That's a weird way to continue. If this was actually the script it wouldn't flow very well from the last line from section 9.

Weird way to say this

That's just weird English

And the last noise you see or get in your certificates because there's less emails that don't exist. They are also fake opening and might be skewering your decision-making.

That is what they say but people must interpret that as 99% in boxing not 99% delivered minus one percent bounce

Should we not put the validity number or whatever the average is for liability in boxing for people or is there a reason why you put 60% here?

We need to make it clear. The email marketing software providers are unable to give a real sperm rate. The largest portion of the list is un included in that spam rate we need to make that clear.

I want a good time to explain to people how different even marketing tools charge people with some of them will charge them even if the contact is unsubscribe and some will even allow you to add an email in the suppression list, but will remain active in the main list and some, if not all of them will charge you for duplicate contacts or multiple lists and then we also should explain that if people are in multiple lists and subscribe the subscribe from the list they don't subscribe from the account, so therefore people might have the impression they're unsubscribing and then they get an email from another list that they're in on your end and they get angry and complain and then you have no idea because of the complaints and spam rates aren't given yada yada

this is a bit too on the nose? we ned to be ore smooth or add things os it doensT' sound lieka sles pitch lol

and the other waya round right?

we can show calaultaor here no? or a cool version of it? ad some the other way aroudn right? like when trackign pizel doesnt ping or downoad or open

we keep saing apple 2021, but like gmail has been prefetching or micsosft uderfetching fro years its ot jsut apple they jsut made it public

we can say like you deliverablity tab isn't a deliverbaility tab, its jstu a delivery tba that shows you thigns that are miinsterpratred weirdly

and then google postmaster dns yahoo sender heub that sreal , toosl liek emailconsul show real deliverbaility and sender reptuation adn everm then ther are limitaitons.

weird to say that liek that lol

at some poitn shoudl probably say how logn it take osn average for a list to be more stale aan alive

or give you an email they dont' use as much on purpose, or they get too much spam, they change provduer ose their passwords, passaway,,,

the number one thing or the first thing to thinkg about or something )jsut so we don't compete with kennedy's message) we have to be more smooth

even if by how many emails, if lessc ontcts you send less... so you still save..

whre are the tst studies iwe can put in the screen as links or wtv

the on screen ... feel a lot of talkign coudl be translated as a animation in the background that goes with what someone says no? i mean i dont' knwo how we time it with nakimbe sayign things but jow cool owuld it be to animate things?

sotirng. maybe in more than on e places right? invoicing tools, inbox, crm a gogole doc. etc. etc

no need to reference ocld email ever. we can say like peopl ewho want to get your emails

these are prtty cool, but technically it would be all three? xD might need to rethink what we say in the regualr banner.

REVIEW: Banner picks: company page and holiday (RME-9 · RME-10) Reviewer: YT · 9/22/2026, 4:40:14 PM Decided 4 of 6

▸ Company page banner [pick one] · C · Both are true [RME-9] · D · One list, three answers [RME-9] · E · Which one [RME-9] · H · One list, three answers (with addresses) [RME-9] (no choice yet)

▸ Halloween 2026 [pick one] · A · The line [RME-10] · C · Trick or treat [RME-10] · D · Haunted inbox [RME-10] (no choice yet)

▸ Q4 holiday banners [keep or cut] KEEP Black Friday · Nov 27 [RME-10] KEEP Cyber Monday · Nov 30 [RME-10] KEEP Christmas · Dec 25 [RME-10] note: but fix design, on my end the list is breoken the x and chekcbox too?

KEEP New Year's Eve · Dec 31 [RME-10]

OVERALL: (none)

don't put liikne on the left, add as rule in branding guidelies, this is the third one so far. bvubt the text is gerat

this is the one i choose. lets make sure (maybe just in quiz it is broken?) but the label icons next to the three email is missing. also we don'T use thinck line bars on boxes, shows as ai too much. so remove the yello line, just put the labelicon in the cicrlce next yo the email

I like this but I would but the ghost a different color so we can see it a bit better?

the valid icon is wrong also it isn'T valid it is to keep. also we have to decide the label icons n also to monitor is missing, even though i understand that the banner is talking abotu an email and what we would say, but it might make people think it is the only status and labels we give. maybe e need to rethink it.

also we need to decide label icon vs text next to it, how much taller/bigger it can be vs text. the icon should be bigger in heght than the text nto same, so we can see it. we also have dark mode of the icon i believe with a fine white line around? we shoudl use that when background isn't white or beige or an o the other light colors

They all look a bit blurry but it may just be because its jsut hte quiz?

