1,269 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2018
    1. I have never really been put in a position where someone had a bad attitude towards my language just because  i don’t really go around talking to random people i guess

      In general, how do you think speakers/individuals perceive Dominican/Colombian Spanish?

    2. As I grew up, I began to understand both languages better and the dialects of the Arabic and English languages.

      great introduction - it seems that you are going to deal with Arabic and English

    3. When i was younger i had a more colombian accent because i had picked it up from the way my parents talked. During high school i picked up a more dominican accent because i would always be around dominicans. I use a lot of there slang too like how i am always saying “ cono ” and that is a really big dominican thing. I work in a supermarket and if i talk spanish to a customer sometimes they do ask me if i am dominican

      are you going to focus on Dominican and Colombian Spanish? how are they different? could you give us an example?

    4. i feel like knowing both languages English and Spanish is something really good but tricky as well. It’s a good thing because when being bilingual their are more opportunities for individuals. The reason why I feel like it is also tricky is because when you been somewhere speaking one Language for a long time then having to step out and transition into speaking another one can be some what hard.

      Make sure that you check the rubric and the questions (what is the objective of the essay?) – you have not identified and/or explained the language attitudes towards you dialect/language(s). Go back to the readings and make sure that you are able to identify how individuals/speakers perceive your language/dialect (Spansglish?), and describe the factors that contribute to these attitudes.

    5. For example when eating something and I want to know if its spicy I would say “does this pica”?

      I think that the example really illustrates what you are trying to say

    6. We judge on grammar, we judge on the English they use and we judge on the way they present themselves when speaking

      yes, but how? Go back to the rubric and the questions - you need to identify and explain the language attitudes towards your dialect/language - how do speakers/individual perceive your language/dialect (is it English, Spanish, or both?)?

    7. We judge people on the use of their grammar and how they use it

      yes, but you need to make reference to the dialect/language you have chosen for this essay - check the rubric

    8. When in a professional environment we are opt to use our “professional” English and of course when we are at home, with our friends our language becomes more comfortable to us.

      are you going to focus on Spanish and English? Both? or aonly one?

    9. Being Hispanic in our society means that we have to know how to speak Spanish and there’s a correct way when speaking it as well.

      what is this "correct" way?

    10. My dad got the hang of it pretty well, he is fluent in english and can even write some things depending the subject. My mom on the other hand is still struggling to speak english. She doesn’t feel as comfortable speaking the different language and feels as if people will probably make fun of her and ignore her. Instead of trying to teach her the basics I thought it would be easier if I were to just speak to her in english, since she understands some things and she’d try to respond in spanish, now we use this method of communication every day. Although both my parents understand the english language enough to carry small conversations, I feel more comfortable talking to them in spanish majority of the time.

      how is this relevant to the objective of the essay?

    11. I was always made fun of the way I pronounced certain english words in my early years, but in my opinion I think I definitely perfected the English language by the time I finished junior high school.

      are you going to focus on both languages - Spanish and English?

    12. I think that just because a person is speaking Spanish or Jamaican or Chinese that they act or might seem like a bad perso

      ok - this is a language attitude, why? could you describes factors that contribute towards this attitude?

    13. I feel that this is always happening whether you’re high status or low status and  whatever language you speak.

      I cannot understand this sentence - whatdoes it mean "you're high status of lower status"?

    14. When other people speak different languages it doesn’t mean that it can be low or high status. Many people that speak different languages can speak in proper ways or professional ways. It doesn’t matter what language you speak you can still speak in a good manner. Everyone in the world either its high status or low status speaks in a professional ways, when you’re in a good mood and in a professional environment you will speak in a ways that should be spoken. My mom for example is not rich or high status, but she knows how to speak when she is around her colleagues or in a professional environment. I believe that all people can speak in a respectful and right way, without profanity or slan

      Xavier, check the questions and the rubric - you ned to explain about your dialect/language - intriduce it clearly to the reader and explain why you have chosen it. (We are not dealing with switching speech style)

    15. For example, when speaking to a person of higher authority, I use a more prestige language. Whereas, when I am speaking to people I am more comfortable around, such as, friends and some family, I use a more causal and loose conversational speaking

      could you give examples of how you switch your speech style depending on you audience? who is considered a higher suthority?

