fugitivity to interpretation t
Is this person smarter than me or do they have a thesaurus....harrumph...
fugitivity to interpretation t
Is this person smarter than me or do they have a thesaurus....harrumph...
an apologetic postscript
This is kinda iconic idk...
because” and “despite” coexists
?
his thesis keeps many of our inside jokes and meme
Now why would you say this...
Hermocrates
?
this section is nothing less than theseimpossible acts of longing for the ineffable
Aurkay
nonexistent summit of Aetna where Hölderin’sEmpedocle
is it that serious
Acknowledgements
Starting off with strikethrough always fun
first, that as the race climbs higher in the scale of development, sodevelopment shall proceed at an accelerated pace; second, that in the same proportion, the race shallbecome less fertile.
This really does feel like eugenics omg
Workmenare annually consumed, and fresh ones introduced
Holy shit
and by him it is handed down on his death-bed to none buthis Successor
Omg it's the Giver
Under the skillful generalship of the Circles almostevery Woman's charge was fatal and very many extracted their sting uninjured, ready for a secondslaughter.
This is crazy
Manyof them, he said, were on the point of being admitted to the class of the Regular Triangles; othersanticipated for their children a distinction they could not hope for themselves. That honourable ambitionwould now have to be sacrificed.
Not the elites using inter-class resentment to destroy the revolution...
Colour Bill
Why does this feel like a critique of like a lack of intersectionality
The Art of Sight Recognition
This is like the Hellenistic period omg...
we are even now indebted for our finest poetry and forwhatever rhythm still remains in the more scientific utterance of these modern days.
Is this a metaphor for like the Renaissance or something
Is this a metaphor for like the Renaissance or something
infant whose angle deviates by half a degree from the correct angularity is summarily destroyedat birth
welp
I for my part havenever known an Irregular who was not also what Nature evidently intended him to be - a hypocrite, amisanthropist, and, up to the limits of his power, a perpetrator of all manner of mischief
I can't not the literal racism
more than, a combination of moral obliquity and criminality with you, and istreated accordingly
Bye asf
For this reason, among our Higher Classes, ``Feeling'' is discouraged or absolutely forbidden. From thecradle their children, instead of going to the Public Elementary schools (where the art of Feeling istaught,) are sent to higher Seminaries of an exclusive character; and at our illustrious University, to``feel'' is regarded as a most serious fault, involving Rustication for the first offence, and Expulsion forthe second
This is crazy
the cheap system
This also feels like eugenics
Mr.Smith, permit me to feel Mr. Jones.
This is so vulgar omg I'm scandalized...Abbott you sly dog
The tact and skill which suffice to avert a Woman's sting are unequal to thetask of stopping a Woman's mouth; and as the wife has absolutely nothing to say, and absolutely noconstraint of wit, sense, or conscience to prevent her from saying it, not a few cynics have been found toaver that they prefer the danger of the death-dealing but inaudible sting to the safe sonorousness of aWoman's other end
Ok is this really necessary like we get it
jealousies and suspicions skilfully fomented among them by the Circularparty, they are stirred to mutual warfare, and perish by one another's angles
Move over Marx like
to make some of the more intelligent leaders of a rebellionperfectly Regular, and to admit them at once into the privileged classes
Omg this is like...the commodification of dissent this is like Marxist lmao
And how perfect a proof of the natural fitness and, I mayalmost say, the divine origin of the aristocratic constitution of the States in Flatland!
Let me fucking laugh
in proportion as the working-classes increase in intelligence, knowledge, and allvirtue, in that same proportion their acute angle (which makes them physically terrible) shall increasealso and approximate to the comparatively harmless angle of the Equilateral Triangle.
This is wild
while they do little or nothing to vulgarize their own privileges, serve as a most usefulbarrier against revolution from below
Abbott was spitting omg...he said let me deconstruct the American Dream real quick in my Book about Shapes
for fear lest the freshly developed organism may, by force of unconsciousimitation, fall back again into his hereditary level.