I would really like to find the past one in my download folders. It's gonna be a folder with a video on it. That video should be able to give you the date to help you find how we generate them the scripts how we then went to create the voice and the captions and then how it works for the terminal, etc., and one of the things were really gonna need help with for V or maybe she needs to find somebody is how we're gonna do the background music and things like that and I don't mind paying when we've done all the videos paying for a month or two a little bit higher to clone my voice and my face maybe and then my face in the corner, which we then decide my face always there is it just my voice or is it a man's voice or is it a couple of different voices based what we're talking about maybe that's the ship shaped characters you know I don't know. Maybe it's a question for V to decide there's a lot of these questions and thoughts that we could present to her so that she can see well and make a good decision for us once we've kind of confirmed all of this obviously.

Did you find the process we use in order to create the first one? What is email because the script and the video came out really well we did do other video things and I'd like to add and edit maybe even though what his email not the content but like the video maybe just because who might come up with better smarter animations that are grounded and we also need to process right to keep these somewhere because some things like if you're talking about SPF and how it works, where we designed an animated header we might reuse it or we might reuse the base of it in order to make it different and change it, but at least we don't have to re-create things always from scratch, which then uses less tokens and also ensure that everything is correctly branded. This is also a great time to double check that her branding isn't getting confused or you know this organized because we have different projects and then are adding random things we shouldn't be adding.

Even if we might not be publishing, something somewhere the descriptions and whatever should be done on a social media level just because they have different character limit so you can put your L some of them we have to be reminded to add it as like a sticker like on it Instagram stories we have to do it manually so we need all that information organized somewhere in a database because this is a lot of stuff to manage and a lot of steps and we're not gonna be doing a continuously we're gonna start and we're gonna stop everything tracked correctly and we need to learn things as we go so that there's less corrections and back-and-forth

Just making sure we're on the same page it doesn't have to be an actual exact card like we take a long video. We just cut it into like trim it. It can be a rewrite in order for it to be Pierre in a shorter sentence so that it works for social media in places where videos can't be a minute a minute and a half two minutes plus

How about we do it in order and then also we have a page connect here or like whatever drop down I don't know somewhere where we can see which questions we have actually done what part like the square versus the video versus posting it versus the M4 versus the cards versus you know every single step EV all the reviews like everything on the table and if at some point, some questions or combined in the same video for whatever reason that becomes a combined role of videos instead of each line being its own QA/video role in this table page to track process

We will create the first version of the storyboard, but we can add her own ideas when she comes up with better ideas to have animations that are gonna keep people listening you know more of the page or things are gonna be used, but the points to create a storyboard where we talk about normal email things, but find a way to visualize that or explain things by creating mind animation just putting text making a list of examples means whatever makes sense using obviously the information from the email Monarch

vy is going to be the one who confirms the resized didn't break or things have moved and will also be the one scheduling and preparing the post to put online whether it's for the LinkedIn page my personal page, her personal page, Diego, Bruno, or cat's personal page on LinkedIn or TikTok or YouTube shorts or YouTube long format which we're gonna be recruiting the email as a pla then the audio version of that with the video or the exact same but for Spotify and then confirming the descriptions, the PDFs or generating tickets saying hey, in order to post this, we have a description, but I would like to have the description with a lead magnet. The lead magnet she can choose from could be the ones that are still in drafts that I haven't finished which then organizing and pushes me to create them, which is kind of good because it fixes and opens new funnel options on the email monarch pages. It's a task I need to do so might as well create the lead magnets from the ones we already have drafted and kind of almost done, but I actually have to build them using our template system or maybe she has another idea or you help her come up with another idea that would be great for that particular video which would then also I guess be a good thing to add as another option for lead magnet on the actual email almanac page or use it for a social media in general on its own specific learning page right

