76 Matching Annotations
  1. Dec 2024
    1. the ecofascist tendencies (even if unintentional) of white cis-heteronormative ableist ignorance in mainstream concerns about eco-anxious youth

      hoo boy

    2. the mainstream’s concern about eco-anxiety

      so this is kind of a meta issue - a larger group (the mainstream) is "concerned" about the eco-anxiety of a smaller group (the youth). Are the youth eco-anxious, and the mainstream are anxious about the youth's eco-anxiety? that seems like a weird move of deferral... like people of my gen don't worry about the climate, we worry about our kids worrying about the climate? I feel like the age/generation aspect gets lost as the article goes on, though... is eco-anxiety specific to "the youth"? or do we (the mainstream) worry about it specifically for the youth? Is "the mainstream" implicitly older/parental+ ?

    3. the existential threat of climate change is posed to a certain way of inhabiting the planet that I call habit-ability

      ok but man this is a clunky sentence. "Habit-ability" is a cool wordplay - deserves some flair!

    4. what Kyle Powys Whyte terms crisis epistemology.

      this sounds interesting

    1. .

      that wouldn't answer the question, though. I don't see how the question and the proposed answer are connected

  2. Oct 2024
    1. Sanctioning Guidelines for the Early Resolution Option

      CUT if the ERO is no longer an option

    2. Conditional Suspension

      confusing name for this - maybe "Suspension with conditional reinstatement"?

    3. shall be treated as though suspended from the university

      is this different from "suspended"? how and why?

    4. Learn more

      more than what?

    5. the Judicial Advisor shall inform the panel during the penalty phase of deliberations

      what? the panel for the SECOND offense should know about the FIRST offense.

    6. A. Formal Warning

      each of these should be linked to the list above

    7. After three years, based on feedback from the Stanford community and the Office of Community Standards staff, the BJA voted to adopt the following amendment to the Student Conduct Penalty Code on May 25, 2016 that determines that the Office of Community Standards should use the following guidelines in determining sanctions for ERO agreements.

      I think it's confusing and unnecessary to include this HISTORY of feedback and revisions here - just put the CURRENT POLICY

    8. probation—a period of observation and review—until conferral the terminal degree and a one-quarter suspension held in abeyance, 40 hours of community service, and an online training on academic integrity.

      format as list; don't define "probation" - link to definition elsewhere on page; I don't understand the difference between "probation" and "suspension"; "suspension held in abeyance" seems redundant!

    9. The order of the penalties in the list does not suggest their frequency or likelihood,

      the order seems random - I suggest putting them in order of severity

    10. The Judicial Advisor shall inform any member of the community whose role in implementing the penalty requires that person to be informed of a penalty imposed by the Judicial Panel. The Judicial Advisor shall also inform the reporting party of any penalties imposed by the panel.

      these seem to contradict the sentence above, if "a penalty imposed by the panel" is "information contained in a student's disciplinary record"

    11. No information contained in a student’s disciplinary record will be released without the written consent of the student.

      doesn't follow from the previous 2 sentences

    12. It is applicable only to the actions of the judicial entities

      so abstract!

    13. .

      confusing to list 2 versions of the Charter

    14. Violations

      inaccurate heading

    15. and what the ramifications are for a student.

      "ramifications" seems like the wrong word

    16. when

      is it really about "when"?

  3. Aug 2024
    1. Ego must give way to the collective enterprise.

      easy to say, and not always easy to determine who is being driven by "ego" and who is speaking for "the collective enterprise"

    2. The right artist for opera embraces this tapestry, while the artist insisting on individual achievement will always struggle

      Wonder who he's talking to here...?

    3. too often pitted against each other by a system predicated on the achievement of the rugged individual

      "rugged individualism" seems like the MOST prejudicial explanation for what pits directors and conductors against each other - even in the best-faith collaboration, they can have competing goals and priorities!

