2,734 Matching Annotations
  1. Sep 2022
  2. event.preventdefault.net event.preventdefault.net
    1. ‘Nowadays, we tend to notice the similarities between websites. Design looks like it is driven by technological constraints rather than by contents and aesthetics’, criticizes web designer Yehwan Song in her Anti user friendly design manifest (Song, 2019).

      Damn it I can't find this

    2. Using templates (e. g. Wordpress, Squarespace, Wix), which get installed in an unreflected manner and show the content but do not convey it. In these templates websites are downgraded to a generic, predictable and impersonal shell with a user experience that focuses only on an efficient way to perceive information rather than communicating an individual experience.

      Should the unprofessional user feel bad about this, though?

    1. To put it another way, gamification, echo chambers, and moral outrage porn go together like junk food. Different kinds of junk food are unhealthy in different ways—some are too high in salt, some too high in fat, some too high in sugar. But the reason they are often consumed together is that they are all likely to be consumed by somebody who is willing to trade off health and nutrition in return for a certain kind of quick pleasure. The same is true of gamification, moral outrage porn, and echo chambers. They are all readily available sources of a certain quick and easy pleasure, available to anybody willing to relax with their moral and epistemic standards.

      This is bad analysis re:junk food and it is bad analysis re:instrumentalization. Oh, yes, it's all just down to individuals' backbones!

    2. Instead of the humbling confrontation with the evidence of one’s errors, echo chambers offer their members the joys of unanimity and uninterrupted confidence.

      There are definitely echo chambers on the left and I haven't seen a fragment of unanimity from any of them

    3. Life outside of an echo chamber is full of all kinds of cognitive difficulties. We must constantly struggle with conflicting evidence and unexplained phenomena. And we are confronted, over and over again, with evidence of our own cognitive fallibility. These confrontations humble us—which is good for us, but also quite painful. Echo chambers banish all that epistemic friction.31 They remove, through distrust, the impact of disagreeing voices.

      I am skeptical of this account. People often find new ways to slice up similar beliefs in order to generate the same conflict. Everyone who buys this idea of How Things Work believes themself to be doing a virtuous struggle-with-conflicting-evidence.

    4. An epistemic bubble is a social structure where insiders aren’t exposed to views on the outside. Despite the superficial similarity, epistemic bubbles and echo chambers work through entirely different mechanisms. In an echo chamber, inside members may have plenty of exposure to outside views, but outside voices have been undermined. Epistemic bubbles are structures of bad connectivity; echo chambers are structures of manipulated credence. In an epistemic bubble, outside voices aren’t heard; in an echo chamber, outside voices have been systematically discredited. Importantly, I’ve argued, many communities with problematic belief systems have been misdiagnosed as epistemic bubbles. But actually, they are mostly the result of echo chambers. It isn’t that climate change deniers, for example, are simply unaware of what climate change scientist think, or the standard publicly available arguments for climate change. They are, for the most part, quite well acquainted with those arguments and conclusions. It is that they think that the institutions of climate change science have been systematically corrupted and are untrustworthy. This helps to explain the intractability of climate change denialists. Since an epistemic bubble works through simply omitting outside voices, we should be able to shatter one simply by exposing an insider to more voices and more viewpoints. We should expect epistemic bubbles to go down with the first contact with the missing evidence. But echo chamber members are pre-prepared for encounters with external viewpoints and armed with explanatory mechanisms to dismiss those other voices. Echo chambers are far more robust.

      Epistemic bubble vs. echo chamber

    5. Value capture occurs when: (1) our natural values are rich, subtle, and hard-to-express;(2) we are placed in a social or institutional setting which presents simplified, typically quantified, versions of our values back to ourselves;(3) the simplified versions take over in our motivation and deliberation.

      Might extend beyond simplification and quantification

    6. Heuristics, after all, are simplifications of the real thing. They are good heuristics insofar as they remain properly tethered to our deeper values. The successful use of a heuristic involves a complex process of management. We need to step back and reflect on whether using the heuristic is actually helping to achieve the underlying values. Increasing your running mileage might sometimes be a good proxy for fitness, but not when it brings irreversible knee damage. We need to adjust our heuristics when they drift.

      A nice note on heuristics

    7. Let us call the designed technology which offers points and scores “design for gamification.”

      Kind of too narrow IMO. Structuring the little blips of dopamine in neatly timed releases doesn't require them to be coming as numbers ticking up.

    8. Games, I have argued, are the art form that works in the medium of agency. The game designer doesn’t just create characters, stories, and environments. The game designer sculpts the temporary agency that the player will occupy during the game.
    9. Let me emphasize the fact that Twitter offers us an invitation to change our values. Twitter will not change our values for us. It is a system designed to offer us pleasure in return for simplifying our values—but we still have to take up that offer.

      Freely though perhaps not knowingly chosen.

    10. Insofar as Twitter’s gamification motivates its users, then it will drag all of its users’ communicative values in the same direction—towards the same metric. Gamification homogenizes the value landscape.

      Gravitational force creating up and down.

    1. The first half of the 19th century saw a dramatic increase in the number of women able to write. By 1860, more than 90 percent of the white population in America could both read and write. At the same time, romantic and Victorian notions of subjectivity steadily enhanced the perceived connection between handwriting and identity. Penmanship came to be seen as a marker and expression of the self—of gender and class, to be sure, but also of deeper elements of character and soul. The notion of a signature as a unique representation of a particular individual gradually came to be enshrined in the law and accepted as legitimate legal evidence.

      So sad that there's absolutely no way to know anything about the cultures of literacy anywhere but America and Europe, so tragic that "the law" can only be known in its common law manifestations..

      ...come on.

      If this were really about history, any particular scope of investigation would be fine, but when we're going to talk about The Nature Of Handwriting, I wish we'd get a bit wider of a view, no? Compare the legibility of ancient Chinese. Compare the shifting relevance of handwriting for scripts poorly accommodated by tools for digital text. Compare systems of instruction around the world.

    2. The inability to read handwriting deprives society of direct access to its own past. We will become reliant on a small group of trained translators and experts to report what history—including the documents and papers of our own families—was about.

      As though we are not already so reliant!

    3. For many young people, “handwriting,” once essentially synonymous with cursive, has come to mean the painstaking printing they turn to when necessity dictates.

      We begin to get to the core misunderstanding: why does the author imagine print handwriting to be significantly "painstaking"?

    4. Writing is, after all, a technology, and most technologies are sooner or later surpassed and replaced.

      This is not how academicky types talk about technology. Consider the technology of the shovel. Do you imagine that it is being "surpassed" and "replaced" by the Caterpillar excavator? Rather, a subset of the contexts in which the shovel used to be used – with massive amounts of labor – lend themselves to the excavator. Has the excavator "surpassed" it in rosemary-bush-planting? Thinking about contexts of use is important.

    5. In 2010, cursive was omitted from the new national Common Core standards for K–12 education. The students in my class, and their peers, were then somewhere in elementary school. Handwriting instruction had already been declining as laptops and tablets and lessons in “keyboarding” assumed an ever more prominent place in the classroom. Most of my students remembered getting no more than a year or so of somewhat desultory cursive training, which was often pushed aside by a growing emphasis on “teaching to the test.”

      This is a fantastic example of sneaky rhetoric. Typing is made to sound alien by calling it "keyboarding" (literally who is teaching that). We are told that this can be blamed on "teaching to the test", to which the reader can be presumed to object, though there is no evidence given. By the end of the paragraph, the reader is vaguely concerned.

    1. Read the articles on Wikipedia to learn about computer terminals, terminal emulators and shell.

      Don't! Don't do this! If you've not yet learned ls, do not go down these rabbit holes!

    2. The above is the screenshot of the Gnome terminal application. As you can see the command prompt contains the following information:

      Have we already defined "the command prompt"?

    3. In Linux the shell (or terminal) is the lifeline of the developer, and of any power user. Things which can be done on the GUI (by clicking on different buttons), can be done much more efficiently on the terminal by using commands. Maybe one can not remember all the commands, but with regular usage one can easily remember the most useful ones. The following guide will introduce you to a minimal set of basic commands required to use your Linux computer efficiently.

      I wish this didn't try to convince people to humble themselves before the Superior Method. Most people who need to learn the terminal start because they have something they need to do that they can't do outside the terminal. They feel either irritated – that it should have been forced on them – or intimidated – because it's so foreign. Beginning such a guide with "The way you are already using a computer is inefficient" rather than, e.g. "The things you can already do in other interfaces are useful to learn in the terminal because there you will be able to combine them with things that other interfaces can't do," focusing on the context of what they're trying to unlock – seems unnecessary.

      Most people who learn the terminal to the level covered here end up believing that it is more efficient for a ton of stuff. It's fine to let people see that for themselves.

    1. Like their cyberpunk forebears, postcyberpunk works immerse the reader in richly detailed and skillfully nuanced futures, but ones whose characters and settings frequently hail from, for lack of a better term, the middle class. (And we do need a better term; here in the United States, economic mobility has rendered the concept of "class" nearly obsolete.)

      lm effin ao

    2. Cyberpunk realized that the old SF stricture of "alter only one thing and see what happens" was hopelessly outdated, a doctrine rendered irrelevant by the furious pace of late 20th century technological change. The future isn't "just one damn thing after another," it's every damn thing all at the same time. Cyberpunk not only realized this truth, but embraced it.

      I wonder if general SF historians would agree with this

    1. Very good or bad mushrooms tend to attract lots of nicknames. This is one of the good ones. It is most commonly known as porcini, an Italian word meaning “pig.” The young fruit bodies resemble pigs, and hogs are in fact fond of them. The English name, penny bun, refers to its rounded shape and brownish color. The German name, Steinpilz (stone mushroom) refers to the species’ firm flesh. The Dutch name is squirrel’s bread. Nobody knows what the Dutch are thinking.

      A mystery.

