1,669 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
    1. as anonymous buyers shopped(using model homes), arranged finance, budgeted and then workedon their dwellings. Like other goods, houses became items ofconsumption

      Hard to conceptualize what they were like before

    2. Buyers could now increase their existing mortgage to financeimprovements without going through the uncertainty and expenseof applying for a separate loan. This reduced the cost of medium-term finance for all types of home improvements

      Ironic in that a house is the realization of this independent and individualist American Dream but it is made to be uniform and tie you to society

    3. Its influence on class segregation, the removal from resi-dential areas of ‘inharmonious’ land uses (including corner stores),and the standardization of designs and street layouts, was at leastas great.

      The zoning required a certain standard which required a certain socioeconomic level

    4. ncreasingly, even modest dwellingscame with a standard array of services, in subdivisions that metstandards of minimum lot size, street width and layout, andperhaps the provision of open space for parks. Dwellings nowincluded more services while residential areas met higher stan-dards too

      Zoning as an avenue for accountability

    5. Large speculative builders also cateredto this working-class demand. In 1920s Detroit, for example, oneentrepreneur built hundreds of worker’s houses without furnacesand bathrooms in areas that at first lacked piped water and pavedroads

      Demand for housing quality might motivate other policy or public change

    Annotators

      • why is the house where commodification takes place?
      • housing is an outward reflection of your own personality
      • people shape the norms and practices among houses, not the other way around
      • the interests of all the different members of the household come into conflict when deciding what modifications to make
      • Belize community in which the houses basically all follow the same structure
      • housing is a signal for upward mobility, both in the area and style of house as well as how you furnish it (new vs old money?)
      • an increase in economic freedom sometimes presents the opportunity as well as the incentive to differentiate yourself from the poor
      • the house is an ultimate buy in to the consumer ideology of the location, immobility
      • what if the house facilitates disagreement because of proximity
      • the home maybe is also a place of piece in that you can "equally" share in the benefits of everyones labor
      • an investment in communal property like a home is a mitigation effect for conflict between household members and households and society signals a trust(?)
      • owning homes smooths out the complexities

    Annotators

    1. Consistent with these findings is evidence that highereducation has a “darkening” effect on identification for recent Brazilian cohorts

      Race is constructed based on external incentives and maybe the primary one is the comparative mindset

    2. As a testament to the variable nature of race-color categorization in the country, the optionsgiven to Brazilians can significantly affect how they self-identif

      There is less internalized racial categorization

    3. A shift in racial identification, in contrast, may beattributed to the emergence of a racial group consciousness

      Which I would say is formed by a catalysts and the opportunity to mobilize

    4. These robust findings demonstrate that racial membership is remarkably un-wavering for non-Hispanic whites, blacks, and Asians in the United States

      Asian needs more digging but white and black are siloed into certain privileges, or non privileges

    Annotators

      • Politicians are power seeking and not actually interested in advancing the best policy
      • ideologies are strategies for mobilizing voters and gaining office
      • the formation of policy positions over time might be genuine even if the catalyst is not
      • ideologies are a proxy for the policies a politician might support and lower the intellectual barrier for voters
      • we keep pushing voters to move ideologically by demanding less of them
      • does ideology actually predict the policies enacted?
      • you want to develop an ideology that will attract the time savers but also not signal disingenuousness if they ever choose to become more informed

    Annotators

    1. The public policy challenge in the United States should be tobreak down barriers that limit those who would benefit from homeownership fromaccessing it, while not pushing people to become homeowners for whom it doesn’tmake sense or providing subsidies where not appropriate.

      Well thanks for telling me the problem

    2. Suburban locations witha high minority share of residents may also have lower appreciation rates than loca-tions with a higher share of non-Hispanic white residents

      Ones identity can damage the wealth accumulation of a housing purchase

    3. They face high transaction costs associated with moving, buying and sellinghomes, and foreclosures.

      I mean I feel like the takeaway is that not all decisions to own a home are good ones

    4. The analysis starts with the value of the use of the home as measured by the rent ahomeowner would pay to live in a comparable property.

      I feel like even if it is shown to make financial sense that is not the reason most people elect to buy

    5. rom 2005 to 2015,the number of borrowers with student loan debt increased from 24.0 million to43.3 million and the student loan debt balances grew from $378 billion to $1.19 tril-lion, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York’s Consumer Credit panel.

