2 Matching Annotations
  1. Apr 2022
  2. twitter.com twitter.com
    Dr. Deepti Gurdasani on Twitter
    1
    1. cheyennechooi 28 Apr 2022
      A very disturbing read on the recent JCVI minutes released. They seem to consider immunity through infection in children advantageous, discussing children as live 'booster' vaccines for adults. I would expect this from anti-vaxx groups, not a scientific committee.
      is:text
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    twitter.com/dgurdasani1/status/1454383106555842563
  3. Aug 2020
  4. twitter.com twitter.com
    ReconfigBehSci on Twitter: "this kind of piece behavioural scientists need to reject! A shallow understanding of the bias literature in an even shallower application to the pandemic- the idea that believing lockdowns brought down infection rates is an example of the "post hoc fallacy" is bizarre 1/3" / Twitter
    1
    1. Grace1999 27 Aug 2020

      ReconfigBehSci {@SciBeh} (2020) this kind of piece behavioural scientists need to reject! A shallow understanding of the bias literature in an even shallower application to the pandemic- the idea that believing lockdowns brought down infection rates is an example of the "post hoc fallacy" is bizarre 1/3. Twitter. Retrieved from: https://twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1298939778340184065

      is:text lang:en COVID-19 Behavior Science Cognitive bias Post hoc fallacy
    Visit annotations in context

    Tags

    Annotators

    URL

    twitter.com/SciBeh/status/1298939778340184065