    16. A lot of non Spanish speakers think that Spanish is really hard to learn and that the ones that speak it , talk really fast. But just like with any other language , there’s different accents . I’m from Mexico , from the north . My accent is different compared with some members of my family from the south. even though I considered myself fluent in Spanish , there’s still some words that I have trouble understanding.

      can you explain linguistically your dialect/language(s) (maybe you can give some examples)? North and South are different, how?

    17. is to communicate and express ourselves.

      yes, but as you have indicated, there are some specific language attitudes towards Spanish speakers that are not the same that towards English speakers, why? are English speakers perceive as not educated? why?

    18. The attitude towards American-English in states such as North Carolina would be seen as friendly, while in California it can be contributed to being laid-back.

      why? how can you explain these language attitudes?

    19. The attitude that exists throughout my language/dialect would most likely be considered as one of rudeness.

      ok, yes, very clear and direct, but what is your dialect/language(s). Make sure to introduce the dialect/language(s) to the reader

    20. to get rid of some my accent

      why? how do poeple perceive your "English accent"? - This is the objective of this essay. Make sure to go back and check the rubic and the questions - clearly explain the attitudes that exist about your dialect/language (How do people perceive them?)

    21. When I started to go to middle school and high school, I noticed people would know my bad accent and try stay away from me.

      here it seems that you are more focused on your non-native accent

    22. Then, I had to start going to school where I eventually learned English. I can say for sure that it’s really hard to learn English if it’s not the first language. It’s probably the same for every language and I was not able to keep up with the class. No one in the class spoke Chinese so I was kind of isolated from everyone. But I remember when I was able to pick up English when I was repeating letters and words when the whole class was repeating after the teacher. Even today, I feel like I speak English better than Chinese even though my English is not that good either.

      As a reader, I think that your dialect/language(s) could be both Chinese/English, but do you mix them or do you treat them separately?

    23. Like how people in France would see English as a useful tool in their everyday lives especially on traveling and teaching it as a subject in English or ESL setting.

      what about in the US?

    24. For example, on rare occasions my sister would test me by speaking to me in French out of random and wants to know if I mastered it like she did and would make fun of me for it. Not really a difference to me. It depends on how you were brought up into the language like i two languages were spoken through the entire years of your life non stop.

      Again, make sure to identify the dialect/language(s) and then - What are the attitudes speakers have about it? Can you clarify the attitudes that you have identified? As a reader, it is not clear. For example, does your speech in French perceived as a more "posh, educated and/or polite" than your speech in English? why?

    25. ublic describe

      Make sure to check the essay questions and rubric, the question is about language attitudes - how do speakers perceive your dialect/language? (make sure to review the readings!)

    26. Sometimes its like I would know what there saying but don’t know how to say it or emphasis it in a complete sentence. Even at time when I speak (but I don’t really notice it) people would say when I speak I have a slight french accent.

      So, how would you describe your dialect/language(s)? is it a specific English dialect with a French accent? is it a mix between French and English? As a reader I cannot identify your dialect/language.

    27. Calm/Neutral, Comfortable/Playful, and Annoyed/Angry.

      Malekie, you are describing how you are able to switch your style depending not just on your mood but also your audience. Make sure to read the reading and think about the concepts and discussions we had in class this week. You need to identify and describe your dialect/language and explain the attitudes that exist about this specific dialect/language - For example, if you identify your dialect/language as a "Brooklyn English dialect" you need to explain how people/speakers perceive your speech: lazy? posh? laidback? and then splain why it is perceived this way (What social factors do you think contribute to these attitudes?).

    28. d my dialect.

      As a reader, I am not sure if your are talking about a specific English dialect, or specific Spanish dialect... you must clarify and linguistically described your dialect/language from the beginning.

    29. Sure, there are few moments where I may talk like those in the stigmatized form but for the most part, I think my Hindi/Punjabi is decent enough to kind of be considered as the prestige form.

      why? what is the difference between the "stigmatized form" and the "prestige form"? How can I know the difference?