    1. He is the James Patterson or Barbara Cartland of public policy.

      Do you smell the class anxiety

    2. the overclass midwits who read The New York Times and The Economist, listen to NPR, and watch TED Talks and PBS

      Oi! I don't want to hear this sneering at public broadcasting from the Bari Weiss outlet

    1. Microformats2 so that computers know how to interpret our blogposts,

      Sometimes I wonder if it has to be this complicated. mf2 is neat because it allows the emulation of the featureset of 2007-ish era corporate social media, but I worry that it scares off some of the "my ideal social media would be managed in bash scripts" folks who do cool altweb stuff – or the handwritten HTML people who mostly seem to be detoxing from anything frameworky, I presume because of their day jobs.

      I wonder if RSS feeds are structured enough to do most of the work. I know it feels like backwards progress to the Real Indieweb folks given the origins of microformats and a preference to not duplicate content, but...

    2. WordPress wants to be the Operating System for the Web.

      What is the POSIX of the web

    1. More dramatically, the Salk researchers realized that they could also engineer crops so that their roots would produce suberin, a waxy compound found in cork. Much like the cork in a wine bottle, fragments of the suberin-infused roots would then take an extremely long time to decompose. Up above, harvesting would go on as usual; down below, the roots of the crops would accumulate in the soil, building up its stored carbon.

      But how would this impact fungi etc.?

    1. Do you want a world in which everyone is guaranteed six weeks of paid vacation, enough time to travel overseas in elegant solar- and wind-powered clipper ships?

      oh come on

    2. We would need a second Earth if everyone on the planet ate the way Americans do.

      See, this is it: even the poor in North America eat a lot of meat. So this isn't some "other" we can say needs to change their behavior – so you're no longer talking about "carbon footprint mindset applies to the people you think of as cartoonishly wealthy", you're saying "carbon footprint mindset is necessary and important broadly, with special dispensations for the things I intuitively consider fine (car commutes) and not for the things I don't (meat)."

    3. As Bloomberg News recently reported, the personal emissions of the top 0.001% — those with at least $129.2 million in wealth — are so large that these people’s individual consumption decisions “can have the same impact as nationwide policy interventions.”

      CURSE YOU, PAYWALL. the most interesting link of the piece

    4. Oxfam has defined the world’s 1% as the 60 million people earning over $109,000 a year. They defined the 10% as the 770 million people earning over $38,000. Yet even those who are affluent in a global sense might not have the extra cash to replace their gas furnace with a heat pump, put solar panels on their roof or replace their car with an EV. Nor might they have the choice to buy clean power from their utilities. The U.S. government has yet to pass policy that makes private zero-carbon options available or that provides public options like community solar or suburban public transportation. And that is exactly why you should not tell people who live paycheck to paycheck, or who are not already deeply engaged in the climate fight, that they should worry about their individual carbon footprints.

      Right, but... here's the thing: anything that makes your lifestyle more comfortable than the $37k/yr person is "discretionary"-ish. Where you are probably spending a lot (in global terms) of money on things that are a lot (in climate terms) worse for the environment than strict survival itself dictates. Am I willing to shame!-shame! the billionaire jet-setting class? Sure. Do I think that the $38k/yr person should feel bad about much, even if they're catastrophically wasteful in global terms? I can see the argument for it – I'd feel Some Type Of Way about it if I were a Pakistani flood victim – but my gut, at least, says no. But where you decide your inflection point for those feelings ought to be isn't something you can just wave at The Science to decide, or say "there are people replacing their clothes every three months, and we can all agree that's bad, and let's not think too hard about the impact statistics that I'm citing that actually cover much much more normal ways of life in post-industrial societies."

    5. new wardrobes every three months (fashion brands usually produce four “collections” a year)

      this line makes me question the accuracy of the rest of this piece

    1. he site today continues to be a place of pilgrimage throughout the months of June and July, but the three days and two nights of fasting and prayer are no longer framed as literal immersions in Purgatory, but rather as a time of ‘prayer and reflection’.

      I wonder if I could take mom

    2. hese Neapolitan dioramas of Purgatory are partly geared towards prompting each passerby to pray for the souls represented but, in some parts of the city, this logic is reversed: the dead themselves are petitioned for intercession on behalf of the living in return for certain kinds of ‘refreshment’. This refreshment would consist in prayers, songs, flowers, chocolates, cigarettes, etc, and the requests would either involve healing, getting a job, finding a spouse, or getting pregnant. Devotees would adopt a particular soul through the simultaneous adoption of its material counterpart, a skull, which would be polished, cleaned and placed inside a small wooden box. And here again we see the emphasis on giving the immaterial and spiritual a material and physical location, on connecting them to the stuff of this world.

      Well. There are many things one could say, but also, the frame

    3. It is here in Naples that the practice of prayer for the souls in Purgatory reaches its greatest contemporary expression. Throughout the ancient centre of the city, small shrines consisting of three-dimensional dioramas of Purgatory can be found embedded in the walls of its narrow, twisting streets. Red and orange flames engulf an ensemble of tiny terracotta figurines – portraying a young woman with flowing hair, an old man, a priest – all raising their arms towards Heaven and the assistance of the Virgin Mary, the queen of Purgatory. People from the surrounding neighbourhoods stuff passport photos of deceased loved ones into the glass cases of these dioramas to gain them, too, some relief from the flames through proximity to Mary’s divine intercession, an intercession accompanied by the prayers of all those walking past.

      And the physicality of the representations here shouldn't be missed

    4. Yet it is upon these prayers for the dead that the entire logic of Purgatory as a lived, social phenomenon hinges – the belief that death does not sever us irreparably from those we love. For Catholics, prayers for the dead allow one to both ease their suffering in Purgatory and to accelerate their passage through it. Thus love for the deceased is not founded solely upon memory, but rather upon a continuing social life of mutual care and assistance.

      We pray that the souls in heaven might intercede for us; we pray as a kind of intercession for the souls in purgatory

    1. As if speaking directly to future historians still wedded to the colonial alcohol discourse, in 1908 , Booker T. Washington wrote: “I have read much in the Northern papers about the prohibition movement in the South being based wholly upon a determination or desire to keep liquor away from the negroes and at the same time provide a way for the white people to get it. … I have watched the prohibition movement carefully from its inception to the present time, and I have seen nothing in the agitation in favor of the movement, nothing in the law itself, and nothing in the execution of the law that warrants any such conclusion. The prohibition movement is based upon a deep-seated desire to get rid of whiskey in the interest of both races because of its hurtful economic and moral results. The prohibition sentiment is as strong in counties where there are practically no colored people as in the Black Belt counties.”

      Booker T Washington would like to speak to you, Mr. Burns

    2. A better explanation for the “dry wave” that swept the South from 1907 to 1910 would be to point out that Southern “wet” forces were far weaker, more dispersed geographically, and far less organized than the well-entrenched brewing and distilling trusts of the North, and were therefore less able to defend against united community activism. Also, in the Democrats’ one-party South, liquor interests had less opportunity to flex their political muscle by throwing their financial weight behind rival political parties or candidates more willing to defend their interests.
    3. In the 1880s, even as violence and lynchings ended Reconstruction and the Jim Crow era began, prohibitionist rallies made the point of announcing that all were welcome to attend, regardless of color. Black and white temperance speakers shared the same stage and applauded each other’s accomplishments despite organizational segregation, as Black voters were courted by white politicians.
    4. From the podium of a national women’s rights convention in 1866—alongside icons Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton—Harper called-out her white sisters who talked a big game about their own oppression and disenfranchisement but were complicit in the racial oppression of their African American counterparts. “Talk of giving women the ballot-box? Go on,” she proclaimed. “I tell you that if there is any class of people who need to be lifted out of their airy nothings and selfishness, it is the white women of America.” After Harper’s withering j’accuse, Susan B. Anthony moved to rename their National Woman Suffrage Association the American Equal Rights Association, which would demand universal suffrage regardless of race.

      ha!

    5. Add to this the political dynamics: the brewers, distillers and saloonkeepers who were making money hand over fist tended to be well-to-do whites. And while their clientele included mostly men of every color and creed, those communities that paid a disproportionate price for their men’s addiction—primarily women, African Americans, and Native Americans—had no vote, no legal standing, no political or economic power, and thus no recourse in opposing their systemic alcohol-subordination.

      Yoo.

  3. justanotherfoundry.com justanotherfoundry.com
    1. The idea for JAF Herb was to develop a typeface with the prop­er­ties of black­let­ter, without evoking any negat­ive connota­tions. The design retains the complex, humane char­ac­ter of fraktur without appear­ing conser­vat­ive, aggress­ive or intol­er­ant.

      You can't! You can't scrub the nature of a thing off and still have the thing!

      I don't know, I have some sympathy for it in a European context, but...

    1. He offered Dillenius a job at his garden in Eltham, Kent; and, in 1721, Dillenius migrated to Britain to work on Sherard’s plant collection, the mosses of Britain, and a pinax (illustrated book) of Britain’s plants.

      "pinax" – to look up

    2. In Phenomenology of Perception (1945), Merleau-Ponty writes: In visual experience, which pushes objectification further than does tactile experience, we can, at least at first sight, flatter ourselves that we constitute the world, because it presents us with a spectacle spread out before us at a distance, and gives us the illusion of being immediately present everywhere and being situated nowhere. Tactile experience, on the other hand, adheres to the surface of our body; we cannot unfold it before us, and it never quite becomes an object. Correspondingly, as the subject of touch, I cannot flatter myself that I am everywhere and nowhere; I cannot forget in this case that it is through my body that I go to the world, and tactile experience occurs ‘ahead’ of me, and is not centred in me.
    1. Liberating one group often means prohibiting another group from doing its opposite. In ‘expanding human freedom’ for Black people, the 13th Amendment quite explicitly took away white Americans’ perverse freedom to own slaves. The fundamental question about ‘freedom’ is always: who has the freedom to do what and to whom?
    2. ‘All great reforms go together,’ Douglass was fond of saying: abolitionism, women’s suffrage and temperance – as Prohibition rightly points out later on.

      Dang, that's a grouping.

    3. Did General George Washington ensure that his men had liquor at Valley Forge? Sure. But he also understood that the Quaker colony of Pennsylvania had – at the request of local Native American tribes – a strict prohibition against trafficking the ‘white man’s wicked water’ dating back to William Penn’s Great Law of 1682. That the early colonial Pennsylvania was arguably spared the bloody Indian Wars that plagued the other colonies is credited to the justice and fair play between colonisers and natives embodied in the Quaker prohibition.

