26 Matching Annotations
  1. Nov 2021
    1. Kara built on her students’ knowledge of larger sociopolitical contexts in order to counter prevailing notions about place, food, and obesity—

      I wonder what other contexts would work to help students think critically about social issues.

    2. “I think this helps them with their critical consciousness. I don’t think they’ll walk away saying ‘I won’t eat McDonald’s anymore,’ but I want them to be able to challenge social structures, I want them to understand systemic racism, and I want them to be able to see themselves as change agents.”

      I thought food was in interesting angle to work with, but this quote helped my perspective. I think that when students bring in their own funds of knowledge, they can critically analyze these systems through different lens', such as this one.

    3. Throughout this unit, Kara asked her students to make use of their knowledge of their own neighborhoods, positioning them as experts about the places they inhabit.

      I like this idea of making the students the "experts". Even though it's such a simple term, students feel more empowered in their learning and work when they are identified as experts, and who wouldn't be an expert of their own neighborhood?

    1. My awareness of students’ love of literature and writing, ranging from poetry and short stories to young adult literature, guided me to select texts that could extend the conversation to texts about humane treatment.

      Like stated in The Vulnerable Heart of Literacy, using literature is a way to extend the invitation to have challenging conversations or having testimony and witness.

    2. “If you treat students more professionally, then they are likely to act more professionally.”

      I agree with this statement, as we should be open to our students having their own voices in our classrooms. How does this idea of "professional" work with younger students, such as lower elementary?

    1. Counternarratives, or counterstories, represent one tenet of critical race theory. While they take a variety of forms (e.g., personal stories, others’ stories, compos-ite stories), Solórzano and Yosso (2002) define them as a “method of telling the stories of those people whose experiences are not often told” in order to “shatter complacency, challenge the dominant discourse on race, and further the struggle for racial reform” (p. 32).

      I didn't learn about counternarratives until this semester in my MEd program, which I'm surprised about. When I reflect on my early education through high school, I don't ever recall my teachers asking me or any other students to write counternarratives.

    1. When teachers use Thanksgiving as the vehicle for their instruction about Native peoples, they are inadvertently locat-ing Native lives in the past.

      I think that this is important because a lot of students don't actually know the history behind Thanksgiving. Taking this as a lead into centering Native people would be a good objective to obtain. Not only do we need to discuss Natives lives in the past, but also bring them to the present.

    2. #OwnVoices stories— a hashtag created by Corinne Duyvis to describe a book that is written by someone who is of the particular culture being depicted. The idea is that the quality of a story is improved when the person creating that story is an insider who knows what to share and how to share it with outsiders.

      This brings in the idea of authenticity. I am working on a project that revolves around children's literature and their climate, and a big part of this project is discussing the racial/cultural background of the author, illustrator, and even audience.

    1. When the plot diagram was completed, I asked the students to think of Goldilocks as a young Black girl. “How would the story change? And in what ways would the character’s traits, the setting, or the author’s point of view become different if the Goldilocks was an 11- year- old Black girl from your neighborhood?”

      The idea of invitation!

    2. literacy instruction should be re-sponsive to students’ identities (e.g., race, ethnicity, gender expression, age, appearance, ability, spiri-tual belief, sexual orientation, socioeconomic sta-tus, and community environment) and languages/dialects as they affect students’ opportunities to learn

      Not only do I feel like literacy instruction should be responsive to our students' identities, but it can help build their identities too. Just to make a connection, I feel that I would have been more invested in my own Asian culture had my teachers provided me and made me feel comfortable with engaging all students in other texts of Asian culture.

    1. Finally, it is important for educators to implement these same tools with White students who benefit from white supremacy and the damaging narratives that mainstream media produce about Black youth and other youth of color

      I was going to highlight a sentence earlier and question if there was going to be any learning and advocacy among the White student population. I think it is just as important to implement these tools with White students so that they can be conscious and play a role in getting rid of White supremacy.

    2. invite

      "Invite" is the KEY word! Of course we want all of our students to partake in these discussions, but it should never be forced.

    3. 2) provides youth with opportunities to in-vestigate, dismantle, and rewrite the damaging narratives that mainstream media and other social institutions use to construct and oppress Black youth. A pedagogy of healing is increas-ingly necessary and important in a time when Black youth are feeling wounded, weary, and dispirited by the ubiquitous as-sault against Black bodies and a burgeoning media culture that works to stigmatize, criminalize, demonize, and objectify them.

      This is an example of Tenet Two in *The Vulnerable Heart of Literacy: Critical Witness and Testimony. As we engage students in witnessing their peers' testimonies, we can provide opportunities for them to be critical witnesses in rewriting these damaging narratives.

