2 Matching Annotations
  1. Oct 2022
    1. My argument is that a certain form of critical spirit has sent us down the wrong path, encouraging us to fight the wrong enemies and, worst of all, to be considered as friends by the wrong sort of allies because of a little mistake in the definition of its main target. The question was never to get away from facts but closer to them, not fighting empiricism but, on the contrary, renewing empiricism.

      Critique / scepticism is meant to get closer to establishing facts, not meant to get away from them. Not meant against empiricism (yeah, that's just, like, your opinion dude) but to strengthen empirical factfinding. Establishing how the presented facts came about, and see if the method of establishing them can be improved. Vgl [[Data geeft klein deel werkelijkheid slecht weer 20201219122618]]

  2. Mar 2022
    1. Descartes said we need an entire new way of thinking. When the scientific method provided that new way of thinking and biology showed that microorganisms caused disease, suffering was alleviated. What forms of suffering could be alleviated, what forms of wealth could be created if we knew a little bit more about cooperation? I don't think that this transdisciplinary discourse 00:19:09 is automatically going to happen; it's going to require effort. So I enlist you to help me get the cooperation project started. Thank you.

      Reduktionismen wie Descartes' method. Zweifel, die unter anderen zu unserer dichotomischen Sichtweise geführt haben, bringen uns dazu, neue Akteure (hier im biolog. Bsp. der Mikroorganismen) zu finden. Was sind die nächsten Akteure? Welche Kollektive sind von Belang? Und wie ließe sich das ANT des Kooperativs beschreiben? Eine erste Antwort auf diese Frage deutet nur auf die Antwortbedingung - es muss eine empirische Beschreibung sein