      I should learn more about that – I'd known that PA had a different approach to relations with the local tribes, but I'd not known this part?

    4. Generations of social reformers and activists – both in the United States and around the world – focused not on the alcohol in the bottle, nor on ‘other people’s habits’, but on what they called ‘the liquor traffic’: unscrupulous sellers who got people hopelessly addicted to liquor for their own profit. The difference between opposing liquor and the liquor traffic is subtle, but hugely important. Liquor is just the stuff in the bottle, but trafficking is about profit and predation; like human trafficking, diamond trafficking or the traffic in narcotics and opioids.

      I wish we were clearer about it today!

    1. Creation occurs across both public and private channels. When you share something funny with your group chat, you are a creator. A text message is a post.

      This is just... stupid. Talking about The Creator is interesting because it isn't just everyone's way of engaging with the internet.

    2. Creators only produce small-scale pieces of content: everything they do is a minor, if not wholly ephemeral, work.

      "I have not wasted weeks of life watching longform YouTube essay content and I am unaware that it exists."

    3. The post should not require interpretation or specialized background knowledge. It should be self-explanatory for its target filter bubble.

      I sort of wonder if this isn't a bit contradictory. Its "target filter bubble" finds it "self-explanatory" because they have "specialized background knowledge", no?

    1. Devotees of the Traditional Latin Mass might enjoy a tidbit from a 2003 article by Tolkien’s grandson Simon. It seems that Tolkien, like Evelyn Waugh and Graham Greene, wasn’t a big fan of the liturgical reforms that followed the Second Vatican Council:He was a devout Roman Catholic and it was soon after the Church had changed the liturgy from Latin to English. My Grandfather obviously didn’t agree with this and made all the responses very loudly in Latin while the rest of the congregation answered in English. I found the whole experience quite excruciating, but My Grandfather was oblivious.
    1. Allowing the earliest stages of natal puberty to take place for gender-dysphoric children, prior to the decision of whether to administer puberty blockers, is considered diagnostically meaningful because some will experience their dysphoria remit during this time and some will not. However, what Laidlaw et al. are implying here is that waiting until adulthood is clinically meaningful for gender-dysphoric children, when there is no indication that this is the case – there is no discontinuity between gender dysphoria in adolescence and in adulthood.

      For some dysphoric GNC kids, that dissipates with the early stages of puberty. For some, it persists – and if it does, that's typically the kind of dysphoria they're gonna have forever, so puberty blockers are then real important.

    1. I love the idea of socially annotating the web anyhow, but I also have this fear that the service dies and all the precious annotations would be gone.

      I wonder what the simplest way to save this would be. For me, I'm happy to have the annotated text saved with a little around it. The Atom feed of a user has that – I'll bet there's a neat way to save feed entries to local files without needing to manually cron it into being so.

    1. For those of us who feel different, who don’t easily fit into structures of this society or this world, we have to make our own structures, definitions, and taxonomies to feel at home — that is, to build our own world. And while others might be confused why we spend so much energy inventing new names and containers seemingly constantly, it’s important to remember doing this helps us simply exist … so that we can connect in this one world we share.

      Imagine the world you'd feel at home in and describe it.

    1. Apple meanwhile, they dress it up very well. And it’s very pretty, but if you want to operate in the Apple ecosystem, they control how you breathe and everything has to be exactly like how they want you to do it. And they have this big fight for our privacy going on, which I appreciate of course. I love it. But the end result somehow is that they tripled their advertising revenue over the past quarter or something like that. Somehow everyone now has to use their advertising program. So this is again, someone trying to control the internet.
    2. And this leads to the harsh choice that if you have a device on your network, a modern phone or a modern browser, or a modern Chromebook even, you have to give it unimpeded and uninspectable access to the internet, because the moment you try to figure out “what is my phone telling about me” to it’s creator, then the phone ceases to function. It will not allow you to do that.
    3. The other notable thing about the UK is that they are mad for football over there, everyone is mad for English football. So there is a lot of “unpaid” streaming going on. And also many lawsuits, which means that UK ISPs now routinely get court orders that say, you must block the following illegal streaming sites. And it has now gone so far that internet providers actually preemptively hunt for these streamers. So before big matches, they look what sites suddenly get a lot more traffic. It’s probably no accident if just before the Arsenal match starts you suddenly you have 500 megabits of internet going somewhere. And then they block these sites. So it is quite preemptive.

      Evil

    4. A fun thing is that found out, I know a lot of people in Iran, I have some sorta family members there, and they told me, yeah, we all use a VPN. And I was very impressed. I thought these people are so privacy conscious. And they said, no, no, it’s the only way to get somewhat performant internet here. Because if you don’t use a VPN, you go through the interception infrastructure and it is like super overloaded. So we use a VPN to get fast internet and crucially, and I was very impressed by that, they said we also have no hopes that the VPN actually gives us privacy, because they were aware to many of the VPN providers out there are not actually that good in terms of providing privacy. But at least they are good at providing a faster internet in Iran.

      I wonder if you can use that as a defense

    5. They have a sort of highly curated Facebook and they even have video conferencing solutions that they built themselves, which were used more during the Corona outbreak even. And they have made their own specifically modified Android tablets and they have a Linux operating system. So these people really run their own internet and it’s probably not even correct to call it an internet. Of specific interest, their modified Android tablets are rumored to be a fully controlled and setup to keep track of everything you do. And that’s just terrible. And then I realized that’s actually what actual Android tablets also do, but they do it on behalf of advertisers. And in this case, they do it on behalf of the north Korean government. The probably only had to change a few domain names in the source code.

      bleak

    1. we need to remember that the so-called "subtractive principle" - writing 'IX' instead of 'VIIII', for instance - is actually a medieval invention

      VINDICATION

    1. The move away from that curriculum is overdue. But I’ve come to think that we home in on the shortcomings of Calkins’s methods because dumping them is relatively straightforward. You can’t just fix absurd teacher-student ratios by force of will—you need money and buildings and teachers.
    2. The education crusader Horace Mann, who sparred with the phonics-fixated schoolmasters of Boston, went so far as to claim that children were frightened by the alphabet, which he described as a horde of “skeleton-shaped, bloodless, ghostly apparitions.”

      Another bizarre Horace Mann fact!

    1. How much scent is too much is both personally and culturally dependent. Take oud, a super expensive incense that Middle Eastern people scent their clothes with. If you’ve ever strolled through an international airport, you know the scent bower can be large. Part of what one is choosing with perfume is to create a nimbus. The question is, how social or private should that nimbus be? 

      Complicated feelings about the appropriate volume for one's speaking voice: similar?

    2. Yeah. I wanted to inhabit my body more and stop doing this head-in-a-jar screen thing. It’s funny, when you write about the smell of freshly sharpened pencils, you can’t just go to Wikipedia and start your research there. You have to get actual pencils—a lot of them, it turns out—and sharpen them first. With smell, you bump into thingliness at every turn. 

      Smell doesn't let us retreat into concepts and abstracts.

    1. One owner of eight rental properties in North Carolina posted a blog about her hatred of both landlord and tenant because, in her words, “I don’t believe that there is a hierarchy in the relationship between me, the homeowner, and our clients who choose to rent our homes,” she wrote. Except that the hierarchy is very real, and very clear. As Oksana Mironova, housing policy analyst at Community Service Society of New York, puts it, “A conversation about power is instead becoming a conversation about who is being mean to someone else.”

      The affliction of our age

    1. “When we work with undergraduates on digital humanities projects,” Quinn said, “it's often easier to take a humanities undergrad and teach them just enough coding to do what they need to do rather than taking some of the CS majors who can do the coding in their sleep but don't really think about the questions in the nuanced ways that we need them to.”

      this is so friggin' true I could cry

    2. Humanities specialists argue that these majors open up higher-earning opportunities later in life because they don’t lock students into a narrow programming language, certification or career path. The critical thinking taught in humanities courses allows students to adapt to jobs that may not have existed when they enrolled in college.

      Does that critical thinking not involve knowing what a CS degree actually entails before commenting on it

    3. According to Schmidt, the Great Recession sparked the beginning of a downward spiral in humanities such as history, art, philosophy, English and foreign languages.“In the period of the Great Recession, you had Barack Obama out there saying we need more STEM majors and fewer English majors,” Schmidt said. “That was a story you were hearing from a lot of people in influential positions … and I think that made a difference.”

      This is sort of insulting. Oh, English majors regret their choice because former president Barack Obama said something? Not, you know, how that's impacted their daily lives?

    1. Several Snohomish residents at Tuesday’s meeting wanted the City Council to pump the brakes. They asked why Snohomish needed to provide affordable housing. They said they worried that low-income housing “brings crime,” and they shared fears of inheriting Everett’s “cesspool.”

      It's someone else's responsibility! Keep the poors away!

    1. Unfortunately, once he’s shone a light on the injustice of the world, told you that you’re right for feeling like the world is fucked up, he essentially hangs up the phone. He says, in this book, his fundamental belief is that “we must adapt ourselves to the requirements of chaos”, and he advocates for this by breaking the novel form, and assigning all information equal value, which is why he does things like name the race of every character, and the size of their breasts or genitals.

      Heh. I have not yet read much Vonnegut but boy do I feel like I know this guy

    1. (She contrasted the fellowship she felt among lionfish hunters with the behavior of other conservationist types: “Turtle people treat each other like shit and backstab each other.”)
    1. The 1990s also saw the introduction of “stepbacks,” a two-layered cover with the top page “stepped back” a quarter inch from the side to conceal a (typically much sexier) illustration beneath. By hiding suggestive clinches and implausibly fit cover models behind a more innocuous screen, stepbacks provided readers with a cover—literally—if they didn’t want to be seen reading a titillating story in public. The cover of the 2002 mass-market edition of Book 4, Romancing Mr. Bridgerton, shows a landscape background with a lipstick-kissed handkerchief being dropped from the oversize title—but pulling back that page reveals a painted clinch of the protagonists, whose clothes seem about to succumb to the forces of passion and/or gravity.

