813 Matching Annotations
  1. Aug 2025
    1. RPHEmX mY

      $$ R_{phe} m_x m_y = R_{phe} \cos(\phi)\sin(\phi) = R_{phe} \frac{\sin(2\phi)}{2} $$

      except to be consistent with \(m_z\), I would define it as:

      $$ R_{phe_{\text{mine}}} \sin(2\phi) $$

      that means

      $$ R_{phe} \frac{\sin(2\phi)}{2} = R_{phe_{\text{mine}}} \sin(2\phi) $$

      so

      $$ \frac{R_{phe}}{2} = R_{phe_{\text{mine}}} $$

  2. Apr 2025
    1. SPHE/artXY = − Irf2αω+ RPHEτ 0DL − W2 E0art ,APHEXY = − Irf2αω+ RPHEω2ω τ 0z ,SAHE/artXY = Irf2αω+ RAHEτ 0z − W2 E0

      $$S^{PHE/art}$$ and \(S^{AHE/art}\) have the same artifact voltage written for them, however they have different angular dependence. why should they be the same?

    2. VmixXX = Irf2 RAMR Re [mx] sin 2φ,

      Te real part refers to the part that's in phase with the drive, rather than the part which is phase shifted. I expect this to be only approximately accurate, if there is a phase shift.

    3. the transverse leadsinclude some of the same magnetic layer as the main chan-nel. For those early devices, we find that the resultinganalyses of spin-orbit torque produce anomalous results,

      Need to be careful about this

    4. In all of these processes, the resultis a dc voltage perpendicular to the magnetization axis

      How did these mechanisms in particular get chosen? Symmetry? Or just issues that have been reported?

    5. d the spin Hall magnetoresistance in thePt layer, as these produce identical contributions to theST-FMR signal for our sample geometry

      Do they ever produce non identical contributions?

    6. magnetic layer with in-planeanisotropy and an in-plane magnetic field, the symmetriccomponent arises from τ 0DL and the antisymmetric compo-nent from a combination of the current-induced Oerstedfield and τ 0FL .

      Why is this the case?

    7. fied longitudinal dc voltage

      How do we know that it's not radiating rf at 2f from the mixing as well? And maybe that causes additional damping?

  3. journals-aps-org.proxy.library.cornell.edu journals-aps-org.proxy.library.cornell.edu
    1. non-equilibrium torques have the form~τneq =τx0τz

      presumably because y torques are disallowed, for conservation of m

  4. Mar 2025
    1. latent heat 𝐿 to the environment as it goes fromnormal to superconducting at applied field 𝐻𝑐 (𝑇1) at temperature 𝑇1.

      Why doesn't this happen at the other superconducting normal transition? One might say it's because there is a field, but why does that matter? I'd naively assume you don't need a field because the water ice transition has latent heat under no field.

    1. grain-oriented so it has a square hysteresis loop and much lower core losses, for better performance in transformers

      Wouldn't you not want a hysteresis loop to have a good transformer?

    Annotators

    1. amping-like SOT compared to HDL because the lattervaries inversely with the saturation magnetization (Ms) and the layerthickness (tFM) of the driven FM layer

      Why is this?

    2. the damping-like torque [sDL M  (M  r)]due to the absorption of the spin current component transverse to Mand field-like torque [sFL (M  r)] due to reflection of the spin cur-rent with some spin rotation.

      Where is the reference that purports these mechanisms?

    Annotators

  5. Feb 2025

    Annotators

  6. Jan 2025
  7. Dec 2024
    1. result of an orbital Rashba effect associated with localinversion symmetry breaking in BaPb1−xBixO

      They just said that it's centro-symmetric (which I believe means that it has inversion symmetry, Why do they now say that it breaks inversion symmetry?

    Annotators

    1. hat the magnetization rotatescoherently with field and current (Fig. 2C)

      Effectively increasing the anisotropy. Except that in the other dirrection, it decrease the anisotropy? So wouldn't it make it only rotate coherently in 1 dirrection?

    2. Pt/Co/AlOx system. We made addi-tional control samples from a Pt/CoFeB/MgOmultilayer and found that the switching direc-tion is the same as with Pt/Co/AlOx (fig. S5

      Why use MgO at all then? Why not keep the Pt/Co/AlOx vs. Pt/Ta/AlOx?

    3. Bext is parallel (top) or antiparallel (bottom) to the current directiondefined as in the inset to (A)

      Why does the external field change the switching dirrection of the current?

    4. s. From the ratio of the symmetric and antisymmeteric peak componentsin (C), we determine the JS /Je ratio for Pt to be ~0.07,

      Why is it based on the ratio of these?

      Also, what's the value for Ta?

    Annotators

    Annotators

  8. Nov 2024
    1. synthetic antiferromagnet (SAF

      Why use and antiferomagnet? It would make sense to pin to the antiferomagnet, but this is pinned to IrMn, which is a ferromagnet??.