this is correct title font style with one font dark green and then italics and bolder in teal. can we update on preview on all pages, and then push on prodafter testing othign broke? cause i eealized our headers lost this design style accross the board, and alos different font sizes, etc on pages or even between prod and and preview. we can create as new ticket for TT chat, and then TT can manage and push the pill when time to do it

these options should be different based ont he esp and how things are paid /scale f paid, or plans etc. we havethis info

put my pic here and make it readble so small. and add at bottom the line that says donT' copy btut make it ai readbale or wtv that means?

menu is wron color, also too many options lets leave the sign up option get strted and one more link like pricing? how it works?

footer is not made for landing page lead magnet. shuld be thinner footer wtih logo and tradm eark plu sa create account no? then the 2026, tc under the line?

color hard to read on backtround

hard to read too

hard to read this size thid font.

hard to read all types of eyebrows like this

hiw about money being onne of the options. also lets make titles two fonts like h1. . importnt word teal and italic thing

why is the pick at least one in a box that looks drag and drop

perfect.

lets not make it look visually similar to the bo under it.

lets make those two statements sisually better looking

the open now, should be more still open, closed, if a human has reviewed and chosen 10, but they can still click to get promo in exchange to the waitlist signup form/process thigns

whats the current on? also need to say 2 a month

this too can be mulit select, bold , italics, rotate, wtb so peopel can skim options easily. ther has to be research on this we ca mplement, some pshycologial trick or somethign to ge tmore peopel to answer btter

can be select more than one. can we highlisht or make it easier to read. images, or just highlight italics, bold, wtv? proabbly sam with other lengthy answer/options

also where is the quiz part?

pt this in the quiz before so everyon ehasd to answer

im thinkging we switch this into the ones we confirmed is the rounds, but th eusbmissions are for any lsit size?

do we need this here , why not just on the form?

in the section we should state not all invalid emails bounce. replace with the 26% stat or wtv and the url where it was from

this didn't look like it was a link.

why this award and not all of them or another one or?

back to back same guy normal right? jsut a cut?

16 17 are same cahracter same kind of line but different angles. which one do we keep? based on the rest?

remove this

Let's keep this one

This is completely wrong the table thing was supposed to happen during one of the tanks but we can just forget it

keep

rEJECTED — background hands/people

keep

3

3

2

1

2

v2

v1

v1

i liked mine better? maybehalf ay? or push back if you want

Bounces down, opens up. money. do i know why. yes? i got it, but no. do i care? no, because it works.

this joke is not as good really, i think my new idea is better idea

anything beter than we're good at that

from reviews, gemini ai, or exxagerated like we're Suuuuuper good at that.

why are we not allowed to say that ? thats just internal rule no?

how about this is the blocklist person who keeps getting cut off?, but somhow his gossip is in the testimonial reivew.

The funny part can also be that the one question was about how to get off the blacklist right and go to record step-by-step what to do everything done and they got like a warm-up and got listed and then the really laying other than like maybe what did they do to you it's that's not even what you do the clean emails addresses or whatever this was just free help. Because they wanna help? and so quick ...

and maybe there is like a shadow that always kind of appears and thats why she is whispering and looking around or at her nails when her attiute has t ocome out more than the fear.

kind of the liek the funny fear jokes from the language app, where the owl comes to yourw indow at night or wtv, but different version of that?

so we merge the whisper person with the person we cut off and merge them into just t ehsos weird omg why so nice. whats the catch. which is true, everyobe is like apprehensi eot get on a call and then they are liek holy shit best callive had in my life!

not this exactly, but the point is good but need the funny to be funnier.

this one is great!

we need better options for this sentence something like you give them your email list, and if you want more info about your email stuff, and they clean it and give you all this weirdly clear information.

how do we make sure this doesn'T feel like a bad edit but an actual on purpose?

dont knwo what this isç

b but different delphis maybe?