Wow this is a really stratified society...
of the coming Equilateral, and a patient, systematic, and continuousdevelopment of the Isosceles intellect through many generations
This feels like eugenics tf
But, writing as a Historian, he has identified himself(perhaps too closely) with the views generally adopted by Flatland, and (as he has been informed) evenSpaceland, Historians; in whose pages (until very recent times) the destinies of Women and of the massesof mankind have seldom been deemed worthy of mention and never of careful consideration.
Emphasizes the function of mathematics as like...a way to humble ourselves. Like our society is probably stupid
One touch of Nature makes all worlds akin
Maybe in the future we can expand our sensory abilities to sense the fourth dimension somehow which would be pretty epic
lt has been objected that he is awoman-hater
dafuq
even I cannot now comprehendit, nor realize it by the sense of sight or by any process of reason; I can but apprehend it by faith.
Book probably emphasizes like...the way in which mathematics can induce curiosity and a sense of awe around our world rather than tamping things down
Most biologists believe that P =(0),anda biomathematical argument exists for this claim
well
In order to decide which is the biologically correct solution, we mustutilize more experimental evidence
Girl not the lack of a square or something to indicate the proof is over like be real...
biologists prefer to use gel electrophoresisasthe assay from which experimental conclusions are to be drawn
So what was all the hoopla about RecA-coating about exactly...
(Wasserman et al., 1985)
Maybe look at this idk
<2,1,1>
can probably give examples / draw diagrams here
parental tangleP is removed from the synaptosome and replaced by the recombinanttangleR
OK so we're finally getting to the stuff from the first paper...
Mostofthese assumptions are implicit in theexisting analysesofthe resultsofenzyme experiments on circular DNA
Expose them
Figure 8.7 shows some standard tanglediagrams
Yet more examples!
DNA is bound to thesurfaceofthe protein. This means that the resulting protein-DNA tangleis rational, since any tangle whose strings can be continuously deformedinto the boundaryofthe defining ball is automatically rational
Might just have to say like ok usually the DNA forms rational tangles
A class of equivalent tangles is called a tangle type.
Seems like it would just be called a tangle idk
On the unit 3-ball, select four points on the equator (called NW,SW, SE, NE)
This seems to be like...the worst way to describe this idk
boundary 2-sphere 8 2 = oB 3
so the unit circle...be serious
Standard 4-plats
Ok I would give more clear pictures of how these are braided together
plectonemic supercoiling
I think this means the superhelix itself is intertwined...?
well-understood familyof4-plats
maybe I should define / look up what 4-plats are...
that uniquely classifycertain homologous subfamiliesofknots and links, for example, torusknots, two-bridge knots (4-plats), and so on.
Ok so it's an invariant which is shared by one and only one knot / link
insisted that thetransformation that superimposes one knot on another must beorientation-preserving on the ambient space.
so the knot must be equivalent with orientation as well
tum up in Tn3 recombinationexperiments
should maybe show a bunch of different examples of the kinds of knots you can get with these experiments / rejoining stuff...also think about the effect that recombining has...is it just a crossing change? Can you make any knot or two-component link through this process?
An equivalence classofembeddings is called a knot (link) type
OK I think we just call it a knot/link and then an individual embedding is a diagram
dimers, that is, linksoftwo components, because dimers are the onlylinks that tum up in topological enzymology experiments
ok work so you'll never get a link of three components or more
describe the partsofknot theory and tanglecalculusofbiological relevance
Oh goodie goodie...girl idk about this tangle calculus business though
RecA-coated DNA is approxi-mately 100 angstroms in diameter
So it makes it thicc LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
higher thecrossing number, the greater the gel mobility
Ok so the HIGHER the crossing number the GREATER the gel mobility...this is bizarre
surprisingly) determined by the crossingnumberofthe knot or link
Wait this is crazy
reaction products prior toelectrophoresis in order to relax the supercoils in the DNA knots andlinks
Ok so unknotted DNA can have supercoils but knotted and linked DNA cannot because that messes up gel electrophoresis
perform recombination in multiple binding encounters with the DNA,which is called distributive recombination.
