“Great civilizations are not murdered. They commit suicide.”

on Salesforce can (and should)

to

source control

that process

release

codified in code

Description

Description

Description

Description

Description

Description

Description

Description

Description

Maturity Model

Description

2.25 Disable Automounting (Scored)

Welcome to JKAN's Data Quality Dashboard

A Topology Template consists of a set of Node Templates and Relationship Templates that together define the topology model of a service as a (not necessarily connected) directed graph

As an example, he offered the fact that the Cloud Foundry Service Broker API is currently being seen as a de facto standard, and has been embraced by both Google’s Kubernetes

For compliance, audit, security, and legal professionals — there is a simple truth: automation is your only answer. When you are outnumbered and outgunned, there is no other option.

Security practices can’t be effectively scaled generating documentation by hand and throwing thick reports over silo walls.

For example, security teams at many government agencies use the popular Nessus configuration and vulnerability scanner to test servers and hand off thick reports of potential security and compliance issues to developers and system administrators.

Penis pump.

Amazon. Dildo. If you delay it

You don't eat People Food and give your developers Dog Food. Doing that is simply robbing your long-term platform value for short-term successes. Platforms are all about long-term thinking.

SDG Dashboard

Office of Management and Budget (OMB) directs agency chief information officers (CIO) to respond to 36 information technology (IT) management reporting requirements

no existing Federal solution

code available for Government-wide reuse

Obama’s tech story reaches back to his first campaign in 2008 and the strides his administration has made since then. In 2009, Data.gov launched to the public with 47 federal data sets; today there are more than 193,000

FederalProjectSchema

License

Temporal

Spatial

rmed by the 18F DevOps staff to manage and control user access to the application. The System Owner must ensure that authorization.

Account Management

FederalProjectSchema

License

Temporal

Spatial

Below is the editor generated from the JSON Schema.

Withdrawn, Suspended, or on Hold: A project applicant has indicated in writing or otherwise requested that an agency withdraw or temporarily suspend the project's review; or place the project on hold.14 • Awaiting Applicant Action: A project applicant has sole or joint responsibility for completing a required action before Federal action can proceed, such as modifying a project design or providing more information on an updated design that is necessary to render a Federal permit or review decision. This includes instances when an applicant and a federal agency disagree as to whether an application-related action is truly completed, so long as the Federal agency does not intend to proceed in its review absent applicant action or additional information. • Awaiting Other Cooperator Action: A state, local tribal, or other Federal Government agency action or decision is necessary before the affected Federal agency can proceed in processing a permit application or completing a review. • Lacking Financing: A project applicant temporarily loses financing critical to the project or lacks sufficient financing to continue the permit or review process. • Facing Legal Action: A project applicant or sponsor is subject to legal delays including any temporary restraining order, preliminary injunction, permanent injunction, stay in proceed~ngs, settlement negotiation, or other court-ordered stay that delay completion of the permit or review. • Other: Examples could include instances where a government agency is shut down or a natural disaster prevents agency personnel from conducting a particular review activity. Limitation ofstaff resources, however, would not be considered an external factor affecting the timeliness ofa permit or review.

To which types of infrastructure projects does this guidance apply? This guidance applies to a subset ofinfrastructure projects in the sectors identified in Executive Order 13604 and later supplemented by the Steering Committee that apply for or receive Federal funding,, or that seek a Federal permit or review and meet the threshold criteria identified in Section 2.2. Unless explicitly excluded, all modes and sub-sectors ofthe sectors below are covered by this guidance. Executive Order 13604 allows the Steering Committee to include other sectors as appropriate: • Surface transportation, including all highway, rail, and transit projects6 • Airport capital improvement projects • Ports and waterways7 • Water resource projects8 • Renewable energy generation9 • Electricity transmission • Stonn-water infrastructure • Broadband internet • Pipelines, except those subject to Federal Energy Regulatory Commission oversight

Ensure that permit evaluation and environmental review schedules associated with any infrastructure project is posted to the Dashboard is done so in a timely manner and kept current by appropriate project team personnel. This includes: o Schedules for completing permits or reviews for which its agency is the agency of jurisdiction, and o Schedules for completing National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) actions for which it is the Federal lead agency.

The purpose ofthis guidance is to establish metrics and provide clarity for reporting and tracking permit and environmental review timelines using the Federal Infrastructure Permitting Dashboard. Section 2 ofthis guidance establishes a set ofmetrics to track permit and review timelines for certain infrastructure projects and sets forth a schedule for collecting the data.