4 Matching Annotations
  1. Jan 2021
    1. I really found this exercise very useful to get to know properly your team members, sometimes we feel frustrated because we don't feel comfortable working with some people, this definitely helps a lot.

    1. People don’t want to think too hard about your customer experience because thinking is hard work.

      As a user myself, I can totally relate to this article. I tend to stick to simple things in life, especially when it comes to technology. In the world that we live in, we don't have any time to actually sit and figure out an app or a website: we are constantly in a hurry and already have too many other things going on. We use so many apps and scroll down on so many websites per day, switching from one to another. So yes, I believe that when creating a user experience you have to take into consideration how simple it will be for the users.

  2. Mar 2019
  3. Jul 2016
    1. When FA and ADC in forceps major were entered, FA was still significantly related to incongruent RT (β = −0.11, P < 0.01), whereas ADC ceased to be significant.

      ID: 024
      Variable: Incongruent RT
      Covariate: FA of forceps major, ADC of forceps major
      *how do we annotate that DTI parameters were included pairwise? does it matter that they were entered pairwise? we have a beta for each FA that varies by its DTI pairing

      ID: 025 Variable: Incongruent RT Covariate: FA Beta: -0.11 P: <0.01

      ID: 026 Variable: Incongruent RT Covariate: ADC P: insignificant