Case: IP #8 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/1) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 26; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 71

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 31009

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #62

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 55; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 9; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 87

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4883T>C p.Ile1628Thr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 284

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001859 (3 in 1613848) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018535-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #16 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 40; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 10; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #9 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 85; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 56; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 30

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3917G>T p.Arg1306Leu

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100301

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613956) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019501-C-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #23 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 32; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 15; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 55

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4022G>A p.Arg1341Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 291

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in 1613944) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019396-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #1 in type 2M VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 30; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = n/a; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a; VWF:CB (IU/dL) = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3845T>C p.Leu1282Pro

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100329

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #15 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440 - blood group B

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 26; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 5; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 25.0

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3923G>A p.Arg1308Pro

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100303

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #17 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 46; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 64; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #19 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 58; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 22; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 54

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3946G>A p.Val1316Met

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 290

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #9 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 93; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 107; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 18

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2446C > T p.Arg816Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 295

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00001983 (32 in 1613930) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6036488-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

ClinVar: 296

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #43

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 22; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 13; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 29

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4789C>T p.Arg1597Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 285

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1614028) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018629-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #46

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 64; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 16; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 66

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4789C>T p.Arg1597Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 285

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1614028) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018629-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #7 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/1) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 35; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 35

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 31009

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #21 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 14; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 4; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 31

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #12 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 59; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 59; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 16

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #61

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 5; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 20

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4883T>C p.Ile1628Thr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 284

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001859 (3 in 1613848) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018535-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #15 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 20; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 15; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 28

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #5 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440 - blood group B

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 44; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 25; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 135

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 288

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #22 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 42; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 17; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 51

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4022G>A p.Arg1341Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 291

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in 1613944) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019396-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #16 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 93; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 48; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 76

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #18 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 25; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 26

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3946G>A p.Val1316Met

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 290

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #2 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 21; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 13; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 37

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 288

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #21 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440 - blood group B

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 22; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 26; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 53

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #20 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 10; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 12

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #6 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/1) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 17; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 22

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 31009

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #8 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 61; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 59; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 25

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2446C > T p.Arg816Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 295

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00001983 (32 in 1613930) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6036488-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

ClinVar: 296

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #36

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 40; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 16; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 51

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4541T>G p.Phe1514Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 304

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #18

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIE) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 19.3; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 9; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 30

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 31009

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #11 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 74; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 79; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 18

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #1 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 13; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 49

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2435del p.Pro812Argfs*31

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 303

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00007187 (116 in 1613916) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6044297-CG-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3797C>T p.Pro1266Leu

ClinVarID: 314

gnomAD: 0.0006678 (1077 in 1612852) 2 homozyogotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019621-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #49

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 56; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 15; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 47

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4789C>T p.Arg1597Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 285

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1614028) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018629-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #14 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 20; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 13; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 39

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #45

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 26; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 9; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 30

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4789C>T p.Arg1597Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 285

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1614028) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018629-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #17 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032441 - blood group AB

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 12; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 26

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #19 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 13; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 8; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 22

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #20

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIE) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 29; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 18; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3437A>G

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 31009

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #18 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 151; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 121; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 53

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #14 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 14; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 10; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 26

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3922C>T p.Arg1308Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 289

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #5 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 29; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 26; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 10

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2435del p.Pro812Argfs*31

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 303

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00007187 (116 in 1613916) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6044297-CG-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variants: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

ClinVarID: 296

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #9 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 12; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 10; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 21

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3437A>G p.Tyr1146Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 31009

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3539–10T>G

ClinVarID: not found

**gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #15 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 67; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 78; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 88

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #60

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 38; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 7; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 37

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4883T>C p.Ile1628Thr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 284

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001859 (3 in 1613848) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018535-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #23 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N/1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 40; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 54; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 50

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4751A>G p.Tyr1584Cys

ClinVarID: 310

gnomAD: 0.003442 (5555 in 1613678) 15 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018667-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #20 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 49; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 41; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 23

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #17 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 62; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 22; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 37

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3946G>A p.Val1316Met

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 290

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #3 in type 2M VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 41na44; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = n/a; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a; VWF:CB (IU/dL) = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4001G>A p.Arg1334Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 2572701