    4. case of 12-year-old shooting victim Tamir Rice, who was killed by police in Cleveland, Ohio. Unfortunately, Rice was not viewed as “a boy playing with a toy in the park, but a Black male with a gun” (O’Malley, 2014). Many me-dia outlets characterized Rice as “big for his age,” as if this was a sufficient reason for the cause of his death.

      This reminds me of the Adam Toledo case. I felt like people was more coverage on why the officer did it and the pressure that got put on him to make a decision in a split-second, versus the young boy.

    5. he newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.

      I think that it is crazy that Malcolm X is the one who said this because it is SO relevant right now. It is all over social media.

    1. attending to tensions that may exist in how English teachers and teacher educators address issues of trauma and healing in our classrooms.

      I thought this was interesting. Is there tension because teachers do not know how to address trauma and healing in classrooms? Or are there tensions because it is done without purpose and intention? Or are there tensions because it is a difficult concept to address in classrooms?

    2. Listening to teachers and students that day and in the weeks leading up to and following the 2016 election provided striking and poignant reminders that students of all ages carry with them into school the myriad worries, ideas, and oft-repeated phrases of indoctrination spouted on television, websites, and in neighborhoods.

      In this time where technology, social media has become so valued in our students' lives, they are engaging in their own learning a lot outside of our classrooms. Some of these students are walking into my classroom teaching me something.

    3. acknowledging our personal dismay with the outcome of the election, even as we also recognize that some readers did and, perhaps, still do support President Trump.

      I think it is important to remember that educators should remain unbiased. We don't want to impose our own opinions (if any) on our students, as we are trying to teach them to have an open-mind in their learning.

    1. Teachers must cultivate spaces for students to write.

      Based on what I learned in other books, this is something that we cannot force upon our students. We simply extend the invite for them to share their experiences through literacy (reading, writing. story-telling, etc.), and it's the students' choice to witness, then create their own testimony/testimonios.

    2. “I am a [blank] writer.” This exercise presumes their writing competence and assumes that all youth are writers.

      I love this! Students are still developing their identities as they enter our classrooms, so this demonstrates an effective way to get students to add to their identities as writers, and students in general.

    3. I wanted to create spaces where youth writers define, understand, challenge, and use writing in and out of school and where they are critical ethnographers of their own writing lives.

      This also relates to the book I read for class - The Vulnerable Heart of Literacy. Writing is used as a doorway to testimony and witness for our students' traumas, as well as our own.

    4. Parents and community members understood writing to be the timed writing tasks for standardized exams or the demonstration of the conventions of writing on school assignments,

      This is how I viewed writing throughout most of my life until I took education classes in college. If I felt this way, I can't imagine how other parents or community members felt, especially if their child was doing poorly. Throughout my high school years, we were trained to write in a particular fashion to adhere to certain styles, but not necessarily from a radical standpoint.

    1. I finish this chapter of class by asking students to write a piece of historical fiction.

      I think this is a great idea. Growing up, I always had a weakness in history, but if I was offered the chance to tie in my past experiences with my learning, I would have made much more progress.

    2. I bring in students’ lives in two ways. First, the unit itself is about their lives and the unfolding narrative of how racial inequality, displacement, economic disparity, as well as resistance and resilience are currently playing out in their neighborhood. And second, I ask them to write a narrative about a time their homes were lost, stolen, or restored.

      This relates to the book I just read: *The Vulnerable Heart of Critical Literacy where students are extended the invitation to discuss their experiences and traumas, which allows us as teachers and their fellow peers to be critical witnesses.

    3. When I started paying attention to the larger themes that brought the world into our classroom, my students (mostly) stopped rebelling. Dirk—and others—taught me that teaching language arts means plumbing my students’ lives to bring their stories and voices into the classroom as we examine racial injustice, class exploitation, gender expectations, sexual identity, gentrification, solidarity, and more.

      This made me connect to the movie Freedom Writers. Once Erin Gruwell stopped teaching by certain objectives and standards, and tended to the support and needs of her students, they started to care about their own learning.

    4. My students’ voices and lives didn’t need “housekeeping”; they didn’t need to be told to “hush.” They needed a teacher who could unleash their beauty on the page and their capacity to discuss and argue in the classroom. When I stopped attending to test scores and started listening to the music of my students’ voices and seeing them as “more than a score,” I increased my capacity to engage them. I knew what didn’t work, but I still didn’t know what did work.

      As educators, how can we make this possible when we are depended on to follow the standards and meet certain expectations ourselves?