37 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2017
    1. Starr et al. (2015).

      Change reference to: Fenner et al., 2016. Link to biorXiv preprint at:

      http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/12/28/097196

    2. FAQ for data repositories

      Insert link to FAQ: https://www.force11.org/group/data-citation-implementation-pilot-dcip/data-citation-faqs-repositories

      Actually, we will be moving these to a more permanent address, so perhaps we should wait

    1. How to Cite Data

      Need to add another category:

      How do I make my data citable?

      Easy answer: Deposit your data in a repository that supports data citation.

    2. digital object identifier (DOI)

      I think here is where we link to: How do I make my data citable?

  2. Aug 2016
    1. the

      "to"

    2. Include a “Data availability section” in each article

      Include a space above this line, as per the previous bullets.

    3. Proper citation and deposition of data generated from their study Proper citation of 3rd party or previously generated data used in their study

      Should be indented.

    4. For Publishers and Editors: Data Citation Guidelines

      What do we think we want to put here?

    1. Will develop a section here to allow other repositories to annotate their pages. I have a colleague who has developed a method for injected tagged annotations into html tables. Should we give that a try?

    2. Repository Landing Page Examples

      We should put a link to the FAQ page for repositories: https://www.force11.org/group/dcip/eg1faqs

    1. outcomes of the Force11 Data Citation Implementation Pilot

      We need to reference the JDDCP and Starr et al somewhere in the introduction.

    1. Raw fMRI data of 14 healthy controls (HC) and 15 chronic low back pain patients (CLBP). Subject had to perform a motor imagery (MI) task during scanning session.

      Dataset description: A description of the dataset, with more information than the title.

    2. Raw fMRI data of controls and patients

      Title: The title of the dataset

  3. Jun 2016
    1. 2016-02-02T09:35:03Z

      Publication Date: Date that the dataset was made available through the repository. Dates should be in a standard format, e.g., ISO 8601

      Note that this date may be different than when the data are deposited in the repository. If the data have been deposited and are under embargo, the repository should provide information on when the data are available.

    2. 2016-02-02T09:35:03Z

      Deposit Date: Date that the data set was uploaded to the repository. Dates should be formatted according to ISO 8061 standard.

    3. 2016-02-02T09:35:03Z

      Data availability and disposition (conditional) : The landing page should provide information on the availability of the data, e.g., if it is currently under embargo or otherwise restricted, or has been de-accessioned (i.e., removed from the archive). As stated in the JDDCP, metadata should persist beyond de-accessioning.

  4. May 2016
    1. 1.0

      Versions: What versions of the data are available, if there is more than one version that may be accessed.

    2. 12 Files

      Data access: Users should be able to download or otherwise access data via the landing page

      Data availability and disposition (conditional) : The landing page should provide information on the availability of the data, e.g., if it is currently under embargo or otherwise restricted, or has been de-accessioned (i.e., removed from the archive).

    3. CC0 - "Public Domain Dedication"

      License/Waiver: The license or waiver under which access to the content is provided (preferably a link to standard license/waiver text (e.g. https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)

    4. Cranmer, Skyler (The Ohio State University)

      Publisher/Contact: The organization and/or contact who published the dataset, e.g., a data repository, and is responsible for its persistence.

      Explanation: The publisher/contact field should probably be split. The contact person, in this case, is the author(s) who are responsible for generating the data.

      Publisher = Harvard Dataverse. No need to add this information to this page, as it is implicit in the location. The machine readable metadata also identifies the Dataverse as the publisher. However, if a landing page is maintained for this data set in another context, e.g., Data Cite, Biocaddie, the publisher field should state that Harvard Dataverse is the responsible party.

    5. Cranmer, Skyler (The Ohio State University) Leifeld, Philip (University of Glasgow) McClurg, Scott (Southern Illinois University) Rolfe, Meredith (UMass Amherst)

      Creator/author: The person(s) and/or organizations who generated the dataset and are responsible for its integrity.

      Starr et al. strongly recommends that Creator Identifier(s, e.g., ORCiD, be included as well.

    6. 2016-04-21

      Publication Date: Date that the dataset was made available through the repository. Dates should be in a standard format, e.g., ISO 8601

    7. doi:10.7910/DVN/2XP8YF

      Data set identifier: A machine-actionable identifier resolvable on the Web to the dataset.

    8. Citation Metadata

      Note that many of the required and recommended elements are found in this section of the landing page. The Data Citation Principles implementation recommendations specify which metadata elements should be present, but do not specify a layout or particular organization.

