Case3: 73 year old man

DiseaseAssertion: He carried the MYL2 p.Ala13Thr variant

FamilyInfo: Yes, his wife, son, and daughter

ParentalTesting: Yes with screening by ECG and Echocardiography; underwent 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography (M-mode, 2D, and Doppler), and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0002094, HP:0003388, HP:0012828, HP:0001650, HP:0034313, HP:0030882

CaseHPOFreeText: presented with dyspnea on exertion and easy fatigability. He was found to have severe aortic stenosis with an aortic valve area of 1 cm2 and a peak gradient of 68 mmHg. He had mild LVH with a wall thickness of 13 mm on an echocardiogram and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of > 70%. A 12-lead ECG was unremarkable without evidence of LVH. He also had an 80% luminal diameter stenosis of left anterior descending coronary artery on coronary angiography. He underwent aortic valve replacement and a single vessel coronary artery bypass surgery. He has been asymptomatic since surgery

CaseNotHPOs:NR

CaseNotHPOFreeText:NR

CasePreviousTesting: Whole exome sequencing (WES)

Genotyping Method: Sanger sequencing

FunctionalAnalysis:NR

Variant:NM_000432.4:c.37G>A

ClinVar:14064

CAID:CA010242

gnomAD: gnomAD v2 12:111356964 C / T , gnomAD v3 12:110919160 C / T ,gmonAD v4 chr12-110919160-C-T

AdditionalInfo:NR

Case4: 43 year old woman.

DiseaseAssertion: diagnosed with HCM and carried variants in TTN, ALPK3, and MYL2 (p.Ala13Thr).

FamilyInfo:Other family members, II-1 is a 72-year old woman with history of intermittent atrial flutter with a normal interventricular septal thickness (8 mm) and a normal LVEF (58%). Likewise, individual II-4 is an asymptomatic 70-year old male, who had normal ECG, echocardiogram, and myocardial stress perfusion tomography. Proband’s children (IV-1 and IV-2) were asymptomatic and had normal ECGs and echocardiograms on the last evaluation. Likewise, individual IV-3 was a 7-year old asymptomatic boy who had a normal ECG and echocardiogram.

ParentalTesting: Yes, mother, brother, and father were tested

CasePresentingHPOs:HP:0031664, HP:0012835, HP:0004972, HP:0001670, HP:0034313, HP:0031656, HP:0012825

CaseHPOFreeText: Her physical exam was notable for the presence of a II/VI mid-systolic ejection murmur at left sternal border that radiated toward base of the heart. She also had a mildly elevated arterial blood pressure. A 12-lead ECG showed evidence of LVH, interventricular conduction delay, and repolarization abnormalities. An echocardiogram showed severe asymmetric septal hypertrophy with a hyperdynamic LV systolic function, systolic anterior motion of the mitral leaflet, and a LVOT gradient of 60 to 70 mmHg at rest (Figure 3B). CMR findings were also notable for asymmetric septal hypertrophy and mild patchy hyperenhancement.

CaseNotHPOs:NR

CaseNotHPOFreeText:NR

CasePreviousTesting: Whole exome sequencing (WES)

Genotyping Method: Sanger sequencing

FunctionalAnalysis:NR

Variant:NM_000432.4:c.37G>A

ClinVar:14064

CAID:CA010242

gnomAD: gnomAD v2 12:111356964 C / T , gnomAD v3 12:110919160 C / T ,gmonAD v4 chr12-110919160-C-T

AdditionalInfo:NR

Case2: 63 year old woman, diagnosed with HCM

DiseaseAssertion: Individual carried the MYL2 p.Ala13Thr, TTN, and ALPK3 variants.

FamilyInfo: Yes, son and daughter and husband was all diagnosed.

ParentalTesting: Yes with screening by ECG and Echocardiography; underwent 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography (M-mode, 2D, and Doppler), and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0004383, HP:0005144, HP:0001962, HP:0001279, HP:0001278, HP:0031295, HP:0040284, HP:0011703, HP:0025275

CaseHPOFreeText: Echocardiographic findings of a hyperdynamic left ventricle and an interventricular septal thickness of 19 mm. She had a history of brief episodes of palpitations and one episode of syncope a few years earlier, which was thought to be due to orthostatic hypotension. A 12-lead ECG was notable for possible left atrial enlargement. A 30-day rhythm monitoring showed rare ventricular ectopic beats and episodes of sinus tachycardia. CMR showed a normal LV wall thickness and function and minimal patchy mid myocardial hyperenhancement in the basal inferior and infero-lateral wall.

