the compute-rich can copy the compute-poor, especially if their models are open — there's a reason why big AI labs still follow the academic literature.
【论证自相矛盾】作者在「溢出效应对算力贫方没有不对称优势」的论点中，援引「大实验室也跟踪学术文献」作为证据。但这恰恰说明算法知识的流动是双向的——如果如此，为什么算力贫方的「复制」会被贬低，而算力富方的「跟踪学术」就被当作平衡因素？同样的机制被选择性地用来支持不同的结论。
Unnecessarily verbose, heavier file size
contradicted later
ReconfigBehSci on Twitter: ‘RT @Esseph63: In the phrase that begins, “It’s one rule for them …”, these are the them. Https://t.co/VNb3LI5Q3p’ / Twitter. (n.d.). Retrieved 16 August 2021, from https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1414676877873074193
and I keep up with the modern way
Here we can clearly observe Betteredge's double standard. Just a few lines above, he ascribes a contradictory behavior to women, and now he exhibits it gloriously himself. It's very apparent throughout the story that Betteredge cares a great deal about whether someone is "a Dustman or a Duke." He never fails to talk highly about people of rank, and scarcely about people of no particular hereditary rank. It even manifests itself in the way he values himself (albeit with some insecurity), as opposed to his servants. But here, he so blatantly declares himself free of any prejudicial behavior... This is one of various instances in which his hypocrisy is showing face.