Don't piss me off...
deduce mathematically the path of theDNA in the black mass of the synaptosome, both before and afterrecombination
So like what connects to what?
synaptic complex
Be serious...
nzyme thatmediates site-specific recombination on DNA is called a recombinase
so I guess integrase and transposase are recombinases...?
Site-specific recombination
yass
At this point they can be examined and dissected
So like check your shit to make sure your not perpetrating...
entangled formofthe product DNA knotsand links contains information about the enzymes that made them.
So how can we figure out what went on in the "black box" in between the DNA substrate and the DNA products?
figure eightcatenane
Hmm not sure why it's called figure eight because this has two components I'm pretty sure
black box
So basically we take the closed circular DNA substrate, get the enzyme to bind to it, and then it cuts the DNA up or something and then releases several DNA products, some of which may be knotted DNA, supercoiled circular DNA, or linked DNA. Presumably the knotted DNA is like the axis with itself
catenanes
molecules which consist of rings linked together
passing onestrandofDNA through another by meansofa transient enzyme-bridgedbreak in oneofthe DNA strands
crossing change!
Ifone scales the cell nucleus up to the sizeofa basketball, theDNA inside scales up to the sizeofthin fishing line, and 200 kmofthatfishing line are inside the nuclear basketball
Maybe mention this...with a picture
The three-dimensional shape insolution isof great biological significance but is very difficult todetermine
Ok so motiviation is that it is very hard to determine the 3D shape in solution specifically
in solution in the cell
Oh yeah everything is just suspended in goo all the time I forgot
two theorems
TWO hold up...
topological results about knots and tangles
Ok in actuality this seems like it does have to do with DNA and knot theory
aspectoftopoisomerases is dealt with in more detail in Chapter8
Wait hold up maybe we can do DNA shit + knot theory here
rather a supercoiled DNA with linking number differenceof-25
so negatively supercoiled
mixtureofthe same DNA with linking numberdifferences that vary all the way from the original number to0
Hmm
linking number differenceofa supercoiled DNA can be reduced to 0
This means the linking number returns to what it would be in a relaxed state, i.e. 0 writhe
distributed to change the average twist by +0.28 and the average writheby +0.72 in accordance with the results mentioned abov
So topo I is changing the twist only but this rebalances itself such that it mostly ends up changing the writhe...so twist ends up increasing by 0.28 and writhe by 0.72
enzymes were found that can actually change the linking numberdifference
Oh right...so topoisomerases change the relaxed DNA into negatively supercoiled DNA by changing the linking number??
supercoiled
negatively supercoiled
or each changeof1 in the linking difference, there is a changeof0.72 in the writhe
and a change in 0.28 in twist...
writheofa planar curve is 0
writhe of DNA in relaxed state
in most cases is less thanLk0
because negatively supercoiled??? well actually the linking number is supposed to be constant so wtf
heavilyused telephone cord
Ok this was written in 1995
After some time, muchofthe twisting will be seen to introducewrithingofthe axisofthe elastic material
Can do this with an experiment with a rubber band or a rope or something...maybe hit up Marshall's
closed strand of DNAofconstant linking numbe
can't change the linking number after you've closed DNA
Lk=Tw+Wr
Important to state but will NOT be proving this obviously
When A is a straight line segment or planar curve,dv.<always isperpendicular to the curve A, so that in these cases, Tw reduces to thenumberoftimes thatv.cturns around the axis
Ok so just ignore the previous parts
we need the use of vector
Hopefully we do not need to use vectors for this...
White, J.H., and W.R. Bauer, 1986, "Calculation of the twist and the writhe forrepresentative models of DNA," Journal of Molecular Biology 189, 329-341.
This could be useful for examples / figures
two distant segmentsofa DNA axisare brought very close together, then this proximity will contributeapproximately±1to the writhing number because in almost all viewsthis proximity will be seen as a crossing.
