OpenAI had not disclosed to RubyGems that they were responsible for the attack prior to now.

Meta said that when the content was flagged, the company had no indication that the individual depicted in the video was 'a real person' because they did not report the content.

For AI to respect human dignity and truly serve the common good, responsibility must be clearly defined at every stage: from those who design and develop these systems to those who use them and rely on them for concrete decisions. In many cases, however, the internal processes leading to a result remain opaque, making it harder to assign responsibility and correct errors. This is where accountability becomes crucial: the possibility of identifying who must “account” for decisions, justify them, monitor them, and, when necessary, challenge them and remedy any harm caused.

Anyone who uses AI tools in our editorial workflow is responsible for the accuracy and integrity of the resulting work.

When you delegate an issue to an agent in Linear, the delegation is visible. There's a person who set the agent loose within that system, and that person is accountable for the outcome. You design the environment well, you let the agent run, and you own what it produces.