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000006196 (10 in 1613834) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019417-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #25 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD and hemophilia A

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 121; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 111; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 1

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #13 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 12; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 7; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 26

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #14 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 55; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 30; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 56

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #8 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 27; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 8; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 33

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 288

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #18 in type U VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: unclassified (2A/2M/1C) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 14; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 26

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1613892) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #4 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 48; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 33; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 46

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 288

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #48

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 16; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 20

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4789C>T p.Arg1597Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 285

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1614028) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018629-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #44

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 30; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 11; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 47

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4789C>T p.Arg1597Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 285

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1614028) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018629-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #59

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 28.7; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 5; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 32

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4883T>C p.Ile1628Thr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 284

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001859 (3 in 1613848) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018535-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #21 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 36; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 9; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 36

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3946G>A p.Val1316Met

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 290

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #19 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 45; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 42; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 11

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #13 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032441 - blood group AB

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 30; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 10

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3922C>T p.Arg1308Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 289

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #16 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440 - blood group B

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 63; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 10; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 82

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3946G>A p.Val1316Met

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 290

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #19

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIE) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 12; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 5; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 24

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3437A>G

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 31009

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001840 (1 in 543518) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022841-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #1 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 17; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 4; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 26

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

ClinVarID: 288

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #7 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 22; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 20

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 288

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #20 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370 - blood group A

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 48; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 11; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 46

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3946G>A p.Val1316Met

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 290

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #7 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440 - blood group B

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 166; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 144; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 2

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2446C>T p.Arg816Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 295

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00001983 (32 in 1613930) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6036488-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #12 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 42; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 15; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 48

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3922C>T p.Arg1308Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 289

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #6 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 74; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 80; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 40

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2435del p.Pro812Argfs*31

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 303

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00007187 (116 of 1613916) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6044297-CG-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

ClinVarID: 296

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #3 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 37; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = n/a; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 288

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #13 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 55; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 45; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 16

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #6 in type 2B VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442 - blood group O

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 22; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 5; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 27

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3916C>T p.Arg1306Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 288

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case: IP #47

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032440 - blood group B

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 24; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 6; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 32

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4789C>T p.Arg1597Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 285

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1 in 1614028) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018629-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #10 in type 2N VWD sub-cohort

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = 50; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 55; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = 15

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2446C > T p.Arg816Trp

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 295

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00001983 (32 in 1613930) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6036488-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

ClinVar: 296

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: IP #50

DiseaseAssertion: type 2A (IIA) VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: VWF:Ag [IU/dL] = n/a; VWF:Ac [IU/dL] = 11; FVIII:C [IU/dL] = n/a

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Sequence variations in the VWF were identified through direct sequencing, while the detection of large rearrangements utilized the multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) technique or assessed copy number variations (CNVs). Sanger sequencing methodology was applied for VWF analysis in patients investigated prior to 2016 (approximately 14% of IPs), whereas next-generation sequencing (NGS) was employed for the analysis of VWF in patients inspected from 2017 onwards (about 86% of IPs). In both strategies, the entire VWF, encompassing all 52 exons, intron/exon boundaries, and promoter regions, was analyzed.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4790G>A p.Arg1597Gln

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100391

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case UZ075: 2 year old female (row 76 supplemental table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 27; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 25.5; Act/Ag ratio = 0.94; FVIII:C (%) = 94.6; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 317

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.6551G>A p.Cys2184Tyr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1677275

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in 1613988) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-5993909-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: F5:Leiden

Variant: c.1601G>A p.Arg534Gln

ClinVarID: 642

gonmAD: 0.02143 (34574 in 1613166) 450 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/1-169549811-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case 3: 32 y.o. female, study ID UZ002 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: type 2B VWD presequencing, type 2B Malmo/New York VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 51; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 30; Act/Ag ratio = 0.59; FVIII:C (%) = 48; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 264

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod:WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3797C>T p.Pro1266Leu

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 314

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.0006678 (1077/1612852) 2 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019621-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case 2: 33 y.o. female, study ID UZ104 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD presequencing, type 2M VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 14; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 10; Act/Ag ratio = 1.00; FVIII:C (%) = 8; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 239