      Huh! I only remember these as covering blurby nonsense

    1. Plant 10 percent of thefield with pollinizer cultivars toachieve the best pollination andhighest yield (Figure 5). Red Pearland Sussi are two commonly usedpollinizer cultivars.
    2. Kinnikinnick (Arctostaphylosuva-ursi) and lingonberries areeasily confused due to theirsimilar leaf structure and berrysize (Figure 4). Both plants arenative in the Pacific Northwest.Kinnikinnick has red berries, 5 to8 mm, while lingonberry fruitsare bright red and 7 to 11 mm.
    1. The inability of people at a lower level in the social scale to make any meaningful provision for themselves from savings, as well as the fact that so much is taken out of their hands by the state, means that their income is, in effect, pocket money of the kind that a child receives from its parents. They spend up to the hilt and even beyond, and remain economic minors. Gone in my lifetime is the idea that debt is to be avoided, that it is discreditable to live entirely on credit, and shameful not to repay. If you have no assets worth speaking of, the bailiffs have nothing to seize, and creditors can whistle for their money. 

      :) fuck this guy :) :)

    2. First, it puts the meaningful accumulation of assets for those who do not already possess them out of reach. (I speak, of course, in generalities; there are always exceptions). This in turn has the effect of transforming a society divided by permeable classes into a fixed caste society. There have always been advantages to being born in a well-off household, but asset inflation encourages them to become hard-wired, so to speak, into the social fabric.

      I wonder if I believe this. Doesn't it at least seem like the division between creditor and debtor rebalancing would have the opposite effect?

    3. With the concept of enough go those of modesty and humility. They are replaced by triumph and failure, the latter certain almost by definition to be the more frequent. The humble person becomes someone not laudable but careless of his future, possibly someone who will be a drain on others insofar as he has failed to make adequate provision for himself – even if, given his circumstances, it would have been impossible for him to have done so. For notwithstanding technical progress, automation, and robotics, we shall need people of humble and comparatively ill-paid employment for the foreseeable future.

      How on earth does this have to do with inflation and not how generally boned the have-nots are?

    4. for not to speculate, but rather to place one’s trust in the value of money at a given modest return, is to risk impoverishment.

      Perhaps I come too much from debtor stock to understand, but there's never seemed to me to be such a clear divide between speculation and any other investment.

    5. the only way to insure against poverty in old age is either to be in possession of a government-guaranteed index-linked pension (which, however, is a social injustice in itself

      😒

    6. For one thing, inflation destroys the very idea of enough, because no one can have any confidence that a monetary income that at present is adequate will not be whittled down to very little in a matter of a few years. Not everyone desires to be rich, but most people desire not to be poor, especially in old age.

      This isn't a property of inflation, but of uncertainty around inflation

    1. The alloy was such that a type would cool and turn solid almost instantly, allowing for quick production of identical types.

      Material benefit not to use but to efficiency of production

    1. A matrix isn't a full mould. It only gives the shape of the letter. If you look at actual types shown below, you can see they are like long square rods. Gutenberg would combine the matrix with a hand mould to create the whole mould for a type. Next he would pour a liquid metal alloy consisting of lead, tin, and antimony into the mould. The alloy cools quickly, and out comes a lead type similar to the ones seen below: Square metal rods with typefaces on them.

      how type was made

    1. New Orleans, obviously, was a major city in the Confederacy, and when Louisiana seceded, New Orleans did too. But it was retaken fairly early on in the war. When the Union army occupied New Orleans, the expectation among town people was, “Just wait until August.” Because then, all these unacclimated Union soldiers are gonna die, and they’ll see that yellow fever is on the side of the South. When all these boys die it will vindicate us and our system.Benjamin Butler, who was the occupying general, was really worried about disease, and like everyone in America he had heard the tales of New Orleans. He was acutely aware that most of the men in his army had never been this far south before, that they were decidedly unacclimated and vulnerable to this disease. So he installed a strict quarantine. He didn’t let ships come in or out without a thorough inspection. He doubled the salary of the quarantine officer, he cleaned the streets, he fired people who seemed to be the lackeys of the bureaucrats in New Orleans. He did a whole program of sanitation.And it worked. There were only a few cases of yellow fever reported during the war years, even though hundreds of thousands of people came in and out of the city each year. It’s actually a miraculous demonstration of just how effective martial law can be in stopping diseases, I guess, and how effective quarantine could be when properly instituted and rigorously upheld.But right after the war, when the Union army receded, the same people who had been in control of New Orleans before the war took up their former positions and went back to their old ways. The said, whatever happened during the war, let’s forget about that. Benjamin Butler was very much hated as a tyrant in New Orleans by whites, who associated the quarantine with him but not improved health. And right away health problems came back. There was a serious epidemic again in 1867, and periodic epidemics throughout the ‘60s and ‘70s, culminating in the epidemic of 1878, just after the end of Reconstruction. That was the worst in a generation; 5,000 or 10,000 people died in New Orleans alone, 25,000 people died across the Gulf South. It went all the way up to Memphis, which had never had yellow fever before.But once again, in the midst of this devastating epidemic, you had this prevailing attitude among the commercial-civic elite, who say “Quarantines just don’t work here.” They said this even though they had proof that it did work during the war. It was only when immigration dries up so precipitously after the war, and when cotton goes elsewhere, that New Orleans could sort of shake itself free from this attitude.
    2. they counter the pushback by essentially denying disease, both as an epidemiological reality and as a social reality too. Increasingly by the 1850s, you see people saying, well, yellow fever is not that big of a problem. It’s not that serious of an illness, and anybody who’s temperate and well-mannered and courageous and manly will survive. It only kills the immoral, the drunk, the unfortunate. Your cousin in Philadelphia or your niece in Sligo who thinks of New Orleans as a “necropolis,” they don’t know what they’re talking about, these northern critiques of New Orleans’s health situation are a proxy for abolitionists attacking slavery.

      Drive a bigger truck and yellow fever will not be an issue

    3. I don’t want to conflate immunity with class position because they are distinct in the Bourdieuian sense. But immunocapitalism produces this sort of immune overclass that develops a set of policy positions which include an antipathy toward public health measures. Does a lackadaisical attitude toward yellow fever become a conservative litmus test for pro-slavery politics?In this period, New Orleans spends far, far less on public health than does any other comparable American city. I’m talking about 2 cents on public health per person per year, compared with 69 cents in Boston. It’s the deadliest city in America by far, it has triple the average national mortality rate. And everyone derides it as a Necropolis or The Seat of Pestilence or The Great Charnel House or The City of Death—MH: Jesus.
    4. Immunocapitalism is a system of class rule in which elites in New Orleans used yellow fever and the destruction that it brought to essentially divide and subjugate the masses, both black and white.
    5. People who were rich and white—many of whom owned slaves and country plantations—were able to leave. You would get onto a carriage with your family, or perhaps with enslaved people whom you owned, and you would go to your country plantation. Or you would go to the north and you would take in theater and do business in New York. Some went to London or Paris to do their summer tours there. But that’s only for the very richest people, and many had no choice but to remain in town during epidemics because they did not have the funds or freedom to leave. And if you stuck in town, life would be very miserable. You would spend three months in utter fear that you were going to die. You would steel yourself to keep working because you would be fired if you didn’t, if you gave up your post in your grocery or wholesaler or merchant house. If you did get sick, you would spend all the money you had in the world and then some on doctors and nurses to try to safely take you through the acclimating process. If you survived, you would be known as an acclimated citizen; if you died, you were a poor and unfortunate unacclimated stranger. And you had about a 50% chance of living or dying of this disease in the 19th century.
    6. With the banning of the transatlantic trade, New Orleans becomes the biggest slave market in the United States and the center of the exclusive domestic slave trade.

      I need to look up the timeline

    1. Make content and publish it on your own site. And also create connections with other people that do the same. Share what you learn, share your successes and your failures. Share your passions, your hobbies. But do it on your own site, with your own voice, at your own pace.

      I like that making connections is mentioned. That's important to me, thinking about what I've gotten out of my site. It's not that we should move to an asocial medium – it's that the forms of "engagement" designed for ad sales aren't what encourage what we really want out of this stuff.

    1. Since vinegar can corrode certain materials,the best containers for this pickling techniqueare our jars with glass lids, thus Fido, Officina 1825and Lock Eat. They are also ideal because they comein large sizes, perfect for gherkins or other, largervegetables.

      The mysterious "other, larger vegetables"!

    2. The fire of the melting leaves traces of itselfin the light of the cooled down material. Thus4,500 million years ago, only the silica dustwould have remained on the surface of theincandescent sphere called earth; therefore thepositive attitude, with its dynamic enthusiasm,clarifies and gives transparency to the truth.Saying BORMIOLI is like saying GLASS.Those eight letters are dressed in blue, blueKlein, a colour that is a source of pure conceptualinspiration; then, in a second moment, theyflare up red in the flames to create just like withprestidigitation skills iconic shapes, multipliedaccording to the language and logic of popart. In the background of a clear horizon freecrystalline beaches can be caught.
    3. Beyond the autobiographical references, itis certain that the activity of a glassmaker,at the service of Ars, never finds a definitivefulfillment, because it takes place withoutend beyond the existence of the individual, inagreement with Life (the one with a capitalL). The permanent evolution of process andof product, which dates back to the time ofthe Phoenician, proves and confirms this.
    4. I could not imagine at that time theonomatopoeia of fate: I could not recognizethe heat of the fire and the light of the glassthat had always resonated within my surname:BORMIOLI.
    1. If enough people in a community are doping, he said, it spreads risk even to those who are clean, as the level of competition rises and more people are pushed to exhaustion and injury.

      This is useful as a metaphor also

    1. I think what gives me trouble here, actually, is that the account seems incomplete. It tells us about the demand side of cultural production over the last several decades: There is less demand for intellectually challenging culture (the argument goes) because it is less valuable to consumers as a means of rising in a social hierarchy. But what about the supply side? What about the companies and institutions that create culture? It would be unsophisticated to think that they’re merely responding to some natural market signal, wouldn’t it?The word “money” doesn’t appear in either Goldberg or Marx’s posts, which seems odd to me for posts putting forward an argument about class. As big a story as the expansion of the internet over the last few decades has been the rise of a finance-led asset economy, in which rising asset prices (in stocks as in homes) are prioritized over wages, productivity, semiconductor chips, halfway decent 90-minute movies, etc. What role does all the investment-seeking money play in supposed cultural boredom? Major labels and movie studios1 tend to belong these days to public, integrated multinational conglomerates, which prize consistent returns -- whether from multi-season television shows, or established and wholly owned I.P. -- over any particular kind of innovation, creativity, or daring.

      awww SHIT tell 'em

    2. But it does suggest that most of what we get these days, in terms of what’s most widely consumed and covered, is pap. Ross Douthat has described these trends as a symptom of cultural decadence.

