375 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2020
    1. implantable brain chips are seemingly noncontroversial, enabling those who are paralyzed or nat-urally less cognitively endowed to achieve on a more equitable level

      evening the playing field... what happens if able bodied and able minded people want to use this technology for enhancement

    2. electrodes with flexible tips did not damage the brain and that enough information torecognize commands could be produced by decoding only a small number of the neurons in a brain. n15

      "minimally invasive" for beneficial results

    Annotators

    1. genetic engineering may soonprovide treatments, if not outright cures, for most diseases; and nanotechnology andnanomedicine can address yet more ills. Together they could significantly extend ouraverage life span and improve the quality of our lives. Yet, with each of these technologies,a sequence of small, individually sensible advances leads to an accumulation of greatpower and, concomitantly, great danger

      extension of the lifespan seems like it shouldn't be a problem since this is the basis of most medical treatments, but eventually everyone dies... should we prevent this ending that cannot be prevented by current medicine?

    2. "I'm as fond of my body as anyone, but if I can be 200 with a body of silicon,I'll take it." It seemed that he was at peace with this proces

      not something I would consider

    Annotators

    Annotators

    1. The fact that the RP occurs before our feeling of consciously willing a movement and the movement itself does not show that we do not consciously will our voluntary actions

      counter argument

    2. it assumes that the RP is sufficient for both conscious will and voluntary movement. But there is reason to believe that it is sufficient for neither.

      interesting

    Annotators

    1. free will is better defined as a belief that there is acomponent to biological behavior that is something more than theunavoidable consequences of the genetic and environmental his-tory of the individual and the possible stochastic laws of nature

      convincing

    Annotators

    1. Any crime, however heinous, is in principle to be blamed on antecedent conditions acting through the accused's physiology, heredity and environment.

      common theme

    1. Ludovico is an aversive treatment in which prisoner-patients are forced to watch violent scenes while being made severely nauseated by means of injections

      classical conditioning agains violence

    1. The unique patterns of neurobiology inside each of our heads cannot qualify as choices; these are the cards we’re dealt.

      interesting point

    2. we choose neither one. We are each constructed from a genetic blueprint, and then born into a world of circumstances that we cannot control in our most-formative years.

      formative years are when we are young

    3. If you think genes don’t affect how people behave, consider this fact: if you are a carrier of a particular set of genes, the probability that you will commit a violent crime is four times as high as it would be if you lacked those genes.

      interesting

    4. After one session I never saw the Doctor again, and since then I have been fighting my mental turmoil alone, and seemingly to no avail.

      interesting, he appears to have tried to get help

    1. we can’t be held responsible for our actions

      is this true though? what about the pedophiliac who had a tumor that was responsible for his behavior?

    2. everything that will happen in the future is the consequence of what has happened in the past plus the laws of nature.

      genetics + laws of nature + nurture = unconscious decision

    3. the universe is like a giant billiard ball game. Just as the path of every billiard ball is determined by the forces acting on it, so is the path of every elementary particle.

      great analogy

    Annotators

  2. Oct 2020
    1. certain degree of certainty."

      better than just based on the presentation of the case without supporting incriminating or proving innocence evidence

    2. We see the danger that this might become compulsory one day, but we have to be aware that if we prohibit it, we are also denying people who aren't going to commit any crime the possibility of proving their innocence."

      just like how dna samples were finally put into evidence to prove people innocent.

    1. How free is our will? Is conscious choice just an illusion?

      I would argue that our conscious thought is simply behind our subconscious so there is no breach in autonomy

    2. which the outcome of a participant's decision can be predicted before it is made.

      so is everyone then going to have to constantly wear some sort of brain scanning device? isn't this just showing that the decision has been made before hand, not what the decision will be?

    1. McDaniel had never committed a violent crime, his only vices being smoking some weed and playing a little dice. And yet, he was deemed one of the most dangerous people in the city via this algorithm, which critics have used as an example of increased racial profiling by police.

      heat list inaccurate?

    2. major profiling, which reinforces pre-existing profiling issues such as race and socioeconomic status.

      interesting.. identifying crime hotspots is kind of like profiling whole areas

    1. rejected. But I know of no argument which proves that there could never be such knowledge about a person's future acti

      is he claiming that someone or something has the ability to predict the future?

    2. Ben's belief is surely based on evidence which puts it beyond reasonable doubt that Algy will commit the offence, and proof beyond reasonable doubt is all we ever require when we find someone

      main point

    3. raints that prevent us from practising it. By 'prepunishment' I mean punishment for an offence before the offence is committed; I shall use 'postpunishment' to mean punishment after the offence has been committed. This leav

      definition of pre-punishment

    Annotators

    1. "Thehumandimensionofbeingsubjectedtotheassessmentofyourpeershasprofoundsocialandcivicsignificance.Ifyousupplantthatwithabiologicalmetric,you'relosingsomethingextraordinarilyimportant,evenifyougainanincrementalvalueinaccuracy."

