I'm curious of the use of "aspiring" here. Is it just an uplifiting, novel way to describe all students, or is it somehow hinting at the personal responsibility potential students have to Aspire?

If there are non-aspiring students, wouldn't we be expected to take the inclusive lens to relationship and perhaps blame ourselves for not meeting them where they are, or not allowing them to engage authenticaly?

So, just because today is the day after the presidental election, I am struck by the words "nnovation and experimental. Like, isn't that the point of the whole Make America Great Again thing -- don't just rush forward. Concentrate on the basic stuff. Will we be expected to rein it all it? What part of that makes some sense? Can we do all the basic stuff and also all the new stuff on the same or less resources? Just asking.

"access, offerings, and delivery" doesn't quite capture the notion of expanding the notion of commiunity I'm thinking about my Goldilocker here. It's not really access or offerings that I'm expanding, though often I am sharing links to full-text open-access resources. But also I am sharing a love of learning and a shared curiousity -- Scholarshiop as Conversation!

this sounds like us. Also, lawn games! how very elite of us.

I am noticing just now, how "post-secondary" sort of kind of assumes our community members, aka learners, have attended, graduated from?, "secondary" school. I wonder if that's exclusive in an unintended or in an intended way. Does it give us a shared experience to start together from? Surely, almost all college/university students have graduated secondary school. But all of our learners? Probably not -- patient education!, staff development!!, community outreach!!!

What does this mean? It's a pretty broad statement. Is it Educators in general who are in short supply, or just those who are willing to mentor? Is this based on facts? If so, whose facts??

This is a page note. I decide with whom to share this page note -- the options are Post to Public or a private note. I will opt for the public option for this note.

Disseminate -- dissertation formatting support and other support offered by ConSchol lives here, though not noted.

The relationship between Knowledge and Wisdom is not lost on me here.

"Share" seems like the lesser of the three "explore, create, share." I guess sharing is publishing and so I get that. I totally get Explore -- but maybe CREATE short changes RESEARCH.

Showcase! what can that mean for 2Center? What might we have on the walls!?!?

I think I can only make Page Notes on this document. Probably not OCR ready. Barriers -- like walls!

diversity/includion of perspectives.

How to imagine this as an org? as a unit? as a team??

assumption that self-driving cars are safer?

if the threshold is $220M for googleX, what is it for us?

I like this example because it takes the problem of "undernourishment" breaks it down into the nurishing crops that need to grow ... although that surprises me because we grains get a bad rap, nutrition-wize.

This is a priviledge that comes with vast resources. Do we have those at UM? In the Library?

not so easy when you're consulting with a faculty member. but uderstandable.

Yeager's work is mentioned here because it is statistically significant. How significant?? No numbers.

Or just be an informed, critical thinking citizen

but should we click on the green circles or not??

Here are, or maybe is is correct since it's a single screenshot.

Missing a period.

and how are reputations established? By the establishment, I suppose. What does it take to be validated/established as an ACCURATE news organization?

I'm not sure I understand why deciding who is the expert first somehow mitigates my worst tendencies toward confirmation bias. I'm picking my experts based on my bias.

Wiley says that Addiction articles are available to the public one month after publishing: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.13477/full

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impact_factor

for "PLOS Medicine impact factor"

What's flawed about it?

I'm not sure that students will match the "owner" with the "Registrant."

Some students will miss the significance of the dash. It might be helpful to describe it as a minus sign, as in "look for this term, minus the site that follows.

missing word here, at

missing word here, at or for

This really needs unpacking.

For the better know...? of for the more intellectual ones? Popularity and reliability are only related in expert circles, maybe.

Adopting the neutral gender third-person pronoun.

Still true in Feb 2017? We'll see for how long.

Might not be the best idea to place the "Going Rambo" headline -- which is a reference to the big ram statue below the headline -- so close to the photo of the 1993 bombing aftermath.

How do we know it's California? Probably more than one Stockton.

too

Would be interesting to understand why this is a good starting date.

"he really is from..." isn't yet documented. It's FACEBOOK, not his driver's license!

Actually, you are starting here. The "here" is the Blaze page where you seek out the reference to the Daily Dot.

I have just highlighted one of the answers. I wonder if they are randomized if it will stick to the words or not. I"d like to share this comment with just CheatersWilly.

The answer is TRUE!

this doesn't seem to have captions.

Here is a global comment added to Step 1

and indeed it appears I can modify the text in this tutorial, built with design tools.

Sandbox is such a techie word!

My oldest kid is of baby-sitting age, and we've had the same discussion. Not baby-sitting: child-CARE.

Useful table for thinking about student-centered activities.

Worth looking into for LPI.

Stereotyping, pigeon-holing, I know why Frey did it, but identity-awareness may be compromised here. Not that they are giving themselves away, but that they are creating characters (complex or otherwise) that may necessitate some processing.

In PUBIC AMERICAN schools? All levels? That's pretty old data at this point (1989).

I'd like to follow up on these two studies. One-shot outcomes weaker than online course. Is this comparing apples to eggplants?

wtf

What is the origin of "tony" here??

You must have tried AFTER 2pm.

Would the "authorized officers who are certified..." wear something on their shirt or hat or jacket to show me that they know that they're trained?!

Would the pilot group be centered in the UP?

People identify ITS about 200 different ways.

I am still experimenting.

I also know her from Open.

• kid plays while parent works.
• kid engaged in virtual world; parent in actual.
• disconnect between child and parent.
• VERY traditional mother role; kid's clothes still kind of old school, despite remote.