    4. the company’s traditional and predominantly white audience were challenged by the score. Not so the Black members of the audience, many of whom reported attending an opera for the first time

      i would like to see evidence for this essentialist statement

    5. New York City Opera premiere

      1986

    6. An elite approach to opera demands that everyone approach the work from the same level and scolds anyone who “doesn’t get it”

      again, this feels like a straw man

    7. Rather than expect education before the opera, I would see it as a sign of success if an audience member wants to learn more after the performance.

      these aren't mutually exclusive, and ideally there's a feedback loop between enjoying and learning

    8. a deep experience of opera should not be predicated on any prior knowledge: of the art form, of a foreign language, of the work being performed

      I agree with this.

    9. although they can afford tickets to the opera, the musicology and history degrees that seem a prerequisite make the experience feel out of reach

      wait WHAT? I mean I have degrees in musicology and history, so maybe this comment isn't for me... but it still seems like an exaggeration. Maybe people are intimidated because they sense that the composer's name is supposed to mean something to them, and it doesn't? Recognizing a composer's name and connecting it with a language, country, century, and style isn't "musicology and history degrees"...

    10. Even though supertitles are now the norm at most opera houses

      yeah this is a straw man since supertitles are pretty much universal now.

    11. I believe it’s the air of assumption, exuding from the opera house architecture, that attendees already belong to a certain class and a certain level of education.

      Hmm, so this suggests several "interventions" - change the architecture? change the venue? change the attendees (demographics)? change the codes of dress and behavior that signal class and education?

    12. .

      True. It's not the AMOUNT, it's the enjoyment you expect to get from the $$

    13. “Because nobody likes it, so the entitled people enjoy the fact that they have a differing opinion.”

      this statement doesn't even make sense! not worth quoting in the NY Times!

    14. “The Ed Sullivan Show” — which, in the estimation of The New York Times, “defined American taste” from 1948 to 1971

      OK, but 1971 was a long time ago, and the TV variety show as taste-maker seems totally archaic! (Was Yuval born in 1971??)

    15. on his radio

      (radio has a different place and status than TV... this sentence seems tucked in, and also name-dropping!)

    16. I suspect opera singers were still presented as visitors from "highbrow" culture in those mainstream contexts... there's a dissertation there!

    17. the art form is most exciting and viable when it is a subversive act

      this statement would be more compelling if you defined "exciting" and "viable"

    18. affirming authority in their work

      i.e. affirming POLITICAL authority

    19. opera always fares best when it goes against the grain

      define "fares best"? this could mean many things.

  4. Oct 2023
    1. made without the consent of other collaborators

      THIS seems like a violation of academic integrity.

    2. including graduate students

      There are no graduate students on the list of presenters in this event.

    3. A remarkable film demonstrating how generative AI perceives the field of Ethnomusicology

      This is a weird displacement of responsibility for the film, and even insinuates that the AI was responsible for the 3 slides with slogans? this is a ridiculous evasion

    4. there was a late addition

      bad practice

    5. was contributed by a member of the collective in the hours before the event

      contributed by a member - but not reviewed or approved by the other members? it sounds like one member took advantage of the collective-authorship context and even sabotaged the group's presentation.

    6. that briefly used a controversial Palestinian phrase

      technically accurate, but misleading

    7. No one in our collective, including the author of the film, had prior knowledge of the affects these words carry for the harmed individuals

      Naive, given the extensive coverage of the past 2-3 weeks.

    8. the Indigenous graduate student-presenters

      ???

    9. —and also what allegedly happened to Indigenous graduate student presenters after it was over.

      this "-- and also..." construction is weirdly melodramatic. It suggests that the use of the slogan was bad, but balanced by a bad action against the grad student presenters. "Allegedly" casts doubt on whether that balancing event actually happened. ALSO, I don't think any of the 6 presenters listed on the conference website were grad students

    10. the scholars’ experiences.

      and yet the scholars on the panel could be said to have experienced many of the things they were analyzing

    11. How does McDonald know this?

    12. Such hostility is in violation of SEM’s anti-harassment policy, and we deeply regret that it occurred.

      This is a weird statement. "We deeply regret that someone violated our policy" is not the usual response to a policy violation! "Violating a policy" implies consequences. "It occurred" suggests that the event has been investigated and confirmed. What good is a policy if the only response is "we are sorry someone did that"?

