- Sep 2023
-
-
-
for: Donald Winnicott, human INTERbeing, human INTERbeCOMing, Deep Humanity, DH
-
title: For Donald Winnicott, the psyche is not inside us but between us
-
author: James Barnes date: May 18, 2020
-
comment: insight
- adjacency
- between
- Donald Winnicott
- Deep Humanity concept of human INTERbeCOMing
- adjacency relationship
- when James Barnes wrote that Winnicott's psychoanalysis is based on a unitary conception of self and other,
- that resonated deeply with me
- due to my own spiritual journey in
- non-duality as well as
- Deep Humanity conception of human INTERbeCOMing
- when James Barnes wrote that Winnicott's psychoanalysis is based on a unitary conception of self and other,
- between
- adjacency
- source: early morning discussions
- this morning, after deep discussion, my partner posted a picture of Donald Winnicott on my WhatsApp and I googled Donald Winnicott and found, read and resonated deeply with this article:
-
-
Winnicott also had a strikingly different notion of the agent of psychological change.
- for: Winnicott, Freud, comparison, comparison - Winnicott - Freud, transitional space, Bardo, evolution
- paraphrase
-
comparison: Winnicott, Freud
-
Winnicott had a strikingly different notion of the agent of psychological change than Freud.
- Winnicott
- His psychotherapeutic model was developmental, one that sees.
- the therapeutic relationship and
- the original parent-child relationship(s)
- as analogous.
- Thus, just as he saw the development of the child as being fundamentally tied
- to the immediate, visceral relationship with the mother in the experiential unit.
- His psychotherapeutic model was developmental, one that sees.
-
psychotherapeutic change was all about the relationship between - client and - therapist.
- This was later conceptualised as a shift
- from a ‘one-person’ psychology
- to a ‘two-person’ psychology.
- This was later conceptualised as a shift
-
Freud
- Freud was focused on rational interventions from the outside
- This gave way in Winnicott to a co-creative journey occurring in the area in between,
- which was much more about who one was and what one did, than what one thought or said.
- In his book Playing and Reality (1971),
- Winnicott called the location of this experience ‘transitional space’,
- alluding to its dynamic, insubstantial quality,
- but also to its nature as a place of becoming.
- It is, he said, a place we both
- create and that
- creates us
- a paradox that we must accept and not try to resolve
- where unformulated possibility replaces
- fixed identities, and
- experience is necessarily co-constructed.
- Winnicott
-
-
comment
- Winnicott's transitional space is like
- the Tibetan concept of the Bardo
- the biological concept of evolution
- Winnicott's transitional space is like
-
‘There is no such thing as a baby … if you set out to describe a baby, you will find you are describing a baby and someone.’
-
for: Donald Winnicott, quote, quote - Donald Winnicott, quote - human INTERbeing, human INTERbeing, human INTERbeCOMing, white - humans INTERbeCOMing, DH, Deep Humanity, altricial, mOTHER, non-duality
-
quote: Donald Winnicott
- There is no such thing as a baby … if you set out to describe a baby, you will find you are describing a baby and someone.
-
comment
- what Winnicott says here is the essence of:
- the Deep Humanity concepts of
- the individual / collective gestalt and
- human INTERbeCOMing,
- the Buddhist concepts of:
- emptiness,
- non-duality in the human realm,
- Indra's net of jewels in the human realm and
- Thich Nhat Hahn's INTERbeing
- complexity
- the Deep Humanity concepts of
- what Winnicott says here is the essence of:
-
-
, a fundamentally unitary conception of self and other.
- for: human INTERbeCOMing, human INTERbeing, DH, Deep Humanity, Donald Winnicott
-
quote
- He (Donald Winnicott) largely circumvented the subject-object dualism inherent in the Freudian model of mind (which both the Ego-psychologists and the Kleinians subscribed to) and
- espoused, or at least regularly insinuated, a fundamentally unitary conception of self and other.
- He (Donald Winnicott) largely circumvented the subject-object dualism inherent in the Freudian model of mind (which both the Ego-psychologists and the Kleinians subscribed to) and
-
comment -The Deep Humanity definition of the individual / collective gestalt identifies the indivisible nature of the individual and collective.
- It can also need called the ' self / other gestalt' and both are really another way to articulate non-duality in between members of the same species
- a ' unitary conception of self and other' is yet another way to articulate this same thing
-
Save Share Tweet EmailJames Barnesis a psychotherapist, lecturer and writer with a background in psychoanalysis and philosophy. He has a psychotherapy practice in Exeter, UK, and sees clients remotely.Edited by Christian JarrettSyndicate this idea Save Share Tweet EmailFor Donald Winnicott, your psyche isn’t just in your head – it emerges from your relationships with others and the world
for: human INTERbeing, human INTERbeCOMing, DH, Deep Humanity
-
- Jul 2022
-
bafybeiac2nvojjb56tfpqsi44jhpartgxychh5djt4g4l4m4yo263plqau.ipfs.dweb.link bafybeiac2nvojjb56tfpqsi44jhpartgxychh5djt4g4l4m4yo263plqau.ipfs.dweb.link
-
The ‘ideal’ is nothing other thana representation of social conditioning and the installation of a personware module into the newbornhuman that tries to accord what is with what the social system projects. We acknowledge of course thatsome mediation is always needed. The baby sees the world and the social world in particular throughthe eyes of the parent and only afterwards autonomously. This mediation is crucial to the cognitivedevelopment of the person and cannot happen without a personware. But the personware can beconstructed such that it empowers the individual and does not subjugate it to the social demands.
!- definition : good enough * From Donald Winnicot, a parent who is "good enough" is actually healthier for the child than the standard "ideal" parent. * A "good enough" parent does not force the child to choose between two aspects of wellbeing, both of which are necessary.
-