digital projects; it can be found in a subfolder under the docs tab, or here [https://hcommons.org/docs/women-in-book-history-databases-and-website-symposium-participants/]
-
1836
I'm curious why the organizers chose 1836 as the end date for this symposium. Any thoughts?
-
- Oct 2017
-
lti.hypothesislabs.com lti.hypothesislabs.com
-
First, though, I will show how this dissension was lost to historical view by considering how the recurrent critical narra-tive of Charlotte’s regrettable but inevitable “minor[ing]”
Moe explicitly separates her argument into two parts here. The first will be to analyze how the critical tradition led to Charlotte's "minoring."
-
- Jun 2017
-
scholarcommons.usf.edu scholarcommons.usf.edu
-
Cynthia Richards, Pedagogy Editor
Congratulations, Cynthia. This is the first issue Cynthia edited as Pedagogy editor.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-
-
jeremydean.org jeremydean.org
-
course
This would be an ideal practice for Introduction to Literature courses introducing digital literacy.
-