Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this paper, Ahmadi et al demonstrated that antibodies produced locally in the liver by infiltrating B cells can enhance liver damage caused by fat accumulation. The main finding is that human samples extracted from severe alcoholic hepatitis showed antibody accumulation that may be related to an enhanced immune response to self-antigens, which could ultimately fuel liver damage - which was already present due to alcohol consumption. Their data are corroborated by arrays and gene ontology assays, and I strongly believe that these data could add to the future options we have to treat patients.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors tried to characterize the function of the SWI/SNF remodeler family, BAF, in spermatogenesis. The authors focused on ARID1A, a BAF-specific putative DNA binding subunit, based on gene expression profiles. The study has several serious issues with the data and interpretation. The conditional deletion mouse model of ARIDA using Stra8-cre showed inefficient deletion; spermatogenesis did not appear to be severely compromised in the mutants. Using this data, the authors claimed that meiotic arrest occurs in the mutants. This is obviously a misinterpretation. In the later parts, the authors performed next-gen analyses, including ATAC-seq and H3.3 CUT&RUN, using the isolated cells from the mutant mice. However, with this inefficient deletion, most cells isolated from the mutant mice appeared not to undergo Cre-mediated recombination. Therefore, these experiments do not tell any conclusion pertinent to the Arid1a mutation. Furthermore, many of the later parts of this study focus on the analysis of H3.3 CUT&RUN. However, Fig. S7 clearly suggests that the H3.3 CUT&RUN experiment in the wild-type simply failed. Thus, none of the analyses using the H3.3 CUT&RUN data can be interpreted. Overall, I found that the study does not have rigorous data, and the study is not interpretable. If the author wishes to study the function of ARID2 in spermatogenesis, they may need to try other cre-lines to have more robust phenotypes, and all analyses must be redone using a mouse model with efficient deletion of ARID2.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors present the OpenApePose database constituting a collection of over 70000 ape images which will be important for many applications within primatology and the behavioural sciences. The authors have also rigorously tested the utility of this database in comparison to available Pose image databases for monkeys and humans to clearly demonstrate its solid potential. However, the variation in the database with regards to individuals, background, source/setting is not clearly articulated and would be beneficial information for those wishing to make use of this resource in the future. At present, there is also a lack of clarity as to how this image database can be extrapolated to aid video data analyses which would be highly beneficial as well.

I have two major concerns with regard to the manuscript as it currently stands which I think if addressed would aid the clarity and utility of this database for readers.

1. Human annotators are mentioned as doing the 16 landmarks manually for all images but there is no assessment of inter-observer reliability or the such. I think something to this end is currently missing, along with how many annotators there were. This will be essential for others to know who may want to use this database in the future.

Relevant to this comment, in your description of the database, a table or such could be included, providing the number of images from each source/setting per species and/or number of individuals. Something to give a brief overview of the variation beyond species. (subspecies would also be of benefit for example).

2. You mention around line 195 that you used a specific function for splitting up the dataset into training, validation, and test but there is no information given as to whether this was simply random or if an attempt to balance across species, individuals, background/source was made. I would actually think that a balanced approach would be more appropriate/useful here so whether or not this was done, and the reasoning behind that must be justified.

This is especially relevant given that in one test you report balancing across species (for the sample size subsampling procedure).

And another perhaps major concern that I think should also be addressed somewhere is the fact that this is an image database tested on images while the abstract and manuscript mention the importance of pose estimation for video datasets, yet the current manuscript does not provide any clear test of video datasets nor engage with the practicalities associated with using this image-based database for applications to video datasets. Somewhere this needs to be added to clarify its practical utility.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this manuscript, the authors conducted a straightforward molecular approach to link FMRP and MAP1B proteins functionally. Both proteins are connected since FMRP is a translational regulator of the MAP1B protein, a microtubule-stabilizing factor.

The results combined molecular genetics (FMRP knock-out mice) with acute inactivation of FRMP and MAP1B to conclusively support the notion that FMRP-dependent regulation of MAP1B is necessary for proper neuronal migration toward the olfactory bulb using the rostral migratory stream.

Overall, these results increase our knowledge of the molecular mechanism that controls how neurons migrate in the brain to reach their final destinations and confirms that cytoskeleton regulators are key players in this process.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Kimchi et al. examined the role of cholinergic inputs to the amygdala in regulating reward-seeking behavior. To investigate this, the authors developed a head-fixed behavioral task where animals were trained to lick at random intervals, with some of these responses being reinforced ("windows of opportunity") as opposed to control epochs when no reward was delivered.