      Send fewer people to college

    6. For example, the share of households in whichthe head was 44 or younger fell from 49.2 percent in 1985 to 35.7 percent in 2015;conversely, the share of households in which the head was 65 or over rose from 21.5percent in 1985 to 23.9 percent by 2015

      Homeownership rises among elderly and the elderly population rises which basically means fewer young people own homes

    1. Advanced democracies expend incredible resources in the administration ofelections in the hope that election results and public policies will closelyreflect the preferences of the citizenry.

      Optimistic view of how democracies function

    2. In just a three-year span, the majority party made a clear turn towardprogressive domestic policies, and the introduction of more working-classvoters into the electorate and increased presence of the Labor Party mayhave provided impetus for such a change.

      But the question is whether the shift actually moved towards representing the average voter or if the perception drives the shift which drives the voter

    3. ‘‘It has to be recognized that even under the conditions existing inAustralia, the wages of our workers are not sufficient to enable them tosafeguard against these evils [sickness, unemployment, and old-age]’

      Slimy politicians

    4. However, average turnoutwith compulsory voting would have been 91 percent, and Labor would havereceived 53 percent of the votes.

      I mean, more people turned out and that helped a party, seems like common sense

    5. Put another way, property-owners com-prised 84 percent of the electorate even though they only comprised 59percent of the eligible voters.

      something to be said about the perceived stake in the country, even if its not unequal

    Annotators

    1. but quite unimportant for the more contemporary issue of affirmative action,where, it would seem, both opponents and supporters can enlist equality asjustification for their views.

      Racial progressivism uses the same language as meritocratic modern racism

    2. Blacks’ history of slavery and discrimination has encouraged them toevaluate policies based on their perceived impact on the racial group rather thanthe individual.

      Because for a long time the nuances that would make up an individual have been traded for policies that affect the whole group

    3. hey find that the impact of this group-specific form of individualism on policy opinions is mediated almost entirely bymeasures of symbolic racism

      symbolic racism underlies the decision

    4. Finally, large differences emerge on valuessuch as egalitarianism, the optimal size of government, and the general fairness ofthe American political system

      Ok seeing the system of racism that created the change in these views is easy enough, they are and should be self-interested

    5. Since then, Democratic support in the South has droppedquite sharply (Petrocik 1987, Black & Black 1992, Frymer 1999). It is also ap-parent that the main shift has been among white southerners

      This is a compelling example because lowkey JFK going race liberal was a catalyst

    6. fall to scholars of race and politics to provide theevidence that will test the previous generation’s optimism

      Good lord, its been repealed but not for any good reason

    Annotators

    1. So, once again, Republican gains are concentrated among racially conservative Latinos.

      racial views tell us more about partisanship than race. Also, race is not directly correlated with racial views

    2. Trump gained votes among Latinos with conservative views of racial issues – in particular, immigration and criminal justice policy.

      All this article does is reinforce shady's idea that ethnicity is not the indicator others think it is

    3. The graph below shows that Trump gained votes in 2020 among Black, Latino, and Asian voters who strongly disagree or disagreed that white people had an advantage or neither agreed nor disagreed:

      A refusal to believe it is the most salient cleavage

    4. although Black Americans express different views of racial inequality than do white Americans

      This is just pointing out that "identity politics" is not the sole indicator of preference

    1. “the pioneer of today and of tomorrow standing on the doorstep of his own home who is going to safeguard and advance this Democracy of ours.”

      Capitalist motivations drive homeownership desires

    2. Those most likely to own in this period were those who built their own homes, which allowed them to avoid a mortgage entirely; older Americans who could leverage a lifetime of savings for this purchase; or the wealthy who could afford to purchase outright.

      Indebtedness = poorness = pariah?

    3. shape housing policy following the mass foreclosures exacerbating the Great Depression and through the New Deal

      Invited a powerful lobby with distinct incentive structure to the table

    4. The longing he finds enshrined in the aesthetic record allows Hoover to intimate that homeownership is most desired by — and perhaps desirable for — select Americans in possession of the right pedigree.

