37 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2015
  2. learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet02-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet02-xythos.content.blackboardcdn.com
    1. His manner atthese moments was frigid and abstract; his eyes were vacant in expression; whilehis voice, usually a rich tenor, rose into a treble which would have soundedpetulantly but for the deliberateness and entire distinctness of the enunciation

      I feel like the analytic ability of Dupin could be related to modernist or realist art. It seems as though he is so analytical and notices the little things that he sees all of life in a realist (simplistic) way, even if a situation is hard to decipher and details usually go unnoticed, such as a modernist painting or the situation of the murder later on in the story. I think when living in a city, there is a higher degree of analytic ability people have just from naturally seeing so many details around everything almost every second of the day.

    2. The Frenchman supposes it thevoice of a Spaniard, and ‘might have distinguished some words had he beenacquainted with the Spanish.’ The Dutchman maintains it to have been that of aFrenchman; but we find it stated that ‘not understanding French this witnesswas examined through an interpreter.’ The Englishman thinks it the voice of aGerman, and ‘does not understand German.’ The Spaniard ‘is sure’ that it wasthat of an Englishman, but ‘judges by the intonation’ altogether, ‘as he has noknowledge of the English.’ The Italian believes it the voice of a Russian, but ‘hasnever conversed with a native of Russia.’

      I find this to be a very true aspect about society that Poe points out. So many people will assume cultural traits without any background knowledge. True that people think they know more then they do, and make pre-existing assumptions without all the evidence of a situation or background of a person

    3. The impossibility of egress, by means already stated, being thusabsolute, we are reduced to the windows

      The story keeps narrowing it down, however is written in such a way that the curiosity of the reader keeps building. It is interesting to see how a story is unfolded backward through clues.

    1. It was the most noisome quarter ofLondon, where every thing wore the worst impress of the most deplorable poverty, and of the mostdesperate crime. By the dim light of an accidental lamp, tall, antique, worm-eaten, woodentenements were seen tottering to their fall, in directions so many and capricious that scarce thesemblance of a passage was discernible between them.

      interesting to see the layout of London. I feel like poe is giving his own cultural map of the city like in unfathomable city. As the text continues (which hypothesis didn't let me highlight for some reason) he mentions the transition from a run down area to the more livley human populated area where "human life revived" and he comes to a temples and palaces. This is interesting to the layout of the city and the proximity between developed and underdeveloped.

    2. This old man," I said at length, "is the type and the genius of deepcrime.

      Poe seems to admire the genius mind of the characters he creates. This genius contrasts the genius of Dupin in "Murderers of the Morgue". How does the way Poe displays the genius of a character reflect modernism or realism in his art?

    3. As he proceeded, the company grew more scattered, and his old uneasiness and vacillationwere resumed. For some time he followed closely a party of some ten or twelve roisterers; but fromthis number one by one dropped off, until three only remained together, in a narrow and gloomylane little frequented.

      This makes me think of all the people that surround me when I walk on the street everyday. Poe does a good job of envisioning social groupings on the street in a realism sense

  3. gimmeshelter2015.files.wordpress.com gimmeshelter2015.files.wordpress.com
    1. "You can't make an ome-lette without breaking eggs

      is it possible to develop a successful neighborhood, city, or society without breaking anything? This relates back to the quote about nihilism at the beginning.

    2. n th~ fate of "all mism of the modern econom -met mto air. The Innate dyna-this economy, annihilates ev:; ~~d of the ~ulture that grows from vironments, social institutions y m:~gp~ha~ ~~ ~~eates-physical en-moral values-in order to ' ysica 1 eas, arttstic visions h create more to go 00 dl 1 ' t e world anew. This driv d II '.' en . ess y creating I. b. .

      What does this say about our world today? How does development effect the natural world and people? Is it a god thing that everything gets destroyed to be rebuilt?

    1. They needed vast acreage in order that their castles could be set far enough back from public roads so that they would not have to see the public

      Why do you think the rich people wanted to control so much and hide from everything at the same time? Is their purpose to make others worse off? How does this effect the masses in the city? I'm confused by the rich peoples actions

    2. And if, somehow, the parks were created, how would people get to them? Long highways would be required, and their rights-of-way would necessarily cross hundreds, if not thousands, of different properties, and that meant hundreds, if not thousands, of landowners who would be ready to fight, and that would mean hundreds and thousands of additional con-demnation proceedings. The reformers realized that even in the unlikely event that they won on Long Island, that they actually succeeded in unhorsing the powerful barons, they wouldn't know _'Yhat to do with their victory.

      I feel like today's world is the exact opposite of this time. We see so much construction in the city that goes far beyond playgrounds and many parks are developed. It seems as though there is more construction here than in the open land where the rich people live outside the city

    1. "restoring the land to park use."

      This is comparable to our class discussion of structure and landscape in parks. Although parks intend to reflect nature, the design of nature is always manipulated for a purpose, therefore it isn't completely natural and needs to be "restored"

    2. In effect, this ts a crrcular arena, a theater in the round, and that is how it is used, with com-plete confusion as to who are spectators and who ar~ the show.

