65 Matching Annotations
  1. Aug 2015
    1. In an affinity space no one is stopped from gaining intensive knowledge because someone else thinks they are “my low students” or “struggling.”

      It is important that students realize that everyone has strengths and weakness and different needs.

    2. Furthermore, rarely is the core generator (e.g. the textbook or the curriculum guide) modified (“patched”) in an ongoing way based on student desires, pleasures, displeasures, actions, and interactions.

      Important to take students interests into consideration.

    3. Many children are exposed to language and other symbols connected to modern technologies and media (e.g. the Internet, video games, text messaging) that seem more compelling and motivating than school language.

      I have to talk to my students all the time about not including "text talk" in their academic work. "LOL" and "OMG" are not appropriate language for a formal assignment.

    4. ensuring that people feel like they belong to and are a valued and accepted part of the social group within which their learning takes place

      Creating that environment is critical.

    5. The teacher heard her as rambling.

      I wonder what the teacher could have done to help Leona become aware of the many things she was doing unintentionally well in her story and help her develop those skills even farther.

    6. What we are dealing with here is talking and thinking about the (internal) design of the game

      Could later manifest into thinking about author's intent and purpose.

    7. He ended up reading on the Internet, in books, and in his video games much more complicated and much more academic-like language than he read in his first-grade school texts.

      This is important. Students should be read appropriately challenging books and be exposed to academic language early.

    8. Some planets that are near the sun are hot; others that are a little farther away are warm.

      Good use of compare/contrast.

    9. What is happening here is that a little girl, who cannot yet “really” read, is learning and practicing non-vernacular forms of language associated with school and schooling.

      She definitely seems to have reading readiness.

    10. All human beings acquire their first language well, and about equally well as everyone else

      I don't agree with this. What about students with mild speech/language impairments?

    11. I have seen students who struggle in one of these areas but not the subsequent ones (like a student with very low fluency but very high comprehension).

    12. Poor children do it as well as rich, if they have access to the cards, games, or figures.

      Is their point that poor children can read as well as rich if they have access to books?

    1. comprehension instruc-tion be conducted in small groups or individually based on students’ needs

      It's ok for each group to be working on a different strategy

    2. The model we recommend for teaching any comprehension strategy is the gradual release of responsibility

      Students become more and more independent.

    3. teachers were assigned at random to introduce a set of strategies briefly and then quickly move students to applying or juggling multiple strategies simultaneously, which resulted in students with stronger performance on some measures.

      I never thought to do it that way, sounds a little overwhelming!

    4. For example, it is a rare day when a book about shark attacks or one by Steven Jenkins does not garner great interest in many students.

      I personally always found non-fiction texts to be very low-interest!

    5. teachers will have to employ a variety of instructional strategies, such as partner reading and collaborative strategy use, to pro-vide the extra measure of scaffolding needed to support students’ com-prehension of more challenging text

      It is possible for students to read texts above their level if the right supports are in place.

    6. In providing exposure to a range of texts, one important dimension to consider is the genre of the text, particularly its communicative purpose.

      This is something I need to do more of. It is important for students to learn genre features and strategies for comprehending specific genres. And it's important for students to learn what their reading likes/dislikes are.

    7. replaces literacy instruction with a two-hour block of inte-grated science–literacy instruction.

      I think this is a great idea. I hate how teaching science has become a "when I get to it" kind of thing. It's not prioritized because it's not tested as heavily as math and ELA.

    8. comprehension of the expository text, in contrast to the narrative text, was significantly related to the student’s amount of world knowledge

      I have had students who comprehend expository better but I always thought it was because expository is more concrete and requires less inferencing.

    9. Skilled readers are also more motivated and engaged readers, reading more actively and more voluminously, thus further developing their knowledge and skill

      We have to make sure all kids feel confident in their ability to read.

    10. integration of the text base with relevant prior knowledge from readers’ store of knowledge in long-term memory.

      Teachers have to activate prior knowledge.

    11. We use our knowledge of the world, along with our knowledge of how language and text work, to make all the local inferences required to connect the sentences to one another—to build, if you will, a coherent representation of what the text says.

      Inferencing is critical to reading comp.