      Dichotomy of purporting that its a fundamental american desire while also using it as an exclusionary divide

      • This I also take a problem with, because creating more informed voters does not mean restricting either
      • comes back to a public policy question, the theory of universal voting might be the "right" thing to do but in reality it is not possible or desirable
      • the problem lies not in the virtual representation of the electives but in the unequal distribution of voters
      • analgesic = medication designed to relieve pain
      • mandatory voting would not solve the disconnect between voting wants and reality, it shouldn't
      • both saying we need more informed voters

    Annotators

      • I wonder what Australians would say about the level of intellectual democratic engagement
      • seems like it should be the last step not the first
      • right so the good policy is taking steps towards creating universal turnout without mandating it, in fact mandating might be counter productive
      • OECD = Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development
      • I still deeply worry that you're pushing citizens into the ocean with no swimming lessons, enough flapping of arms to sink the ship
      • just assuming that the other reforms would follow, as a matter of political practicality you should go the other way
      • not sure freeing up money for advertising is actually laudable

    Annotators

    1. en these habitualnonvoters tend to be concentrated in poor and other-wise disadvantaged groups. M

      Virtual representation, but it does reek a bit of hypocrisy given who's arguing for it

    2. pproximating universalparticipation in other forms of activism or participationwould require much more radical reforms of political cul-ture and institutions.

      Pragmatic argument

    3. about whether higher voter turnout is actually avaluable goal, and whether compulsion is an appropriateway of achiev

      In a first past the post system you are forcing voters to cast stategically

    Annotators

  2. Jun 2026
    1. This concentration of disadvantages results in schools that are overwhelmed by students’ social and economic challenges.

      Race is a proxy for more than just the economics

    1. Because community service programs inelementary and secondary schools andnational service programs after high schoolcan instill in young people a sense ofpurpose and patriotism, and

      David Brooks baby, maybe bring this up, also bring up the rural urban divide. How do we get over american being so goddamn big

    2. Ina nation whose federal government spends1,000 times more money on STEM educationthan on civics, it’s important to placegreater emphasis on sustaining Americandemocracy.

      Woohoo liberal arts education baby

    3. at precisely are the best ideasand aspirational values that bind togetherwhat author Heather McGee calls a nation of“ancestral strangers”

      Pull yourself up from your bootstraps

    1. Instead, we should be asking ourselveswhy 44% of Medicaid recipients work full-timewithout having access to affordable privatehealth insurance

      Maybe we try to provide universal healthcare through mandates to provide insurance

    2. This typeof work does not always have consistenthours but is based on demand each week, soit needs to be reviewed over longer periodsof time. If they are forced to recertify more

      Again the weaponization of bureaucracy, maybe ask a question about this.

    3. meetingcommunity engagement hours prior toreceiving benefits. This new requirementwould require Medicaid recipients to provethey have worked or volunteered for atleast 80 hours each month.

      And this are people who are probably really frequenting the er

    1. Yet only one state, Louisiana, denies schools voucher money if their students perform poorly on state standardized tests. In West Virginia, voucher students who fail state tests lose their eligibility for the program.

      Public money just going straight to private pockets

    1. This has seriously compromised the Democratic Party’s ability to formulate creative and practical solutions to real-world problems, not all of which can be solved by attacking corporate power

      This feels like the main problem to me

    2. prevent any large entity from renting out large numbers of single-family homes. The amendment undercut the bill’s intent to make housing more affordable—making it illegal for a company to build homes and rent them out would restrict the supply and drive up the cost for renters.

      Its basically more bearuacratic red tape, this I do see a problem with

    3. They see in Trump’s populist gestures confirmation of the appeal of their own ideas and potential for cooperation.

      This is scary for nick, its still a trump playbook

    4. and lauds small businesses and farms that are less able to generate economies of scale than giant corporations are, and therefore have to charge more for their products.

      Bro looooves the farmers market

    5. The neo-Brandeisian thinkers Warren recruited into the administration represented the movement’s brightest minds and most energetic administrators.

      TLDR, Biden hops on board despite his progressivism

    6. A profound crisis must have profound causes, and Lynn was offering a totalistic account of social decay.

      But they are also missing some of the importsnt urban rural consiousness here, but maybe thats not what hes concerned about as the root

  3. Apr 2026
    1. Similarly, future work shouldexamine the extent to which urbanites harbor resentmenttoward suburbs and the political ramifications of thosefeelings

      Hate it hate it hate it

    2. resentment might not have held its predictivepower, as modeled in this paper.

      Resentment tends to get channeled through parties and so it is reinforced by the ongoing polarization

    3. over urbanAmerica’s disparate political influence and anti-ruralstereotypes (e.g., “those backward hicks”) have longbeen pervasive in America and many other Western so-cieties

      Part of the reason it might not be as powerful is that its just less true

    Annotators