a

a, a, only option

already agree with all the after of this section

only option works

before revieweed by would be a button that would make me generate the report by hand and while that happens they cant delete the list

option b

lets not use dashboard as the title page or anythign already in the menu highlighted based on which page htey are on. the motto is in the footer on the left and the logo in behing=d as now is delph the octopus

i like option b

i like how it is no the colors, jst spacing of eyrbow from title is too close right now on the current app

for footer i like th trust beats tactics only from a and the octopus on the righ of the page like it is now

option b but use a different octopus for different reasons or pages?

agreed

only option

option a or current

keep as is

option a

Consumer Email

Consumer Email

ist it one of these Can't Receive Email / Site can't be reached

we don't labe this do we?

hmm is that a label no?

depends as well on other laebls

not always

no label remove other labels might arise though

no label at all , remove

Invalid/Typo/Trap

stay as keep high risk

no suppress low risk is oue out of the box choice

no to monitor hgh risk is correct

to monitor, low is the correc t one

keep high

keep high is correct for this

to keep high for military

suppress low is correct out of th ebox, they can put to monitor if they want

keep medium is correct

high

i prefer this one not invalid or Typo as the label in the list

high not medium

to keep medium is correct

yes keep low is correct

low not high

suppress, low not monitor medium so red dot is bigger but to monitor is still avaialle

suprpress

medium

medium

medium

Monitor, Low is correct the dot is wrong it is bigger at medium and can be put in to keep or in to suppress, but it is To monitor

Low

i still don't get how having bad sender rep is an issue inreceiving an email, there must be other things too this label appears for?

i think i need new descrption for this?

exaplin that iit may still have active dns, but human person can'T use i unless htye buy it again or someone else does an creates new inbox

approved

appfroved

i prefer Schools keep mailboxes alive for years, so old addresses linger and still accept mail. The catch: they sit behind aggressive institutional filters, so a low open rate here is usually the filter, not the person.

approved

i don't think this is true same for the description version , why would sending to somepne who has bad sned er rep be bead for me?

approved

approved

approved

approved

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text and lets do this then the merge and write mix of all the descriptions nd the longer smart though provoking report description please

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text and lets do this then the merge and write mix of all the descriptions nd the longer smart though provoking report description please

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text and lets do this then the merge and write mix of all the descriptions nd the longer smart though provoking report description please

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text and lets do this then the merge and write mix of all the descriptions nd the longer smart though provoking report description please

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text and lets do this then the merge and write mix of all the descriptions nd the longer smart though provoking report description please

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text and lets do this then the merge and write mix of all the descriptions nd the longer smart though provoking report description please

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text and lets do this then the merge and write mix of all the descriptions nd the longer smart though provoking report description please

approved

approved

dont make it as a list, as a apragraph, use lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text too

remo dash and update sentence to accomodat this change

dont make it as a list, as a apragraph, use lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text too

approved

write as Paragraph not as a list 123

CHANGE TO: The address looks made-up rather than real: all numbers, keyboard mashing (asdf, qwerty), test or filler words, or obvious refusals. These usually come from forms with no confirmation step, where people type junk to get past a gate. Deliverable ones can sit in a low-frequency segment, but anything clearly fake is worth removing, and the real fix is a confirmation step so the junk never lands on your list in the first place.

CHANGE TO: The domain has no working website (a 404, or no web DNS), though it may still handle email. Plenty of legitimate senders are email-only, so this isn't fatal, it's a yellow flag that the business could be inactive. Send with a light touch and let engagement and bounces tell you whether anyone's really home.

CHANGE TO: The website won't load (a DNS failure), even though the mail server may still be alive. Mail can sometimes still get through, but a site that's fallen off the internet is a sign the domain may be drifting toward abandoned. Keep sending for now if the mailbox responds, but watch for bounces and don't be surprised if this one degrades.

CHANGE TO: The domain shows a 'parked' or 'for sale' page instead of a real site, which usually means it's expired, abandoned, or being held by a squatter rather than run by a real business. Mail to it is a coin flip at best. Remove these, because the person or company you thought was there almost certainly isn't sending or receiving from this address anymore.

CHANGE TO: The domain was registered less than 30 days ago, so it has almost no track record yet. It might be a brand-new business or something short-lived thrown up for a single purpose. Nothing to remove, just watch it: if real engagement develops the flag stops mattering, and if it goes quiet or starts bouncing, treat it as the throwaway it might be.