CaseNotHPOs: HP:0000822, HP:0001639, HP:0032092

CaseNotHPOFreeText: No history of systemic arterial hypertension, valvular disease, or other conditions to explain cardiac hypertrophy. No LVOT obstruction.

CasePreviousTesting: Whole exome sequencing (WES)

Genotyping Method: Sanger sequencing

FunctionalAnalysis: NR

Variant:NM_000432.4:c.37G>A

ClinVar:14064

CAID:CA010242

gnomAD: gnomAD v2 12:111356964 C / T , gnomAD v3 12:110919160 C / T ,gmonAD v4 chr12-110919160-C-T

AdditionalInfo:NR

Case1: A 44-year old male of European (non-Finnish) ancestry.

DiseaseAssertion: Disease, with the MYL2 p.Ala13Thr variant.

FamilyInfo: Mother, father, and sister was diagnosed at different ages; they all had it.

ParentalTesting: Yes with screening by ECG and Echocardiography; underwent 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG), echocardiography (M-mode, 2D, and Doppler), and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR).

CasePresentingHPOs:HP:0100749, HP:0002094, HP:0031664, HP:0033678, HP:0011703, HP:0001712, HP:0031296,HP:0020034, HP:0031656

CaseHPOFreeText: Presented 3 years ago with persistent but mild chest pain and dyspnea. presence of II/VI mid-systolic murmur that increased with the Valsalva maneuver. Cardiac enzymes were negative for acute coronary syndromes. A 12-lead ECG was notable for sinus tachycardia at the rate of 104 bpm and evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) with repolarization abnormalities. Myocardial stress perfusion tomography showed homogeneous distribution of the radiotracer in the myocardium. An echocardiogram showed a hyperdynamic left ventricle with moderate asymmetric septal hypertrophy, a maximum wall thickness of 1.8 cm. There was a resting left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient of 20 mmHg that increased to 40 mmHg upon Valsalva maneuver. CMR findings were notable for septal hypertrophy and diffuse patchy hyperenhancement, involving multiple myocardial walls. increasing dyspnea with a mild level of physical activity and chest pain. Evidence of LVH with repolarization abnormalities on a 12-lead ECG and a hyperdynamic left ventricle with a septal thickness of 2 cm, systolic anterior motion of mitral leaflets, mild to moderate mitral regurgitation, and an LVOT gradient of 100 mmHg on echocardiography (Figure 3A). Underwent surgical myectomy, which led to resolution of LVOT gradient and symptoms.

CaseNotHPOs: HP:0011675, HP:0011703

CaseNotHPOFreeText: Not show significant cardiac arrhythmias except for periods of sinus tachycardia at rest.

CasePreviousTesting: Whole exome sequencing (WES)

Genotyping Method: Sanger sequencing

FunctionalAnalysis: May affect cardiac contractile function and actin filament velocity, But NR about the MYL2 p.Ala13Thr variant.

Variant: NM_000432.4:c.37G>A

ClinVar:14064

CAID: CA010242

gnomAD: gnomAD v2 12:111356964 C / T , gnomAD v3 12:110919160 C / T gmonAD v4 chr12-110919160-C-T

AdditionalInfo: NR

Case: IP #8 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/1) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 26; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 71

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 31009

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #62

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 55; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 9; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 87

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4883T>C p.Ile1628Thr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 284

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001859 (3 in 1613848) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018535-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #16 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 40; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 10; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #9 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 85; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 56; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 30

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3917G>T p.Arg1306Leu

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100301

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613956) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019501-C-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #23 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 32; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 15; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 55

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4022G>A p.Arg1341Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 291

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in 1613944) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019396-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #1 in type 2M VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 30; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = n/a; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a; VWF:CB (IU/dL) = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3845T>C p.Leu1282Pro

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100329

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #15 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440 - blood group B

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 26; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 5; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 25.0

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3923G>A p.Arg1308Pro

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100303

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #17 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 46; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 64; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #19 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 58; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 22; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 54

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3946G>A p.Val1316Met

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 290

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #9 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 93; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 107; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 18

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2446C > T p.Arg816Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 295

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00001983 (32 in 1613930) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6036488-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

ClinVar: 296

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #43

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 22; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 13; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 29

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4789C>T p.Arg1597Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 285

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1614028) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018629-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #46