The authors conducted in vivo optogenetic stimulation of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons and discovered that a 2-second optical stimulation of these neurons encouraged licking behavior when followed by reward delivery. This was in comparison to time epochs where no reward was delivered or compared to control mice only expressing EYFP. However, it remained unclear how many trials were required for this effect to manifest.

Furthermore, they demonstrated that the stimulation of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons did not induce real-time place preference or affect locomotion. The reward-driven licking behavior was also mitigated by systemic cholinergic receptor antagonists.<br /> Next, the authors observed the bulk calcium dynamics from these neurons in a version of the task where an auditory cue predicted reward availability. They found strong calcium signals when mice were licking and when the tone was present, but also reported signals when mice were spontaneously licking.

By injecting a genetically encoded Acetylcholine (Ach) sensor directly into the Basolateral Amygdala (BLA), they showed that Ach signals were present when mice were engaged in licking, both during reward availability and for non-rewarded licks. Photostimulation of Ach terminals directly in the BLA increased licking behavior when a reward was available.

Finally, using in vivo and ex vivo physiology, they demonstrated that Ach signaling influences the electrophysiological dynamics in the BLA. This may help clarify some of the postsynaptic responses triggered by this neuromodulator.

Strengths of the paper:

1. The experiments were well-executed and sufficiently powered, with most statistics being correctly reported.<br /> 2. The paper is a technical tour de force, employing fiber photometry, in vivo and ex vivo electrophysiology, optogenetics, and behavioral approaches.<br /> 3. Robust effects were observed in most of the experiments.<br /> Weaknesses:<br /> 1. The experimental design varies slightly across each behavioral experiment, making it difficult to directly compare one effect to another.<br /> 2. The paper doesn't include data showing the precise location for the Ach recordings. As a result, it is unclear whether these signals are specific to the BLA, or whether they might also be coming from neighboring regions.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Hage et al examine how the foraging behavior of marmoset monkeys in a laboratory setting systematically takes into account the reward value and anticipated effort cost associated with the acquisition and consumption of food. In an interesting comprehensive framework, the authors study how experimental and natural variation of these factors affect both the decisions and actions necessary to gather and accumulate food, as well as the actions necessary to consume the food.

The manuscript proposes a computational model of how the monkeys may guide all these aspects of behavior, by maximizing a food capture rate that trades off the food that can be gathered with the effort and duration of the underlying actions. They use this model to derive qualitative predictions for how monkeys should react to an increase in the effort associated with food consumption: Monkeys should work longer before deciding to consume the accumulated food, but should move more slowly. The model also predicts that monkeys should show a different reaction to an increase in reward value of the food, also working longer but moving faster. The authors test these predictions in an interesting experimental setup that requires monkeys to collect small increments of food rewards for successful eye movements to targets. The monkeys can decide freely when to interrupt work and consume the accumulated food, and the authors measure the speed of the eye movements involved in the food acquisition as well as the tongue movements involved in the food consumption.

By and large, the behavioral findings fall in line with the qualitative model predictions: When the effort involved in food consumption increases, monkeys collect more food before deciding to consume it, and they move slower both during food acquisition and food consumption. In a second test, the authors approximate the effects of reward value of the food at stake, by comparing monkey behavior during different days with natural variations in body weight. These quasi-experimental increases in the reward value of food also lead to longer work times before consumption, but to faster movements during food consumption. Finally, the authors show that these effects correlate with pupil size, with pupils dilating more for low-effort foraging actions with increased saccade speed and decreased work duration. The authors conclude that the effort associated with anticipated actions can lead to changes in global brain state that simultaneously affect decisions and action vigor.

The paper proposes an interesting model for how one unified action policy may simultaneously affect multiple types of decisions and movements involved in foraging. The methods employed to measure behavior and test these predictions are generally sound, and the paper is well written. While the model and paper in their present form can clearly inspire researchers to consider this integrated perspective, and trigger further research employing such a framework, there are some conceptual and methodical shortcomings that reduce the conclusiveness of the results and the usefulness of the proposed model.

(1) The model proposed in the paper takes a very specific functional form that is neither motivated by the previous literature nor particularly useful for indexing the behavioral tendencies of individual monkeys (or of the same monkey in different contexts). For example, while it is clear that the saccade effort cost will need to outgrow the increase in the utility of the accumulated food for the monkey to start feeding, it is unclear why this needs to be modeled with a fixed quadratic exponent on the number of saccades? Similarly, why do licks deplete the food stash with the specific rate hard-coded in the model? Finally, the proportion of successful saccades and lick events is assumed to be fixed, even though it very likely to be directly influenced by movement speed (speed-accuracy trade-off), which is also contained in the model. It would strongly increase the plausibility and potential impact of the model if the authors could clearly state where these hard-coded model terms come from. Ideally, they would formulate the model in more general terms and also consider other functional forms, as briefly suggested in the discussion. This latter point would be particularly important since not all model predictions were actually borne out in the data.