      It is interesting how everyone in a park is on display for everyone else. This reminds me of De Certeu's Concept of Readers and Writers. The center of an Intricate park allows for many different stories to be told in different instances, just as people are writers when walking the street.

    3. ~e reverse seldom happens. People or uses W'lth less money at therr command, less choice or less open respectability move into already weakened areas of cities, neighborhoods that are no longer coveted by people with the luxury of choice, or neighborhoods that can draw for financ. ing only upon hot money, exploitative money and loan-shark money. The newcomers thereupon must try to make do with something which, for one reason or another, or more typically for a complexity of reasons, has already failed to sustain popular-ity. Overcrowding, deterioration, crime, and other forms of blight are surface symptoms of prior and deeper economic and func. tiona! failure of the district.

      This is a connection to gentrification on most cities. The rich folks come in, and leave the poorer ones to scramble into areas where they all crowd together. As seen in Unfathomable City, when things like this happen it forces people into poverty which brings out even more overcrowding, deterioration and crime.

    4. They use the park at different times from one another because their daily schedules differ. The park thus possesses an intricate sequence of uses and users

      I thought of heavy park traffic like what heidegeer describes as "staying in things". A successful park allows for it to be inhabited at all times.

  4. Oct 2015
    1. The first assumes a one-way causal relation: cities are physical entities designed by the minds of people and built by the body. A body is thus a physical tool used in the service of the mind, a disembodied consciousness, to make a physical city. Another common version of this dominant way of seeing bodies and cities is that the city is ‘bad’ for the body, ‘unnatural’ and damaging; this is still, however, very much a one-way relation.

      very interesting how the two narratives are so true yet contradict each other. Bodies build cities, yet cities hurt bodies. It is interesting to look at the city from the perspective that it is a completely manmade and unnatural concept. In what ways is the synthenticness of a city damaging?

    2. Tactical ways of operating appropriate and divert spaces away from administrative strategies designed to create abstract place

      People naturally operating in the city is what makes the city unique. This is what makes something bottom up rather than top down.

    3. “produce each other as forms of the hyperreal, as modes of simulation which have overtaken and transformed whatever reality each may have into the image of the other

      I like this because it clearly creates an image of how people create cities but also that cities create people. It's a mutually binding thing

    1. They transmute the misfortune of their theories int theories of misfortune.

      If the ministers knew they had a misfortune of theories, is he trying to say that the people that plan a city are fully aware that they are deteriorating it?.

    2. hese names make themselves available to the diverse meanings given them by passers-by; they detach themselves from the places they were supposed to define a""ii_d ;rve as imaginary meeting-points on itineraries which, as metaphors, they determme for reasons that are foreign to their original value but may be recogmzed or not by passers-b~

      The way we use street names now is more so for cognitive mapping rather than using the name to remember the value it holds or what it represents. I think this is very true, that we rarely think of a street name and wonder why it is so, it is usually just a part of an intinerary. e.g. subway stops

    3. The trace left behind is substituted for the practice. It exhibits the (voracious) property that the geographical system has of being able to transform action into legibility, but in doing so it causes a way of being in the world to be forgotten.

      If making maps legible puts them in a position of being forgotten, does that take away a cities value as a place? Is the Unfathomable city too legible? at what point is too descriptive of a map useless?

  5. Sep 2015
    1. Objects and places are centersof value

      How do personal and public places differ in value such as a bedroom or a public park? How does this relate to the video we watched?

    2. He can articulate ideas but he has difficulty expressingwhat he knows through his senses of touch, taste, smell, hear-

      How do we see this in real life when people can't explain what they experience? How does this effect individuals or society?

    3. The openness of a sea is compared to the freedom of a city. Nothing is restricted in either one, however, the density is contradictory to each other.

  6. gimmeshelter2015.files.wordpress.com gimmeshelter2015.files.wordpress.com
    1. a, sand, or ice, or through a tangled maze of jungle. Yet even the sea has the sun and stars, the winds, currents, birds,.and sea-colors without which unaided navigation would be impossible. The fact that only skilled professionals could navi-gate among the Polynesian Islands, and this only after extensive training, indicates the difficulties imposed by this particular environment. Strain and anxiety accompanied even the best-prepared expeditions.

      Shows how majority if individuals feed off of the contexts of the city. Everyone uses what is around them to make their way. The saturation of population and supported guidance in the city is what makes urban life thrive. Everyone subconsciously assists one another to continue on, just like people thrive off others ideas.

    2. While such devices are extremely useful for providing condensed data on interconnections, they are also precarious, since orientation fails if the device is lost, and the device itself must constantly be referred and fitted to reality.

      This connects to the modern world....Everyone seems to be lost without their phones. We are so connected to something that makes our lives so much simpler and easier, but when we lose them, orientation seems to be lost.