      A. When has this not been true?

      B. ross douthat?

    3. And the film writer Farran Smith Nehme took a tour through the last 100 years of box-office hits and found that well-reviewed, popular movies aimed at adults have all but vanished from view:Of the 120 top-10 box office hits for 2008–2019, 42.5% were aimed at children/youths; 25% were superhero movies; 11.7% were Star Wars/science fiction; 13.3% were thrill rides; 2.5% were whatever the Hobbit was supposed to be; 1.7% were poorly reviewed movies for adults; and 3.3% were well-reviewed movies for adults. 

      I'm immediately suspicious of percentages, but happy to go sniff through this

    4. I don’t know, but the music writer Ted Gioia, in a newsletter from January, pointed out that “the new music market is actually shrinking. All the growth in the market is coming from old songs.”

      Annotated and complained about already

    5. I’m of two minds about it: On the one hand, there’s a self-flattering conventional wisdom about the emptiness or unoriginality of contemporary culture crudescing among my peers that seems worth resisting, or at least attending to. Why would or should yuppie parents like us be aware of the “scintillating and new”? (Surely the most damning thing you can say about Dimes Square is that people like me are aware of it?) What are we doing ourselves to seek out challenging or even just adult culture, rather than just assume it should be served up to us or dominate whatever passes for “the conversation”? And boy doesn’t it seem like a convenient coincidence that culture was more dynamic at a time when we didn’t get tired at 8 p.m.?

      This portion: handy for when I'd like to quote someone else on this

    1. With a full-time aphorism-maker such as Mencken it’s hard to see why one sentence rather than another should be regarded as a ‘quotation’. ‘Democracy is also a form of religion. It is the worship of jackals by jackasses’ is not regarded as a ‘quotation’ familiar enough to get into the dictionaries, while ‘Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard’ apparently is, on both sides of the Atlantic.
    2. The problem with Wilde is not just that he and every character he created always sound like they’re quoting Oscar Wilde, but that after him quotations that didn’t sound at least a little bit like Oscar Wilde were unlikely to be quoted, because they didn’t sound like quotations.
    3. Quotations are ‘familiar’ in that strange and slightly coercive sense of being ‘stuff that well-informed or with-it people, or members of my family, should know, but which you too could look as though you know if you read this book’.
    4. But the modern book of quotations is also the bastard offspring of the early modern jest book, which ascribed jokes and smart sayings to well-known figures such as the poet John Skelton or the fool Richard Tarleton. Jest-book-style anecdotes were often transcribed alongside more serious quotations in manuscript notebooks compiled by individual readers. So in 1601, the lawyer John Manningham recorded in what’s usually called his ‘diary’ (though really it’s more like a commonplace book) the quotation (though really it’s more like a paraphrase): ‘All our new corne comes out of old fields, and all our newe learning is gathered out of old bookes (Chaucer).’

      agricultural innovation complicates further...

    1. Here’s the thing though: AWS Lambda integrations with AWS services are really really good! Especially Step Functions. If I invoke the ECS RunTask API from StepFunctions (Something I do quite a lot, I might add), its rarely as simple as passing JSON directly. Either using environment variable overrides or command overrides, or a command override plus some API gymnastics in my task to hydrate references. I also have to handle returning response or error data back to my state machine. This experience results in monotonous work that needs to be accurate. Not my cup of tea. (I imagine good tooling could help with this pain-point. I’m watching the functionless framework closely here.)But frameworks will not be able to solve performance issues. You see, lambdas start up within a couple of seconds, while it can take a minute or two for Step Functions to kick off a Fargate task. Observability is also easier with lambda functions. You can click straight through from step functions to lambda execution logs, while Fargate tasks which stop will only linger for an hour. If you want to click through you’d better do so quickly. I concede that you can hook up event bridge to log stopped task details. But then you need to build your own user experience on top of what AWS gives you. I don’t have time for that.An even larger benefit to this proposal there is a whole bunch of great tooling which is built to deploy lambda functions. Serverless Framework, SAM, Chalice, etc. I can’t use that with Fargate or Step Functions Activities. Why shouldn’t you be able to deploy long running tasks to AWS with these great frameworks?

      This sounds like a list of stuff that the ECS folks should be listening to...

    1. Fellow IndieWeb netizen Maya

      We are neighbors! (I started my blogroll by copying yours, so I could be fairly be called your imitator)

    2. Another path of integration to think about is sharing annotated links from h. to my blog or the other way around. I blog links with a general annotation at times (example). These bloggable links I could grab from h. where I bookmark things in similar ways (example), usually to annotate further later on. I notice myself thinking I should do both, but unless I could do that simultaneously I won’t do such a thing twice.

      Many, many, many of my blog posts start their life as annotations that I then cut down or expand. I find that this helps me make sense of the habit of annotation; you make the best use of the tool that's most in your hand.

    1. As racially mixed kids (white father, mother of Asian descent), they wouldn’t even fit into any of the prescribed Antiracism, Inc. identity boxes.

      I can't roll my eyes any harder

    2. This academic year, let’s imagine that my son’s seventh-grade math teacher will be following “A Pathway to Equitable Math Instruction,” a recently published antiracist toolkit for teachers, funded in part by the Gates Foundation. Embarking on her “antiracist journey,” my son’s teacher will have learned that standard mathematics instruction is plagued by “the toxic characteristics of white supremacy culture” such as “perfectionism,” “worship of the written word” and “objectivity.” In math classrooms, the workbook explains, white supremacy culture manifests whenever “math is taught in a linear fashion,” “rigor is expressed only in difficulty” and grading practices “center what students don’t understand rather than what they do.” To “dismantle” white supremacy in collaboration with her students, my son’s teacher must “identify and challenge the ways that math is used to uphold capitalist, imperialist, and racist views”; and “expose students to people who have used math as resistance.”

      I don't like this kind of quoting words to say, you know, there's no way that perfectionism could be bad so this toolkit is obviously bunk. Maybe they talk more about why it's bad when math is taught in a linear fashion. The author has not given himself the responsibility of summarizing an argument, only of clipping out things that'll bother people.

    3. In a chapter called “Let’s Talk About Whiteness,” Singleton declares that “Whiteness represents a culture and consciousness that is shared by White people.” The variation within my own extended white family invalidates this absurd, quasi-mystical claim. With all due respect to my evangelical Christian, Trump-supporting relatives in rural Texas, we share neither a culture nor a consciousness.

      This weakens the piece. Sheep to the shepherd

    4. This war of words between Catholics and Protestants on the subject of public schools exploded into real violence in Philadelphia in the spring of 1844. Allegations that Catholic residents wanted to remove the King James Bible from the city’s schools led to widespread rioting, with pitched battles between Protestants and Irish Catholics on the streets of Philadelphia featuring stones, torches, sabers and muskets. At least fifteen Philadelphia residents died in the fighting. Dozens of homes and two Catholic churches were razed to the ground. Two months later, at the Fourth of July parade, Protestants marched with banners proclaiming “Foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of a Republican Government” and “The Bible is the basis of Education.”

      I didn't know the King James Bible had been so particularly warred over!

    5. Mann’s lowest-common-denominator approach to religion in public schools may have been informed by his own religious upbringing and his shift away from the fire-and-brimstone Calvinism of his parents to a kinder, gentler Unitarianism. When Mann was fourteen, his older brother Stephen drowned after skipping a Sunday church service to swim in a local pond. The family minister devoted his eulogy to castigating Stephen for profaning the Sabbath, proclaiming that his future life would be one of eternal damnation.

      Holy shit, Calvinists.

    1. A little over $2M, but that number keeps growing because I still have loads of usernames despite instagram patching the ratelimit bypass.

      Someone made $2m from instagram username squatting

    1. times of fecund cultural production

      This is some "I know people think X because when I talked to my Uber driver..." level analysis meant to work only for people who already agree that The KIds These Days Just Don't Care About The Important Stuff – so she's not even trying to justify it. Doesn't necessarily speak ill of the book, but boy does it say something about her.

    2. The internet, Marx writes in his book’s closing section, changes this dynamic. With so much content out there, the chance that others will recognize the meaning of any obscure cultural signal declines. Challenging art loses its prestige. Besides, in the age of the internet, taste tells you less about a person. You don’t need to make your way into any social world to develop a familiarity with Cage — or, for that matter, with underground hip-hop, weird performance art, or rare sneakers.

      The significance of a niche signal shared, though, increases.

    3. I can think of no recent novel or film that provoked passionate debate.

      Where did you look for that debate?

  4. Aug 2022
    1. German brands, Japanese brands, and American brands likely all source their grape flavorings, for example, from the same vendors.

      Japanese melon and strawberry flavors are very different!

    2. In some cases, yes, a candy is better because it is fundamentally different, on a chemical level, than what’s available in America. Europe’s strict regulations on chocolate quality mean that it offers something that’s not really comparable to a Hershey bar (and that Europeans are generally enthusiastic to tell you how much American chocolate sucks).

      🙄

      I mean, I despise Hershey's, but

    3. the primary feature is the texture. Chewing one feels like you’ve encountered a Starburst that fights back.
    4. To take a shot at mainstream American success, Hi-Chew’s makers did the usual stuff that consumer-products businesses do: They hired retail consultants, switched distributors, that kind of thing. But they also set their sights on a very important group: Major League Baseball players, the only people who routinely spend time chewing snacks in extreme close-up on TV. Morinaga supplied Japanese players in the league with Hi-Chew, Kawabe told me, focusing first on teams in markets where major retailers were headquartered. The gambit worked; ESPN reported on just how obsessed the 2015 Yankees squad was with the little fruit candies. Walgreens and CVS picked up the brand after it became popular with the Chicago Cubs and Boston Red Sox. Regular people tried the newly plentiful and suddenly trendy candy, and then insisted that their brother or spouse or co-workers try it. Hi-Chew’s U.S. sales grew from $8 million in 2012 to more than $100 million in 2021, according to Kawabe.

