- Jun 2021
-
outlier-org.admin.datocms.com outlier-org.admin.datocms.com
-
Lesson
Table caption: "Table7.3 Growth of GDP over Different Time Horizons"
-
-
outlier-org.admin.datocms.com outlier-org.admin.datocms.com
-
We explore them in other chapters and in particular in Macroeconomic Policy Around the World.
Reference to OS 19 (not currently mapped in our AL)--remove?
-
The European Union has strong programs to invest in scientific research. Researchers Abraham García and Pierre Mohnen demonstrate that firms who received support from the Austrian government actually increased their research intensity and had more sales. Governments can support scientific research and technical training that helps to create and spread new technologies. Governments can also provide a legal environment that protects the ability of inventors to profit from their inventions.
From OS
-
Scientific Research
This would be an excellent place to mention the US funding of COVID vaccine research--maybe a link to learning after this card?
-
For example, saver's credits make certain retirement savings tax-exempt, meaning savers get to keep more of the interest they earn on savings investments.
This example is pulled from Giacomo's slides. Possible replacement: education fund accounts? (Same concept of tax-exemption, less common)
-
In the United States and many other countries, the government taxes gains from private investment. Low capital gains taxes encourage investment and so also economic growth.
This sentence is from OS
-
Government Action: Education
First paragraph is Giacomo adaptation, second paragraph is OS text
-
EducationSavings and investmentScientific researchHealthcareInternational tradeInfrastructureSpecial economic zones
This is a combo of Giacomo's list and OS's list. I've devoted one explanation card to each item on this list. Education, savings/investment, and scientific research are featured by both Giacomo & OS; we may want to cut some of the others
-
A Healthy Climate for Economic Growth
From OS 7.3
-
empirical evidence
It would be great if we could pull empirical evidence to support this
-
-
outlier-org.admin.datocms.com outlier-org.admin.datocms.com
-
Capital Deepening
Start of OS content (late 7.3), runs to the end of the section
-
image
Caption: "Figure 7.6 Physical Capital per Worker in the United States The value of the physical capital, measured by plant and equipment, used by the average worker in the U.S. economy has risen over the decades. The increase may have leveled off a bit in the 1970s and 1980s, which were, not coincidentally, times of slower-than-usual growth in worker productivity. We see a renewed increase in physical capital per worker in the late 1990s, followed by a flattening in the early 2000s. (Source: Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices, University of Pennsylvania)"
-
image
Caption: "Figure 7.5 Human Capital Deepening in the U.S. Rising levels of education for persons 25 and older show the deepening of human capital in the U.S. economy. Even today, under one-third of U.S. adults have completed a four-year college degree. There is clearly room for additional deepening of human capital to occur. (Source: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics)"
-
explosive growth
Key term?
-
.
In the lecture notes, Giacomo says "The logic behind decreasing returns is that, if K increases while holding L fixed machines per worker and worker productivity falls." I don't have great clarity on what "worker productivity falls" truly means and don't want to put something incorrect--fill in once lecture videos are out
-
hen a new technology is created to increase productivity, many firms can benefit from the new technology aside from the firm that created it.
This example is taken from lecture (the pollution example is from OS Micro)
-
Spillover
We should actually define spillover somewhere
-
nternal forces create the potential for a production function with increasing returns.
This is a shortened version of the full definition to avoid vocab words we haven't defined yet
-
Growth Comes From Within
Starting off with Giacomo's slide content
Tags
- Card 3
- Card 10
- Card 19
- UUID ckq9yo0ci00003f5vr13gnf86
- Card 4
- Card 17
- UUID ckq9wqd7a00003f5vtub0prm1
- Card 18
- UUID ckq9xaz2300003f5vm4sw5ydx
- Section 4.4
- UUID ckq9ylcvn00003f5ve9axufvc
- UUID ckq9yf4hv00003f5vrs5ogyof
- UUID ckq74212r00003f5vtujot351
- Card 5
- UUID ckq9yi46p00003f5vpim1favp
- UUID ckq747e7500003f5v1465o7aj
- Card 15
Annotators
URL
-
-
outlier-org.admin.datocms.com outlier-org.admin.datocms.com
-
website
This link to learning is a NYT article behind a paywall, we should look for a replacement that is truly free
-
Lesson Text
For this card & the others in this section--if we keep capital deepening defined in the later section, we should revise the wording to avoid referencing capital deepening or heavily edit this section
-
image
Figure 7.7 Capital Deepening and New Technology Imagine that the economy starts at point R, with the level of physical and human capital C1 and the output per capita at G1. If the economy relies only on capital deepening, while remaining at the technology level shown by the Technology 1 line, then it would face diminishing marginal returns as it moved from point R to point U to point W. However, now imagine that capital deepening is combined with improvements in technology. Then, as capital deepens from C1 to C2, technology improves from Technology 1 to Technology 2, and the economy moves from R to S. Similarly, as capital deepens from C2 to C3, technology increases from Technology 2 to Technology 3, and the economy moves from S to T. With improvements in technology, there is no longer any reason that economic growth must necessarily slow down.
-
Arguments Favoring Convergence
Back to OS 7.4
-