Compared with 6a, 6i and 6j achieved lowerMIC values, suggesting that the antibacterial activity of thecompounds in which the urea group and benzene ring arelinked by carbon atoms may be higher than that of thecompounds in which they are directly linked.
This result suggests that increasing the distance between the urea group and the benzene ring improves antibacterial activity. However, the article does not fully explain why this structural change enhances activity. Could this be due to improved flexibility of the molecule, better binding interactions with the ribosome, or changes in hydrophobic interactions?