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 64; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 16; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 66

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4789C>T p.Arg1597Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 285

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1614028) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018629-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #7 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/1) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 35; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 35

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 31009

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #21 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 14; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 4; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 31

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #12 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 59; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 59; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 16

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #61

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 5; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 20

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4883T>C p.Ile1628Thr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 284

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001859 (3 in 1613848) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018535-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #15 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 20; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 15; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 28

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #5 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440 - blood group B

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 44; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 25; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 135

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 288

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #22 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 42; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 17; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 51

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4022G>A p.Arg1341Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 291

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in 1613944) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019396-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #16 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 93; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 48; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 76

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #18 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 25; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 26

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3946G>A p.Val1316Met

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 290

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #2 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 21; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 13; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 37

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 288

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #21 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440 - blood group B

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 22; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 26; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 53

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #20 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 10; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 12

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #6 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/1) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 17; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 22

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 31009

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #8 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 61; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 59; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 25

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2446C > T p.Arg816Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 295

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00001983 (32 in 1613930) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6036488-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

ClinVar: 296

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #36

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 40; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 16; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 51

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4541T>G p.Phe1514Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 304

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #18

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIE) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 19.3; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 9; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 30

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 31009

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #11 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 74; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 79; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 18

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #1 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 13; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 49

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2435del p.Pro812Argfs*31

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 303

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00007187 (116 in 1613916) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6044297-CG-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3797C>T p.Pro1266Leu

ClinVarID: 314

gnomAD: 0.0006678 (1077 in 1612852) 2 homozyogotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019621-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #49

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 56; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 15; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 47

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4789C>T p.Arg1597Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 285

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1614028) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018629-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #14 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 20; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 13; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 39

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #45

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 26; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 9; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 30

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4789C>T p.Arg1597Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 285

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1614028) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018629-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #17 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032441 - blood group AB

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 12; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 26

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #19 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 13; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 8; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 22

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #20

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIE) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 29; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 18; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3437A>G

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 31009

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #18 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 151; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 121; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 53

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #14 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 14; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 10; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 26

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3922C>T p.Arg1308Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 289

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #5 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 29; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 26; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 10

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2435del p.Pro812Argfs*31

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 303

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00007187 (116 in 1613916) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6044297-CG-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variants: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

ClinVarID: 296

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #9 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 12; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 10; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 21

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 31009

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3539–10T>G

ClinVarID: not found

**gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #15 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 67; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 78; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 88

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #60

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 38; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 7; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 37

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4883T>C p.Ile1628Thr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 284

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001859 (3 in 1613848) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018535-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #23 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N/1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 40; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 54; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 50

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4751A>G p.Tyr1584Cys

ClinVarID: 310

gnomAD: 0.003442 (5555 in 1613678) 15 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018667-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #20 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 49; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 41; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 23

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #17 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 62; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 22; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 37

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3946G>A p.Val1316Met

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 290

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #3 in type 2M VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 41na44; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = n/a; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a; VWF:CB (IU/dL) = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4001G>A p.Arg1334Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 2572701

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000006196 (10 in 1613834) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019417-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #25 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD and hemophilia A

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 121; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 111; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 1

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #13 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 12; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 7; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 26

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #14 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 55; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 30; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 56

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #8 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 27; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 8; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 33

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 288

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #18 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 14; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 26

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #4 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 48; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 33; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 46

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 288

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #48

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 16; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 20

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4789C>T p.Arg1597Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 285

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1614028) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018629-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #44

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 30; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 11; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 47

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4789C>T p.Arg1597Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 285

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1614028) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018629-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #59

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 28.7; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 5; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 32

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4883T>C p.Ile1628Thr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 284

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001859 (3 in 1613848) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018535-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #21 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 36; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 9; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 36

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3946G>A p.Val1316Met

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 290

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #19 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 45; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 42; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 11

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #13 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032441 - blood group AB

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 30; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 10

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3922C>T p.Arg1308Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 289

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #16 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440 - blood group B

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 63; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 10; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 82

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3946G>A p.Val1316Met

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 290

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #19

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIE) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 12; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 5; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 24

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3437A>G

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 31009

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #1 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 4; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 26

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

ClinVarID: 288

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #7 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 22; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 20

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 288

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #20 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 48; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 11; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 46

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3946G>A p.Val1316Met

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 290

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #7 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440 - blood group B

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 166; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 144; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 2

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2446C>T p.Arg816Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 295