    9. The last decade has seen substantial advances in statistical techniques for the analysis of network data, and a major increase in the frequency with which these tools are used. These techniques are designed to accomplish the same broad goal, statistically valid inference in the presence of highly interdependent relationships, but important differences remain between them. We review three approaches commonly used for inferential network analysis---the Quadratic Assignment Procedure, Exponential Random Graph Model, and Latent Space Network Model---highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the techniques relative to one another. An illustrative example using climate change policy network data shows that all three network models outperform standard logit estimates on multiple criteria. This paper introduces political scientists to a class of network techniques beyond simple descriptive measures of network structure, and helps researchers choose which model to use in their own research. (2016-01-31)

      Description: More detailed description of the data beyond that available in the title

    10. Cranmer, Skyler (The Ohio State University)

      Publisher/Contact: The organization and/or contact who published the dataset, e.g., a data repository, and is responsible for its persistence.

      Explanation: The publisher/contact field should probably be split. The contact person, in this case, is the author(s) who are responsible for generating the data.

      Publisher = Harvard Dataverse. No need to add this information to this page, as it is implicit in the location. The machine readable metadata also identifies the Dataverse as the publisher. However, if a landing page is maintained for this data set in another context, e.g., Data Cite, Biocaddie, the publisher field should state that Harvard Dataverse is the responsible party.

    11. Cranmer, Skyler (The Ohio State University) Leifeld, Philip (University of Glasgow) McClurg, Scott (Southern Illinois University) Rolfe, Meredith (UMass Amherst)

      Creator/Author: The person(s) and/or organizations who generated the dataset and are responsible for its integrity.

    12. doi:10.7910/DVN/2XP8YF

      Data set identifier: A machine-actionable identifier resolvable on the Web to the dataset.

    13. The last decade has seen substantial advances in statistical techniques for the analysis of network data, and a major increase in the frequency with which these tools are used. These techniques are designed to accomplish the same broad goal, statistically valid inference in the presence of highly interdependent relationships, but important differences remain between them. We review three approaches commonly used for inferential network analysis---the Quadratic Assignment Procedure, Exponential Random Graph Model, and Latent Space Network Model---highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of the techniques relative to one another. An illustrative example using climate change policy network data shows that all three network models outperform standard logit estimates on multiple criteria. This paper introduces political scientists to a class of network techniques beyond simple descriptive measures of network structure, and helps researchers choose which model to use in their own research.

      Description: More detailed description of the data beyond that available in the title

    14. , Harvard Dataverse, V1 [UNF:6:agrnQnH86oRB/yOd+p8V4A==]

      Unique numerical fingerprints: Satisfies the specificity and fixity requirement by providing some check sum or fingerprint of the data file, to provide an integrity check.

      For more information, see [http://guides.dataverse.org/en/4.3/developers/unf/index.html?highlight=unf]

    15. Cranmer, Skyler; Leifeld, Philip; McClurg, Scott; Rolfe, Meredith, 2016, "Replication Data for: Navigating the Range of Statistical Tools for Inferential Network Analysis", http://dx.doi.org/10.7910/DVN/2XP8YF, Harvard Dataverse, V1 [UNF:6:agrnQnH86oRB/yOd+p8V4A==]

      Full data citation: Recommended citation including all key elements.

      Note: Data citations can be formatted according to the styles of individual journals. But all the recommended elements should be in the citation, regardless of format.

    16. Replication Data for: Navigating the Range of Statistical Tools for Inferential Network Analysis

      Title: Title of the dataset

    1. Vrana A, Hotz-Boendermaker S, Stämpfli P, Hänggi J, Seifritz E, Humphreys BK, Meier ML (2015) Data from: Differential neural processing during motor imagery of daily activities in chronic low back pain patients. Dryad Digital Repository. http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2h0q3

      Full data citation: Recommended citation including all key elements.

      Note: Data citations can be formatted according to the styles of individual journals. But all the recommended elements should be in the citation, regardless of format.

    2. dc.contributor.author Vrana, Andrea dc.contributor.author Hotz-Boendermaker, Sabina dc.contributor.author Stämpfli, Philipp dc.contributor.author Hänggi, Jürgen dc.contributor.author Seifritz, Erich dc.contributor.author Humphreys, B. Kim dc.contributor.author Meier, Michael L.

      Data creators/authors: The person(s) and/or organizations who generated the dataset and are responsible for its integrity.

      Note that Dryad uses the Dublin Core (dc) metadata attributes to make this page machine-parseable.

    3. Show Full Metadata

      Additional required and recommended elements are available in the full metadata record. Please note that the Starr et al recommendations do not require a specific layout or organization for the landing page, just a set of elements that should be included.

    4. DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2h0q3

      Data set identifier: A machine-actionable identifier resolvable on the Web to the dataset.

    5. Raw_Data.zip (2.090 Gb)

      Means to access data; in this case, the link provides a way to download the data.