    30. Hindi/Punjabi

      This is the first time that you put them together and I know that you are talking about your linguistic repertoire that contains these two languages - maybe you can indicate this in your previous paragraph

    31. I wouldn’t use English as much at home as I would when outside but I did tend to mix it in with my Hindi. In fact, I would, or rather do, tend to mix in Punjabi as well.

      do you mix the theree languages then? English, Hindi and Punjabi or just Punjabi and Hindi? how are these languages similar and/or different? I want to know more about these languages... are they linguistically related?

    32. For example, something in Hindi would be pronounced with a more emphasis and more of an accent in Punjabi.

      I am not sure if I know what you mean, I do not have a clear picture, could you give a more specific example that illustrates what you are trying to say?

  2. May 2018
    1. I explained to my student that I wanted to see improvements next time I administer the test on her.

      How did this specific artifact impact or change your own thinking or understanding?

    2. Standard 4B

      IMPORTANT:

      your artifact must target the measurement of language proficiency and language acquisition and improvement, either for a class with ELLs or for an individual ELL.

    3. But since she was a very talkative adolescent, the SOLOM was the best method for me to assess her oral abilities.

      relate the artifact to the standard - foe example...

      • by being familiar with national and state requirements, for ELL identification, reclassification, and exit from language support program
      • by sing "language proficiency instruments effectively and appropriately"
    4. . I had decided to assess my student using the “Student Oral Language Observation Matrix” (SOLOM) in order to assess her command of oral language.

      so you are addressing this aspect of the standard "proficiency instruments to show language growth and to inform their instruction. " right?

    1. had to meet and discuss the topic at length in order to agree with a common rubric that would assess what we are looking in the outcome of the essay

      How did it impact or change your own thinking or understanding?

    2. This assignment taught me a lot about collaborating together as a group member with other experienced teachers in order to establish solid expectations for what we want to see displayed in the student work.

      great, but how does this paper relate to the standard? how are you demostrating that you are meeting this specific standard?

    3. The goal of the curriculum unit was to teach students about the historical impact of different immigrant communities on American soil over time

      having in mnd this goal, What exact part of the standard do the artifacts address? (Cite it directly in your reflection).

    4. The final assessment consisted of writing a 2-3 page essay comparing and contrasting two selected immigrant groups (out of the three studied in class). The essay was a culminating activity that would test students’ overall comprehension of the content while also assessing their language proficiency through the use of their writing skills.

      you do not need to summarize the artifact

    1. But speaking to his aunt revealed the root of many of his academic problems. He was experiencing a severe case of homesickness because he was away from his parents, who were living in a war zone.

      "They know and understand public issues that affect ELLs’ education and support ELLs and their families socially and politically. "

    2. Kid Talk discussions

      make sure to include COLLABORATION - "They collaborate with school staff to provide educational opportunities for ELLs and advocate for appropriate instruction and assessment by sharing their knowledge "

    3. This workshop emphasized the role that educators play in ensuring that their student feel part of a community and can in turn contribute to that community through social representation.

      yes - at at the same time that you "view your ELL students’ families as vital resources that inform their classrooms and schools."

    1. Although quite necessary and very useful, assessments measure just a part of who our students are as individuals. In the future, I would like to create an ELLs Portfolio that contains the information found in this case study. All teachers would be able to access the information to better inform their instruction.

      make sure to answer these questions:

      • How do the artifacts relate to the standard? “How do the artifacts demonstrate that you have met the standard?”
      • How did the artifacts contribute to your professional understanding, skills, or dispositions? How did it impact or change your own thinking or understanding? In what areas in your teacher development still need to grow relative to this standard?
      • Did did completing these artifacts impact students and student learning? (if relevant) How might you implement some aspect of what you learned from completing these artifacts in the classroom?
    2. analyze a variety of assessments to get a wide picture of the student’s language abilities. Assessments include NYSESLAT, i-Ready, NYS ELA, Pearson, Social Studies MOSL, and field observation. The informal field observation is essential to the “wide picture” because it accounts for the student’s social language use. Unfortunately, I did not teach this student this past year. However, I will likely have them as an 8thgrader next year. I will use this data to work with the administrator in charge of programming to ensure this student ends up in the correct placement next year. We must wait for the NYSESLAT 2018 results before any final decisions can be made, though. I will use the updated data to inform my instruction as the 8thgrade ENL provider. For purposes of more in-depth reflection, I want to include the student’s progress the most recent NYSESLAT test in 2017. He scored perfect in the Speaking modality! This is consistent with previous projections and the number of years in the country (now four). This student has continued to grow academically and socially. He is the captain of his basketball team and a leader among his peers.

      Remember - this is nit a summary of the artifact

    1. This artifact shows that I understand that different state assessments technically assess different things:

      "assessment must be fair, valid, reliable, and easy to administer."

    2. This artifact shows that I understand that assessing ELLs IS an issue and that the data backs up that assertion.

      make sure to address the standard directly - "assessment issues as they affect ELLs, such as accountability, bias, special education testing, language proficiency, and accommodations in formal testing situations."

    1. This artifact references two videos of me teaching the small group of students. As I describe in the Commentary, I provide sufficient wait time, include all students in the discussion, and allow students to respond to one another without teacher interruption. Although the pace of the class seems slow and quiet, these students talked and participated more than they ever have in their full-group core classes. There was no behavior to manage partially because all students were engaged with the topic.

      How do the artifacts relate to the standard? “How do the artifacts demonstrate that you have met the standard?”

    2. This shows that I planned the instruction based on the students’ learning and social contexts.

      "Candidates support ESOL students in accessing the core curriculum by teaching language through academic content and view language and content as joint means to achieve ELLs’ academic and language development goals."

    1. The lesson also drew directly on the students’ experiences because either themselves or a family member was an immigrant. I knew this going in and was able to capitalize on that in my lesson plan. I also chose a level of language instruction that I knew was appropriate for my Expanding-level students. They are fluent English speakers, they just needed something specific to talk about (content) and a specific way to express it (language).

      How do the artifacts relate to the standard? “How do the artifacts demonstrate that you have met the standard?”

    2. An in-depth analysis of the lesson plan sequence may be found in the artifact itself.

      In what areas in your teacher development still need to grow relative to this standard?

    3. Not only is it possible, it works even better than giving students content with no language support or language instruction with no context.

      how did completing these artifacts impact students and student learning?

    4. It addresses Standard 3A: Planning for Standards-Based ESL and Content Instruction.

      be more specific - What exact part of the standard do the artifacts address? (Cite it directly in your reflection).

    1. These students also struggle accessing the ELA content, so many of the examples we used came from the novel in the then-current ELA unit.

      Did did completing these artifacts impact students and student learning?

    2. s Slides

      make sure to address the artifact - the material that you have created - " Materials selected are challenging, culturally appropriate, interesting, motivating, linguistically accessible and age-appropriate, and supportive of student learning."

    3. I had visual cues for the instructions (talking to a partner, just listening, or writing notes). I also created a graphic that I put on almost every slide, which I was able to refer to over and over again during the lesson.

      How do the artifacts relate to the standard? “How do the artifacts demonstrate that you have met the standard?”

    4. For example, I wanted students to discuss the ideas in the photos before I presented the corresponding language, so I made the pictures appear before the words.

      What exact part of the standard do the artifacts address? (Cite it directly in your reflection).

    1. I am even more hopeful about the future of language policy in the U.S. I hope to look back in 20 or even 10 years and see how the issues this artifact raises are addressed.

      Besides, contributing to your professional knowledge, how did completing this artifact impact students and student learning? (if relevant) and how might you implement some aspect of what you learned from completing this paper in the classroom?

    2. I learned that language policy is a process that does not change overnight.

      In what areas in your teacher development still need to grow relative to this standard?

    3. It introduces the regulation, looks at the positives and negatives, and provides recommendations for future language policy.