(2) The authors derive qualitative predictions, by simulating their model with apparently arbitrary parameters. They then test these qualitative predictions with conventional statistics (e.g., t-tests of whether monkeys lick more for high vs low effort trials). The reader wonders why the authors chose this route, instead of formulating their model with flexible parameters and then fitting these to data. This would allow them (and future researchers) to test their model not just qualitatively but also quantitatively, and to compare the plausibility of different functional forms. The authors certainly have enough data and power to do this, given the vast number of sessions the monkey completed.

(3) The effort manipulation chosen by the authors (distance of food tube) goes hand in hand with a greater need for precision since the monkey's tongue needs to hit an opening of similar size, but now located at a greater distance. This raises the question of whether the monkeys moved slower to enhance its chance of collecting the food (in line with a speed-accuracy trade off). The manuscript would benefit from an explicit test of this possibility, for example by reporting whether for each of the two conditions, the speed of tongue movements on a trial-by-trial basis predicts the probability of food collection? At the very least, the manuscript should explicitly discuss this issue and how it affects the certainty with which effects of tube distance can be linked to anticipated effort cost alone.

(4) The authors report most of the effects on the different measures (work duration, movement vigor, lick vigor, etc) in separate analyses. However, their model predicts that all of these measures result from the same action policy (maximization of the capture rate) and should therefore be related on a trial-by-trial basis. This is so far hardly tested in the presented analyses (with the exception of the pupil correlations in Figure 5). The model's assumed action policy would appear more plausible if the authors could demonstrate these trial-by-trial interrelations with some tests of association (e.g., correlations/regressions as already done for pupil measures in Figure 5) or possibly with dimensionality reduction of the multivariate data.

(5) The manuscript measures pupil dilation in a time period ranging from -250ms before to 250 ms after saccade onset. However, the pupil changes strongly during saccade execution relative to the preceding baseline, leaving doubts as to whether the aggregated measure blurs several interesting and potentially different effects. It would be more conclusive if the manuscript could report the analyses of pupil size separately for a period prior to saccade onset and during/after the saccade.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This manuscript links the distinctive stinging behavior of sea anemones in different ecological niches to varying inactivation properties of voltage-gated calcium channels that are conferred by the identity of auxiliary Cavbeta subunits. Previous work from the Bellono lab established that the burrowing anemone, Nematostella vectensis, expresses a CaV channel that is strongly inactivated at rest which requires a simultaneous delivery of prey extract and touch to elicit a stinging response, reflecting a precise stinging control adapted for predation. They show here that by contrast, the anemone Exaiptasia diaphana which inhabits exposed environments, indiscriminately stings for defense even in the absence of prey chemicals, and that this is enabled by the expression of a CaVbeta splice variant that confers weak inactivation. They further use the heterologous expression of CaV channels with wild type and chimeric anemone Cavbeta subunits to infer that the variable N-termini are important determinants of Cav channel inactivation properties.

1. The authors found that Exaiptasia nematocytes could be characterized by two distinct inactivation phenotypes: (1) nematocytes with low-voltage threshold inactivation similar to that of Nematostella (Vi1/2 = ~ -85mV); and (2) a distinct population with weak, high-voltage threshold inactivation (Vi1/2 = ~ -48mV). What were the relative fractions of low-voltage and high-voltage nematocytes? Do the low-voltage Exaiptasia nematocytes behave similarly to Nematostella nematocytes with respect to requiring both prey extract and touch to discharge?

2. The authors state in Fig 3 legend and in the results that Exaiptasia nematocyte voltage-gated Ca2+ currents have weak inactivation compared with Nematostella. This description is imprecise and inaccurate. Figure 3 in fact shows that Exaiptasia nematocyte voltage-gated Ca2+ currents display a faster rate of inactivation compared to Nematostella Ca2+ currents. A sub-population of Exaiptasia nematocytes does display less resting state (or steady-state) inactivation compared to Nematostella Ca2+ currents. The authors need to be more accurate and qualify what type of inactivation property they are talking about.