      I think more accurate truth sounds better than social and civic significance

    2. acceptanceofDNAprofilingmaybeanotherbellwether.Highlycontroversialwhenintroducedinthe1980s,ithadthesupportofthescientificcommunityandisnowwidelyacceptedinthecourts.

      proof that something so novel can be accepted

    3. developedpattern-recognitionalgorithmsthatidentifydeceptioninindividualsubjectsbycomparingtheirbrainscanswiththoseinadatabaseofknownliars

      confirmed algorithms exist

    4. OneofthepioneersinthefieldisDanielLangleben,apsychiatristattheUniversityofPennsylvania.Backin1999,hewasatStanford,examiningtheeffectsofadrugonthebrainsofboysdiagnosedwithattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder.HehadreadapapertheorizingthatkidswithADHDhavedifficultylying.InLangleben'sexperience,however,theywerefullycapableoflying.Buttheywouldoftenmakesociallyawkwardstatementsbecause"theyhadaprobleminhibitingthetruth,"hesays."Theywouldjustblurtthingsout."Langlebendevelopedahypothesisthatinordertoformulatealie,thebrainfirsthadtostopitselffromtellingthetruth,thengeneratethedeception–aprocessthatcouldbemappedwithascanner

      "free won't"

    5. commercialfMRIlie-detectionservices,marketedinitiallytoindividualswhobelievethey'vebeenunjustlychargedwithacrime

      how does memory come into all of this? could this show someone lying based on a fallacious memory? or since they believe its true will it appear that they are telling the truth?

    6. Functionalmagneticresonanceimaging–fMRIforshort–enablesresearcherstocreatemapsofthebrain'snetworksinactionastheyprocessthoughts,sensations,memories,andmotorcommands.Sinceitsdebutinexperimentalmedicine10yearsago,functionalimaginghasopenedawindowontothecognitiveoperationsbehindsuchcomplexandsubtlebehaviorasfeelingtransportedbyapieceofmusicorrecognizingthefaceofalovedoneinacrowd.Asitmigratesintoclinicalpractice,fMRIismakingitpossibleforneurologiststodetectearlysignsofAlzheimer'sdiseaseandotherdisorders,evaluatedrugtreatments,andpinpointtissuehousingcriticalabilitieslikespeechbeforeventuringintoapatient'sbrainwithascalpel.NowfMRIisalsopoisedtotransformthesecurityindustry,thejudicialsystem,andourfundamentalnotionsofprivacy.I'minalabatColumbiaUniversity,wherescientistsareusingthetechnologytoanalyzethecognitivedifferencesbetweentruthandlies.Bymappingtheneuralcircuitsbehinddeception,researchersareturningfMRIintoanewkindofliedetectorthat'smoreprobing

      what do they mean by "probing"

    Annotators

    1. neuroimaging evidence is little different, inprinciple, from commonly accepted forms of physical evi-dence, such as blood tests, breathalyzer tests, or fingerpri

      good analogy

    2. Neurological testresults provide information on the basis of which to resolvecontested factual disputes in criminal trials.

      accurately? do we know what the test results mean?

    Annotators

    1. but it can also place individuals injeopardy for acts they haven’t committed — but might someday.

      should everyone with amygdala defects be locked up?

    2. In otherwords, just because you have a biased reaction to a photograph doesn’tmean you’ll act on those biases in the workplace.

      what we think may be the truest version of ourselves without the worry about what others will think of outward actions

    3. “We have no evidence whatsoever that activity inthe brain is more predictive of things we care about in the courtroom tha

      important distinction

    4. whether you’re rational, but you can have someone who is totallyrational but whose strings are being pulled by something beyond hiscontrol.”

      all decisions are pre-determined?

    5. “To a neuroscientist, you are your brain; nothing causes your behavior otherthan the operations of your brain,”

      I wonder what psychologists would say

    6. retribution — the idea that bad peopleshould be punished because they have freely chosen to act immorally

      are they saying that no choice is made freely?

    7. landmark case in which a divided Supreme Courtstruck down the death penalty for offenders who committed crimes whenthey were under the age of 18.

      based on the fact that their brains weren't fully developed?

    8. new and sometimes troubling lines between “normal” and“abnormal” brains.

      shouldn't neuroscientists be deciding this? experts in the field?

    9. see which one lighted up the face-recognition area inways suggesting familiarity

      people fallaciously add details to events that happen in heightened emotional states, so perhaps this would make the truth easier to find

    10. t the same time, skepticsfear that the use of brain-scanning technology as a kind of super mind-reading device

      how would this work? they cannot read minds

    11. Thereport concludes that neuroimaging evidence is of mixed reliability but “thelarge number of cases in which such evidence is presented is striking.

      if it is not 100% reliable, I feel like it should not be used in the court of law to make these decisions

    12. Neuroscientific evidence haspersuaded jurors to sentence defendants to life imprisonment rather than todeath;

      who is delivering the neuroscientific data to the jurors

    13. head trauma to the tendency of violent video games tomake children behave aggressively.

      if a boy kills his mom are they really going to argue its the mom's fault by letting him play violent video games?

    14. evidence of Weinstein’sarachnoid cyst shouldn’t be admitted in court.

      again, what are the effects? could it actually have caused a lapse in judgement?