      What exact part of the standard do the artifacts address? (Cite it directly in your reflection). "Candidates demonstrate knowledge of history, research, educational public policy, and current practice in the field of ESL teaching and apply this knowledge to inform teaching and learning."

    1. This more personalized instrument met that need and making it made me think about how it is my job to bridge the gap between a students proficiency and the social and academic language they are required to use to be at grade-level.

      How did it impact or change your own thinking or understanding?

    2. My mentor teacher suggested that I create a separate form of evaluation for my students.

      What exact part of the standard do the artifacts address? (Cite it directly in your reflection). "Candidates know and use a variety of standards-based language proficiency instruments to show language growth and to inform their instruction. They demonstrate understanding of their uses for identification, placement, and reclassification of ELLs"

    1. Standard 4A

      this artifact MUST treat GENERAL ISSUES of assessment of ELLs, fairness and bias in testing, special education versus ENL support, etc., NOT assessment of a particular child or the use of a specific assessment tool.

    1. While my paper on open educational resources did open up some technological tools to enhance language and content issues, I believe it is still very much a developing field and very much lagging behind the actual pace of technological advancement.

      yes, but it allow you to become "familiar with a wide range of standards-based materials, resources, and technologies" from where you are able to "choose, adapt, and use them in effective ESL and content teaching."

    2. I felt that the materials were challenging but that we scaffolded them and provided supports — especially vocabulary supports — that made them more linguistically accessible and supportive of student learning.

      here you are demostrating you meet the standard

    3. e; placed alongside it’s quality, which was varying but in general not high; and the total lack of accessible resources that organized this material for potential use in ENL classes.

      What exact part of the standard do the artifacts address? (Cite it directly in your reflection). "Candidates are familiar with a wide range of standards-based materials, resources, and technologies, and choose, adapt, and use them in effective ESL and content teaching."

    4. wide range of print and resources including ESL curricula, AV materials, webquests, podcasts and other forms of multimedia” as well as other internet resources

      yes!

      but, remember to "Briefly describe the context in which the artifacts were produced" (class)

    1. I used recasting, first by asking the question (or giving the statement) in a different way, and then restating what they said using the academic vocabulary.

      And how did completing these artifacts impact students and student learning?

    2. howing an awareness of theories of second language acquisition and findings based upon what we read in class about recasting and vocabulary learning as literacy learning

      this is your second paragraph - relate the artifact to the standard and demostrate that you are meeting Standard 1B

    3. classes at Lehman, I did not consider recasting as a method of teaching so consciously.

      make sure to "Briefly describe the context in which the artifacts were produced" (class, for example)

    1. by having students share their brochures and solve each other’s math problems, students could be assessed across intellectual and social development.

      In what areas in your teacher development still need to grow relative to this standard?

    1. All of these changes have required me to learn specific methodologies and practices in order to provide the support my students need to succeed and all of them are rooted in political decisions and progressive changes through history.

      besides your professional knowledge and skills, how did did completing this artifact impact students and student learning?

    2. Scandinavians have long been a privileged immigrant group, both in laws that favored and eased their immigration, and culturally, finding it easier to assimilate into Anglo society.

      how does the artifact / paper you demonstrate that you have met the standard?”

    3. I also saw how the practices inside a classroom are very much driven by the legal decisions and research that happen outside it.

      make sure to point out to that you relate this to your knowledge of history - teaking into account this standard:

      "Candidates demonstrate knowledge of history, research, educational public policy, and current practice in the field of ESL teaching and apply this knowledge to inform teaching and learning"

    4. I reflected both on how far the laws have come since my grandfather came from Norway and received a “certification” in English from an English for adults program in his local high school and the history of laws that both helped and hindered Mexicans who moved to the United States. One of the fundamental differences in two groups was in transportation. My grandfather came here to stay as an adult. My research on Mexicans showed that many students in New York schools came to the US as children and frequently went back and forth. Fortunately, today the law classifies them as SIFE  (students with interrupted formal education), and attempts to provide them with additional resources.

      Remember - **Do not summarize or duplicate the artifact.

    1. primarily the struggles for Civil Rights for a variety of disenfranchised groups and the cultural changes surrounding the women’s liberation.