    3. Only powerful civilizations can begin to act on their total environment at a significant scale. The conscious remold-ing of the large-scale physical environment has b:en poss~b.le ~nly recently, and so the problem of environmental 1mageab1hty is a new one.

      Is Environmental Imaginability really new though, just because cities are relatively new to humans? People have been innovating landscapes for thousands of years, maybe not cities, but different environments have been created, and societies have flourished.

    1. Ever since the Great Awakening, the official power and prestige of the American clergy had be~n in a state of decline. With the coming of the American Revoluuon, and espe-cially by the nineteenth century, ministers--l,.~~ ?egun to sh?re up their failing status by claiming major responsibility for formu~g the character of the rising generation in the young republic. 88 But m the confidence man, they found what they perceived to b~ a serious competitor for the power to shape the character of Amencan Y?uth.

      This seems to be a recurring thing throughout history. When rock and roll started teenagers started acting differently and parents thought they lost control of their kids behavior. Now, some older people think technology has almost corrupted our generation socially. It is always the older generation worried about the younger ones. If confidence men were the competition for shaping the youth, what were they up against? How did the older people want to shape the youth? Is having a competitor is this area inevitable?

    2. young man had just set foot in the city when he was approached by a confidence man seeking to dupe and destroy him. Why did this archetypal villain pop out of the shadows just as the American youth entered the city in search of fame and fortune?

      It is obvious as to why confidence men choose young men first arriving with high asperations. However, no text surrounding confidence men speak about the motivation behind all of this. It is clear that a confidence man wants to benefit himself by tricking a young man into giving him money or something of value. What is the purpose of trying to ruin the youth FOREVER. Is this over exaggeration simply writing tactic? Are confidence men really in it to ruin people or just to benefit themselves?

    3. In the confi-dence game, an impressionable youth fell under the power of a villain who corrupted his character, enticed him into a life of vice, and finally reduced him to slavery.

      This is an example of a recurring writing tactic, involving the use of hyperbole, to scare the youth that want to move to the city.

    1. L.A. smells like flowers all the fucking time and I think that smell is pumped in from kind of secret reservoir of perfume. But I didn’t leave New York because I fell out of love with the city. If New York had voice mail I would leave it insane messages day and night. I would tell it how much I love and miss it. The energy. The culture. The Jamaican meat pies.

      Recurring love/hate relationship. Makes a confusing message. Feels bipolar.

    2. New York’s indifference to your plight makes you strong. Fall to your knees and thank New York for making you strong.

      After all the bad things being said about the city, this seems to be a positive one. The writer later explains how he misses the city dearly. Do you think that the message of this is that because New York makes you stronger, it out ways all the negative aspects, and gives purpose to stay in the city?

    3. Just avoid people who smile too much. Especially when smiling is not the appropriate emotional response to a situation.

      THEME: Connection to Confidence man. The advice to avoid seemingly nice people. Also connection to a couple paragraphs above..."optimism is a poison. If given a chance they will sell you out." It touches the idea that anyone can be out to get you in the city.

    4. Just avoid people who smile too much. Especially when smiling is not the appropriate emotional response to a situation.

      THEME: Connection to Confidence man. The advice to avoid seemingly nice people. also connection to a couple paragraphs above..."optimism is a poison. If given a chance they will sell you out." It touches the idea that anyone can be out to get you in the city.

    5. New York isn’t your fantasy. You’re the fantasy in New York’s imagination. One day the fever will break and every New Yorker will immediately cease to be.

      Saying that people don't choose to go to New York, New York pulls people in and decides what happens to them. It's kind of personifying New York because it is playing it out to be like an evil controller of fate and once people realize that..then they will all leave.

    1. I hurt the people I cared about, and insulted those I did not. I cut myself off from the one person who was closer to me than any other. I cried until I was not even aware when I was crying and when I was not, cried in elevators and in taxis and in Chinese laundries, and when I went to the doctor he said only that I seemed to be depressed, and should see a "specialist."

      She obviously is depressed because she is unhappy with the life she has created for herself in the city...however this is all based on choices she had as a young person. She earlier stated that "New York is only for the very young". To help avoid others hitting this depression...shouldn't she say the city is not for the young, but rather for people who have already created a life for themselves so they don't make mistakes a young person would. If that were the case, then it would connect to the coming bachelor girl, and the theme would be to come to the city after you are successful.

    2. It is often said that New York is a city for only the very rich and the very poor. It is less often said that New York is also, at least for those of us who came there from somewhere else, a city for only the very young.

      This could potentially be stated about any large city.

      Is this writer saying this because she personally had a bad experience with the city over time...or does this hold true for everyone?

      Is she trying to discourage others from city living if those standards don't apply?

      This part ties back to the theme that everything is good in moderation...once you have too much of the city when you get older, it spoils your way of living.

    3. I stopped believing in new faces and began to under-stand the lesson in that story, which was that it is distinctly possible to stay too long at the Fair

      This is the moral of the story. This theme of "staying too long at the fair" connects to the modern world because it demonstrates how people tend to overuse things without noticing, and it goes to show that everything is good in moderation.