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3863T>G p.Leu1288Arg

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100294

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case 6: 4 y.o. male, study ID UZ024 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: type 2 NOS VWD presequencing; type 2M VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 12.2; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 6.3; Act/Ag ratio = 0.52; FVIII:C (%) = 37.1; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 570

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3863T>G p.Leu1288Arg

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100294

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case UZ036: 13 year old female

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 6.5; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 4.6; Act/Ag ratio = 0.71; FVIII:C (%) = 28.6; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 258

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.8008G>A p.Gly2670Ser

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1703812

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000005576 (9 in 1614024) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-5952498-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultpleGeneVariants:

Gene: FGG

Variant: c.503C>T p.Thr168Met

ClinVarID: 1703849

gnomAD: 0.00003719 (60 in 1613552) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/4-154610096-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case 5: 2 y.o. female, study ID UZ068 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: type 2 NOS VWD presequencing, type 2B VWD + hemophilia A postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 43.3; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 25.2; Act/Ag ratio = 0.58; FVIII:C (%) = 21.6; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 384

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3946G>T p.Val1316Leu

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1703818

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2/1613946) 0 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019472-C-G?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants: variant: F8:c.5883G>A; p.Trp1961*; ClinVar ID: 1703846

Case 19: 2 year old male, study ID UZ070 in supplmental table

DiseaseAssertion: low VWF

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 45; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 39.4; Act/Ag ratio = 0.88; FVIII:C (%) = 74.4; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 232

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod:WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.5746C>G p.Arg1916Gly

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 2572097

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000004337 (7 in 1613868) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6011713-G-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleSequenceVariants:

Gene: SERPINC1

Variant: c.89T>A p.Val30Glu

ClinVarID: 18012

gnomAD: 0.002625 (4237 in 1614198) 14 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/1-173914872-A-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case UZ096: 38 year old female (row97 in supplemental table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 22.8; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 22; Act/Ag ratio = 0.96; FVIII:C (%) = 53.2; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 149

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.7636A>T p.Asn2546Tyr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100480

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000003717 (6 in 1614024) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-5969304-T-A?daset=gnomad_r4at

Case 10: 28 y.o. male, study ID UZ095 in Supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: Type 2 NOS VWD presequencing, type 2M VWD postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032441

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 11.8; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 5; Act/Ag ratio = 0.42; FVIII:C (%) = 18.8; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 180

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3943C>T p.Arg1315Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100310

CAID:

gnomAD: 6.196e-7 (1/1613892) 0 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6019475-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case UZ056: 8 year old male (row 57 in supplementary table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 1/2M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 10.8; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 9.6; Act/Ag ratio = 0.89; FVIII:C (%) = 30.2; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 196

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193).

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.5198T>C p.Leu1733Pro

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1703810

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case UZ050: 3 year old male (row 51 supplemental table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 29.6; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 26; Act/Ag ratio = 0.88; FVIII:C (%) = 78

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.6551G>A p.Cys2184Tyr

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 1677275

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.000001239 (2 in1613988) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-5993909-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case UZ098: 41 year old female (row 99 in supplemental table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 1 VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 30.1; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 25.8; Act/Ag ratio = 0.86; FVIII:C (%) = 61.5; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 377

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4751A>G p.Tyr1584Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 310

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.003442 (5555 in 1613678) 15 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018667-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case UZ063: 10 year old male (row 64 supplemental table)

DiseaseAssertion: type 2M VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032442, HP:0040225

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 20.2; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 8.5; Act/Ag ratio = 0.42; FVIII:C (%) = 28; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 242

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.3863T>G p.Leu1288Arg

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 100294

CAID:

gnomAD: absent

Case 17: 47 year old female, study ID UZ099 in supplemental table

DiseaseAssertion: acquired VWD presequencing, acquired VWD + type 1 VWD variant postsequencing

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0032370

CaseHPOFreeRext: vWF:Ag (%) = 2.6; vWF:GPIbR (%) = 2.2; Act/Ag ratio = 0.85; FVIII:C (%) = 7; Platelets (x10^9/L) = 325