    Annotators

    1. planting false memories would rob us of our free will and authenticity

      hasn't this most-likely happened to many of us anyways? Meaning don't we all have false memories?

    2. Our question for participants was

      interesting that they proposed this plan to normal people who may not understand ethics rather than some sort of ethics board

    3. it isn’t too far-fetched in principle that somebody could deliberately give you a false memory

      What is the method of implanting a memory? Seems kind of far-fetched to me that someone could convince me I did something I did not

    4. especially likely to occur when someone plants the seed of a false suggestion in our mind,

      Interesting, more likely if someone deliberately tries to plant the seed

    5. memory researchers have known for decades that our recollections of the past are often inaccurate

      common in articles about our memory, but not widely known or grasped in the population

    Annotators

    1. Changing or losing memories could make you happier or sadderdepending on if you’re losing sad or happy memories.”

      what happens if we do not have the long-term effects

    2. “Memories make upour identity, including our personalities, and in some important ways, we areour memories so if we lost or changed our memories we would be differentpeople.

      more opposing argument

    3. “Our memories and our experiences are fundamental to our personhood, toour lives, to everything that makes us who we are

      another credible source of counter argument, clearly signifying debate

    4. “And even if it does change a little bit of our personalidentity, it makes us able to function.

      Case by case basis I feel, only if memory is truly traumatic

    Annotators

    1. erasing a memory can harm another person who shares it

      there would be no way to erase a memory all-together since many people were likely involved

    2. violate post-traumatic growth

      if traumatic events keep happening, are we to expect the drug to be used over and over again since each subsequent time will be just as traumatic if we never learn from past experiences?

    3. So memory erasure can be treated as one of the problems of human enhancement.

      I would argue that "enhancement" should be replaced with "change"

    4. propranolol does not disrupt numerical personal identity, because propranolol does not threaten psychological continuity, and only dampens the link between memory and emotion

      couldn't tampering with emotions alter one's identity?

    Annotators

    1. beneficial effect of making people less convinced thattheir memories are absolutely true.

      there are far better ways to get this point across

    2. Such research raises hope for treatingconditions such as post-traumatic stress disorder(PTSD), in which painful memories become intrusiveand damage an individual’s ability to live an ordinarylife.

      I wonder how this could be regulated

    Annotators

  3. Sep 2020
    1. If genetic and biomedical means of enhancement could countersuch natural tendencies, they could have a crucial role to play in improving our moralcharacter,

      improving moral character

    2. Thus, the most likely effect of cognitive enhancementby genetic or biomedical means may be to speed up a growth of knowledge that wouldotherwise have taken humanity a longer time to achieve

      further explanation

    3. cognitive enhancement of all of us which makes us more proficientin fulfilling our aims must be for the best of all of us on the whole.

      network effect-- if more people are taking CEDs, more value will be observable

    4. increase the risk of the development or misuse of weapons of mass destruction

      interesting as a major idea from just increasing the cognitive ability of people

    Annotators

    1. we could never be justified in depriving someoneof his free will, no matter how gruesome the violence that wouldthereby be prevented.

      is free will equal to moral decisions?

    2. continuum of readiness to help others.

      I often wondered during my EMT class who in the class would take necessary action to save lives in times of extreme distress

    Annotators

    1. We shouldevaluate and regulate the use of each cognitive enhancement drug amongst the ill and the healthy alike, as and when they become approved and available

      regulate not prohibit

    Annotators

    1. the employer might consider thenon-enhanced as virtuous, self-motivated, good employ-ees who have made a choice to be ‘‘normal,’’ or couldconsider them to be unmotivated lower achievers

      I could see both sides

    2. Cognitive skills are also clear examples of bona fidequalifications.Intelligenceandaptitudetestinginemployment have been used since World War I

      again, enhancement seems like a no brainer

    3. owever, an employeris not required to provide an accommodation which wouldresult in undue hardship in their business

      couldn't each business then say that they cannot afford such accomodations

    4. Absent an employment contract or other type of agreement,employers may fire employees for ‘‘good reason, bad rea-son or no reason at all’’

      seems like a more of a volunteer than an employee

    5. weighed by organizations and byindividual

      why not introduce a placebo to the marketplace that would encourage harder work and more productivity without side effects

    6. A panoply of chemical agents also are being shown tohave significant effects on specific social attitudes, moraljudgment, emotional attachment, memory, and economicjudgment. Any of these could be used temporarily or longterm for specific tasks in specific jobs.

      temporarily? hinting at long term effects?

    7. In both fields, emphasis has been placed onhow freedom and responsibility might be undermined byresearch in the neurological bases of behavior, how socialinequity might arise from enhancing cognitive abilities,and how detecting mental states might challenge privacy

      freedom/responsibility, social equality, and privacy are in question

    8. ffected by such interventions, frommemory to mood to morality.

      if cog enhancement is considered immoral by some it is interesting that it could affect one's morality

    9. her performance, she says, is optimal, pre-dictable and consistent. She says she can work harder,longer, and better, and can prove it.

      how?

    Annotators

    Annotators