      I can believe this. It helps that it's a category-definer: gum-like-but-not-gum.

    1. They chip away at traditions, forgetting that, for students, visiting fellows and new academics, these are the very things that cause rapture and delight.

      For some, do they cause fear? For all equally?

    2. While the London gentlemen’s clubs are well-dressed and traditional, they’re largely devoid of ceremony; instead, they’re well-appointed places to relax over meals or drinks and sniffingly observe shibboleths of the upper classes, from which syllable to stress in ‘patina’, to why one ought not to own fish knives. Meanwhile, foundationally working-class clubs, such as the Knights of Columbus or the Freemasons, deck themselves in formal ceremony and ritual. The already powerful can afford not to make too much fuss. For the up-and-coming, or the downtrodden, formality gives an unparalleled sense of membership to a grander body.

      The rich's ease

    3. More importantly, the rules of formality are ultimately accessible to all. Anyone can learn the etiquette and wear the tie, and so become part of the ever larger, ever more diverse in-group that practices the formality of the event.

      This isn't wrong, but it also requires a conscious commitment among the keepers of the formality. E.g., do "formal" hairstyles include Black hairstyles?

    1. The Homestead Acts were unquestionably the most extensive, radical, redistributive governmental policy in US history. The number of adult descendants of the original Homestead Act recipients living in the year 2000 was estimated to be around 46 million people, about a quarter of the US adult population.

      1/4 americans

      I want a citation to follow to read more about the estimation

    1. Something is ontologically off with e-bikes, which time and adoption alone can’t resolve. Whether as bicycles haunted by motorbikes or as mopeds reined in by bikes, e-bikes represent not the fusion of two modes of transit, but a conflict between them.

      This makes about as much sense as ice cream cakes representing the conflict between cake and ice cream. Also, the extent to which infrastructure here is acknowledged but treated as fixed: bananas. Nuts. (Banana nut ice cream!)

    2. The truth will differ based on circumstance, but the result is the same: a weird ambiguity.

      Isn't it weird for this piece to entirely set aside the idea that it should refer to the actual effects in truth? To sidestep having to do more than "some people say A and some people say B and the fact that people don't agree signals spooky weirdness"?

    3. A motorcycle signals power (and maybe a caricature of outmoded masculinity) from its exhaust.

      tbh i'm getting a lot of "insufficiently parsed-out feelings about outmoded masculinity" from this piece

    4. In theory, the easier ride that an e-bike provides should make it more tempting than a standard bike. For people with certain mobility issues, it may indeed be. Yet for the most part, all the nuisances of biking still crop up: hot or cold or wet weather, needing to transport something heavy or awkward, taking on another errand during the day that requires a drive, and so forth. Counterintuitively, because the e-bike is easier to ride than a normal bike, I feel less inclined to adopt it as a regular practice, let alone a whole commuting identity. All the downsides of biking still remain, without the satisfaction of persisting in the face of adversity.

      I don't think you can reasonably say "for the most part" and "all". The difference between "for the most part" and "all" is important – and if we're saying it's unpleasant to be out in weather, why isn't that adversity in the face of which he can persist?

    1. Rights are larger than laws, and Google has violated the former, even if they are not bound by the latter.

      Jesus I hate the American education system

    2. Working backwards, Google isn’t legally compelled to give Mark a hearing about his digital life (Sixth Amendment); they are wrong not to. Google isn’t legally compelled to give Mark due process before permanently deleting his digital life (Fifth Amendment); they are wrong not to.

      It is so much more concerning that we're accepting as given that Google plays a state-like role here.

    3. Again, Google is not covered by the Bill of Rights; all of these Amendments, just like the First, only apply to the government. The reason why this case is useful, though, is it is a reminder that specific legal definitions are distinct from questions of right or wrong.

      ???????

    4. Munroe, though, assumes the opposite: liberty, in this case the freedom of speech, is an artifact of law, only stretching as far as government action, and no further. Pat Kerr, who wrote a critique of this comic on Medium in 2016, argued that this was the exact wrong way to think about free speech: Coherent definitions of free speech are actually rather hard to come by, but I would personally suggest that it’s something along the lines of “the ability to voluntarily express (and receive) opinions without suffering excessive penalties for doing so”. This is a liberal principle of tolerance towards others. It’s not an absolute, it isn’t comprehensive, it isn’t rigorously defined, and it isn’t a law. What it is is a culture.

      It's an enshrinement of an analysis of history that says – fairly reasonably, given the 1700s context they were working with – "if we don't have XYZ legal right, we will slide towards tyranny".

    5. Hill’s story noted that in 2021 the CyberTipline at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, the only entity legally allowed to hold CSAM (NCMEC also manages the PhotoDNA database), “alerted authorities to ‘over 4,260 potential new child victims'”. We don’t know how many of those children were subsequently rescued, but a question worth posing to anyone unilaterally opposed to Google’s approach is how big that number would have to be to have made it worthwhile? But, to return to the original hand, one of those 4,260 potential new child victims was Mark’s son (and another was taken by Cassio, a second father found by Hill caught in the same predicament, for the same reasons): the question for those applauding Google’s approach is how big the number of false positives would have to be to shut the whole thing down?

      Do you note that in the first, it's implying that those are true positives? Despite the phrasing being "potential"? The whole problem is that "alerting authorities" to a "potential new child victim" was actually bad and terrible in this case. So having more cases of that would be... worse.

      It reminds me of the memes around local journalists ctrl-c ctrl-v ing police statements. If no one is able to establish ground truth, more numbers make things less clear, not clearer.

    1. And I sit here in my straight leg jeans that prompted my partner to say that I look like “Diane Lane in an ‘80s movie” (compliment!) and/or that I’m about to go out and farm, I’m reminded of how uncomfortable I felt in skinny jeans for the first time — but also how outmoded my flared low-rise had come to feel. None of this jean discourse is really about fashion, or figuring out what you like. Same, much of the time, when it comes to other forms of bodily discipline, particularly with food and exercise. There’s always a “choice” about what kind of maintenance you want to pursue, but it’s a severely delimited one. So much of this maintenance is about not falling behind, particularly as a woman. To fall behind is not only to lose a grip on your class status, but your visibility and value within society at large. It’s not just middle class a woman is communicating with “appropriate” clothes and body and grooming. It’s vitality, participation, and gameness in a game in which you’re always already losing.
    2. Truly wealthy people buy items that are timeless; middle-class people buy items that need to be replaced, either because of poor construction or wear or aesthetic dating, every five to seven years. Middle-class clothing is valued for its quality — it shouldn’t look cheap, or worn, or wrinkled — but also for its homogeneity, its clear markers of belonging. Styles and silhouettes travel through middle class acceptability: first introduced as cutting edge, experimental, fashion-forward, slightly terrifying….and then gradually incorporated into the standard middle-class uniform.
    3. As Barbara Ehrenreich argues in Fear of Falling, the thing we often forget about the middle class is that it requires constant maintenance. Despite the myths we tell ourselves about our country, the poor largely stay poor and the rich almost always stay rich. To maintain middle class status is to be constantly treading water, to be proving and reproving middle class social and financial capital.
    1. She admits she was naive, and that getting close to human remains is almost indescribably transformative. Her senses are sharpened; she is appreciative and humbled. And she is convinced that, as Poppy Mardall advises, your first corpse shouldn’t be someone you love: no one needs to handle the shock of death and the shock of grief at the same time. Life would be better lived if we knew death better.
    2. He insists that three things are always found at murder scenes: a weapon, an inebriant, and porn or a sex toy. His customers disgust him.
    1. He’s 55, still sitting the way popular high school boys sit, which is easy to confuse with self-satisfaction but is really lack of concern so pure that the question of whether or not to feel satisfied wouldn’t ever come up.

      lack of concern

    2. There’s a way of looking at stars as something aspirational, and a way that’s the opposite. It’s akin, I think, to looking at a wealthy person and seeing a benevolent future peer or looking at a wealthy person and seeing a monster forged from luck and evil.

      a monster forged from luck and evil

    1. Imagine the worst life one could live without wishing one had never been born. Now imagine the kind of life you dream of living. For those who embrace the Repugnant Conclusion, a future in which trillions of us colonize planets so as to live the first sort of life is better than a future in which we survive on Earth in modest numbers, achieving the second.

      Fun to toss around

  5. meatverse.dev meatverse.dev
    1. We believe the meatverse can enable better social experiences than anything that exists today, and we will dedicate our neurocapital to helping achieve its potential. As I wrote in our original covenant: “we don’t build services to make money; we also don’t make money to build services; we seek to escape the cycle of death and rebirth through the merger of flesh and capital.”

      Most important thing I'll read today.

    1. But religion comes naturally to Homo sapiens. Perhaps the first big reason is that for much of humanity’s passage across time we were manifestly not in control of our destiny, just ephemeral sparks of life blown about by whims of climate and disease and geography and the population dynamics of our prey and predators, those sparks often snuffed out with no warning. It would have been comforting to think that Someone was in control. Maybe the improved ability to steer one’s own life, enjoyed today by those in developed societies and with an education, is partly responsible for the fading of faith?

      Our inability to avoid death has been more consequentially muted by our newfangled ability to avoid thinking about death

    1. the-cybersmith asked: Your Mother-in-law is wiser than you know.Fiat currencies come and go, but gold and silver stay valuable.If some catastrophe happens, and you and your family wake up to realise that you've all been transported to ancient Babylon, or the Persian Empire, or the Roman Republic, or Medieval England, or Ming Dynasty China, your credit cards and your bitcoin and your bank notes with Illuminati symbols on them will be useless.Gold and silver? Melt them down and sell them, you'll immediately be able to trade with the locals. ms-demeanor answered: It’s a smoky day in the postapocalypse.

      A lot of Tumblr prompt fiction is unbearably twee to me. This is not. The author makes a point elegantly.