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting: The Thrombosis-Hemostasis gene panel test used whole exome sequencing and included 99 diagnostic-grade genes (table 1 in PMID:36696193)

GenotypingMethod: WES using the coagulation subpanel of the UZ Leuven Thrombosis-Haemostasis gene panel test. WES was performed on the sequencing platform NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina), and Alissa Interpret software v5.2-5.4 (Agilent) was used for variant interpretation. Assessment of copy number variation was validated within the bioinformatics pipeline. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association of Molecular Pathology guidelines were used to classify variants as pathogenic (P), likely pathogenic (LP), a variant of uncertain significance (VUS), or (likely) benign (LB, B) variants

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: c.4751A>G p.Tyr1584Cys

HGVS:

ClinVarID: 310

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.003442 (5555 in 1613678) 15 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6018667-T-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

FGG variant

Variant: c.323C>G p.Ala108Gly

ClinVarID: 547969

gnomAD: 0.003031 (4885 in 1611606) 12 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/4-154611883-G-C?dataset=gnomad_r4

Case: Row 21 in Supplemental Table 1. Variant is found in 14 patients in 13 families

DiseaseAssertion: 10 have type 1 VWD, 2 have VWD type 2A, 2 have VWD type 2M

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 1.2 (1.1-1.4); VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 2.0 (1.2-2.9)

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Genetic analysis was performed at the laboratory of hematology of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen. Ion semiconductor sequencing (Ion-Torrent) was used to analyze the VWF gene from peripheral blood obtained in EDTA tubes or from saliva samples. The 52 exons of VWF gene were analyzed including ±20 bp exon-intron boundaries. If no VWF gene variant was detected, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis was performed to find large deletions or duplications. Thus, MLPA was performed in 183 patients (46.9%). All variants were confirmed with Sanger sequencing.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: 2771G>A R924Q

HGVS: VWF:c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: Type 1: two also had C2304Y and one had T1156M. 2M: one also had R1374H. 2A: one also had G1609R

Case: Row 16 in Supplemental Table 1.

DiseaseAssertion: type 2N VWD

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 0.2; VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 2.0

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Genetic analysis was performed at the laboratory of hematology of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen. Ion semiconductor sequencing (Ion-Torrent) was used to analyze the VWF gene from peripheral blood obtained in EDTA tubes or from saliva samples. The 52 exons of VWF gene were analyzed including ±20 bp exon-intron boundaries. If no VWF gene variant was detected, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis was performed to find large deletions or duplications. Thus, MLPA was performed in 183 patients (46.9%). All variants were confirmed with Sanger sequencing.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: 2372C>T T791M

HGVS: VWF:c.2372C>T p.Thr791Met

ClinVarID: 294

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.00001797 (29 in 1614030) no homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6044361-G-A?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: P812R fs*31

Case: Row 20 in Supplemental Table 1. Variant is found in 14 patients in 14 families

DiseaseAssertion: 7 have type 1 VWD, 7 have VWD type 2N

FamilyInfo:

ParentalGenotype(s):

CasePresentingHPOs:

CaseHPOFreeRext: FVIII:C/VWF:Ag = 1.2 (0.4-1.9); VWFpp/VWF:Ag = 2.7 (1.6-3.8)

CaseNOTHPOs:

CaseNOTHPOFreeText:

CasePreviousTesting:

GenotypingMethod: Genetic analysis was performed at the laboratory of hematology of the Radboud University Medical Center in Nijmegen. Ion semiconductor sequencing (Ion-Torrent) was used to analyze the VWF gene from peripheral blood obtained in EDTA tubes or from saliva samples. The 52 exons of VWF gene were analyzed including ±20 bp exon-intron boundaries. If no VWF gene variant was detected, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis was performed to find large deletions or duplications. Thus, MLPA was performed in 183 patients (46.9%). All variants were confirmed with Sanger sequencing.