    13. .

      When does a senior scholar criticizing a grad student at an academic conference become a verbal attack?

    14. the event’s presumed focal point was blurred by an unexpected interpolation of visual and sonic references

      passive; no attribution of responsibility

    15. You need to educate yourself.”

      confusing - Hahn is the current/outgoing President of SEM

    16. They

      i.e. the 6 unnamed scholars who complained to Hahn

    17. That colleague

      did the reporter not get this person's name? or choose not to name her?

    18. quickly moved on from the Middle East

      had the presentation been about the Middle East before the 15-30 seconds for these 3 slides? Info above and below suggests not - that 3 slides about the Middle East popped up in an unrelated context.

    19. the presentation screen went black and displayed the controversial slogan for less than five seconds, then transitioned to similarly brief slides reading “Free Palestine” and “End Israeli Apartheid.”

      questions about the creation and operation of the slide deck

    20. it has never meant an advocacy for destroying Israel.

      So Prof. McDonald seems to be distancing himself from the controversy and the negative reactions, and offering a more neutral/ordinary take on the slogan

    21. according to two professors who attended the event

      do we infer that these two professors were the reporter's first source? main source?

    22. .

      This paragraph only gradually reveals that the author/reported wasn't present at the event. How did the reporter hear about it?

    1. comfort/discomfort as important affective conditions for thinking

      relationship of "hospitable" to "comfort/discomfort" - moving away from hospitable = comfortable to hospitable = welcoming, attentive, well-resourced, intentional, careful

    2. the concept of the “global intimate,” coined

      Define?

    3. connect the (dis)comforts experienced in relation to one’s home(s) to “the global,” this putatively all-encompassing, transcendental-spatial whole

      And…?

    4. wanting to maintain critical purchase

      = challenging the status quo

    5. comfortable these modalities of inquiry were becoming, in their signposting and methodological expression, and the likelihood that they would just be integrated

      Assimilated, losing the edge of challenge participants and potential to transform narratives, epistemology, power dynamics

  5. Sep 2023
    1. Schenkerian Theory

      this jump to Schenker feels abrupt to me, maybe because I never got as far as Schenker in my music theory/analysis studies. You have to argue that Schenker is the point of origin behind basic theory (triads, Roman numerals, tonal harmony, phrase structure, antecedent-consequent forms, baroque-classical forms...) and I think that's giving Schenker too much credit. Also, there are settler-colonial historical explanations for the white-classical-european canon of American music education, including theory, and history is much more persuasive to me than this individual attribution to Schenker

    1. I had never once run across the word soars (used as a plural noun) and couldn't deduce its meaning from context clues. Mildly ashamed at my complete unfamiliarity with what James seemed to be employing as a piece of standardly accepted music-analytical lingo, I googled the term, to discover that the only hits online were an obscure 2011 article that seems to have coined the term and a blog post by James.

      OMG I had this exact same experience

    2. I think it is my duty to absolve, preemptively, the reader

      AMEN

    3. the insuperable difficulties I had in appreciating, simply at a ground-floor expository [End Page 126] and rhetorical level, what The Sonic Episteme is trying to say and why it is trying to say it.

      yes PREACH

    4. I got off the boat early, or never quite got on it, in reading The Sonic Episteme

      ME TOO

    5. negative, omnibus term—a catch-all, garbage-pail category—for very nearly any at all recent, at all repugnant aspect of social reality, from automation to Zoom calls, and from alpha males to Omega ratios

      i love this :-)

  6. Jul 2023
    1. she defines ‘woke’ as 1.) a reduction of each individual to the prism of marginalization; 2.) a focus upon inequalities of power rather than attempts to foster justice; and 3.) the conclusion that, because the historical record is rife with crimes against humanity, then all history is criminal

      ok! thank you for this succinct and substantial synopsis

  7. Jul 2022
    1. reproduction.

      This “expanded sonic practice” sounds exactly like musicology/ethnomusicology

    2. As a practice, music is positively obsessed with its media specificity

      What kind of patently false statement is this? How narrow a definition of “music” would you need to make this statement true?