      In what areas in your teacher development still need to grow relative to this standard?

    2. . I collaborated

      collaboration in order to "to provide educational opportunities for ELLs and advocate for appropriate instruction and assessment by sharing their knowledge of ELLs"

    3. On the other hand, by visiting the library and learning about its programs, I made contacts in the larger community that allowed me to support students’ learning and well-being.

      I feel you can connect his to sub-standard 2 "They know and understand public issues that affect ELLs’ education and support ELLs and their families socially and politically."

    4. My research for ESC 502 made me more aware of the unfairness of this fact than I otherwise would have been.

      It is a fascinating prject, but I am not sure how this related to this standard

    5. My research paper for ESC 502 allowed me to learn about the extreme disparity between access to libraries and their resources as a comparison between different school districts

      to which sub-standard is this artifact related?

      • Professional Development
      • Family Partnerships
      • Advocacy and Collaboration
    1. parents advocate for their child/ren, and how administration delegate teachers to this particular population of students

      yes! "They are aware of community resources to assist ELLs and share this information."

    2. he artifacts have demonstrated that I have met the standard in that they all promotes professional development in my ENL pedagogical career.

      Make sure to reinforce your work aoutside the classroom that goes beyond pedagogical practices and it is related to the COMMUNITY: "They know and understand public issues that affect ELLs’ education and support ELLs and their families socially and politically."

    3. All three artifacts demonstrate how I have taken advantage of professional growth opportunities, and demonstrate the ability to build partnerships with colleagues and students’ families, serve as community resources, and advocate for ELLs. For example, in artifact 1, the goal of the PD was to promote understanding of the characteristics of effective literacy instruction for ELLs’, while artifact 2 was A Parents Guide to ENL; What is ENL, Why their child/ren is part of the program, and the benefits and resources available to them and their children. The artifacts have demonstrated that I have met the standard in that they all promotes professional development in my ENL pedagogical career.

      Simone, make sure to clearly related each artifact with a sub-standard

      • Professional Development
      • Family Partnerships
      • Advocacy and Collaboration
    1. These specific grids aides in helping us to evaluate and ensure the continuous intellectual, social and physical development of each learner.

      yes!

      Moreover, you can also add that you are able to "assess learners’ content-area achievement independently from their language ability"

    1. Rubrics provide an efficient and effective way to provide formative assessment to  students to promote their learning and achievement

      How did completing these artifacts impact students and student learning?

    2. For example, my Informational Rubric was broken down by standards that students should be able to do by the end of the assignment. They were written in a child friendly way so that students can look over the rubric with an adult and understand what the assignment expected of them. The science rubric was specific to a task that was assigned. Rubric was categorized: Exceeds Expectations, Student made appropriate predictions about each object. Students were able to write what actually happened by including specific details. Their writing was focused and organized.  Most words are spelled correctly. Capitalization and punctuation were used correctly. Meets expectations, Approaching expectations, Far below expectations

      How did the artifacts contribute to your professional understanding, skills, or dispositions?

    3. Rubrics were used to grade the work accordingly.

      what do you mean by accordingly??

      Make sure to mention these aspects: "They can assess learners’ content-area achievement independently from their language ability"

    4. The artifacts I decided to use for this standard was a Math Rubric, Science Rubric and Reading Rubric I designed for my ELLS in First Grade.

      you only need one artifact

    1. Whereas, this artifact serves as a guide on how I can cater to all the needs of my students in order to prepare them for college and career.

      besides contributing to your professional knowledge and skills, from the student's perspective, how did completing this artifact / this paper impact students and student learning?

    1. I have observed that, children learn from each other and if we isolate them because of their needs, this is going to set them back even further. 

      Besides you professional understanding, how did completing this artifact impact students and student learning?

    2. If they are treated equal then this means that their special needs will never get targeted.

      how do you relate your artifact to the standard?

      Make sure to relate the assessment part - "They design assessments that measure students’ discrete and integrated language skills and their ability to use social and academic language in a range of contexts."

