This is one of my favorite parts of the website. I think this a is a great organizational tool and something I want to try for in our website.

They fact that they're acknowledging the possibility of technical errors is something I haven't really seen before. It makes me feel like they really care about the website and it's users and want to make our use of it as successful as possible.

You can contact the special editors and project staff via email and it gives a lot of background about the project editors. I like how there are so many different people involved.

Though this seems like a lot of information to sift through but I'm so glad they give so much background on the website and contributors. It really helps explain the website. Because the website is so extensive, this makes it more approachable and offers a lot of help.

This part where they help users cite things from their website is really interesting to me. I think it's nice that they acknowledge their users are going to need to cite. They make it easy to cite so that they have no excuse not to.

One of the things I noticed about this website was that it looks kind of outdated. Not in the sense that it's not updated with current information or that it's not reliable, but more in the way that it feels very old. With the newer and newer technology, I'm glad they're updating their appearance so that it can be even more appealing.

I feel like this section kind of comes out of no where. and I'm still kind of confused about how they are a historical website but they also have journal issues? The pictures are eye catching but also throw off the aesthetic of the page.

The navigation bar being constantly visible and accessible on the side is something I know Sean wants on the our website and I'm inclined to agree. I think it makes the site easily approachable and accessible.

I don't like how small the font is. I think it makes the site title page look cluttered.

There's different ways to browse the website which I really like. I'm not sure how feasible it would be to include a search bar on our website, but I would like that feature.

I was drawn to the site because it covers women's history, but the fact that it goes from 1600-2000 seems like it won't be able to give an in depth look at each movement, but rather an overview of all possible movements.

I like the way they outline the different sections because when I was first investigating this site as a potential test site, this navigation bar helped me find everything easily

It looks like they are asking for participation from all different scholars. That's really cool. I think it's important to be recognizing activists in history who otherwise would get no acknowledgment of their efforts. That's something that often doesn't happen. Women and other marginalized groups are often written out of the history books.

The title page seems a bit overwhelming to me. I think the pictures and small font through me off

When you click on a source with multiple documents and it brings you to a page like this that lists the different documents for each topic. I like the way they organize everything. It's very simple and clean.

They list the number of documents they have that pertain to each source, which is really helpful.

They separate the sources based on what's primary and secondary and what is a full text source. I really like this because it is makes the site very easily to navigate.

They have such an extensive bibliography. This is fantastic resource because people often need to find primary sources and when they do they need to cite it to demonstrate how important it is as a primary source.