CHANGE TO: A military address (.mil). Mail routes through the Department of Defense gateway, which accepts everything at the door but then filters hard inside and often drops what it doesn't like without a bounce, so a real inbox can still silently swallow your mail. Keep them if they're your audience, but treat delivery here as unproven, watch engagement rather than trusting 'delivered', and don't read a lack of bounces as success.

CHANGE TO: The person's mailbox is over its storage limit and can't take new mail right now. Sometimes that's temporary, but an inbox that stays full is usually one nobody empties anymore, meaning abandoned. We'd suppress these by default. If you want to give them a chance, park them in a retry segment and re-check in 60 to 90 days before sending, rather than mailing into a full box now.

CHANGE TO: The address is on a defunct or absorbed ISP (sbcglobal.net, earthlink.net, prodigy.net and similar). These still receive mail, but nobody's really maintaining the service anymore, and many are checked rarely or not at all. On its own it doesn't change the verdict, so keep it, but if it pairs with other caution flags or shows no engagement, lean toward retiring it.

CHANGE TO: This domain shows up on threat-intelligence lists tied to malware, phishing, or other malicious activity. An address here often means a compromised or throwaway account, and mailing it does nothing good for you. Remove it right away. If it's genuinely someone you know, assume their account may be compromised and find a different way to reach them before sending anything.

CHANGE TO: This address turns up on lots of marketing lists, so the inbox is crowded and your mail competes with everyone else's. It's a real, sendable address, engagement just tends to run lower. To earn attention, make the subject line and timing count and keep the content genuinely relevant to them; if they never engage, treat them like any other cold contact and taper off.

CHANGE TO: This address has the hallmarks of people who tend to hit 'spam' more often than average, based on its pattern and history rather than anything the person has done to you yet. It's still deliverable, so this is a caution flag, not a removal. Only send mail they clearly asked for and expect, keep the unsubscribe obvious and easy, and watch complaints closely, pulling back fast if they climb.

CHANGE TO: A government or public-sector address (.gov and the like). These are real and reachable, but they sit behind strict filters built to block bulk and marketing mail, so even a valid inbox may never see a promotional send. Keep them, but expect low reach on anything that looks like marketing, and lead with plain, expected, relevant mail.

CHANGE TO: The domain's registration has lapsed, so it's no longer live and nothing sent to it can be delivered. Usually the business closed, moved, or simply let the domain go. Remove every address on it. If it was an important contact, look for them somewhere else (LinkedIn, a new address) rather than mailing a dead domain.

CHANGE TO: The domain hasn't set up the usual email authentication (SPF, DKIM, DMARC). This doesn't stop you from sending to them, it just tells you the domain owner hasn't locked things down, which makes the domain easy to spoof. Nothing to remove on its own, but if you weren't expecting this signup it's worth a second look, because a fake address is more likely to hide behind an unauthenticated domain. Keep by default and let other signals decide.

CHANGE TO: The domain is missing the basic security setup a maintained domain normally has, which usually means nobody is actively looking after it anymore. Abandoned domains drift toward trouble over time and are a poor bet to keep sending to. Remove these unless you have a specific reason to believe the domain is still cared for.

CHANGE TO: The domain's registration runs out within the next 30 days. If the owner doesn't renew it, the whole domain stops working and every address on it goes dead, so this is a short clock, not a permanent problem. If the contact matters, reach out now while mail still lands and ask for a longer-term address, and re-check the domain in a month. If they renew, the flag clears on its own.

approved. we can add a "cta" to decide if they wan to send to all the role accon=unts, or remove people that might not be the same or interested?

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text too in this definition

this means nothing, can e make it ore clear without being specific?

remove the dashes, and explain what that means for them simply put? harder spam filters, lower thresholds?

approved

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text

how is this different from invalid email? no mx records is als invalid email no? (the same as Invalid/Typo/Trap no?)