    1. Colchicine is widely used in plant breeding by inducing polyploidy in plant cells to produce new or improved varieties, strains, and cultivars.[63] When used to induce polyploidy in plants, colchicine cream is usually applied to a growth point of the plant, such as an apical tip, shoot, or sucker. Seeds can be presoaked in a colchicine solution before planting. Since chromosome segregation is driven by microtubules, colchicine alters cellular division by inhibiting chromosome segregation during meiosis; half the resulting gametes, therefore, contains no chromosomes, while the other half contains double the usual number of chromosomes (i.e., diploid instead of haploid, as gametes usually are), and lead to embryos with double the usual number of chromosomes (i.e., tetraploid instead of diploid).[63] While this would be fatal in most higher animal cells, in plant cells, it is not only usually well-tolerated, but also frequently results in larger, hardier, faster-growing, and in general more desirable plants than the normally diploid parents. For this reason, this type of genetic manipulation is frequently used in breeding plants commercially.[63] When such a tetraploid plant is crossed with a diploid plant, the triploid offspring are usually sterile (unable to produce fertile seeds or spores), although many triploids can be propagated vegetatively. Growers of annual triploid plants not readily propagated vegetatively cannot produce a second-generation crop from the seeds (if any) of the triploid crop and need to buy triploid seed from a supplier each year. Many sterile triploid plants, including some trees and shrubs, are becoming increasingly valued in horticulture and landscaping because they do not become invasive species and do not drop undesirable fruit and seed litter. In certain species, colchicine-induced triploidy has been used to create "seedless" fruit, such as seedless watermelons (Citrullus lanatus). Since most triploids do not produce pollen themselves, such plants usually require cross-pollination with a diploid parent to induce seedless fruit production. The ability of colchicine to induce polyploidy can be also exploited to render infertile hybrids fertile, for example in breeding triticale (× Triticosecale) from wheat (Triticum spp.) and rye (Secale cereale). Wheat is typically tetraploid and rye diploid, with their triploid hybrid infertile; treatment of triploid triticale with colchicine gives fertile hexaploid triticale.

      This is wild.

    1. A goat tower you can drop into some farmland, the wilderness, or for extra chaos, a village.

      I love reading RPG supplements like this as narrative-less works of creative writing. There is too many goat!

    1. By the 1910s, younger generations no longer associated it with death. This caused at least one memorable incident in Weaver’s family, when his Quaker grandmother thought she’d bake raisin pie to make a good impression with her in-laws in Lancaster. “She thought she was doing a great thing by bringing this old lady, who was some kind of great-aunt, a raisin pie,” Weaver says. “But she was horrified, like, ‘You think I’m going to die? Do you know something I don’t know?’”

      What a curse!

    2. Like the highly-anticipated white bread, raisins would have been considered a luxury in the 1800s. Prior to deseeding technology, producing raisins meant the painstaking process of removing grape seeds (and usually stems) by hand. Given that the memorial banquet would feature multiple raisin pies and each recipe called for about a pound of the precious dried fruit, Schmeichel says making a funeral pie was “an absolute labor of love.”

      Raisins were luxury food!

    1. One of the weirder things about my Hippocrene Concise Sorbian-English dictionary (2000) is that it has the same sentence as an example for two separate words ("with", "wrong") three pages apart, and that sentence is: Što je z Kevinom? What's wrong with Kevin?

      What's wrong with Kevin?

    2. In Ireland: Conor/Seán - your parents panicked and picked the first thing that came into their heads Kathleen/Eileen/Maureen/Bridget - you must be at least 80 by now Niamh/Fiona/Sinead/Ciara/Orla - standard "it'll do" names Sorcha/Ríona/Bébhinn etc. - yes we get it, your parents are posh Aisling - what an American would call 'basic': there's even a book called "Oh My God, What A Complete Aisling"

      Irish name associations 😁

  6. bluelander.bearblog.dev bluelander.bearblog.dev
    1. But look, if a state or any other kind of business names themselves after a real word but pronounce it weird, I'm going to say the word the way that it's said. I have way more respect for languages spoken by real people than the brand guidelines of legal fictions

      The "correct" pronunciation of the surname "Wagner" is best approximated in English by something between "VOG-neh" and "VOG-nair". It is a German surname, unquestionable derivation. But if I try to use that pronunciation for a guy I knew with the surname his family pronounced "WAG-nur", that makes me the asshole who is wrong. Names borrowed from other languages are weird, sure! Maybe there's an argument to translate everything into the language of use, like Catholics do (Pope Francis / Francisco / Franciscus etc., Mary / María / Maria / Marie etc. – so in an English sentence, the state of Snowy.). But while it is fair for me to think to myself generally that e.g. Kieran is an incorrect spelling of Ciarán, not listening to the people to whom a name is applied about what the name "correctly" is... well, it's a policy that leads down some pretty dickish roads. It's not about not acknowledging the language of origin, it's about acknowledging other context that also matters.

      I'd suggest that listening to the ads on Spanish-language radio is instructive here, because for actually local actual Spanish speakers, even within Spanish sentences, there are pretty sophisticated contextual patterns about whether a place name gets a Spanish or English pronunciation; it's not that one's "right" to people who know what's "correct".

      I will also note that despite being generally more open than most of my ilk to something like prescriptivism, I am a partisan here. There is a feeling of linguistic mob thrill I have never felt more than watching John Kerry come to speak at a packed Pioneer Square in Portland in 2003. Within his first couple sentences he said "OR-eh-gahn" to a gushing crowd and received widespread boos. The panicked confusion on his face: good, actually.

    1. You play as Regency-era occultists. None of the play happens in meatspace, it’s all play-by-post. Literal post, as in tree-corpses letters. Each turn takes a month. You can write multiple letters in a turn, to the GM and other players.

      I am down as hell.

      There's not enough creative play with postal mail. People love getting physical letters. I haven't decided on whether to subscribe to The Flower Letters, but it's sort of storytelling-through-physical-mail. Similarly, I only found out about Cryptogram Puzzle Post late enough that I'm waiting for the collection, but it's like puzzle games sent to you by mail. (I backed The Light In The Mist from the same creator)

      Physical reality this could use:

      • Mailable items to convey game effects so you could swap them. (E.g., you can write about your character being able to enter the Bird Sanctum only if you are the current holder of a feather that'd been mailed to one player)
      • Invisible ink
      • Colored ink with significance of some kind? Maybe too fussy.

      And of course the urban fantasy counterpart would be set in the 90s, done in ballpoint pen on notebook paper, and the gazette would be a lofi photocopy zine.

    1. His vision of the future has no sharp edges, no dark places, no erotic frisson. Supposedly, Meta is working on photorealistic faces, but for now, the avatars available in Meta’s environments are soft and Pixar-like, with big, childlike heads. They sit smiling at each other across a conference table, or they blast off into space on adorable rocket ships. Everything is nauseatingly cute and childlike, and yet it’s not meant for children. Nothing is truly funny or weird, or potentially dangerous in any respect. The sample animation Meta released suggests that it may be possible to someday customize yourself into a giant robot, if you like, but only a cute, funny robot, not a spiky, scary one. The robot sits in a conference room and does his work because he is an adult.

      Facebook aesthetics

    1. Heraldic and personal rebuses are still being created today, though their usage is much diminished. One way they are hanging on is in text messaging. North London teenager Isla Burgess, for example, says her friends refer to her by using the emojis for island and then iceberg on text messages. “We all do it,” Burgess says, smartphone in hand. “My friend Oliver is the olive. Martin is the martini glass. It’s much easier to type.”

      oh my god. I need one. Fuck.

    2. Derived from the Latin expression non verbis sed rebus, which means “not by words, but with things,” a rebus is a puzzle in which a word, or part of a word, is represented by a picture.

      Excellent. Is there a category of English words from conjugated or declined Latin words?

    1. What we pay attention to and the language in which we pay attention are the only realities worth considering, which is one reason why stories are so often framed by the idea that nobody is talking about a problem, when the problem is often quite endlessly talked about—just not solved. Why isn’t the media covering this story? is a common refrain that is just as often accompanied by a link to an article about the story, which is how the complainer learned about it in the first place.

      I'm not going to say that no one is talking about the scourge of "No one is talking about..." but I am going to say I'm glad to find this for quote purposes

    1. How can you generate category and tag pages? More generally, how do you generate any limited set of pages based on querying information from other content, without having to manually create a new (probably empty) content file?

      I am very much a dev, but anything but an expert when it comes to the web or SSGs. This didn't seem that unsolvable to me although I'll acknowledge I do more in Liquid than one "should".

      (ETA: Wait, no, the author agrees with me that doing a lot in one's templates is good.)

    2. What those developers probably mean is that they find static site generators elegant.

      "I think simplicity is synonymous with ease-of-use" is the kind of thing that, well, I wouldn't agree with it, but it's something you can inoffensively say. "You are using words wrong because they don't match my idiosyncratic mental model" is... quite a thing to come out with.

    3. a bunch of technical language

      This isn't "technical language": it's terminal commands. Terminal use is a huge barrier and we shouldn't ignore that, but it's different from the complicated concepts that you can sometimes run into. (I would say that the later-cited "Sections, Lists, Taxonomies, Page Bundles, Leaf Bundles, Template lookup order, and the perfectly unintuitive differences between a index.md page and a _index.md page. (Or are those Sections, or Bundles? Is one a Section and the other a Page? Are Sections and Bundles “pages” too? I have no idea.)" of Hugo are a great example of something that may not look as technical as a ~ $ but that requires far more dev-thinking.)

    4. One workaround is using separate files in the same folder or in subfolder, than use the content API to retrieve them. Each such “resource” can have a body and metadata.

      This is the way, and the existing "content API" built into these tools works pretty okay for it already.

    5. A theming infrastructure imposes a lot of technical restrictions and indirection, such as template lookup orders (see: Hugo), having to specify a handful of default template names (Hugo, again), and having to specify strange content conventions for mapping content to those default template names (still Hugo). Frankly, if a user really wants a template inheritance and theme inheritance mechanism, they’ll probably bite the bullet and work with WordPress or Drupal.

      I don't think this is that hard, but I've happily squelched my hands around in the guts of all my sites' CSS, so I would rather set a Tumblr theme creator loose on SSG theme creation and see what she thinks of it.

