61 Matching Annotations
  1. Last 7 days
  2. Sep 2024
    1. I referred (indirectly) to this in an annotation on https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1945/07/as-we-may-think/303881/ as "the PDF". As the first page indicates this is rather a PDF—specifically someone's PDF of the ACM's reprint from 1996 (which can be found hanging off this DOI: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/227181.227186).

      The Atlantic's PDF can be found here https://cdn.theatlantic.com/media/archives/1945/07/176-1/132407932.pdf (at least for now).

  3. Aug 2024
  4. Jul 2024
    1. This foreword is described in the book as being "written as an article in 1997". There's a brief introduction (8 paragraphs dated December 2002), and then what follows is purportedly that same article, which begins, "The Web was designed to be a universal space of information[...]". The acknowledgements of the foreword, too, says that it "is based on a talk presented at the W3C meeting, London, December 3, 1997".

      The same material, including acknowledgement, but sans the 8-paragraph introduction, is available on a webpage titled "Realising the Full Potential of the Web" on the W3C site. https://www.w3.org/1998/02/Potential.html

  5. Jun 2024
  6. Feb 2024
  7. Dec 2023
  8. Jul 2023
    1. Sorry, Insufficient Access Privileges

      Traveller:

      You may benefit from this link, instead https://www.w3.org/History/1991/HTRejected.wn/WNDocument.wn

      (Not sure if it's actually the same as what's supposed to be available here.)

  9. Jun 2023
  10. May 2023
  11. Apr 2023
    1. amd [sic.]

      I'm having trouble determining the source of this purported error. This PDF appears to have copied the content from the version published on kurzweilai.net, which includes the same "erratum". Meanwhile, however, this document which looks like it could plausibly be a scan of the original contains no such error: https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/dod/readingroom/16a/977.pdf

      I wonder if someone transcribed the memo with this "amd" error and that copy was widely distributed (e.g. during the BBS era?) and then someone came across that copy and inserted the "[sic]" adornments.

  12. Mar 2023
  13. Jan 2023
  14. Nov 2022
  15. Oct 2022
  16. Aug 2022
    1. Other versions which are available are:

      Another PDF from CERN, but this one what looks like a PDF of the original as a first-class digital document, i.e., not a scan of a paper copy: https://cds.cern.ch/record/369245/files/dd-89-001.pdf

  17. Jun 2022
  18. May 2022
  19. Apr 2022
  20. Mar 2022
  21. Feb 2022
    1. This URL is referenced by Ted himself in his upload (to the Internet Archive) of the seminar "Hard and Fast Thoughts for a Softcopy World":

      <https://archive.org/details/HardAndFastThoughts1966>

      Meanwhile, a copy has already been available through IA, too:

      <https://archive.org/details/nelson-file-structure>

      (...albeit uploaded independently by Erica Fischer and not Ted.)

  22. Nov 2021
  23. Oct 2021
  24. Sep 2021
  25. Aug 2021
  26. Jul 2021
    1. Other versions which are available are:

      From CERN, a PDF scan of the original (includes the infamous handwritten note "Vague but exciting...": https://cds.cern.ch/record/1405411/files/ARCH-WWW-4-010.pdf