Some of these mght be new domains that have automatically adde mx records but not real person, or there is a real person they just donM 't on'T care about having a website

lets add everything missing from why it matters and how to that isn't already in report text Accept-All is high. Be smart about how you read "delivered" About 21% of this sample is on Accept-All servers. For B2B outreach this is normal (lots of corporate Microsoft 365 / Mimecast / Proofpoint behind those domains), but it means a "delivered" status from your sending tool is NOT the same as "the inbox actually exists." Mailbox providers will silently drop unknown addresses on accept-all servers, and those failures show up as zero engagement, not as bounces. Watch click rates per domain. Accept-All domains with consistent 0% clicks across multiple campaigns are likely dead boxes.

Accept-All 412 emails Accept-all mail servers say yes at the connection level without revealing whether a specific mailbox is active. Our checks can verify some of these addresses directly, but not all of them depending on how the server is configured. Consumer providers like Yahoo and AOL often run in accept-all mode, and on business domains this usually comes from security gateways such as Proofpoint, Mimecast, or Barracuda sitting in front of the real inbox. We tag every address on an accept-all server so you can track them as their own segment and watch how they behave in your campaigns. Segment these addresses into their own group and send to them separately from your other contacts. Track their engagement (opens, clicks, replies) over a few sends. Addresses that engage can be moved into your main list with confidence. Addresses that never engage after multiple sends are safe to segment aside for re-engagement campaigns or suppression, depending on your goals.

66% of this list is in great shape to send to For a combined tax marketing and booking customer list, the validation profile is healthy. Only 29 of 598 addresses (4.8%) need removal. The Monitor segment is mostly Accept-All on consumer providers like Yahoo and Hotmail, where the addresses are real but the providers respond conservatively to validation queries. These should still be sent to. Accept-All 123 emails Accept-all mail servers say yes at the connection level without revealing whether a specific mailbox is active. Our checks can verify some of these addresses directly, but not all of them depending on how the server is configured. Consumer providers like Yahoo and AOL often run in accept-all mode, and on business domains this usually comes from security gateways such as Proofpoint, Mimecast, or Barracuda sitting in front of the real inbox. We tag every address on an accept-all server so you can track them as their own segment and watch how they behave in your campaigns. Segment these addresses into their own group and send to them separately from your other contacts. Track their engagement (opens, clicks, replies) over a few sends. Addresses that engage can be moved into your main list with confidence. Addresses that never engage after multiple sends are safe to segment aside for re-engagement campaigns or suppression, depending on your goals.

Accept-All 19,281 emails Accept-all mail servers say yes at the connection level without revealing whether a specific mailbox is active. Our checks can verify some of these addresses directly, but not all of them depending on how the server is configured. Consumer providers like Yahoo and AOL often run in accept-all mode, and on business domains this usually comes from security gateways such as Proofpoint, Mimecast, or Barracuda sitting in front of the real inbox. We tag every address on an accept-all server so you can track them as their own segment and watch how they behave in your campaigns. Segment these addresses into their own group and send to them separately from your other contacts. Track their engagement (opens, clicks, replies) over a few sends. Addresses that engage can be moved into your main list with confidence. Addresses that never engage after multiple sends are safe to segment aside for re-engagement campaigns or suppression, depending on your goals. all incoming mail at the gateway but may silently discard messages that don't pass security checks. Monitor carefully. Military domains accept all email at the gate (accept-all) but have aggressive internal filtering. Bounces may not be reported, making it hard to detect delivery failures.

Accept-All 1,320 emails Accept-all mail servers say yes at the connection level without revealing whether a specific mailbox is active. Our checks can verify some of these addresses directly, but not all of them depending on how the server is configured. Consumer providers like Yahoo and AOL often run in accept-all mode, and on business domains this usually comes from security gateways such as Proofpoint, Mimecast, or Barracuda sitting in front of the real inbox. We tag every address on an accept-all server so you can track them as their own segment and watch how they behave in your campaigns. Segment these addresses into their own group and send to them separately from your other contacts. Track their engagement (opens, clicks, replies) over a few sends. Addresses that engage can be moved into your main list with confidence. Addresses that never engage after multiple sends are safe to segment aside for re-engagement campaigns or suppression, depending on your goals. ✓ 3,159 addresses are clean and safe to send first The Keep bucket is deliverable-only. Every risky, low-confidence, and accept-all-without-a-website address has been pulled out into Monitor or Suppress, so what is left in Keep is what a fresh sender can lead with.