    2. Pulse generator Ι(5¬10 ns)

      Why is the pulse generator hooked up to the intermediate frequency port, rather than the Lo frequency port?

      I'm guessing it's because the rising edge contains high harmonic content.

    Annotators

    Annotators

  9. Oct 2024

    Annotators

  10. Sep 2024
    1. ξDL is ex-pected to be approximately independent of tCo

      Is damping like a surface phenominon, ? I remember something about damping being surface but field like being bulk?

    2. μ0Meff from the first-harmonic Hall sig-nal as a function of in-plane magnetic field swept alongφH = 0 or π/2

      Does this agree with Sagnac?

    3. provides resultsfor the SOTs in better agreement with HH measurementson samples with in-plane anisotropy

      can we not put these samples in plane to verify for sure?

    Annotators

    1. ing-angle sputtering results in relatively high resitivities forthe heavy-metal films: 1.5 μΩ m for Pt and 3.8 μΩ m for Ta atroom temperature.

      Why does the angle make high resistivity?

    2. he efficiency of these spin−orbittorques can be maximized if the magnetic layer is as thin aspossible while maintaining a low magnetic damping, if thesaturation magnetization is minimized,

      Why is minimizing saturation magnetization good?

    Annotators

    Annotators

    Annotators

  11. Aug 2024
    1. ystems with strong spin-orbit coupling, anE or T can also drive analogous transverse-flowing spincurrents, yielding spin Hall effects (SHE

      Why spin orbit coupling here? What do we mean by this?

    Annotators

    1. ny HQ Graphene have led to the advancements such asthe installation of the first commercial automated 2D transfer system inside a glovebox in PI’slab(Fig. 4(c))38, 3

      Ralph Lab Glovebox? or at USC?

    Annotators

    1. Joule heating by the injected current asthe sole source of a thermal gradient and assume ∇T ∝ I 2R s ,where Rs is the sample resistance.

      I'd imagine there would be some lag.

    1. The ISHE converts a spin currentinto an electromotive force ESHE by means of spin–orbit scattering

      They assume it's only based on scattering.

    Annotators

    1. Refractive index also varies with wavelength of the light as given by Cauchy's equation: The most general form of Cauchy's equation is n ( λ ) = A + B λ 2 + C λ 4 + ⋯ , {\displaystyle n(\lambda )=A+{\frac {B}{\lambda ^{2}}}+{\frac {C}{\lambda ^{4}}}+\cdots ,} where n is the refractive index, λ is the wavelength

      Why only even terms in this equation?

    1. This isbased on the long-held assumption that a SOT’s effect on the magnetization isindistinguishable from that of a magnetic field.

      Wouldn't that only be true for the fieldlike components?

    Annotators

  12. Jul 2024

    Annotators

    1. Major dielectricfunctions only can be obtained for materials with cubic, hex-agonal, trigonal, tetragonal, and orthorhombic crystal systems[139]. Such functions can no longer be meaningfully definedfor materials with monoclinic and triclinic crystal systems;

      Why?

    2. A necessary condition for the underlyingstructure to represent an orthogonal system of electric suscep-tibilities, A must be wavelength independent.

      is there something deeper here, or is this just an aesthetic preference. What's wrong with A having wavelength dependence?

    3. symmetry breaking in space such asby chiral arrangement of matter produce nonsymmetric contri-butions

      Then where do you see if it obeys onsager? Shouldn't it only be the time symmetry that produces the non symmetric contributions?

    4. a truly 3D phenomenon and dispenses withthe requirement of an ideal sheet with infinitesimal small thick-ness.

      I wasn't aware this was a requirment.

    Annotators

    1. C current is now at a much smaller frequency (usually a few kHz), sonow the magnetization is perturbed quasistatically and not driven into resonant

      Forbidden? or practical?

    2. δ ˆm is very small so its higher-order terms are negligible

      Not true if we use a super weak magnet. Which means we may have to do a more complicated treatment.

    3. H + µ0Meff( ˆm · ˆZ)ˆZ

      Is this making the small angle approximation? It's not really a field right? Is the anisotropy always pointing upwards? Shouldn't it point at some angle phi based on which way the magnet is oriented?

    Annotators

  13. May 2024
    1. onreciprocal phase shift in reflection from anuntwinned single crystal of YBa2Cu307_5, below 50 K (top) and at room temperature(bottom)

      Why is it counts?

    2. determine that the optical Kerr effectwas the primary source of error with this laser, producing on offset of ~ 70 \irad,depending on the coupling efficiency in the loop

      Why this error?

    3. A variant of magneto-optic spectroscopy, X-raycircular dichroism, is an important probe for measuring the orbital contribution tothe overall magnetic moment of materials.

      Why xray in particular?

    4. for the Kerr effects, with definitions of the coordinate systemsused for the magnetization and the incident and reflected electric fields.

      seems like p and s are swapped?