    1. We must more proactively integrate language, literacy, and content learning in the early grades and, indeed, later on, as well.

      I have noticed that even secondary educators are being required to take classes on literacy in the content areas now.

    2. Let them, beginning at an early age, play the game of one or more of these professions.

      I just wonder where that fits into already tight schedules.

    3. Indeed, the Internet requires a good deal of technical reading for a student to fully leverage its possibilities for learning and knowledge production, or even to access, assess, and modify the plethora of information it makes available

      I wasn't totally convinced of the connection--I've had students who are great with navigating technology but low readers, but this makes sense.

    4. But such “catch-up” interventions, which immerse children in school-based language as it applies to the world and to problem-solving, must continue from kindergarten through middle school to be effective

      I always thought of language interventions as early elementary, important to remember that they can't stop there!

    5. It means being able to use such facts and information, as well as various technologies and practices, to solve problems.

      Important that students are not just learning facts and information.

    6. “Tier 2 words”

      These are what we want to instruct.

    7. This breadth of vocabulary is created by parents talking to children, answering their questions, reading to them, modeling their own pleasure in reading, and offering their children a wide variety of experiences in the world.

      How can we portray the importance of these to parents?

    1. synchronyof reading, writing, andspelling development

      I do see how encoding helps with decoding, but I did have a student last year who was fantastic at spelling but struggled with reading because of comprehension. Just seemed like a bit of an overgeneralization because reading involves more than just decoding.

    2. Knowing the stage of spelling of each of your students will determine your choices of ap-propriate word study activities.

      Hm, I have all my students do the same activities just with different sets of words.

    3. Sim-ply put, we must teach to where a child “is at.”

      Must be challenging but not frustrating. "Disequilibrium"

    4. One unique quality of word study as we describe it lies in what we believeis the critical role of differentiating instruction for different levels of word knowledge.

      Students take a spelling inventory that clearly shows where each student is at and the teacher can form groups accordingly.

    5. The purpose of word study, then, is to examine words in order to reveal consistencieswithin our written language system and to help students master the recognition,spelling, and meaning of specific words.

      The program does highlight high-frequency words and emphasizes homophones.

    6. The most effective instruction in phonics, spelling, and vo-cabulary links word study to the texts being read, provides a systematic scope and se-quence of word-level skills, and provides multiple opportunities for hands-on practiceand application.

      We use Words Their Way at my school and I agree that it does have a logical scope/sequence, provides plenty of hands-on practice, and it is helpful for the students to read the words in context.

    7. Designing a word studyprogram that explicitly teaches students necessary skills and engages their interest andmotivation to learn about how words work is a vital aspect of any literacy program.

      Must be fun, but also effective.

    8. differentiate

      This is probably my favorite part of Words Their Way, easily differentiated.

    9. During word study, words and pictures are sorted in routines that re-quire children to examine, discriminate, and make critical judgmentsabout speech sounds, word structures, spelling patterns, and meanings.

      They're doing so much more than just memorizing a list of words.

    10. We believethat this word study is well worth the 10 to 15 minutes of time daily.

      A common complaint heard around my school is that 10-15 min is not realistic.

    11. students expand their vocabularies by comparing one concept with another.

      schema

    12. Students need hands-on opportunities to manipulate word features in a way that al-lows them to generalize beyond isolated, individual examples to entire groups of wordsthat are spelled the same way

      Students can apply their learning to words not on their "list". The spelling test often includes words they fit the pattern but weren't studied throughout the week.

    1. Itmay be helpful to increase the use of concreteobjects or other cues to represent sounds and toprovide more phonemic awareness instructionthat includes familiar letters. Also, by focusingon sounds that can be elongated, teachers aremore likely to draw students’ attention to thosesounds

      Great strategies and suggestions for struggling students.

    2. Someof them also may be used with older children.

      I have had older students who struggle with phonemic awareness and have had difficulty finding age appropriate activities and tasks for them.

    3. In linguistically rich classrooms, phonemicawareness activities will be incorporated inten-tionally into literature sharing experiences, musicexperiences, movement experiences, and otherexperiences throughout the day.

      Genuine experiences.

