Maha explains the difference between digital skills and digital literacy in which she emphasizes the fact that she teaches her students through a digital literacy perspective. Maha does teach how to use hashtags but rather focuses on the content of the task helping her students on how to use different online tools.

These are questions that still remain. Consider that technology has advanced, do you think society should teach the younger generation the difference between digital literacy and digital skills?

This is an interesting quote because it shows how personality and traits of a person actually affects the potential of their effort into college courses. A student's personality plays an important role in how they do in college or academics because whether they are enthusiastic or depressed will show in their study habits as well as test scores. When it comes to academics, many people will think it may come natural rather than utilizing the cognitive skills, which is believed to be a skill that applies. However, cognition is an important asset - there is more that contributes into this criteria of education. Although, what draws the line to being fully considered as a thriver student or a diver student. Can someone(a student)be considered both?

Samuel, explains some factors of ordinary people's lives that has evolved into a new social history.

Samuel explains that social history involves the study of ordinary people's good and bad aspects of their life.

Historian Raphael Samuel doesn't only give his audience the history of social history by analyzing different time periods and eras but, he also makes it clear to his audience that today there is currently a new social history.

I like how Historian Raphael Samuel defines his definition of history in order for the audience to have an idea of his perspective of social history.

According to historian Raphael Samuel social history is the study of ordinary people rather than the privileged individuals. Although what is Historian Raphael Samuel's definition of "ordinary"? What draws the line between ordinary and unordinary people in a society?

i think it is important for society to know our education system problems in order to solve them. In which the Carnegie Unit is trying to help with the problem of the industrial and informational economy models of education.

I liked how the article provided a background history and information of the Carnegie Unit(credit hour). I think having a short summary paragraph of the history helps the audience have a better understanding because I was familiar with credit hour but i never fully understand the situation.

This quote is interesting because it provides information of how people perceive education differently. In one hand we have people that think education is a waste of time and money while in the other hand we have people that think the opposite of that and don't not see education as worthless. In my perspective I wonder if the article is referring to private universities or public universities, although you have to pay for both there is a difference within the two when it comes to tuition. In which do people see all universities in general as a waste of money or private universities as a waste of money because you can get the same education at a lower price elsewhere.

As a empirical researcher I wonder if it was difficult for Du Bois to analyze from his own experience?

This sentence in particular struck me because it provides an true statement how our identity impacts and influences our actions and decisions.