Discussion on

Bellinger C, Drozdyuk A, Crowley M, Tamblyn I. Balancing Information with Observation Costs in Deep Reinforcement Learning. Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence [Internet]. 2022 May 27; Available from: https://caiac.pubpub.org/pub/0jmy7gpd

• 0:37 - need to recognize the networked nature of today's media
• 0:37 - need to recognize the networked nature of today's media
• 0:48 - work within traditional media literacy and build on things that have worked for decades, but recognize what has changed and use the strengths of networked media
• 1:05 - how do children check sources on the internet
• 1:20 - one of the simplest ways is to follow the links back to the source
• 1:34 - when it's a photo, you can do a reverse image search
• 1:50 can do a news search and sort by date to see if the news story is current
• 2:45 - misinformation campaigns happening - mixing genuine content with misinformation
• 3:25 - some create alternate identities or fake accounts
• 4:25 - important to get a sense of how reliable a source is
• 4:35 - what is the purpose of the source and what is their business model? - is there accuracy and reliability in this, then likely will trust it as a source

• 5:10 - impact that we don't get our news from a limited number of sources
• 5:45 - some of these sources are from friends on social media, others are algorithmically determined
• 6:08 - some advantages and disadvantages - the old model was news curated in a newspaper; new model has the potential of getting news we may not have gotten in the old model
• 6:20 but in the old system you had gatekeeping and 'provenance'; in online news it's sometimes an effort to see where the information originates; gate keeping falls to us now
• 7:05 we need to train young people to do this
• 7:30 how should we teach this?
• 7:35 - with the concept approach you don't need to feel like an expert

• 7:40 - success teaching media literacy from the key concepts for three decades; begin from these
• 7:52 - media are constructed;
• 7:55 - they have commercial considerations;
• 7:58 they have social and political implications;
• 8:00 that audiences negotiate meaning;
• 8:05 that each medium has a unique form and the form influences the content
• 8:20 these can be applied to any form of media and adapted to any grade from K-12

• 8:30 so the key concepts of digital literacy are paralleled and are in addition to those, they don't replace the original five concepts
• 8:40 now have implications of digital literacies in that they are networked so we need to understand the idea of the network
• 8:50 understand that content now is shareable, that this is the default rather than the exception
• 8:55 - the ways the tools we use influence not just the content but the ways we use them
• 9:05 - this has an impact, an ethical dimension
• 9:10 - these can be applied in any context and to any grade level
• 9:20 - we have a full digital literacy curriculum that we offer (speaking about Media Smarts Canada); it has lessons on seven different aspects that a teacher or school board can use
• 9:45 - the value of the key concepts is teachers can modify these resources to their contexts
• 9:50 - teachers have in those key concepts what is essentially a GUIDING STAR to understand what they are supposed to be achieving with these lessons

International Law declarations would require some form of exploitation, oppression or exploitation to be proved. In general, the bar would be high for this belief -- as in Quebec citizens being refused the right to vote, for instance.

Idle No More framed as part of a centuries-long conflict between First Nations and the Canadian government. The term "bullied" may have significance here as the omnibus bill was perceived to be a way for government to bully through their agenda without debate. It also have a loose connection to cyberbullying which was a policy issue gaining traction at this time.

Unclear whether this was people sympathizing with Idle No More or appropriating the phrase Idle No More to other issues and causes. This is an important theme in digital humanism - it is quite easy to apply a term to a situation or give support to a cause, but it is never very clear that this translates into material support -- such as public pressure, resource sharing and so on.