    1. During this time we plan to review videos of where “rigorous” questioning and task is implemented. Also, we will have the opportunity to analyze tasks in order to develop linguistic demands for our learners.

      what about collaboration - make sure that you demonstrate this relation between the artifacts and the standard "They collaborate with school staff to provide educational opportunities for ELLs and advocate for appropriate instruction and assessment by sharing their knowledge of ELLs with their general-education and content-area colleagues and with the community."

    2. This was developed to show the students academic progress.

      "They view their ELL students’ families as vital resources that inform their classrooms and schools"

    3. The Action Plan and Progress Report I included as my artifact shows the relationship with my parents.

      make sure to elaborate this idea - "They know and understand public issues that affect ELLs’ education and support ELLs and their families socially and politically."

    4. Professional development is not effective unless it causes teachers to improve their instruction or causes administrators to become better school leaders.

      "They collaborate with school staff to provide educational opportunities for ELLs and advocate for appropriate instruction and assessment by sharing their knowledge of ELLs "

    5. Every grade had a class of ELLS. I had the bulk of the ELLS on the first grade team. I worked closely with my colleagues to plan lessons with language proficiency modifications for ELLS on the grade.

      which sub-standard(s) are you addressing?

    1. Moreover, institutions that promote cultural diversity and allow immigrant children to express their cultural identity by practicing culturally responsive teaching can best nurture the academic growth of their ELLs.

      again- you do not have to summarize / reproduce the artifact.

      Review the reflective rationale questions:

      Respond to these questions in a focused narrative: What exact part of the standard do the artifacts address? (Cite it directly in your reflection). How do the artifacts relate to the standard? “How do the artifacts demonstrate that you have met the standard?” How did the artifacts contribute to your professional understanding, skills, or dispositions? How did it impact or change your own thinking or understanding? In what areas in your teacher development still need to grow relative to this standard? How did completing these artifacts impact students and student learning? (if relevant) How might you implement some aspect of what you learned from completing these artifacts in the classroom?

    2. I selected this particular topic to research because I was incredibly intrigued by the process of assimilation because it is a common experience that immigrant communities in America go through the longer they spend time in this country. Furthermore I wanted to learn more about a similar yet different process called acculturation. I can state with satisfaction that I discovered many interesting from my research which confirmed my own experiences being a teacher of adolescent ELLs. I realized the importance of such factors such as age, family background, parental education attainment and socioeconomic status of ELLs that determine how well or not these ELLs can adjust to life in a new country. The research revealed that the younger the age of the ELL student in school, the more likely that child will be able to assimilate into a new educational setting in a foreign land. However, the older the age of the ELL student, such as the case with adolescents, the more difficult it will be to assimilate into an English-only atmosphere at school.

      you can mention what the paper is about, but remember that the reflective rationale is not a summary of the artifact.

      How does this artifact / research paper relates to this specific Standard?

    1. Seeing that I teach ELA and ENL, this artifact is a good segue way into helping me to differentiate between how I teach ELA content and language to the students, and what skills they need in order to be successful on both the NYSESLAT and ELA exams.

      yes!

    2. The artifact contributed to my professional understanding by giving me a first-hand look at the issues, accountability, accommodation, and biases of assessments for ELLs.

      yes!

    1. My focus was on phonics, phonemic awareness, vocabulary, comprehension, and fluency. I recognize the importance of each component to make English Language Learners successful.

      re-read standard 5A - "ESL Research and History. ​ Candidates demonstrate knowledge of history, research, educational public policy, and current practice in the field of ESL teaching and apply this knowledge to inform teaching and learning."

    1. The artifact I decided to use for this standard is a Curriculum Unit Presentation for 766- Teaching ESL Through Content Areas.

      this artfact corresponds to Standard 4C - Re-read the objectives for Standard 4A "In order to get full credit, this artifact MUST treat GENERAL ISSUES of assessment of ELLs, fairness and bias in testing, special education versus ENL support, etc., NOT assessment of a particular child or the use of a specific assessment tool."

      https://esc708sp18.commons.gc.cuny.edu/standard-4/

    1. Every week we meet to fill out the lesson grid for the following week and also take notes in our “Comments for next year” box as a way to reflect on how the lessons went

      "advocate for appropriate instruction and assessment by sharing their [meaning school staff and other teachers] knowledge of ELLs"

    2. I had many students come up to me telling me they called their aunt and had a great conversation or reached out to a cousin to ask about a family tradition.

      cite: you are able to understand and "view their ELL students’ families as vital resources that inform their classrooms and schools."