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00001983 (32 in 1613930) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6036488-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #12 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 42; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 15; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 48

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3922C>T p.Arg1308Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 289

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #6 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 74; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 80; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 40

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2435del p.Pro812Argfs*31

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 303

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00007187 (116 of 1613916) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6044297-CG-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

ClinVarID: 296

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #3 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 37; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = n/a; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 288

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #13 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 55; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 45; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 16

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #6 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 22; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 5; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 27

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 288

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #47

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440 - blood group B

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 24; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 32

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4789C>T p.Arg1597Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 285

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1614028) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018629-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #10 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 50; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 55; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 15

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2446C > T p.Arg816Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 295

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00001983 (32 in 1613930) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6036488-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

ClinVar: 296

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #50

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = n/a; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 11; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4790G>A p.Arg1597Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100391

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case UZ075: 2 year old female (row 76 supplemental table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 27; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 25.5; Act/Ag ratio = 0.94; FVIII:C (%) = 94.6; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 317

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.6551G>A p.Cys2184Tyr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1677275

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in 1613988) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-5993909-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: F5:Leiden

Variant: c.1601G>A p.Arg534Gln

ClinVarID: 642

gonmAD: 0.02143 (34574 in 1613166) 450 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/1-169549811-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case 4: 1 y.o. male, study ID UZ079 in supplemental table. Also listed in Table 2 line 6

DiseaseAssertion: type 2 NOS VWD presequencing; type 1 VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 18; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 12.6; Act/Ag ratio = 0.70; FVIII:C (%) = 87.9; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 358

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished: Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4342C>T p.Gln1448*

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 2572655

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case 3: 32 y.o. female, study ID UZ002 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD presequencing, type 2B Malmo/New York VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 51; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 30; Act/Ag ratio = 0.59; FVIII:C (%) = 48; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 264

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod:WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3797C>T p.Pro1266Leu

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 314

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.0006678 (1077/1612852) 2 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019621-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case 2: 33 y.o. female, study ID UZ104 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD presequencing, type 2M VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 14; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 10; Act/Ag ratio = 1.00; FVIII:C (%) = 8; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 239

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3863T>G p.Leu1288Arg

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100294

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case 6: 4 y.o. male, study ID UZ024 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: type 2 NOS VWD presequencing; type 2M VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 12.2; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 6.3; Act/Ag ratio = 0.52; FVIII:C (%) = 37.1; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 570

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3863T>G p.Leu1288Arg

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100294

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case UZ036: 13 year old female

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 6.5; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 4.6; Act/Ag ratio = 0.71; FVIII:C (%) = 28.6; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 258

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.8008G>A p.Gly2670Ser

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1703812

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000005576 (9 in 1614024) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-5952498-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultpleGeneVariants:

Gene: FGG

Variant: c.503C>T p.Thr168Met

ClinVarID: 1703849

gnomAD: 0.00003719 (60 in 1613552) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/4-154610096-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case 20: 3 year old male, study ID UZ067 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: low VWF

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 49; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 50.5; Act/Ag ratio = 1.03; FVIII:C (%) = 90.3; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 336

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod:WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.7287+12T>G p.?

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 2572109

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000002479 (4 in 1613878) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-5981774-A-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case 5: 2 y.o. female, study ID UZ068 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: type 2 NOS VWD presequencing, type 2B VWD + hemophilia A postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 43.3; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 25.2; Act/Ag ratio = 0.58; FVIII:C (%) = 21.6; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 384

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3946G>T p.Val1316Leu

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1703818

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2/1613946) 0 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019472-C-G?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants: variant: F8:c.5883G>A; p.Trp1961*; ClinVar ID: 1703846

Case 19: 2 year old male, study ID UZ070 in supplmental table

DiseaseAssertion: low VWF

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 45; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 39.4; Act/Ag ratio = 0.88; FVIII:C (%) = 74.4; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 232

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod:WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.5746C>G p.Arg1916Gly

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 2572097

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000004337 (7 in 1613868) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6011713-G-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleSequenceVariants:

Gene: SERPINC1

Variant: c.89T>A p.Val30Glu

ClinVarID: 18012

gnomAD: 0.002625 (4237 in 1614198) 14 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/1-173914872-A-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case UZ096: 38 year old female (row97 in supplemental table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 22.8; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 22; Act/Ag ratio = 0.96; FVIII:C (%) = 53.2; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 149

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.7636A>T p.Asn2546Tyr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100480

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000003717 (6 in 1614024) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-5969304-T-A?daset=gnomad_r4at

Case 10: 28 y.o. male, study ID UZ095 in Supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: Type 2 NOS VWD presequencing, type 2M VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032441

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 11.8; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 5; Act/Ag ratio = 0.42; FVIII:C (%) = 18.8; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 180

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1/1613892) 0 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case UZ056: 8 year old male (row 57 in supplementary table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 1/2M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 10.8; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 9.6; Act/Ag ratio = 0.89; FVIII:C (%) = 30.2; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 196

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193).

