Und die Bundesregierung sollte sich endlich von X verabschieden und damit Elon Musks Plattform die Relevanz entziehen.
yes, there is no explainable position for public entities that still have accounts on Twitter.
Und die Bundesregierung sollte sich endlich von X verabschieden und damit Elon Musks Plattform die Relevanz entziehen.
yes, there is no explainable position for public entities that still have accounts on Twitter.
Austria's Federal Ministry for Economy, Energy and Tourism is a case in point. The ministry recently completed a migration of 1,200 employees to the European open-source collaboration platform Nextcloud, but the project was not a migration away from an existing US cloud provider. It was a deliberate choice not to adopt one
Austrian Min for Economy Energy and Tourism uses Nextcloud for its 1200 civil servants, not MS Office. It was not a move away from GAFAM bc they did not use that.
2002 motie om per 2006 alles in open standaarden te doen. Nog altijd niet het geval. Vgl gebruik v ODF
Verbeterpunten zijn onder andere het beperkte bereik van de doelgroep
This reads like classic 'it's not the same as X'. And an overestimation of actual human accounts on X in the Netherlands. Although yes, Dutch accounts on Mastodon aren't many, they are easily found, and interaction is up.
Dutch public sector has experimented with Mastodon for a year now. Pilot will run until December 2024. Started with 20 entities, now 40 active accounts. Plus is the easy recognition as authentic source (it runs on social.overheid.nl). They will open up to all levels of civil service in 2025. Good development.