PreviouslyPublished:

Gene: VWF

Variant: 2561G>A R854Q

HGVS: VWF:c.2561G>A p.Arg854Gln

ClinVarID: 296

CAID:

gnomAD: 0.004956 (8000 in 1614214) 26 homozygotes https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6034812-C-T?dataset=gnomad_r4

MultipleGeneVariants:

Gene: VWF

Variant: Type 2N; Three also had R2535, one N2546Y, one 6257-1G>A (novel), and one H1419M fs22 (novel). Type 1: one also had S1090_C1099del (novel) and one had del exon 33-34

Variant: T(3445) a C p.Cys1149Arg ClinVarID: 309 gnomAD: MAF of 0.000001846 (1/541718 alleles) https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/12-6022833-A-G?dataset=gnomad_r4

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case20: GT23, Male, 19, French

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000978, HP:0000225, HP:0000421

(Easy bruising, gingival bleeding, epistaxis)

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed <5% expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGB3

Variant: NM_000212.2:c.1031A>C (p.Tyr344Ser)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA400025814

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case6: GT7, Female, 19, French

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: 1 brother, that is all the information Supp table S1 gives us

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000978 and HP:0000421

(Easy bruising and epistaxis)

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed <10-15% expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent ADP but some response with other agonists (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGB3

Variant: NM_000212.2:c.187C>T (p.Arg63Cys) and NM_000212.2:c.505C>T (p.Arg169Ter)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: 631774

CAiD: CA8622892 and CA291224658

gnomAD: MAF in the East Asian population is 0.00005012 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-45360741-C-T

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case9: GT10, Male, 45, French and Italian

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: Mild lifelong bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed 30-50% variant expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Residual platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1440-13_1440-1del (p.Arg480Serfs*106) and NM_000419.3:c.3077G>A (p.Arg1026Gln)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: 50232

CAiD: CA913184940 and CA10575572

gnomAD: MAF in the European (non-Finnish) population 0.00006482 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-45363676-T-C and MAF in the European (non-Finnish) population is 0.000008801 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-42449775-C-T

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case10: GT11, Female, 54, French and German

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000421, HP:0000225, HP:0000132

(Epistaxis, gingival bleeding, menorrhagia)

CaseHPOFreeText: Spontaneous bruising

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed 10-15% variant expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1073G>A (p.Arg358His) and NM_000419.3:c.1234G>A (p.Gly412Arg)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: 2896 and 381748

CAiD: CA115839 and CA8603182

gnomAD: MAF in the Latino population is 0.0001453 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-42458406-C-T

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case70: GT74, Female, 14 years old, French

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0002239, HP:0002249

(GI bleeding, melena)

CaseHPOFreeText: Serious mouth bleeding, post traumatic heavy bruising, heavy bleeding after adenoid removal

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed less than 5% αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1214T>C (p.Ile405Thr) and NM_000419.3:c.1440-13_1440-1del (p.Arg480Serfs*106)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA290950815 and CA913184940

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case30: GT34, Male, 15 years old, US

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000421, HP:0002239

(Epistaxis, GI bleeding)

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed <5% expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1553T>A (p.Ile518Asn) and NM_000419.3:c.1946+3G>T

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA8603038 and CA626121071

gnomAD: MAF in the European (non-Finnish) is 0.000008790 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-42457661-A-T and MAF in the African population is 0.000 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-42456008-C-A

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case11: GT12, Female, 61, French

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: Brother (died at birth) this is all the information Supp table S1 gives

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000421, HP:0000978, HP:0000790

(Epistaxis, easy bruising, hematuria)

CaseHPOFreeText: Heavy bleeding and menarche

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed <5% variant expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGB3

Variant: NM_000212.2:c.565C>T (p.Pro189Ser)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA291224669

gnomAD: MAF in the European (non-Finnish) population 0.00002638 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-45362012-C-T

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case34: GT36b, Male, 60 years old, Spanish

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: Affected sisters who are proband 36a and 36c in this study

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0004406

(Recurrent epistaxis)

CaseHPOFreeText: Embolism of the submaxillary artery

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed <5% expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.131G>T (p.Gly44Val) and NM_000419.3:c.1440-13_1440-1de (p.Arg480Serfs*106)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA399806881 and CA913184940

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case66: GT69, Female, 32 years old, French

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000978, HP:0000979, HP:0004406, HP:0000132, HP:0004846

(Bruising, purpura, recurrent epistaxis, menorrhagia, prolonged bleeding after surgery)