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.5198T>C p.Leu1733Pro

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1703810

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case UZ050: 3 year old male (row 51 supplemental table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 29.6; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 26; Act/Ag ratio = 0.88; FVIII:C (%) = 78

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.6551G>A p.Cys2184Tyr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1677275

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in1613988) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-5993909-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case UZ098: 41 year old female (row 99 in supplemental table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 30.1; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 25.8; Act/Ag ratio = 0.86; FVIII:C (%) = 61.5; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 377

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4751A>G p.Tyr1584Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 310

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.003442 (5555 in 1613678) 15 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018667-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case UZ063: 10 year old male (row 64 supplemental table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 2M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442, HP:0040225

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 20.2; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 8.5; Act/Ag ratio = 0.42; FVIII:C (%) = 28; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 242

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3863T>G p.Leu1288Arg

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100294

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case 17: 47 year old female, study ID UZ099 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: acquired VWD presequencing, acquired VWD + type 1 VWD variant postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 2.6; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 2.2; Act/Ag ratio = 0.85; FVIII:C (%) = 7; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 325

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4751A>G p.Tyr1584Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 310

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.003442 (5555 in 1613678) 15 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018667-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

FGG variant

Variant: c.323C>G p.Ala108Gly

ClinVarID: 547969

gnomAD: 0.003031 (4885 in 1611606) 12 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/4-154611883-G-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case 18: 0 year old male, study ID UZ078 in supplmental table

DiseaseAssertion: low VWF

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 51.6; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 45.7; Act/Ag ratio = 0.89; FVIII:C (%) = 86.7; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 487

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4342C>T p.Gln1448*

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 2572655

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: Row 2 in Supplemental Table 1. Represents 1 patient that has two variants in VWF.

DiseaseAssertion: type 3 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 3.0 (1.7-4.0); VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 1.9 (1.5-2.9)

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Genetic analysis was performed at the laboratory of hematology of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen. Ion semiconductor sequencing (Ion-Torrent) was used to analyze the VWF gene from peripheral blood obtained in EDTA tubes or from saliva samples. The 52 exons of VWF gene were analyzed including ±20 bp exon-intron boundaries. If no VWF gene variant was detected, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis was performed to find large deletions or duplications. Thus, MLPA was performed in 183 patients (46.9%). All variants were confirmed with Sanger sequencing.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: Del exon 4-5

HGVS: c.221-977_532+7059del

ClinVarID: 156329

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

MultipleVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: L2306R fs*4

Case: Row 2 in Supplemental Table 1. Represents 13 patients in 13 families.

DiseaseAssertion: 13 type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 3.0 (1.7-4.0); VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 1.9 (1.5-2.9)

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Genetic analysis was performed at the laboratory of hematology of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen. Ion semiconductor sequencing (Ion-Torrent) was used to analyze the VWF gene from peripheral blood obtained in EDTA tubes or from saliva samples. The 52 exons of VWF gene were analyzed including ±20 bp exon-intron boundaries. If no VWF gene variant was detected, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis was performed to find large deletions or duplications. Thus, MLPA was performed in 183 patients (46.9%). All variants were confirmed with Sanger sequencing.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: Del exon 4-5

HGVS: c.221-977_532+7059del

ClinVarID: 156329

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: Row 8 in Supplemental Table 1.

DiseaseAssertion: type 3 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 10.0; VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 1.0

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Genetic analysis was performed at the laboratory of hematology of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen. Ion semiconductor sequencing (Ion-Torrent) was used to analyze the VWF gene from peripheral blood obtained in EDTA tubes or from saliva samples. The 52 exons of VWF gene were analyzed including ±20 bp exon-intron boundaries. If no VWF gene variant was detected, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis was performed to find large deletions or duplications. Thus, MLPA was performed in 183 patients (46.9%). All variants were confirmed with Sanger sequencing.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: 1543_1544insGGACAGCT V515G fs*65

HGVS: c.1543_1544insGGACAGCT (p.Val515Glyfs*65)

ClinVarID: 1695359

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: Row 16 in Supplemental Table 1.

