inchosen
...in the chosen...
25 Matching Annotations
- Sep 2019
-
radioscience-submit.agu.org radioscience-submit.agu.org
-
-
3.71×10−11
5.71x10-12 as seen in Table 2?
-
Table 2
Table 2 at 621 for reference.
-
Figures 9 and 10
Figure 9 and 10 at 579 for reference since discussing below mention.
-
Figure 8
Figure 8 above at 550 for reference and consistency.
-
VDFs; h
...VDFs. However...
-
QTN only
...QTN, only...
-
that in for
...that for...
-
−12
Again, -14 as seen from Table 1?
-
−12
-14 as seen from Table 1?
-
Table 1
Table 1 above at 494 for reference and consistency.
-
Figure 7
Figure 7 above for reference.
-
Figure 5
Figure 5 above for reference.
-
kD)-1
(k*lambda sub D)^-2 not required due to no real parts at large k? If so might want to mention in paragraph.
-
intorduces
introduces
-
Figure 3
Figure 3 goes above for reference.
-
Figure 2
Figure 2 goes above for reference.
-
Figure 1
Figure 1 goes above for reference.
-
plane we
plane, we
-
longitudinal component
Longitudinal component- do you mean the longitudinal plasma permittivity: dampened longitudinal waves or oscillations in plasma?
-
The derivation here will use the kinetic approach and followthe work
Utilizing Vlasov as looking for microscopic details versus analyzation of plasma macroscopically.
-
independent longitudinal and transverse components
Again, permittivity?
-
https://ccmc.gsfc.nasa.gov/modelweb/models/iri2016_vitmo.php.
Parameters utilized for modeling electron density and temperature values?
-
however,
remove "however,"
-
Figure 6
Actually suppose to be at 409, insert Figure 6 where start to discuss Figure 6.
-