27 Matching Annotations
  1. Jul 2019
    1. This idea of our great knowledge opened the way to us for sowing the seed of religion in their minds.

      The Japanese were more open to believing the religion of the Jesuits one they explained many other scientific wonders to them.

    2. All of these sects observe a wonderful silence about the creation of the world and of souls. They all speak of abodes of the virtuous and of the wicked; but not one gives any explanation of the nature of the place assigned to the good, nor by whose power it is that the souls of the wicked are cast down to hell.

      The Japanese did not believe they had any one creator or higher power presiding over them.

    3. And they say women are as badly off if they neglect the five precepts. For they say that each woman, on account of her monthly courses, is covered with more sins than all men put together, and that thus so foul a creature can hardly be saved. They go on to say that there is some hope even for women of escaping from the prison of hell, if they give a great deal more than the men to the bonzes.

      It is so crazy how inferior women were seen back then, and simply due to their nature and things beyond their control, they were doomed to go to hell.

    4. They prize and honour all that has to do with war, and all such things, and there is nothing of which they are so proud as of weapons adorned with gold and silver.

      It seems that the Japanese were always prepared for a fight.

    5. Many of these rules are rejections of “evangelical” (Protestant) theological positions as well as the recent moral failings of the medieval Church.

      Ignatius thought that a lot of the Protestant rules should be changed.

    6. For Ignatius, the battle between God and the Devil is an interior struggle for the soul of the believer.

      Ignatius seems to have a similar mindset to Martin Luther in that he believes the struggles of sin are internal.

    1. Luther maintains that when people die, they are released from all earthly penalties as embodied in canon law. The penalty of purgatory is imposed not by earthly law but by the person’s own fear, even despair, brought about by

      Luther does not think that purgatory is a real thing that all people must face when they die.

    2. According to this view, salvation in heaven is an unconditional gift of God’s love and grace. A person receives it through faith alone and acceptance of Jesus Christ as the source of salvation; it cannot be “earned” through the performance of good works, for that would imply that a well-behaved, charitable atheist could be admitted to heaven.

      I really like this passage because I am a Christian myself, and I completely agree with Luther. The old ways of thinking were unachievable and unrealistic. No one can ever earn their way into Heaven or be worthy of the ultimate sacrifice Jesus made.

    3. Religious wars erupted that were not to cease until the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648.

      When Luther made his 95 theses, I wonder if he could have predicted the outcome that would have.

    1. The Dutch created the first modern commercial bank (the Bank of Amsterdam) in 1609 and the first modern securities market (the Amsterdam Stock Exchange) in 1602.

      I wonder how much differently these banks operated as the banks we have now. Technology plays a huge part in security and efficiency, so how was it handled back then?

    1. And the rest of the people for the most part cure themselves with herbs and sticks and other ancient methods, so that they live putting all their faith in these herbs and ceremonies, and die believing that they are saved; and this serves God poorly.

      It is truly amazing the advances we have made in medicine throughout the years. Our modern technology is something that people of the 1500s desperately needed but most likely could not even fathom.

    2. And we cannot reckon how great the damage is, since every day the mentioned merchants are taking our people, sons of the land and the sons of our noblemen and vassals and our relatives, because the thieves and men of bad conscience grab them so as to have the things and wares of this kingdom that they crave; they grab them and bring them to be sold.

      This breaks my heart to hear one King begging another for some form of protection to stop his people from being abducted and sold into slavery.

    3. And that, sir, arises from the great negligence of your highness’s officials toward us and toward shipping us those things. …

      Well this opening paragraph took quite a turn! The whole beginning was kissing up to wanting to hear from the prince and then the end is basically slapping him in the face for neglecting them.

    1. During the last ten days of the month, he performs worship in the mosque, and although, on account of several obstacles, he is unable to proceed on a pilgrimage to Mecca, yet the care which he takes to promote facilities for pilgrims to that holy place may be considered equivalent to the pilgrimage.

      Whomever wrote this clearly was trying to paint a very pretty picture on the leader. Either they are all complete lies, or he is unlike any other monarch in history.

    2. He keeps the appointed fasts on Fridays and other sacred days, and he reads the Friday prayers in the Jámi’ masjid with the common people of the Muhammadan faith.

      Why and when was it decided that Fridays were sacred days?

    3. Much of the failure of the Mughal Empire is attributed to Aurangzeb’s leadership, which according to his critics, was intolerant, one-dimensionally fundamentalist (in the sense of his devotion to Islam), and uncompromising.

      The Mughal Empire seems to be a big melting pot of different religions and cultures. This text proves what many wars and rebellions throughout the history of the world have shown time after time; religious intolerance and the need to be in complete control is a fool-proof way to ensure your empire's demise.

    1. Each ending of a cycle meant great tensions and possible changes in the universe and could mean the end of the Aztec people as a nation — or even the end of humanity.

      Maybe this could be a source as to why some people believe that every so often the world is predicted to end.

    2. Although the Mexica, as the Aztecs originally called themselves,

      Why did the Aztecs, or Mexicas as they were first, change their name?

    3. This is the Hymn which they sang every eight years when they fasted on bread and water.

      Was there a particular reason that they did this?

    4. In many cases gods are interchanged with their human representatives, who function on earth.

      How does one get to be identified as a god in human form? Did some people just say that they were one and hoped people believed them? Or were there specific requirements?

    5. In order to appease the gods, the Aztecs built monumental temples, where they committed sacrifices; like most Mesoamerican gods, the Aztec gods fed on human blood.

      I wonder how the people who were sacrificed were chosen? Were they criminals who were being punished? Or children, who were innocent in the eyes of the gods?

  2. Jun 2019
    1. 11. He ordered that all religions were to be respected and that no preference was to be shown to any of them. All this he commanded in order that it might be agreeable to God.

      This one surprises me because most rulers in this time, and throughout most of history honestly, forbade their people from practicing any religion other than the one the ruler practiced.

    2. At its height, the Mongol Empire was the largest contiguous kingdom in history, stretching from the Sea of Japan to the Carpathian Mountains in central and eastern Europe.

      Is there anything that these people could do that wasn't punishable by death?!?!

    3. Unlike Hammurabi, the Babylonian ruler who is often credited with devising the first codified law (in the eighteenth century BCE), Genghis Khan did not have his laws carved onto stelae (inscribed stones erected throughout the empire) but rather kept them on scrolls that were viewed only by the Mongol nobility.

      If only Mongol nobility were allowed to see these laws, how could the citizens ever know if what they were being told was actually law or just what the people in power wanted them to do? Did this lead to some kind of rebellion or the people wanting to know the truth?

    1. The founder of Mali, the Mandinka leader Sundiata (ca. 1217 — ca. 1255), overthrew the empire of Ghana using cavalry techniques adapted to West African conditions.

      What exactly were these techniques? Are these techniques still used today in some parts of the world?

    2. The fourteenth century saw Europe develop into a series of monarchical states — the forerunners of modern Europe.

      At this point and time, was there any competition between the countries in Asia and the frontrunners in Europe? It is hard to think of a time before the 20th century where Europe wasn't the dominating area.

    3. Most of us get our first formal exposure to history from secondary sources, such as school textbooks or historical monographs, or even from tertiary sources, such as encyclopedias, online reference sites, or commercial study guides like CliffsNotes or SparkNotes.

      While information presented in a fashion such as this is easier to understand, it is not always 100% reliable. As the saying goes, "the winners write history".