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 0.2; VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 2.0

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Genetic analysis was performed at the laboratory of hematology of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen. Ion semiconductor sequencing (Ion-Torrent) was used to analyze the VWF gene from peripheral blood obtained in EDTA tubes or from saliva samples. The 52 exons of VWF gene were analyzed including ±20 bp exon-intron boundaries. If no VWF gene variant was detected, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis was performed to find large deletions or duplications. Thus, MLPA was performed in 183 patients (46.9%). All variants were confirmed with Sanger sequencing.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: 2372C>T T791M

HGVS: VWF:c.2372C>T p.Thr791Met

ClinVarID: 294

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00001797 (29 in 1614030) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6044361-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: P812R fs*31

Case: Row 20 in Supplemental Table 1. Variant is found in 14 patients in 14 families

DiseaseAssertion: 7 have type 1 VWD, 7 have VWD type 2N

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 1.2 (0.4-1.9); VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 2.7 (1.6-3.8)

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Genetic analysis was performed at the laboratory of hematology of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen. Ion semiconductor sequencing (Ion-Torrent) was used to analyze the VWF gene from peripheral blood obtained in EDTA tubes or from saliva samples. The 52 exons of VWF gene were analyzed including ±20 bp exon-intron boundaries. If no VWF gene variant was detected, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis was performed to find large deletions or duplications. Thus, MLPA was performed in 183 patients (46.9%). All variants were confirmed with Sanger sequencing.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: 2561G>A R854Q

HGVS: VWF:c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: Type 2N; Three also had R2535, one N2546Y, one 6257-1G>A (novel), and one H1419M fs22 (novel). Type 1: one also had S1090_C1099del (novel) and one had del exon 33-34

Case: Row 17 in Supplemental Table 1. Found in 2 patients in the same family.

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 2.3 (1.7-3.2); VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 3.0 (2.9-3.2)

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Genetic analysis was performed at the laboratory of hematology of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen. Ion semiconductor sequencing (Ion-Torrent) was used to analyze the VWF gene from peripheral blood obtained in EDTA tubes or from saliva samples. The 52 exons of VWF gene were analyzed including ±20 bp exon-intron boundaries. If no VWF gene variant was detected, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis was performed to find large deletions or duplications. Thus, MLPA was performed in 183 patients (46.9%). All variants were confirmed with Sanger sequencing.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: 2435delC P812R fs*31

HGVS: VWF:c.2435del p.Pro812Argfs*31

ClinVarID: 303

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00007187 (116 in 1613916) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6044297-CG-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case20: GT23, Male, 19, French

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000978, HP:0000225, HP:0000421

(Easy bruising, gingival bleeding, epistaxis)

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed <5% expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGB3

Variant: NM_000212.2:c.1031A>C (p.Tyr344Ser)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA400025814

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case6: GT7, Female, 19, French

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: 1 brother, that is all the information Supp table S1 gives us

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000978 and HP:0000421

(Easy bruising and epistaxis)

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed <10-15% expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent ADP but some response with other agonists (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGB3

Variant: NM_000212.2:c.187C>T (p.Arg63Cys) and NM_000212.2:c.505C>T (p.Arg169Ter)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: 631774

CAiD: CA8622892 and CA291224658

gnomAD: MAF in the East Asian population is 0.00005012 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-45360741-C-T

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case9: GT10, Male, 45, French and Italian

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: Mild lifelong bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed 30-50% variant expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Residual platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1440-13_1440-1del (p.Arg480Serfs*106) and NM_000419.3:c.3077G>A (p.Arg1026Gln)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: 50232

CAiD: CA913184940 and CA10575572

gnomAD: MAF in the European (non-Finnish) population 0.00006482 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-45363676-T-C and MAF in the European (non-Finnish) population is 0.000008801 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-42449775-C-T

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case10: GT11, Female, 54, French and German

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000421, HP:0000225, HP:0000132

(Epistaxis, gingival bleeding, menorrhagia)

CaseHPOFreeText: Spontaneous bruising

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed 10-15% variant expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1073G>A (p.Arg358His) and NM_000419.3:c.1234G>A (p.Gly412Arg)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: 2896 and 381748

CAiD: CA115839 and CA8603182

gnomAD: MAF in the Latino population is 0.0001453 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-42458406-C-T