    5. A = 670 nm [9]. Thisinstrument suffered from a number of difficulties associated with imperfections in thebulk electro-optic modulator (EOM) and with the laser diode source

      What were the problems of a bulk EOM?

    6. The 840 nm interferometer has orders ofmagnitude lower amplitude modulation than the 670 nm interferometer,

      maybe why our 780 nm interferometer higher noise

    7. In the normal-incidence Kerrconfiguration, the sample is capable of backscattering a considerable amount of light,and this effect must be addressed.

      Isn't this what you want to measure?

    8. if we were to rely solely on this method of polarization controlthe tolerance on the extinction coefficient would be insurmountably high: for phasesensitivity of 1 /zrad, the polarization extinction must be better than 120 dB

      Hmm?

    9. of other noise sources much earlier than any fundamentalshot noise limit

      is the shot noise really a "fundamental limit" because if the light were to encode information more strongly, then signal would be greater for same shot noise, right?

    10. for example, if we choose to interfereorthogonal linear polarization states, for example by rotating one of the fibers inFig. 2.2 by ninety degrees, we will be able to measure the ellipticity epp = ^m (6ptp).This will come at a considerable cost in signal strength, however, because nearly allof the fight will be in the wrong polarization state when it arrives at the polarizer(see Fig. 2.1).

      Is there a better way to do this?

    11. e Sagnac interferometer to magneto-optic measurements ofmaterials began in 1989

      [8] L. Onsager. Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. II. Phys. Rev., 38:2265- 2279, 1931. [9] B. I. Halperin. The hunt for anyon superconductivity. In Y. Iye and H. Yasuoka, editors, Physics and Chemistry of Oxide Superconductors: Proceedings of the Second ISSP International Symposium. Springer-Verlag, 1992.

    12. They showed that proper preparation of the polarization states travelingin the interferometer allowed them to measure magnetic fields via the Faraday effectof the fiber [6, 7

      How? Do they use non polarization maintaining fiber?

    Annotators

    Annotators

  14. Apr 2024
    1. rows correspond to irreducible representations

      Why is the number of rows not infinite?

      Also do these representations have to be faithful? seems like they don't because the trivial representation is a row of the table.

    Annotators

  15. Mar 2024
    1. to avoid the formation ofvortices in the SC state.

      Couldn't you still get a vorticy through the thickness? Maybe just higher energy required because thinner confinement.

    2. suppression of the dampinglike torque generated in the Ptlayer by the inverse spin Hall effect, which can be understood by the changes in spin current transport in thesuperconducting NbN layer.

      Could this just be current shunting in the superconductor?

    1. supercurrent is induced along the x axis by enforcing the pairpotential to have a constant phase in a small region close toeach of the two boundaries along x

      How does that work?

    2. With respect to thisreference frame, a rotation of the axes by π/2 degrees aboutthe z axis leads to a sign change of ˜αD , while a rotation of π/4degrees changes the tensor to ηso = ˜αD σz.

      Not obvious to me

    3. as been observed in systems with broken spatialinversion symmetry and strong spin-orbit coupling (SOC)

      Is this the spin orbit torque? What spatial inversion do they mean for a magnet on top of platinum? I assume that inversion is simply the layer order.

    1. such that the latter induces a Group Action on theVector Space, V , such that the latter induces a Group Action on the Vector Space, V ,

      seems duplicate text

    Annotators

    1. A general structure shouldbe regarded as chiral (Fig. 1e), as long as the total twist is non-zero atany point.

      I imagine that it could be oppositely chiral at annother point, and then no longer chiral over all.

    Annotators

    1. bsence of any M, there can be an AFM CD unrelatedto M but proportional to the AFM order L in 𝒫𝒫𝒫𝒫-symmetric AFMs asreported in Cr2O3 (

      Why would this happen?

    Annotators

  16. Feb 2024
    1. pin-polarized electrons flowing from the thinCo layer to the thick layer can switch the moment of thethin layer antiparallel to the thick-layer moment,

      How?

    1. the concept of reciprocity to understand Kerr effect, the useof fluctuation–dissipation theorem, which is another principalresult of linear response theory (that is, the study of irreversiblethermodynamics associated with linear processes that are referredto the equilibrium state of a system) yields an identical result

      Does that mean Fluctuation Dissipation carries the same information as Onsager?

    2. Onsager reciprocity relations and fluctuation–dissipationtheory rely on the assumption that near equilibrium, macroscopicresponse and decay process occur in the same manner as thedecay of equilibrium fluctuations

      Question from the past: how could it not?

    Annotators

    1. he fiber is highly birefringent and the diode light source has8-μm coherence length, only light that couples, after reflectingfrom the sample, between different axes in the fiber willtraverse optical path lengths that differ by less than a coherencelength and interfere coherently at the polarizer

      Explains why we need the SLED.

    2. tements of the symmetries of the electromagneticfield and its measurement entail that the reflection amplitudesbe considered quantum mechanically

      Why??

    Annotators

  17. Dec 2023

    Annotators