9 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. Resocialization
      1. Resocialization or resocialisation (British English)
      2. is the process
      3. by which one's sense of
      4. social values,
      5. beliefs,
      6. and norms
      7. are re-engineered.

      The unwritten bias is that socialization is engineered in a way through values, beliefs, and norms. The question is how value ethics relate to that in terms of what's invaluable, in the sense that everybody shares about universals. When it comes to making it a process where it's one's sense of a bunch of different things, and it's a single sense of a bunch of different things, there's a one-to-many relationship.

    1. The phrase dropping an F-bomb usually refers to the unanticipated use of the word fuck in an unexpected setting, such as public media, a play on the nickname for the hydrogen bomb (the "H-bomb")[‡ 8] and the shock value that using the word fuck in discourse carries.

      The term was first reported in a newspaper (Newsday) in 1988 when Hall of Fame baseball catcher Gary Carter used it.<sup about="#mwt230" id="cite_ref-66" rel="dc:references" typeof="mw:Extension/ref" data-mw="{"name":"ref","attrs":{},"body":{"id":"mw-reference-text-cite_note-66"}}"><span id="mwAsc"><span id="mwAsg">[</span>58<span id="mwAsk">]</span></span></sup> In 2012, it was listed, for the first time, in the mainstream Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary.

    1. In linguistics, a clitic (/ˈklɪtɪk/ KLIT-ik, backformed from Ancient Greek ἐγκλιτικός (enklitikós) 'leaning, enclitic'[1]) is a morpheme that has syntactic characteristics of a word, but depends phonologically on another word or phrase.
      1. In linguistics,
      2. a clitic (/ˈklɪtɪk/ KLIT-ik, backformed from Ancient Greek ἐγκλιτικός (_enklitikós)_ 'leaning, enclitic' is a morpheme
      3. that has syntactic characteristics of a word,
      4. but depends phonologically on another word
      5. or phrase.
    2. Contents

      Prefixes here: 1. Pro- 2. En- 3. Endo- 4. Meso-

      The idea is more to understand the spatial or other metaphors before the applicability, given eg "Mesoclisis is rare outside of formal standard Portuguese" yet the meso layer is what mediates antrhopic/anthropomorphic mappings to micro/macro (maybe apsis/axis)

      Clitic

    1. In English, possessive words or phrases exist for nouns and most pronouns, as well as some noun phrases. These can play the roles of determiners (also called possessive adjectives when corresponding to a pronoun) or of nouns.
      1. In English,
      2. possessive words
      3. or phrases

      exist for: 1. nouns 2. and most pronouns, 3. as well as some noun phrases.

      These can play the roles of: 1. determiners 2. (also called possessive adjectives when corresponding to a pronoun) 3. or of nouns.

      Can't count how many "red flags there are here" or how this "decoupage" is creating new ones...

      Perhaps the biggest one here is that the entire TOPIC is a derivative of another one (possessive) which has it's own page, so, presumably, anything discussed here (whatever THAT means) in terms of possessives is done with assumption of prior knowledge of that whole "base" topic, or the assumption that someone (ie not an "agent") would check when "clarity demands"...