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case54: GT54, Male, 33, Argintinian/Italian

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000225, HP:0006298

(Gingival bleeding, bleeding following tooth extraction)

CaseHPOFreeText: Hematomas

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed <5% expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGB3

Variant: NM_000212.2:c.2014+1G>A and a "LR deletion variant" as mentioned in Sup Table 1

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA400033055

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case70: GT74, Female, 14 years old, French

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0002239, HP:0002249

(GI bleeding, melena)

CaseHPOFreeText: Serious mouth bleeding, post traumatic heavy bruising, heavy bleeding after adenoid removal

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed less than 5% αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1214T>C (p.Ile405Thr) and NM_000419.3:c.1440-13_1440-1del (p.Arg480Serfs*106)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA290950815 and CA913184940

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case30: GT34, Male, 15 years old, US

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000421, HP:0002239

(Epistaxis, GI bleeding)

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed <5% expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1553T>A (p.Ile518Asn) and NM_000419.3:c.1946+3G>T

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA8603038 and CA626121071

gnomAD: MAF in the European (non-Finnish) is 0.000008790 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-42457661-A-T and MAF in the African population is 0.000 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-42456008-C-A

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case11: GT12, Female, 61, French

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: Brother (died at birth) this is all the information Supp table S1 gives

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000421, HP:0000978, HP:0000790

(Epistaxis, easy bruising, hematuria)

CaseHPOFreeText: Heavy bleeding and menarche

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed <5% variant expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGB3

Variant: NM_000212.2:c.565C>T (p.Pro189Ser)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA291224669

gnomAD: MAF in the European (non-Finnish) population 0.00002638 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-45362012-C-T

Case1: (Proband CabGT-1) Male, age not specified, China

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

ProteinExpression: Surface expression detected by flow cytometry showed <5% GPIIb and <5% GPIIIa

Platelet Aggregation: N/A

CasePreviousTesting: Promoter and exon sequences of aIIb and b3 genes were amplified and directly sequence

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.531T>A (p.Cys177Ter)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA290955739

gnomAD N/A

Case7: (Proband CabGT-7) Female, age not specified, Caucasian

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed <5% GPIIb and 11% GPIIIa surface expression

Platelet Aggregation: N/A

CasePreviousTesting: Promoter and exon sequences of aIIb and b3 genes were amplified and directly sequence

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: The first variant was found to be: NM_000419.3:c.1563T>A (p.Cys521Ter) and they did not find the second mutation

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA290950094

gnomAD N/A

Case3: (Proband CabGT-3), Male, age not specified, European Caucasian

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

ProteinExpression: N/A

Platelet Aggregation: N/A

CasePreviousTesting: Promoter and exon sequences of aIIb and b3 genes were amplified and directly sequence

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1214T>C (p.Ile405Thr) and c.1442-13_1442-1del, which is not showing up in CAR (Unregistered Variant?)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA290950815 (p.Ile405Thr)

gnomAD N/A

Case9: (Proband CabGT-9), Female, age not specified, Kuwait

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

ProteinExpression: N/A

Platelet Aggregation: N/A

CasePreviousTesting: Promoter and exon sequences of aIIb and b3 genes were amplified and directly sequence

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1879-2A>G

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA290949031

gnomAD N/A

Case17: (Proband CabGT-17), Male, age not specified, North African

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed 13% GPIIb and 27% GPIIIa surface expression

Platelet Aggregation: N/A

CasePreviousTesting: Promoter and exon sequences of aIIb and b3 genes were amplified and directly sequence

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.2929C>T (p.Arg977Ter) and the other mutation could not be found

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA8602528

gnomAD MAF in the South Asian population is 0.00003266 https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-42452041-G-A

Supplementary Table S1:

Case41: GT48, French, gender and age not specified here at this time

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: All patients had a life-long history of mucocutaneous bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes an absent or strongly reduced expression of alphaIIbBeta3 in platelets

PlateletAggregation: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes absent or severely reduced platelet aggregation with at least three physiological agonists

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing was performed. Sanger sequencing ensured coverage of all exons and splice sties of the ITGA2B and ITGB3 genes and extended 300-500 bp into the introns as well as including the UTR. They sequenced 416 bp upstream of the ITGA2B promoter and 463 bp upstream of the ITGB3 promoter. In total they sequenced 51.2% of the ITGA2B gene and 19.4% of the larger ITGB3 gene