I guess this makes sense because you're viewing DNA from different projections and it seems different - like knots/links can even have different numbers of crossings
writhing numberisdefined as the average over all possible viewsofthe projected writhing number
Again this is confusing...like what are "all possible views" isn't this infinite
helical windingofthe backbone curve around theaxis
twist
DNA axis is seen to cross itself,
writhe
writheWrand twist Tw,which can be used to describe supercoiling (White, 1969)
This may have the proof of twist + writhe = linking number
For a relaxed circular DNA moleculeofthe monkey virus SV40,which has approximately 5,250 base pairs,Lkis about 500, and forbacteriophage Aofabout 48,510 base pairs,Lkis about 4,620
Can give these as examples...with pictures!
does not depend on theprojection or viewofthe pair
knot invariant
one adds allofthe signed numbers associated with thisprojection and divides by 2, one obtains the linking numberofthe curvesA and C,Lk(A,C)
Ok so this is actually something we've done we won
Such a viewgives a modified projectionofthe pairofcurve
So this is like just a link projection
topologyofknot theory to explain the actionofenzymes in carrying out the fundamental processofsite-specificrecombination.
I feel like this one doesn't have to do with DNA as much but maybe you should do this instead idk...
Lk(R) = T w(R) + W r(R).
This could definitely be a theorem that you state...but will not be proving as the proof is like 60 pages long and involves the Gaussian integral and shit ai yai yai
ormula for the sum ofthe first a + 1 terms of a geometric series with ratio p
re-explain this
Since the arithmetic function f(d) = d is multiplicative (verifythis!), we have that u(n) is multiplicative by Theorem 3.1
Ok so I guess you should do the verify part
disjointness of sub-graphs in G′ ensures that these paths do not cycle
Maybe explain this more intuitively? It's just because the u nodes cannot be part of a cycle or isolated so they must be part of a simple path and only one simple path
each node in the coregraph has degree either zero or two
(these are the only two possible cases as each vertex has three hexagons surrounding it)
ode has two incident edges
can highlight this as well
node is isolated in G′ and has degree zero
Show this with like highlighting on the example board
e1, e2, e3,and e4 belong in E
by construction
edge to belong in E′only if it lies between a X-face and an O-face
so like delineating the boundaries
If every tile of the Hex board is markedeither x or o
i.e. the game has been played to completion
u and v now have degree at most 1 since they had degree atmost two before we removed edge (u, v)
so they're like leaves...
all the nodes are isolated
(so g is the union of N disjoint subgraphs)
Each node can have degree at most two, so g can haveat most N edge
Maybe explain this more carefully
supercoiling helps incellular packaging of DNA in structures called nucleosomes, in whichDNA is wound around proteins called histones
nucleosomes make up chromatin which makes up chromosomes
cruciforms
form from palindromic sequences; important for cruciform-binding proteins during DNA replication
polyrnerases
replicates DNA molecules after helicase unzips to actually build a new strand of DNA
helicases
The "unzipping" enzyme which breaks the hydrogen bonds holding the two strands together
Supercoiling of closed DNA is ubiquitous in biological systems
So it's not some niche or theoretical occurrence and it isn't just synthesized by scientists
may, in general, assume almostany configuration in space
so axis can be a knot!
xis ofthe double helix may itself be a helix
Maybe try to find a diagram for this...idk But do explain what a helix is
commonlinear axis
Picture of axis:
fundamental theorem
excellent
Figure 18
Maybe have like an actual ribbon, perhaps that you've labeled to look like DNA, as a prop? Maybe many to pass out though this could take a while
return to itsnatural twist rate,
OK so this is a thing that DNA tries to do, best to explain that early perhaps
linking number of the ribbon is equal to the linkingnumber of this link
so it's literally just the linking number because the two edges already are two components of a link...
average signed crossover number over all possible projections of the ribbon inspace
"average signed crossover number over all possible diagrams"...??? isn't there an infinite number of projections (diagrams)?