One ask: if any of these bounce because the mailbox genuinely does not exist (a true "no such user" bounce, not a blocklist or content block), tell us at lists@reviewmyemails.com and we will credit 2 emails back. It helps us learn and improve the checks, and you get the credits. 1,885 addresses are real but need care (Monitor) Monitor is where the address is real but comes with a caveat, and the decision on each is yours. Some sit on accept-all servers: we confirmed the domain is live and its mail server responds, but the server says "yes" to every address at the connection level, so the one specific mailbox cannot be confirmed active by any tool. That is their server's setting, not a gap in our check. Another 1,334 verified as real but with lower delivery confidence. Many of these domains also sit behind security gateways like Proofpoint, Mimecast and Barracuda that only let mail through from senders they already trust, so even a real, active inbox can block a cold sender until you are recognised or allowlisted. A few carry other flags (breach history, a shared role inbox, heavy mail volume), each explained per label below.

Go label by label below and decide what fits your risk tolerance: som e are worth sending to with care, others you may prefer to hold back. Either is a valid choice. Accept-All 1,416 emails These sit on a server that says "yes" to every address at the connection level, so we cannot confirm whether the individual mailbox actually exists. That is the key difference from Low Delivery Confidence, where we did get a mailbox-level answer. Consumer providers like Yahoo and AOL run this way, and on business domains it usually comes from a security gateway (Proofpoint, Mimecast, Barracuda) sitting in front of the real inbox. We tag every accept-all address so you can track them as their own segment. Do not blast these. Sprinkle a few into your sends over time rather than hitting them all at once, use a shorter sequence with bigger gaps between emails, and cut them off faster if they show no engagement. The ones that do engage can move into your main list; the rest you set aside. Low Delivery Confidence 1,281 emails We checked these mailboxes and they came back real, but with a "risky" signal. This is the key difference from Accept-All: with Accept-All the server accepts everything and hides whether the specific mailbox exists, whereas here we did get a mailbox-level answer, it just was not a clean pass. It usually means the domain or provider has a weaker sending reputation, or the domain is small and low-traffic. These are worth sending to, just keep a close eye on them: track opens and bounces, and drop any that hard-bounce on the first touch. Yahoo and AOL cannot be individually verified, and that is normal These providers run accept-all servers: they say "yes" to every address at the connection level, so no tool can confirm one specific mailbox. That is their server's design, not a gap in the check. Since these subscribers opted in, keep them, but Yahoo and AOL are strict on complaints, so send consistently and prune anyone who never opens.

Accept-All 609 emails Accept-all mail servers say yes at the connection level without revealing whether a specific mailbox is active. Our checks can verify some of these addresses directly, but not all of them depending on how the server is configured. Consumer providers like Yahoo and AOL often run in accept-all mode, and on business domains this usually comes from security gateways such as Proofpoint, Mimecast, or Barracuda sitting in front of the real inbox. We tag every address on an accept-all server so you can track them as their own segment and watch how they behave in your campaigns. Segment these addresses into their own group and send to them separately from your other contacts. Track their engagement (opens, clicks, replies) over a few sends. Addresses that engage can be moved into your main list with confidence. Addresses that never engage after multiple sends are safe to segment aside for re-engagement campaigns or suppression, depending on your goals.

i donT' know how to check htis

dont know what that means. is it bad? its jsut to show templates in react to devs for reskin, and some corrections

sure we can make pop up contact your admin

don't know what ths is

no plans, just credit based

the labels to use will be the ones in glossary when we are done with them

should be, ,lets tell the devs

we can fix those accross the board too right?

yea i agree billing setting should just be in billinf and sender preference should be in same place as notification we already have notdsa bout this and other things

ok no problem to all

ok sure we can fix that easy

i don't knwo what this emeans

lets update our front end to say the same thing like the backend says add that to glossary with description that are short but explian well what each process means

Let tell the devs to update it then To Keep, etc