36 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2025
    1. available locations at four spatial scales for each of three guilds;

      This part is kind of unclear; the article does not clearly define what it considers to be "available locations" - I hope to clarify this with context clues.

    2. priority for species conservation

      I've personally seen roadkill before, and know what a sad reality it is that an animal was killed for nothing more than coexisting with manmade structures. I've also seen the railways in both Banff and Yoho National part personally, and they are very embedded within the forest and in high-traffic animal areas

    3. generally quicker and less expensive

      This reminds me of previous dilemmas of wildlife investment I've learned about in other classes - usually, we try and find data that justifies the cheap option to make it a more feasible endeavor.

    4. reduce the viability of threatened populations

      Important; purpose of why this is needed. I agree with why this is needed and think this cause is important.

    5. Seasons of mortality risk were significantly higher for ungulates in mid to late winter, but were less pronounced for bears (slightly higher in late spring and early summer), and other carnivores (no strong seasonal effects). Wildlife mortality occurred more often during the day than night.

      Important observation

    6. Temporal patterns of mortality differed among species (Figs. 3 and 4). Seasonally, ungulate mortality increased in winter (YearDaycosine = 0.583, SE = 0.063, z-value = 9.3) and spring

      Also, seasonal mortality rates differ.

    7. At the spatial scale of the study area, ungulates and bears had higher mortality where topographical complexity was lower, but topographical complexity increased mortality risk for carnivores at all scales. All guilds exhibited a tendency for greater mortality near roads, but this parameter occurred across spatial scales only for bears. An interaction suggested that the combined effects of train speed and proximity to water was most pronounced for other carnivores (Fig. 2). The logistic regression models with random points distributed along the railway throughout the study area did a moderate to poor job at differentiating mortality sites from random locations. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) was slightly higher for ungulates (AUC = 0.735) compared to bears (AUC = 0.634) and other carnivores (AUC = 0.683).

      The authors observed that some less correlated factors across guilds affected some more than others, such as topography, sidings, and shrub cover.

    8. best predictor of mortality sites was maximum train speed, followed by proximity to water, amount of water within 90 m, and track curvature

      RESULT (Trend); some variability in actual guild results in how much the factor influenced mortality.

    9. We expected that that mortality risk would increase in seasons when deep snows, high water levels, and new precipitation made the railway more attractive for travel (winter) and when spilled grain and early emergent rail-side vegetation had higher nutritional quality and availability compared to broader food availability (winter and early spring) (daily precipitation; Table 2).

      I guess part of hypothesis, or at least their prediciton

    10. We hypothesized that the ability of an animal to perceive an approaching train would reduce strike risk such that mortality rates would increase with increasing track curvature, change in elevation, posted train speed, and canopy cover. We also hypothesized that features that channel animal movement onto the railway would increase risk of collisions, predicting mortality rates would increase with topographic complexity, the amount or proximity of water, proximity of roads, and canopy closure. We hypothesized that high forage quality in the vicinity of the railway would increase animal attraction, and hence the risk of strikes, predicting positive correlations with proximity to railway sidings (where trains travel slowly such that leaking grain accumulates39) and with higher shrub cover, which provides berry-producing forage for bears and browse for ungulates. Finally, we hypothesized that strikes would increase where animals spent more time because they had high security from people in the busy valley bottoms of these protected areas, predicting that mortality would increase with distance to roads, shrub density, and canopy cover.

      Clear hypothesis

    11. We included data from the following species for analysis: grizzly bears, black bears (Ursus americanus), wolves (Canis lupus), coyotes (Canis latrans), cougar (Puma concolor), lynx (Lynx canadensis), moose (Alces alces), elk (Cervus canadensis), white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), mule deer (O. hemionus), unspecified deer, and bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) (Table 1).

      These can be discussed in summary as the three broad category grouping

    12. unit of replication

      So it didn't matter if, say 2 deer were killed in the same spot at the same time. Death = mortality event, and all that they considered.

    13. Elevational declines occur in both directions from the continental divide that separates Banff and Yoho National Parks and these lower elevation areas contain higher densities of many species, especially ungulates in the east end of Banff

      LOCATION; Part of environmental challenge

    14. We expected that mortality risk would increase in (a) places where animals had difficulty perceiving trains, (b) where their movement paths were constrained by adjacent topography or water, (c) where forage opportunities increased, or (d) where the railway provided security from encounters with people

      PREDICTION

    15. The objectives of this paper were to (a) identify the landscape factors and seasons that increase train-caused mortality for large mammals and (b) determine the similarity of these explanatory variables among guilds as a means to assess and prioritize the broader conservation value of potential mitigations.

      THESIS

    16. most cost-effective and ecologically beneficial mitigation while identifying the strengths, as well as limitations, of management actions dedicated to focal species

      Investigation purpose reemphasized.

    17. among guilds and spatial scales, with shrub cover, topographic complexity, and proximity to sidings and roads

      Less confident correlation, but still relevant.

    18. Mortality risk increased across multiple guilds and spatial scales with maximum train speed and higher track curvature, both suggesting problems with train detection, and in areas with high proximity to and amount of water, both suggesting limitations to animal movement

      General result

    19. are

      Main idea: The text emphasizes preventing animal mortality caused by railway collisions, by gathering and analyzing data of conditional variables that positively correlate with death. The goal is to implement a site-specific approach at high collision areas, as they would be more effective and economically feasible. Concepts of resource availability, animal behavior, train detection interference,and unavoidable threats to animals explored.

    20. Railways

      Difficulty of a 3 - straightforward purpose and relevance, but methods of field study and statistical analysis are difficult to understand at times, as well as variable comparisons.