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: HP:0006298 (Prolonged bleeding after dental extraction)

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed <5% expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1878G>C (p.Gln626His)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: 2903

CAiD: CA115852

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case32: GT35b, Female, 16 years old, USA

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: Affected sister who is 35a in this study (See Supplementary Table S1)

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000421, HP:0002239

(Epistaxis, GI bleeding)

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed <5% expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGA2B and ITGB3

Variant: ITGB3: NM_000212.2:c.392G>C (p.Arg131Pro) and NM_000212.2:c.777+1G>A ITGA2B: NM_000419.3:c.2264G>A (p.Arg755Gln)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA8622954, CA8623036, CA8602771

gnomAD: MAF in the African population is 0.00006152 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-45361839-G-C, MAF in the Latino population is 0.0006774 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-45363789-G-A, MAF in the Latino population is 0.0001903 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-42454380-C-T

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case5: GT6, Female, 19, French/Algerian

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000978 and HP:0000225

(Easy bruising, gingival bleeding)

CaseHPOFreeText: Severe bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed <5% expression of αIIbβ3

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGB3

Variant: NM_000212.2:c.940G>T (p.Asl314Tyr)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA400025612

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case24: GT27, Female, 84 at death, French

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0031364, HP:0002239

(Ecchymosis, GI bleeding)

CaseHPOFreeText: Bleeding following trauma

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed 5-10% expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1413C>G (p.Tyr471Ter) and NM_000419.3:c.2468G>A (p.Gly823Glu)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar:

CAiD: CA290950376 and CA399795351

gnomAD: MAF in the European (non-Finnish) population 0.000008791 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-42457994-G-C MAF in African population is 0.000 http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-42453334-C-T

Supplementary Table S1 & S2 Proband and Variant Information:

Case61: GT64, Female, 26 years old, French

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000421, HP:0000978, HP:0000132, HP:0000225, HP:0031364

(Epistaxis, easy bruising, menorrhagia, gingival bleeding, ecchymosis)

CaseHPOFreeText: Mouth and tonsil bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: Flow cytometry showed <5% expression of αIIbβ3 (See Supplementary Table 1)

PlateletAggregation: Absent platelet aggregation (See Supplementary Table 1)

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing of ITGA2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.257T>C (p.Leu86Pro) and NM_000419.3:c.1440-13_1440-1del

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA290956162 and CA913184940

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1:

Case41: GT48, French, gender and age not specified here at this time

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: All patients had a life-long history of mucocutaneous bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes an absent or strongly reduced expression of alphaIIbBeta3 in platelets

PlateletAggregation: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes absent or severely reduced platelet aggregation with at least three physiological agonists

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing was performed. Sanger sequencing ensured coverage of all exons and splice sties of the ITGA2B and ITGB3 genes and extended 300-500 bp into the introns as well as including the UTR. They sequenced 416 bp upstream of the ITGA2B promoter and 463 bp upstream of the ITGB3 promoter. In total they sequenced 51.2% of the ITGA2B gene and 19.4% of the larger ITGB3 gene

Gene: ITGB3

Variant: NM_000212.2:c.1094A>G (p.Asn365Ser) and NM_000212.2:c.1522del (p.Gln508SerfsTer161)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA400026292 and CA772541579

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1:

Case23: GT26, French, gender and age not specified

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: All patients had a life-long history of mucocutaneous bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes an absent or strongly reduced expression of alphaIIbBeta3 in platelets

PlateletAggregation: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes absent or severely reduced platelet aggregation with at least three physiological agonists

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing was performed. Sanger sequencing ensured coverage of all exons and splice sties of the ITGA2B and ITGB3 genes and extended 300-500 bp into the introns as well as including the UTR. They sequenced 416 bp upstream of the ITGA2B promoter and 463 bp upstream of the ITGB3 promoter. In total they sequenced 51.2% of the ITGA2B gene and 19.4% of the larger ITGB3 gene

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1073G>A (p.Arg358His)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: 2896

CAiD: CA115839

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1:

Case10: GT11, French/German, age and gender not specified

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: All patients had a life-long history of mucocutaneous bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes an absent or strongly reduced expression of alphaIIbBeta3 in platelets

PlateletAggregation: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes absent or severely reduced platelet aggregation with at least three physiological agonists

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing was performed. Sanger sequencing ensured coverage of all exons and splice sties of the ITGA2B and ITGB3 genes and extended 300-500 bp into the introns as well as including the UTR. They sequenced 416 bp upstream of the ITGA2B promoter and 463 bp upstream of the ITGB3 promoter. In total they sequenced 51.2% of the ITGA2B gene and 19.4% of the larger ITGB3 gene

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1073G>A (p.Arg385His) NM_000419.3:c.1234G>A (p.Gly412Arg)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: 2896 and 381748

CAiD: CA115839 and CA8603182

gnomAD: MAF in the Latino population for (p.Gly412Arg) is 0.0001453 https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-42458406-C-T

Supplementary Table S1:

Case65: GT76, French, gender and age are not specified

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: All patients had a life-long history of mucocutaneous bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes an absent or strongly reduced expression of alphaIIbBeta3 in platelets

PlateletAggregation: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes absent or severely reduced platelet aggregation with at least three physiological agonists

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing was performed. Sanger sequencing ensured coverage of all exons and splice sties of the ITGA2B and ITGB3 genes and extended 300-500 bp into the introns as well as including the UTR. They sequenced 416 bp upstream of the ITGA2B promoter and 463 bp upstream of the ITGB3 promoter. In total they sequenced 51.2% of the ITGA2B gene and 19.4% of the larger ITGB3 gene

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.2421G>A (p.Trp807Ter)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA399796017

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1:

Case15: GT18, French, gender and age not specified

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: All patients had a life-long history of mucocutaneous bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes an absent or strongly reduced expression of alphaIIbBeta3 in platelets

PlateletAggregation: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes absent or severely reduced platelet aggregation with at least three physiological agonists

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing was performed. Sanger sequencing ensured coverage of all exons and splice sties of the ITGA2B and ITGB3 genes and extended 300-500 bp into the introns as well as including the UTR. They sequenced 416 bp upstream of the ITGA2B promoter and 463 bp upstream of the ITGB3 promoter. In total they sequenced 51.2% of the ITGA2B gene and 19.4% of the larger ITGB3 gene

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1201G>T (p.Gly401Cys) and NM_000419.3:c.2800G>T (p.Val934Phe)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA399804280 and CA290946484

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1:

Case5: GT 6, French/Algerian, gender and age not specified

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: All patients had a life-long history of mucocutaneous bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes an absent or strongly reduced expression of alphaIIbBeta3 in platelets

PlateletAggregation: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes absent or severely reduced platelet aggregation with at least three physiological agonists

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing was performed. Sanger sequencing ensured coverage of all exons and splice sties of the ITGA2B and ITGB3 genes and extended 300-500 bp into the introns as well as including the UTR. They sequenced 416 bp upstream of the ITGA2B promoter and 463 bp upstream of the ITGB3 promoter. In total they sequenced 51.2% of the ITGA2B gene and 19.4% of the larger ITGB3 gene

Gene: ITGB3

Variant: NM_000212.2:c.940G>T (p.Asp314Tyr)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA400025612

gnomAD: N/A

Supplementary Table S1:

Case62: GT73, French, gender and age not specified

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: All patients had a life-long history of mucocutaneous bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes an absent or strongly reduced expression of alphaIIbBeta3 in platelets

PlateletAggregation: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes absent or severely reduced platelet aggregation with at least three physiological agonists

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing was performed. Sanger sequencing ensured coverage of all exons and splice sties of the ITGA2B and ITGB3 genes and extended 300-500 bp into the introns as well as including the UTR. They sequenced 416 bp upstream of the ITGA2B promoter and 463 bp upstream of the ITGB3 promoter. In total they sequenced 51.2% of the ITGA2B gene and 19.4% of the larger ITGB3 gene

Gene: ITGB3

Variant: NM_000212.2:c.889G>A (p.Gly297Arg)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA8623074

gnomAD: MAF in the European (non-Finnish) population is 0.00002643 https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-45364547-G-A

