Antibiotic resistance amongVibriofrom shrimp farm

Validation of the predicted 3D structure

Phylogenetic and motif analysi

Phylogenetic and motif analysis of sequenced Dof domains

Gel elution of PCR products

The table 6.1 gives the mixing probabilities and the associated parametricvalues fork(number of components) = 2,3, and 4. It may be noted thatthe Log likelihood value is smaller fork= 4 (the results fork= 5 , 6 etc.are not better than that fork= 4 and hence are not given here). The fourcomponents Poisson Mixture model is given in table 6.2. It may be notedthat 58% of wards may have higher incidence/relative risk and the remainingwards have lesser/lower incidence for the Cancer disease. We computed theposterior probability for each component for each ward (see table 6.3). Eachward is assigned to a particular component so that the posterior probability islarger. These results are also given in table 6.3 Finally we present Choroplethmaps based on those results

Spodoptera litura

Venomous saliva optimization

Mandibular stylet

Growth maximum values

Rates of growth (OD678/day

Growth

T cell phenotypic distribution in HBsAgPositive, HBsAgNegative from HBsAg positive mothers and healthy newborns.

Mean Somatotypes:

Somatocharts: