I would suggest that future campaigns need to also focus on faculty and the researchers, and simplifying OA so that clear and correct messages about the true nature and benefits of OA ('Open in order to accelerate progress towards solving global challenges') are understood. More equitable forms of OA are absolutely needed but we must be careful that we don't alienate researchers even further.

And it's not just commercial publshers but faculty and researchers too.

And Indonesia

Surely the growth of the internet, networking platforms and social media since BOAI has contributed largely to this?

Are DOIs assigned to all articles, or are there some articles published without them?

How prominent is the use and influence of IFs in South Korea?

I assume that this refers to the Global North (for want of a better term)? In Latin America, there is predominantly one model and that is fairly stable.

Sophy, we need to see what this look like once someone is signed in.

I am worried that are going to get lots of people clicking Other: EuropePMC instead of selecting this option. I found this page: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/pmci/ - I think we should go back to PMC/EuropePMC. PMC Canada doesn't exist anymore anyway.

This is a new style of Tip, different to the ones on other pages which are in the right-hand column. Is that a problem? Is this here because this page doesn't have a right-hand nav?

I am not happy with this change. If this is the final, agreed criteria for the Seal then the question in the application form needs to be updated. Ping Judith.

Account ID

Long help text missing: The country where the publisher carries out its business operations and is registered.

Delete this

which is indexed in DOAJ

@sophy - column width needs to be increased to stop ..laget.. breaking over 2 lines.

Logged with CL https://github.com/DOAJ/doajPM/issues/2326

Move this back and edit

This page doesn't sit well with the other items in the menu which cover metadata out. This is specifically metadata in.

Review this and soften it. This page provides instructions on how to do this. For publishers or 3rd parties working on their behalf.

Add intro txt and explanation of what OAI does

remove (s)

Add links to Terms of Reference for Board and Council.

Delete

To be edited for language and tone.

To be deleted

Might be deleted

This to be deleted

Update the mission before we release the new site.

If you click 'Support' it takes you to Support DOAJ. If you click About, it doesn't take you to About DOAJ. Shouldn't we have one or the other throughout the nav?

We need to get rid of all mentions of 'members' and 'membership' etc

See discussion here re 'lists' https://doajplus.slack.com/archives/GGALMHXU3/p1588658545000100 - consider adding 'authoritative'.

This button has a different movement

Not sure what I think about this button motion. Shouldn't it be the other way around, ie it moves out when you hover over it? Dunno. Really not an issue.

Consider changing to: 'Journal publishers don't need to donate to submit an application to us. Having a journal indexed in DOAJ is always free of charge.'

Terms and conditions page missing

I thin it is strictly an Atom feed and not an RSS feed, although I have no idea what the difference is!

This section might include a link to our Atom feed of recently added journals

I might change the running order here to be: Total journals Article Abstracts Countries Recently updated journals Journals without APCs

Change this to say 'Article abstracts' only

Maybe even just change this to say 'Journals'. All journals in DOAJ are OA by definition

If Team members don't supply an image, the blank space is quite huge and obvious. Any way to overcome that?

I almost feel like the long help now belongs with the 'Link to the journal's open access statement' text. The text in the long help now isn't directly related to 'Where can we find this information?'