Gene: ITGB3

Variant: NM_000212.2:c.1094A>G (p.Asn365Ser) and NM_000212.2:c.1522del (p.Gln508SerfsTer161)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA400026292 and CA772541579

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1:

Case23: GT26, French, gender and age not specified

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: All patients had a life-long history of mucocutaneous bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes an absent or strongly reduced expression of alphaIIbBeta3 in platelets

PlateletAggregation: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes absent or severely reduced platelet aggregation with at least three physiological agonists

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing was performed. Sanger sequencing ensured coverage of all exons and splice sties of the ITGA2B and ITGB3 genes and extended 300-500 bp into the introns as well as including the UTR. They sequenced 416 bp upstream of the ITGA2B promoter and 463 bp upstream of the ITGB3 promoter. In total they sequenced 51.2% of the ITGA2B gene and 19.4% of the larger ITGB3 gene

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1073G>A (p.Arg358His)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: 2896

CAiD: CA115839

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1:

Case10: GT11, French/German, age and gender not specified

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: All patients had a life-long history of mucocutaneous bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes an absent or strongly reduced expression of alphaIIbBeta3 in platelets

PlateletAggregation: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes absent or severely reduced platelet aggregation with at least three physiological agonists

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing was performed. Sanger sequencing ensured coverage of all exons and splice sties of the ITGA2B and ITGB3 genes and extended 300-500 bp into the introns as well as including the UTR. They sequenced 416 bp upstream of the ITGA2B promoter and 463 bp upstream of the ITGB3 promoter. In total they sequenced 51.2% of the ITGA2B gene and 19.4% of the larger ITGB3 gene

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1073G>A (p.Arg385His) NM_000419.3:c.1234G>A (p.Gly412Arg)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: 2896 and 381748

CAiD: CA115839 and CA8603182

gnomAD: MAF in the Latino population for (p.Gly412Arg) is 0.0001453 https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-42458406-C-T

Supplementary Table S1:

Case65: GT76, French, gender and age are not specified

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: All patients had a life-long history of mucocutaneous bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes an absent or strongly reduced expression of alphaIIbBeta3 in platelets

PlateletAggregation: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes absent or severely reduced platelet aggregation with at least three physiological agonists

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing was performed. Sanger sequencing ensured coverage of all exons and splice sties of the ITGA2B and ITGB3 genes and extended 300-500 bp into the introns as well as including the UTR. They sequenced 416 bp upstream of the ITGA2B promoter and 463 bp upstream of the ITGB3 promoter. In total they sequenced 51.2% of the ITGA2B gene and 19.4% of the larger ITGB3 gene

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.2421G>A (p.Trp807Ter)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA399796017

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1:

Case47: GT54, Arg/Italian, gender and age not specified

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: All patients had a life-long history of mucocutaneous bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes an absent or strongly reduced expression of alphaIIbBeta3 in platelets

PlateletAggregation: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes absent or severely reduced platelet aggregation with at least three physiological agonists

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing was performed. Sanger sequencing ensured coverage of all exons and splice sties of the ITGA2B and ITGB3 genes and extended 300-500 bp into the introns as well as including the UTR. They sequenced 416 bp upstream of the ITGA2B promoter and 463 bp upstream of the ITGB3 promoter. In total they sequenced 51.2% of the ITGA2B gene and 19.4% of the larger ITGB3 gene

Gene: ITGB3

Variant: NM_000212.2:c.2014+5G>A and the other variant is a "LR deletion" which is all thats mentioned

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA915940701

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1:

Case15: GT18, French, gender and age not specified

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: All patients had a life-long history of mucocutaneous bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes an absent or strongly reduced expression of alphaIIbBeta3 in platelets

PlateletAggregation: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes absent or severely reduced platelet aggregation with at least three physiological agonists

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing was performed. Sanger sequencing ensured coverage of all exons and splice sties of the ITGA2B and ITGB3 genes and extended 300-500 bp into the introns as well as including the UTR. They sequenced 416 bp upstream of the ITGA2B promoter and 463 bp upstream of the ITGB3 promoter. In total they sequenced 51.2% of the ITGA2B gene and 19.4% of the larger ITGB3 gene

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1201G>T (p.Gly401Cys) and NM_000419.3:c.2800G>T (p.Val934Phe)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA399804280 and CA290946484

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1:

Case5: GT 6, French/Algerian, gender and age not specified

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A