This temporal mismatch—crisis operating 24/7 while support operates 40 hours weekly—creates the necessity for peer networks analyzed in this chapter and documented ethnographically in Chapter 3.
Remove adjective 'temporal' and revise sentence structure with theoretical support from Jonathan Crary's 24/7, particularly his commentary on the ends of sleep amid the late capitalist state of constant socioeconomic hardship and compounding austerity conditions.
fundamental
remove foundationalist diction
.
Add commentary from Crary's 24/7 here to close out the paragraph
private navigation of institutional barriers transformed into collective public discourse.
Vacuous string of abstractions
“Rate my schedule”: 275 CUNY vs 34 NYU
At least 3 paragraphs on this
Reddit’s pseudonymity enables what Proferes (2017) calls “context collapse management.” Users
Incorporate Neussanbaum and boyd in this paragraph as well as an important critical counterpoint that builds toward this point on context collapse management
two decades ago, the influential environmentalist Herbert Girardet (1999) was still posing the relationship between the two as a potential ‘contradiction in terms’. What happened? Why does everyone think cities can save the planet, and why now?
for - question - sustainable cities - how did the contradiction of sustainability and cities posed by Herbert Girardet in 1999 get resolved?
https://github.com/collectiveidea/delayed_job/issues/1099 had possibly helpful solutions
Duplicate at: https://groups.google.com/g/delayed_job/c/5fsuBCZX1Ak
"Specifically, when one of my classmates stated how he was struggling with the concept and another one of my classmates took the initiative to clarify it, I realized that that individual possibilities vary greatly among students."
This is actively being worked on - for those interested you can follow the progress in https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10836
Seeing how this has been treated for 4.5 years makes this seem like a pretty dysfunctional project. Please have mercy on your poor users and fix this.
After 5 years there's still no fix. This is so annoying. I'm now getting rid of all snap packages and installing deb variants instead. Finally I'll purge snap and if these weird decisions keep on going I'll also move to another distro. Common Canonical. Seriously?
I'm trying to help in some way by bringing these issues to light so a discussion about them can take place.
Unfortunately, even though this bug/request was opened in 2016, this feature is still not implemented in ruby-install.
If the document is uncontroversial and agreement is reached quickly it might be committed directly with the "accepted" status. Likewise, if the proposal is rejected the status shall be "rejected". When a document is rejected a member of the core team should append a section describing the reasons for rejection.
Add this statement to the newspaper_search.R program library(RMySQL)
I can't figure out where/how to do this.
Tip: Take your time to think about table design and naming since a well designed database will be easier to work with and understand.
Yes! I like this.
Run the CREATE DATABASE command. Click
I got briefly stuck on the first sentence before noticing the second sentence says how. Maybe "Run the CREATE DATABASE command by either clicking on the lightning bolt icon in the upper left, or choosing Query > Execute Current Statement in the menu." Actually, I'm still stuck—the lightning bolt is grayed out/unclickable, as is the menu option. I tried both while the command was highlighted, and while the command was not highlighted. I also saved the file and then tried.
However, there are times when databases are very useful including: Placing the results of an R program on a web site where the data can be interacted with. Handling large amounts of data. Storing the results of long running programs so that a program can continue from where it left off in case it was interrupted.
Nice
R language
I know there's a good way to google questions about R that gets search results actually about the R language... but can't remember what it is. Might be nice to mention that someone in the less, maybe in a tips section?
Using a database also offered the ability to recover from errors when my R program stopped during processing. Since the database stores the most recently processed work, the R program was able to begin from where it left off before it ran into an error. This was very important because I did not want to waste days of processing by starting over from the beginning.
Excellent explanation!
relational database
Brief definition of relational database for folks who don't know exactly what a database is (beyond e.g. "stores stuff")
I wanted to make further improvements to the finding aid by using natural language processing
Could you provide a brief definition of NLP here, so that novices understand why you wanted to use it?
Introduction
I really like how you situate this lesson as a response to a real scholarly problem you ran into! You might consider preceding this with a few skimmable points so that visitors can tell whether the lesson fits their needs or not. E.g. with my lesson, I started with:
The search bar can be used to view them all at any time.
This doesn't read very well. How about "use the search bar to find all annotations with a specific tag"
loaded whenever you return to the document.
We should really mention that this works when the content changes. Its one of our key features.
"loaded whenever you return to the document even if the content changes".