    6. On top of traversing and retrieving content, templates should be able to transform formats (Markdown to HTML, parsing JSON and maybe YAML) and process images.

      The former they can already do; the latter is... ill-defined.

    7. There should be a full content traversal API, which could be modelled after Kirby’s API (itself inspired by jQuery). Other sources of inspiration: Globbing, e.g. find('posts/*.md'). DOM traversal (there’s no reason why your content tree cannot be a tree of nodes).

      ... this sounds like something's gone wrong to me. I don't have an argument, it just smells bad.

    8. as we said we’re making a tool for technically-minded people

      Are we? I thought we were judging it as too complicated because "content editors" (what a demeaning title) needed assistance

    9. Most generators use restrictive template engines, and feed a restricted context (aka a set of data and functions) to those templates. This seems to come from a misguided need to keep templates “simple”, “logic-less”, and other kinds of baloney.

      Jekyll and 11ty are the two SSGs I've used and they both let me access pretty global site context data. I also do a lot of nonsense with that access.

    10. Another consequence of restricted templates is that SSG documentation will then tell you to work in a third place: not in content, not in templates, but in “config code”. This is a problem because A) it’s probably one place too many and B) it’s often unclear at what time this config code is running or how often: once for every page generation or template run, or just once at the start of a build?

      I agree with this. I hate the config code and I get away with using almost none of it.

    11. To surface this information efficiently, the generator may need to come with a GUI (a web UI could work).

      I think it's interesting that the author views graphic UIs as more "efficient" than running the CLI with a debug flag. I am guessing this is something that very much depends on what you're used to.

    12. How may users control the transformations that are applied to content (processing of Markdown or other formats, templates, image transformations)? Should this be defined in the content or elsewhere?

      See, I would say this is not a simple thing to handle in your HTML-rendering tool.

    13. What will be ignored?

      Does the author object to YAML frontmatter? permalink: false?

    14. Or you have to write some configuration code that populates “Collections” ahead of build time. (Too indirect, and breaks if you change your information architecture a bit. We need something a bit closer to direct manipulation!)

      You can do this in 11ty without configuration code with folder structures and directory data files.

    15. Sometimes it’s just not possible to work with content hierarchies and partial content. (Most JavaScript static site generators fall into that category.)

      ???

      I was literally doing this in 11ty the other day. It definitely required a developer-like approach, but "not possible" is a big claim.

    16. the plain-files-and-scripts philosophy

      You don't have to know the philosophy to use it.

    17. I sometimes talk with developers who praise static site generators as simple, which is hogwash. I’ve seen a few projects where content editors were handed off a site based on a SSG (especially in startups where devs may dominate the conversation), and could not manage any change without a lot of training and assistance. Nothing simple about that.

      Maybe we should all stop describing software as "simple" or even not "simple" until we can agree on a shared definition.

      On decommoditizing protocols:

      The design of software is a constant struggle against complexity. On the one hand, the world is complex, and many difficult problems inherently require complex solutions. On the other hand, it's quite easy to add gratuitious complexity. The key difference is how much of the problem the complex software solves (i.e. how much complexity is exported to the other side of the protocol).

      One example of this sometimes subtle distinction is the comparison of GX vs. OpenType layout by Dave Opstad. Dave points out that for an application to support, say, Tibetan using OpenType, it still has to do a lot of the work. In the GX model, it's done for you in the operating system. Thus, even though OpenType and GX are roughly comparable in complexity, from the point of view of the application GX is "simpler". Thus, overall complexity needs to be weighed against how much of the problem is solved.

    18. {{< imgproc sniffles-4months.jpg Resize "600x" />}}

      Look, I'm not saying it's great, but I've been running a website for a few years now without doing proper image resizing and asset optimization.

    19. how to prepare images themselves (in Photoshop, Gimp or similar software)

      How important do you think resizing all that stuff is

    20. Users are expected to know what formats like HTML and Markdown are

      Ceded!

    21. they are expected to know how to put those files online to publish them. This can require software such as a FTP client, or more complex setups involving one or two additional command line tools.

      Or it can involve uploading to Neocities with a file selection UI.

    22. They’re often written by developers — professionals or hobbyists — to power their own small website or blog, and as such they tend to have a limited feature set. SSG are close parents to scripts: short programs (a few hundred lines of code), which can be used from a command prompt to achieve specific tasks. They’re often built as a hobby by one developer, sometimes getting help from a few others months or years later.

      Does it make sense to class the big'uns (Jekyll, Hugo, etc.) with somebody's bash script as the same kind of thing? Is there really more use of the latter?

    1. Programming consists of overcoming two things: accidental difficulties, things which are difficult because you happen to be using inadequate programming tools, and things which are actually difficult, which no programming tool or language is going to solve. Joel Spolsky reviewing Beyond Java
    1. In short, since the rise of the content industry, established journalistic institutions have struggled to survive and been forced to produce news that functions like content.

      It'd be interesting to compare the environment that produced "yellow journalism".

    2. the content industry is also adept at appropriating existing texts, images, moving images, and recordings.

      Oh, because all of those were produced in industries that have nothing to do with consumption dynamics. Come on.

    3. Does a classic film streamed online rather than projected in a movie theater become content simply because of the context?

      Yes – because as content, it is competing with all the other things you could do in that browser window.

    1. Take Banana no hi (Banana Day) for example. Broken down, the Japanese pronunciation—ba-na-na—corresponds to the Japanese for eight (ba) and seven (nana). The seventh day of the eighth month, August 7, thus becomes “Banana Day.”

      How did I not know this???

    1. In the field, workers operate potato harvesters, made by the German company Grimme. The technology is common among area growers and specifically designed for wet soil, he said. The machines are mounted onto tractors. After the machines scoop potatoes from the ground, the potatoes fall onto a web where loose dirt falls back to the ground The company’s largest machine can harvest four rows at once, Wisdom said. He said he sees technology continuing to evolve. “I think in our lifetime there will be automated potato harvesting equipment,” Wisdon said. At the company’s packing and shipping plant, there is more technology, such as a machine that scans the potatoes and discards imperfect or meager spuds. Wisdom said workers can program the machine to reject undesirable features, such as those green in color or with blemishes. These “cull” potatoes don’t go to waste. Wisdom said they are shipped to a plant and turned into dehydrated potato. After another machine separates potatoes by size — small, medium, large and extra large — and a second sort takes place, with workers inspecting potatoes at a detailed level.

      Potato technology~

    1. But I guess that’s a product of the time we live in.

      Is this a helpful sentiment to express sans citation?

    2. Maybe it’s just me noticing this a bit more lately, but it feels as if people are a lot less engaged with the world around them and they don’t really care about their surroundings. And you can see it everywhere when you start paying attention.

      Well, yes – this is the kind of thing that can be 100% a product of starting to pay attention.

    3. The world around us is pushing us more and more toward selfishness. Social media itself is—for the most part—a self centered world. How many people have IG profiles filled with selfies? I’d probably say way too many.

      Faces are how we connect. The self-centered view is the one that doesn't present one's own face; your own view of the world only features your e.g. hands, absent a mirror.

    1. Opening the code of the algorithm might be a good place to start, but it’s not unlike making an architectural excavation site open to the public: without the guidance of an archaeologist to explain it, it’s just a set of pottery shards. There is not much we as end users can do with “The Algorithm” as-is.

      This is taking the wrong parts as fixed.

    2. But let’s say you come up with 10000 Flits to recommend? You can’t show them all in any given timeline, so what do you do? 

      I wonder if discussion of the problem space would be clearer to non-experts if we spent more time emphasizing just how much stuff there is out there that you can't possibly curate comprehensively.

    1. As is typical of these controversies, it's hard to parse exactly what Jackson did wrong

      Given that the author goes on to give a coherent-sounding sentence, these clauses are meant to signal that it's supposed to be an unreasonable objection

    2. Those who put stock in sensitivity reads seem to mostly imagine that the practice offers a form of insurance, preempting allegations of this -ism or that -phobia, although it rarely pans out that way.

      Do you notice how we've moved on from saying "hey this is just like having a doctor check over a medical drama's script" to "actually everyone just fears cancellation"

    3. authors who don't share the same traits—or "lived experience," to use a favored buzzword—as their characters.

      I begin to think that people really don't know when they're telling on themselves. "Lived experience" is super literal and super easy to explain, and isn't "traits", and calling it a "buzzword" is what you'd do if you don't think people would care about the concept absent "buzz".

    1. “GeoCities was not about self-promotion,” Bohnett told Gizmodo in an interview. “It was about sharing your interest and your knowledge.”
    1. Well the Letter saw that idea coming, and what I love so much about it is the fact that is wants married women to consider that “[n]ow you are married, and have descended so low from so high – from the likeness of angels, from the beloved of Jesus Christ, from a lady in heaven, into carnal filth, into the life of an animal, into servitude to a man, and into the world’s misery”.[3] There it is – servitude to a man. Sure, you might enjoy having kids and all that, but ultimately “whatever advantage or happiness comes of it, it is too dearly bought”.[4]

      I won't pretend that I know the actual history they purport to tell, but it's interesting to consider the proto-feminism of hagiographies like this, just as texts. Woman becomes Christian; woman's father wants to sell her off; woman rejects this fate and either does or doesn't die as a result.

      I wonder what the historical balance throughout the centuries was of women being shoved into convents when they didn't want to go versus women running off to convents when society wanted them to do something else.

    1. In raccoon societies, asking this for any reason other than genuine concern about potential danger is considered the height of rudeness. The traditional response is "why does your face look like that?"

      re: "Why are you doing this"

    1. It’s just too easy to accidentally give a good result to a controversial topic, and have the law makers pounce on you.

      Yes, if there's anything that defines the modern internet it's detailed legislation

    2. You’ll notice there are no actual books here. There are only lists of best books. Cynical me notes that if you were to actually list a book, someone could find it controversial. Instead, you can link to institutional websites, and let them take the controversy for their picks.

      Who the hell wants to find a single book when they're searching for "best books"?

    3. Every recipe site I’ve ever seen is like this — nobody cares about how this recipe was originally your great-grandmother’s. Just tell us what’s in it.

      What a shibboleth