Definition 2.3
Seems like this one should be defined first but whatever
duplex DNA
another name for double-stranded DNA
tangles
Tangles kinda just seem like small subdiagrams of knots...with 4 endpoints (i.e. two strands enter the subdiagram and two strands leave, so four endpoints are attached to it in total)
S = (-3, 0)and R = (1)
wtf does this mean...maybe look this up and go through tangle notation. However this could be one of your theorems...though the paper is like 61 pages lol
substrate molecule as N (S + T ) and the product molecule as N (S + R)
More things to define and such
knot Q
Isn't this not a knot yet?
substrate molecule (the molecule before the enzyme acts)
other important definitions
circular (cyclic) DNA
so DNA molecules do not always have their ends joined
several more general action
so like a double crossing change, an R2 move, and a "separating" series of R-moves / planar isotopies
projections
Ok so "projections" means "diagrams" here...
measure of howintertwined two components of a link are
Is this accurate like...
linking number
Ok so actually linking number is the same methinks
new terminol-ogy, writhe, to model this type of cyclic DNA.
You can't come up with a new name for it like be serious
examples of your ow
definitely a good idea to provide pictures
explanations of proof ideas or important results if relevant
so not necessarily full proofs
10access to the shared resources. In addition, it only considers a singleprocessor and ignores the overhead caused in changing the mode. In thefuture, we will focus on scheduling energy aware dependent periodictasks in multiprocessor MC real-time systems with the overhead ofchanging the mode
Limitations: no consideration of precedence constraints, shared resources, multiprocessors, overhead caused in a mode change
reduce energy consumption up to 32.45 and46.84% compared with Algorithm A in the normal mode and urgencymode, respectively
picking the best values ig
Effect of the ratio of Ci (LO)Ai (L
oh ok so we're actually investigating this
energy consumption up to 32.45% in the urgency mode
maybe he's doing averages...
herefore, EAU can reduce energy consumption up to41.63%
still kinda weird idk
can reduce energy consumption up to 21.17%
still weird tf
normalized energy consumption when ULOLO(Γ) was equal to 0.45
This is why energy is set to 1
In addition, the ratio of Ci(LO) and Ai(LO) was set to 5 for any task τi.
Again assuming the WCET is like 5x the actual execution time
1.3
This makes sense as you'd expect the utilization of all HI-criticality tasks using C_HI values to be higher than the utilization of all HI-criticality tasks using C_LO values
ULOHI (Γ)
utilization of all HI-criticality tasks using C_LO values
Effect of UHIHI (Γ)
Ok so we're differing little thingies
Therefore, EAU can reduce energy consumption up to 46.30% inthe urgency mode compared with Algorithm A as shown in Fig. 9(b).
Ok but this seems much more accurate so what's tea...
actualexecution time of tasks
biggest difference along with slowing down speed in urgent mode...why is using actual execution times valid in urgent mode again...?
pplied the uniform distribution method to select theparameter of the task
so randomly choosing a task period in between 1000 and 5000 inclusive
slack time generated from the early completion jobs and the jobswere executed with Shigh in the urgency mode.
Maybe EAU does this more efficiently than Algorithm A idk
HI level task is executed with Smax in the urgencymode
so no power-saving in the urgency mode
rocessor could providediscrete normalized speed levels, i.e., [0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9,1.0]
So the speeds we just discussed in the example before are not possible aurrrrkkayyy
That is Pind = 0.1, Pmaxdynamic was normalized to 1 and θwas set to 0.2 in Eq. (1) [2]
Ok let's go with that
Pind = 0.1, Pmaxdynamic = 1 and θ = 0.2
ok work let's go with that
Case 3: EAU is feasible in a changed mode
This seems fake lol
sum utilization of tasks
WHICH TASKS...
asks are put intothe delay queue
well right here it does say tasks so it maybe just means that...
other is a delay queue that in-cludes the unreleased and completed job
this doesn't make sense because aren't the number of unreleased jobs infinite? maybe the delay queue just includes the tasks? But it does specifically say unreleased and completed jobs so like what's tea...
