大多数人认为AI在安全领域的主要价值是提高漏洞发现的数量和速度，这是行业共识。但作者明确表示，他们已经超越了这一阶段，现在更关注的是提高软件的安全性和网络弹性，这反映了安全思维的根本转变。

这是一个重要的产品策略声明，值得深入了解其背景。需要核实Anthropic如何定义'trusted organizations'，以及他们如何确保Fable 5版本确实无法用于网络攻击。这涉及到AI安全与商业利益之间的平衡。

大多数人认为深度防御策略只是临时措施，不足以应对AI安全威胁，但作者认为这种策略已经将Fable的风险降低到与行业现有模型相当的水平，挑战了对AI安全需要完美解决方案的主流认知。

作者提出了一个颠覆性的观点：未来网络安全的关键不是计算资源的多寡，而是模型质量的优劣。这挑战了当前AI安全领域过度关注计算能力的趋势，暗示我们应该重新思考AI安全研究的投资方向。

for - progress trap - AGI - Silicon Valley move fast and break things strategy - incompatible with security of AGI

Australia's Cyber Security Strategy: $1.66 billion dollar cyber security package = AFP gets $88 million; $66 million to critical infrastructure organisations to assess their networks for vulnerabilities; ASD $1.35 billion (over a decade) to recruit 500 officers.

Reasons Dutton gives for package:

• child exploitation
• criminals scamming, ransomware
• foreign governments taking health data and potential attacks to critical infrastructure

What is defined as critical infrastructure is expanded and subject to obligations to improve their defences.

Supporting cyber resilience of SMEs through information, training, and services to make them more secure.