    4. Itis the qualityof instruction and the responsive-nessof the instruction to the individuals in theclassroom that should have greater considerationthan the amount of time.

      Important to monitor progress and adjust accordingly.

    5. the difficulty of the task depends inpart upon the number of sounds (fewer soundsare easier than more), which sounds they are(liquids are typically easier than nasals or stops),and their location in the word (middle sounds aremore difficult to attend to than initial or finalsounds).

      Good to remember for scaffolding/differentiation.

    6. They may be asked toblend sounds together to form a word (e.g., Whatword would we have if we put these sounds to-gether? /j/-/u/-/m/-/p/). They may be asked tosegment words into their constituent parts (e.g.,Tell all the sounds you hear in the word dog).

      Blending and segmenting are most important phonemic awareness skills.

    7. Phonemicawareness development is not meaningful in andof itself. It is important only in the context ofcomprehensive reading instruction.

      Interesting. I always thought students had to have strong phonemic awareness before they were ready to move on to other components of reading like phonics.

    8. Adams andBruck (1995), for instance, submitted that songs,chants, and word-sound games are ideally suit-ed toward developing young children’s sensitiv-ity to the sound structure of language. Beck andJuel (1995) posited that time spent on word play,nursery or Dr. Seuss rhymes, and general expo-sure to storybooks contribute to phonemicawareness. Mattingly (1984) encouraged class-room teachers to provide their students with lin-guistic stimulation in the form of storytelling,word games, rhymes, and riddles in order to fa-cilitate phonemic awareness.

      Consensus seems to be that songs, chants, rhymes, riddles, and word games/play help develop phonemic awareness.

    1. Such domain-specific or task-specific qualifi-cation of student ability added to the conditionality of learning.

      It's completely possible for students to excel in some areas and struggle in others. It seems like students were looked at more individually and more specifically, which likely helped improve instruction based on particular needs.

    2. Schools clearly functioned as social institutions centeredaround the interactions of students and teachers.

      Interesting shift. Those interactions are so important for students to develop social skills and are likely to increase motivation.

    3. The goal of learning was no longerseen as the development of an individually held body of knowledge, but rather thecreation of a mutual understanding arising in the social interaction of particularindividuals in a particular context at a particular time.

      This is interesting. Doesn't sound like kids were taught to be critical thinkers.

    4. aspectrum of general text-processing strategies, including summarization, map-ping, self-questioning, and predicting

      So the focus was on comprehension strategies rather than decoding strategies?

    5. There was little, if any, consideration of sociocultural or contextual influences onthe processing of linguistic information

      This is a big limitation.

    6. Text-based learningwas about knowledge, which was organized and stored within the individualmind, and resulted from the input, interpretation, organization, retention, and out-put of information from the individual’s environment

      Seems like reading was thought of more as knowledge than a skill.

    7. his new perspective held littleregard for the innateness or naturalness of reading and little interest in the amal-gamation of literacy fields

      I think recent research on dyslexia and reading disabilities has proved that there is some degree of innateness to reading.

    8. miscue analysis

      still often used today

    9. Learning to read was not so much a matter ofbeing taught, but a matter of arriving at facility as a result of a predisposition toseek understanding within a language-rich environment.

      More student-centered, higher motivation

    10. human beings were biologicallyprogrammed to acquire language under favorable conditions

      What about those with reading disabilities?

    11. Language, as with other innatehuman capacities, was to be developed through meaningful use, not practiced tothe point of mindless reaction

      But what if a child is not sufficiently exposed to meaningful language outside of school?

    12. Such perceptual activities included the identification of visualsignals; the translation of these signals into sounds; and assembly of these soundsinto words, phrases, and sentences

      No fluency, vocabulary, comprehension yet?

    13. developingand validating diagnostic instruments and remedial techniques

      So important for individual student success.

    14. effectiveness of phonics-based techniques over those that relied on a whole-word approach

      This was a critical shift. It was realized that reading instruction needed to be more explicit.

    15. often linked with theapplication of carefully chosen rewards and punishments,

      I wonder if this presented a problem for struggling readers. Being "punished" for having difficulty surely would have made them dislike reading.