If the HI level job τijends and its execution time exceeds Ci(LO)/S under S, the system willswitch to the urgency mode
so we only care if a HI task overruns its deadline, not a LO task
Smax
S max is 1 (normalized)
Algorithm A computes the parameter x= 0.875, the optimal speed of LO tasks SLO = 0.86, and the optimal speedof HI tasks SHI = 0.90
Ok so we're computing the optimal virtual deadline constant x, the optimal energy-saving processing speed for the LO tasks, and the optimal energy-saving processing speed for the HI tasks
Ci(LO) ≤ Ai(HI)
So the WCET for HI tasks in the normal (low) mode must be at most the actual execution time for tasks in the urgent (high) mode
When the HI level task is not completed on time and its execution timeexceeds the worst case execution time (WCET) in the normal modeunder the processor speed S
Seems like this is the same as AMC but only if a HI level task is exceeding its WCET under any processor speed S
If ζ = LO, then the virtual deadline of τi is assigned to ti + T
Ok so this is just implicit deadlines...
Wederived the energy model parameters from the state-of-the-art researches in this area [24], [28], [29], [37], [38]. Weassumed thatmaxdynamicP is normalized to 1 and0.1
the blind leading the blind honey
Static and dynamicpower components can be reduced by selecting lowerivalues for a task
So DVFS can't do anything to help save power dissipated by I/O and memory operations
)dynamicmaxi ind i i
rho is processor speed methinks
I
Below a certain voltage (threshold) no current is supposed to flow between the terminals of a transistor but it does anyway and so this is "leaked" current - it comprises the majority of the static power consumed by the system which is not dependent on processing frequency / clock speed and exists even when the system is in a low-power sleep mode
optimal x is 0.625 where f HIand f LO are 0.7 and 0.5 in each
ok so we're choosing an optimal value for x rather than just picking the least such x which works
urrently-executing job executes for more than itsLO -criticality WCET without signaling completion
AMC pretty much idk
ob is assigned a scheduling deadlineequal to t + ˆTi
difference from EDF
lies somewhere within the interval
maybe have them do this if you do an exercise / handout - compute the middle of the two values
x U LOLO (τ ) + U HIHI (τ ) ≤ 1
HI-mode condition
sufficientcondition for ensuring that EDF-VD successfully meets allHI -criticality deadlines during all HI -criticality behaviors ofτ
HI-mode condition
x ← U LOHI (τ )1 − U LOLO (τ )
How the lower deadlines are computed...
ll currently-active LO -criticality jobs are immediately dis-carded; henceforth, no LO -criticality job will receive anyexecution
EDF-VD mostly uses AMC
ta + ˆTi
virtual deadline artificially decreases the period of HI-criticality tasks
ta + Ti
so just regular implicit deadlines
Ti ≤ Ti
Ok so maybe the constant x is always less than 1?
τ
so fuck Gamma I guess
U yx (τ ) =∑τi ∈τ ∧χi =xCi(y)Ti
x is the criticality of the tasks we are summing and y is the C value we are using
all HI -criticality jobs receive enough execution between their releasetime and deadline to be able to signal completion.
It's giving AMC...
Each such job has a deadline that is Tk time unitsafter its release.
implicit deadline bit
erroneous behavior
then the system is fr fucked the fucked up
if evenone job Ji signals completion after executing for more thanci(LO) but no more than ci(HI) units of execution, we saythat the system has exhibited HI-criticality behavio
it's giving AMC
γi
Actual execution time it appears
sporadic
the original paper used periodic tasks
run-timecomplexity per scheduling decision was logarithmic in thenumber of task
So scheduling overhead is logarithmic which is nice
[8]
Ok so maybe this is the source...
Integrated Modular Avion-ics (IMA) [19] in aerospace and AUTOSAR
Could be examples of systems in which this kinda stuff matters
Mawhin, J. (2007). Le th ́eor`eme du point fixe de Brouwer: un si`ecle de m ́etamorphoses.Sciences ettechniques en perspective10(2): 175–220.
An anthology of other proofs of Brouwer's Fixed Point Theorem