- Sep 2024
-
-
It's a fork of Memery gem. Original Memery uses prepend Module.new with memoized methods, not touching original ones. This approach has advantages, but also has problems, see discussion here: tycooon#1
-
- Jan 2024
-
gitlab.com gitlab.com
-
(I grant that many of us contribute code to Gitlab, and would also like to participate as members of the development team in guiding the implementations, but clearly the core team has to have the final say in what direction that takes... unless someone wants to create and maintain their own fork of Gitlab ;) )
-
- Sep 2021
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
have a philosophy that if someone can provide any more meaningful information to a problem even if it indirectly solves the problem, I think that should also be rewarded.
-
- Dec 2020
-
www.npmjs.com www.npmjs.com
-
No more waiting around for pull requests to be merged and published. No more forking repos just to fix that one tiny thing preventing your app from working.
This could be both good and bad.
potential downside: If people only fix things locally, then they may be less inclined/likely to actually/also submit a merge request, and therefore it may be less likely that this actually (ever) gets fixed upstream. Which is kind of ironic, considering the stated goal "No more waiting around for pull requests to be merged and published." But if this obviates the need to create a pull request (does it), then this could backfire / work against that goal.
Requiring someone to fork a repo and push up a fix commit -- although a little extra work compared to just fixing locally -- is actually a good thing overall, for the community/ecosystem.
Ah, good, I see they touched on some of these points in the sections:
- Benefits of patching over forking
- When to fork instead
-
- Nov 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
You can also see this repo: default-passive-events.
-
- Sep 2020
-
github.com github.com
-
Svelte will not offer a generic way to support style customizing via contextual class overrides (as we'd do it in plain HTML). Instead we'll invent something new that is entirely different. If a child component is provided and does not anticipate some contextual usage scenario (style wise) you'd need to copy it or hack around that via :global hacks.
Tags
- forking to add a desired missing feature/change
- trying to prevent one bad thing leading to people doing/choosing an even worse option
- forced to fork/copy and paste library code because it didn't provide enough customizability/extensibility / didn't foresee some specific prop/behavior that needed to be overridable/configurable (explicit interface)
- run-time dynamicness/generics vs. having to explicitly list/hard-code all options ahead of time
- workarounds
- component/library author can't consider/know ahead of time all of the ways users may want to use it
- Svelte: how to affect child component styles
- maintenance burden to explicitly define/enumerate/hard-code possible options (explicit interface)
- ugly/kludgey
Annotators
URL
-
-
github.com github.com
-
There's no way to change style incapsulation method without patching the compiler, and this means maintaing a fork, which is not desirable.
-
- Jul 2020
-
stackoverflow.com stackoverflow.com
-
Creating and calling a default proc is a waste of time, and Cramming everything into one line using tortured constructs doesn't make the code more efficient--it just makes the code harder to understand.
The nature of this "answer" is a comment in response to another answer. But because of the limitations SO puts on comments (very short length, no multi-line code snippets), comment feature could not actually be used, so this user resorted to "abusing" answer feature to post their comment instead.
See
-
- May 2020
-
nypost.com nypost.com
-
The administration and its allies fear that the more people gravitate toward the successful, free-market self-insurance approach, the worse their government-engineered health “reform” will look. We’re already seeing the beginning of this trend.
-
-
forum.gitlab.com forum.gitlab.com
-
Hey there. We see you’ve been busy reading, which is fantastic, so we’ve promoted you up a trust level! We’re really glad you’re spending time with us and we’d love to know more about you. Take a moment to fill out your profile, or feel free to start a new topic.
-
- Apr 2020
-
www.troyhunt.com www.troyhunt.com
-
you could even provide an incentive if the user proactively opts to change a Pwned Password after being prompted, for example the way MailChimp provide an incentive to enabled 2FA:
-
- Dec 2019
-
zapier.com zapier.com
-
While I wanted to do my best to not judge how I was spending my time during the experiment—to just track it as it is and analyze at the end—I did want to have a baseline to compare my results to. This wasn't a hypothesis of how I spend my time, but more of a vision for how I would like my time to be allocated.
Tags
Annotators
URL
-