Supplementary Table S1:

Case63: GT74, French, gender and age are not specified

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: All patients had a life-long history of mucocutaneous bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes an absent or strongly reduced expression of alphaIIbBeta3 in platelets

PlateletAggregation: All patients in this study met the clinical and platelet function requirements for GT-- this includes absent or severely reduced platelet aggregation with at least three physiological agonists

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing was performed. Sanger sequencing ensured coverage of all exons and splice sties of the ITGA2B and ITGB3 genes and extended 300-500 bp into the introns as well as including the UTR. They sequenced 416 bp upstream of the ITGA2B promoter and 463 bp upstream of the ITGB3 promoter. In total they sequenced 51.2% of the ITGA2B gene and 19.4% of the larger ITGB3 gene

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.1214T>C (p.Ile405Thr) and NM_000419.3:c.1440-13_1440-1del (p.Arg480SerfsTer106)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA290950815 and CA913184940

gnomAD: N/A

Case1: Patient F1P1, Male, 11 years old, Tunisian

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia type I

FamilyInfo: Table 1 states there is a family history of bleeding (we have minimal to no specific info on this)

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000225, HP:0000978

(Gingival bleeding, easy bruising)

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: N/A

PlateletAggregation: GT diagnosis was based on absent platelet aggregation induced by ADP, collagen, and TRAP and subnormal or cyclical ristocetin induced agglutination

CasePreviousTesting: Using PCR they successfully amplified 20 DNA fragments for the ITGA2B gene (covering more than 48% of the ITGA2B gene constituting 30 exons) and15 DNA fragments of theITGB3gene (covering 15 exons)

Gene: ITGB3

Variant: NM_000212.2:c.176T>C (p.Leu59Pro) and NM_000212.2:c.1143A>C (p.Val381Val) and NM_000212.2:c.1545G>A (p.Arg515Arg) and the other variant stated here is g.41037G>C which I am marking as an Unknown Variant-- biocurator should look at this and determine variant

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: 13558 (p.Leu59Pro), 255535 (p.Val381Val), 255537 (p.Arg515Arg)

CAiD: CA123235 (p.Leu59Pro), CA8623175 (p.Val381Val), CA8623284 (p.Arg515Arg)

gnomAD: MAF in the Ashkenazi Jewish population is 0.1565 https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-45360730-T-C for (p.Leu59Pro) and MAF in the East Asian population is 0.5857 https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-45368337-A-C for (p.Val381Val) and MAF in the East Asian population for (p.Arg515Arg) is 0.3455 https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-45369789-G-A

Case2: Male, 10 years old, Andra Pradesh India

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: HP:0000421, HP:0031364, HP:0002239, HP:0000225

(Epistaxis, ecchymosis, GI bleeding, gingival bleeding)

CaseHPOFreeText: N/A

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: See Table 1 for values

PlateletAggregation: See Table 1 for values

CasePreviousTesting: PCR amplification of ITAG2B and ITGB3

Gene: ITGA2B

Variant: NM_000419.3:c.475G>A (p.Gly159Ser)

LegacyVariant: (p.Gly128Ser)

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA8603454

gnomAD: MAF in the South Asian population is 0.00003267 https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/variant/17-42463018-C-T

Case4: No gender, age, or ethnicity provided. Patient followed in Germany

DiseaseAssertion: Glanzmann thrombasthenia

FamilyInfo: N/A

ParentalGenotype: N/A

CasePresentingHPOs: N/A

CaseHPOFreeText: Severe bleeding

CaseNotHPOs: N/A

CaseNotHPOsFreeText: N/A

ProteinExpression: N/A

PlateletAggregation: Minimal information, not specific enough

CasePreviousTesting: Sanger sequencing identified disease-causing variants in 18 out of 20 patients (Probands 6 and 14 excluded) with istoantibodies to αIIbβ3. The mutations were evenly distributed between ITGB3 and ITGA2B.

Gene: ITGB3

Variant: NM_000212.2:c.1717T>C (p.Cys573Arg)

LegacyVariant: N/A

ClinVar: N/A

CAiD: CA400032387

gnomAD: N/A