5 Matching Annotations
- Aug 2023
-
www.pewresearch.org www.pewresearch.org
-
I do expect new social platforms to emerge that focus on privacy and ‘fake-free’ information, or at least they will claim to be so. Proving that to a jaded public will be a challenge. Resisting the temptation to exploit all that data will be extremely hard. And how to pay for it all? If it is subscriber-paid, then only the wealthy will be able to afford it.
- for: quote, quote - Sam Adams, quote - social media
- quote, indyweb - support, people-centered
- I do expect new social platforms to emerge that focus on privacy and ‘fake-free’ information, or at least they will claim to be so.
- Proving that to a jaded public will be a challenge.
- Resisting the temptation to exploit all that data will be extremely hard.
- And how to pay for it all?
- If it is subscriber-paid, then only the wealthy will be able to afford it.
- author: Sam Adams
- 24 year IBM veteran -senior research scientist in AI at RTI International working on national scale knowledge graphs for global good
- comment
- his comment about exploiting all that data is based on an assumption
- a centralized, server data model
- his comment about exploiting all that data is based on an assumption
- this doesn't hold true with a people-centered, person-owned data network such as Inyweb
-
Will members-only, perhaps subscription-based ‘online communities’ reemerge instead of ‘post and we’ll sell your data’ forms of social media? I hope so, but at this point a giant investment would be needed to counter the mega-billions of companies like Facebook!
- for: quote, quote - Janet Salmons, quote - online communities, quote - social media, indyweb - support
- paraphrase
- Will members-only, perhaps subscription-based ‘online communities’ reemerge instead of
- ‘post and we’ll sell your data’ forms of social media?
- I hope so, but at this point a giant investment would be needed to counter the mega-billions of companies like Facebook!
-
-
www.pewresearch.org www.pewresearch.org
-
The big tech companies, left to their own devices (so to speak), have already had a net negative effect on societies worldwide. At the moment, the three big threats these companies pose – aggressive surveillance, arbitrary suppression of content (the censorship problem), and the subtle manipulation of thoughts, behaviors, votes, purchases, attitudes and beliefs – are unchecked worldwide
- for: quote, quote - Robert Epstein, quote - search engine bias,quote - future of democracy, quote - tilting elections, quote - progress trap, progress trap, cultural evolution, technology - futures, futures - technology, progress trap, indyweb - support, future - education
- quote
- The big tech companies, left to their own devices , have already had a net negative effect on societies worldwide.
- At the moment, the three big threats these companies pose
- aggressive surveillance,
- arbitrary suppression of content,
- the censorship problem, and
- the subtle manipulation of
- thoughts,
- behaviors,
- votes,
- purchases,
- attitudes and
- beliefs
- are unchecked worldwide
- author: Robert Epstein
- senior research psychologist at American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology
- paraphrase
- Epstein's organization is building two technologies that assist in combating these problems:
- passively monitor what big tech companies are showing people online,
- smart algorithms that will ultimately be able to identify online manipulations in realtime:
- biased search results,
- biased search suggestions,
- biased newsfeeds,
- platform-generated targeted messages,
- platform-engineered virality,
- shadow-banning,
- email suppression, etc.
- Tech evolves too quickly to be managed by laws and regulations,
- but monitoring systems are tech, and they can and will be used to curtail the destructive and dangerous powers of companies like Google and Facebook on an ongoing basis.
- Epstein's organization is building two technologies that assist in combating these problems:
- reference
- seminar paper on monitoring systems, ‘Taming Big Tech -: https://is.gd/K4caTW.
Tags
- quote - mind control
- progress trap - digital technology
- quote - progress trap
- search engine manipulation effect
- quote - election bias
- progress trap - social media
- search engine bias
- progress trap - search engine
- quote SEME
- quote -search engine manipulation effect
- progress trap
- progress trap - Google
- quote - Robert Epstein
- quote
- SEME
- quote - tilting elections
Annotators
URL
-
-
hackernoon.com hackernoon.com
-
In our early experiments, reported by The Washington Post in March 2013, we discovered that Google’s search engine had the power to shift the percentage of undecided voters supporting a political candidate by a substantial margin without anyone knowing.
- for: search engine manipulation effect, SEME, voting, voting - bias, voting - manipulation, voting - search engine bias, democracy - search engine bias, quote, quote - Robert Epstein, quote - search engine bias, stats, stats - tilting elections
- paraphrase
- quote
- In our early experiments, reported by The Washington Post in March 2013,
- we discovered that Google’s search engine had the power to shift the percentage of undecided voters supporting a political candidate by a substantial margin without anyone knowing.
- 2015 PNAS research on SEME
- http://www.pnas.org/content/112/33/E4512.full.pdf?with-ds=yes&ref=hackernoon.com
- stats begin
- search results favoring one candidate
- could easily shift the opinions and voting preferences of real voters in real elections by up to 80 percent in some demographic groups
- with virtually no one knowing they had been manipulated.
- stats end
- Worse still, the few people who had noticed that we were showing them biased search results
- generally shifted even farther in the direction of the bias,
- so being able to spot favoritism in search results is no protection against it.
- stats begin
- Google’s search engine
- with or without any deliberate planning by Google employees
- was currently determining the outcomes of upwards of 25 percent of the world’s national elections.
- This is because Google’s search engine lacks an equal-time rule,
- so it virtually always favors one candidate over another, and that in turn shifts the preferences of undecided voters.
- Because many elections are very close, shifting the preferences of undecided voters can easily tip the outcome.
- stats end
-
- Oct 2020
-
blog.joinmastodon.org blog.joinmastodon.org
-
Another feature that has been requested almost since the start, and which I keep rejecting is quoting messages.
-