    3. This series has been a great space for me to ask questions and share best practices with teachers from all different burroughs.

      "They collaborate with school staff to provide educational opportunities for ELLs and advocate for appropriate instruction and assessment by sharing their knowledge of ELLs with their general-education and content-area colleagues and with the community."

    1. I have been lucky to learn so much from professional developments and partnerships with incredible people who truly listen when I advocate for the ELLs.

      yes - and also it has given you an opportunity to support ELLs and their families socially and politically.

    2. The Co-Teaching Cycle.”

      make sure to clarify how these documents relates to the family partnership, reaching beyond the school into the community- "They view their ELL students’ families as vital resources that inform their classrooms and schools. They are aware of community resources to assist ELLs and share this information."

    1. Therefore, every month I create a newsletter which informs parents of events in the classroom, and school community

      and you create this letter/artifact in Spanish in order to make sure that the information reaches the families / the community

    2. It is important that we build partnerships with colleagues to better educate our ELLs

      Make sure that you mention "COLLABORATION" "They collaborate with school staff to provide educational opportunities for ELLs and advocate for appropriate instruction and assessment by sharing their knowledge of ELLs with their general-education and content-area colleagues and with the community. "

    1. This led me to think about the challenges my students face in the classroom, especially an ESL classroom.

      Besides contributing to your professional understanding, how did completing this artifact / research paper impact students and student learning?

    1. This ensures that students must use academic language in their writing. The second requirement is that the evidence must be a literary element (characterization, conflict, imagery). This means that students are being held accountable for being able to identify these concepts in the text.

      You can also mention how you are "adapt classroom tests and tasks for ELLs at varying stages of English language and literacy development."

    2. it combines both content and language into one self assessment tool.

      yes, it does combine both, but make sure to inlcude that you are able to assess learners’ content-area achievement independently from their language ability

    1.  I also provide individual feedback for what they can do to increase their understanding of the content.

      Taking into consideration the creation of this artifact / rubric - How did these artifacts contribute to your professional understanding, skills, or dispositions? How did it impact or change your own thinking or understanding?

    2. By providing these two artifacts separately to the class, it allows the students to differentiate between the expectations for both content and language acquisition, as well as compartmentalize the two concepts so that they can both be built upon with clear expectations.

      Regarding your role as a teacher:

      • In what areas in your teacher development still need to grow relative to this standard?
    3. For standard 4C, I have attached 2 artifacts which demonstrate my ability to assess content separately from language acquisition in an effective manner.

      what about adapting classroom tests and tasks for ELLs at varying stages of English language and literacy development?

    1.  This artifact clearly shows that I am actively involved in growing professionally and building partnerships with colleagues.  I also advocate for the ELL students by sharing my own successes with the rest of my school.  I received a highly effective rating for the professional development area of the Danielson Rubric.

      Please, re-read the instructions for this standard - you need 3 artifacts.

      https://esc708sp18.commons.gc.cuny.edu/standard-5/

    1. Letting students generate their own ideas and use these vocabulary words in their own unique ways leads to them, instead of the teacher, doing most of the work.

      student-centered pedagogy

    2. In addition, the creation and usage of this artifact has demonstrated how important it is to give students a convenient opportunity to go back and review words they had previously learned.

      also - you are able "to adapt classroom tests and tasks for ELLs at varying stages of English language and literacy development"

    3. They demonstrate that I have met this standard because they serve as performance-based assessment tools that help students produce their own thoughts and ideas using the target-vocabulary words.

      make sure to address that you are able to create assignments / rubrics that measure language and content - " They can assess learners’ content-area achievement independently from their language ability"