hey believe,with good reason,thatif ind i v i d u a l l i b e r t y i s a n u l t i m a t e e n d f o r h u man beings,-non'should be deprivei of it by others; least of all that some shouldenjoy it at the expenseof others

what troubles the consciencesof western liberalsis not, I think,the belie{ that the freedom that men seekdiffers accordingto theirsocial or economic conditions,but that the minority who possessithave gained it by exploiting, or, at lea.st,averting their gaze from'ih. u"r, maiority who do not.

And so, in colonialcircumstances, the bard could become symptomatic and symbolic of theeducation of Africans and Caribbeans into a passive, subservient rela-tionship to dominant colonial culture

The pressing horrors of the Madagascan crisis prompted Mannonito find a new significance for The Tempest, encouraging him to weave areading of Shakespeare's poetic drama through his reading of the incipientdrama of decolonization

When the man-monster, brutalised by long continued torture, be-gins, 'This island's mine, by Sycorax my mother, which thou takestfrom me', we have the whole case of the aboriginal against aggressivecivilisation dramatised before us. I confess I felt a sting of con-science-vicariously suffered for my Rhodesian friends, notablyDr. Jameson-when Caliban proceeded to unfold a similar caseto that of the Matebele

Ironically, it was Beerbohm Tree's unabashedly jingoistic productionof The Tempest in 1904 that elicited the first recorded response to thplay in anti-imperial terms, as one member of the audience assimilatethe action to events surrounding the Matabele uprising in

Rereading The Tempest in the politicalatmosphere of 1962, he was discomfited by his recognition of the Prosperoin himself. Circumstances had altered: "While many of us today find wedislike in Prospero things we dislike in ourselves, our fathers admiredhim without question and so indeed did my generation until lately" (PM,p. 92).

ed. What the colonial subjects sought was the paradoxifreedom of secure dependence rather than any autonomous, self-determining freedom. This assumption clearly shaped Mannoni's skepticismabout the Madagascans' desire, let alone their capacity, to achieve nationindependen

ons. Mannoni found the Madagascans, on the othhand, to be marked by a Caliban complex, a dependence on authoripurportedly characteristic of a people forced out of a secure "tribasociety and into the less stable, competitively edged hierarchies of a semWesternized exist

YouTube videos playeda central role in forming their initial beliefs in chemtrails

In their view,they are conducting their own experiments and trusting theevidence of their eyes, while the rest of us are guilty of naivelysimply believing what we are told.how does the internet change how we think?105https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108780704.005 Published online by Cambridge University Press

So, under a banner of power tothe people and to the Bible,

The internetis particularly good at fostering non-standard beliefs,because people who share assumptions can find oneanother.

What the community of scientists agree on isour best attempt at what “is true,” and is continually revisedover time in response to new evidence

When encountering new information, the associated perception is not external stimulus-driven but is created according to the pre-existing knowledge structures. Thus, the subsequent responses are shaped by the extent to which new information conforms to expectations derived from one's knowledge structure

the cycle of information seeking

the relationship amongst the information contained within papers, existing DBs and online resources is negligible.

It’s important for Wikipedia to remain a human-written knowledge source

But it seems to me that rumors of the imminent “death of Wikipedia” at the hands of generative A.I. are greatly exaggerated. Sure, the implementation of A.I. technology will undoubtedly alter how Wikipedia is used and transform the user experience. At the same time, the features and bugs of large language models, or LLMs, like ChatGPT intersect with human interests in ways that support Wikipedia rather than threaten it.