3. In a similar vein, the authors need to be more accurate when referring to 'rat beta' used in heterologous expression experiments. It should be made explicit throughout the manuscript that the rat beta isoform used is rat beta2a. Among the distinct beta isoforms, beta2a is unique in being palmitoylated at the N-terminus which confers a characteristic slow rate of inactivation and a right-shifted voltage-dependence of steady-state inactivation consistent with the data shown in Fig. 4D. Almost all other rat beta isoforms do not have these properties.

4. The profiling of the impact of different Cnidarian Cavbeta subunits on reconstituted Ca2+ channel current waveforms is nice (Fig 5 and Fig 5S1). The N-terminus sequence of EdCaVβ2 is different from palmitoylated rat beta2a, though both have similar properties in showing slow inactivation and a right-shifted voltage-dependence of steady-state inactivation. Does EdCaVβ2 target autonomously the plasma membrane when expressed in cells? If so, this would reconcile with what was previously known and provide a rational explanation for the observed functional impact of the distinct Cavbetas.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This work presents a remarkably extensive set of experiments, assaying the interaction between methylation and expression across most CpG positions in the genome in two cell types. To this end, the authors use mSTARR-seq, a high-throughput method, which they have previously developed, where sequences are tested for their regulatory activity in two conditions (methylated and unmethylated) using a reporter gene. The authors use these data to study two aspects of DNA methylation: 1. Its effect on expression, and 2. Its interaction with the environment. Overall, they identify a small number of 600 bp windows that show regulatory potential, and a relatively large fraction of these show an effect of methylation on expression. In addition, the authors find regions exhibiting methylation-dependent responses to two environmental stimuli (interferon alpha and glucocorticoid dexamethasone).

The questions the authors address represent some of the most central in functional genomics, and the method utilized is currently the best method to do so. The scope of this study is very impressive and I am certain that these data will become an important resource for the community. The authors are also able to report several important findings, including that pre-existing DNA methylation patterns can influence the response to subsequent environmental exposures.

The main weaknesses of the study are: 1. The large number of regions tested seems to have come at the expense of the depth of coverage per region (1 DNA read per region per replicate). I have not been convinced that the study has sufficient statistical power to detect regulatory activity, and differential regulatory activity to the extent needed. This is likely reflected in the extremely low number of regions showing significant activity. 2. Due to the position of the tested sequence at the 3' end of the construct, the mSTARR-seq approach cannot detect the effect of methylation on promoter activity, which is perhaps the most central role of methylation in gene regulation, and where the link between methylation and expression is the strongest. This limitation is evident in Fig. 1C and Figure 1-figure supplement 5C, where even active promoters have activity lower than 1. Considering these two points, I suspect that most effects of methylation on expression have been missed.

Overall, the combination of an extensive resource addressing key questions in functional genomics, together with the findings regarding the relationship between methylation and environmental stimuli makes this a key study in the field of DNA methylation.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Dietary restriction (DR) increases lifespan, an effect that has been consistently observed in several organisms, but we still lack a clear mechanism to explain this phenomenon. In this work, Hwangbo et al. revisited the role of the circadian clock in DR-mediated lifespan effects. They found that the increase in lifespan produced by DR is missing on a clock mutant, a clock dependency that is also observed at the level of nutrient-dependent egg laying. By conducting RNA-seq with an impressive temporal resolution, they showed that DR triggers an increment in the number of cycling genes expressed in the fat body, the fly functional analog of the mammalian liver. Interestingly, from these genes, a group of them are de novo daily expressed genes, meaning that their expression was not rhythmic under the control diet but appear rhythmically expressed under DR. Among those, genes encoding proteasome subunits are enriched. The authors finally showed that adult-specific knockdown of these genes in the fat body prevents the increase in lifespan under DR, further supporting a role of the proteasome in this process. Overall, the conclusions are mostly supported by the evidence presented, and the authors' discussion nicely frame their results with other research in the field.

Strengths:

- Many studies have limited their observations of DR on lifespan to a few dietary conditions which makes the reach of some previous conclusions somewhat limited. The dilution strategy that the authors used in this work provides a strong indication that the effect of DR on lifespan relies on clock expression regardless of the conditions used. Furthermore, the inclusion of the egg-laying assay is a good addition to support this hypothesis.<br /> - Because the strength of the rhythmicity statistics relies heavily on the number of data points collected, the temporal resolution used for the RNA-seq experiments (every 2 hrs per 48hrs) is remarkable. This allows exquisite dissection of the phase of rhythmic genes in different conditions. The dataset produced in this work might be of use to other groups interested in weighting the role of other represented gene clusters in DR.

Weaknesses:

I see only minor flaws in this work, that if addressed, might strengthen the authors' conclusions, particularly:

- The results of the lifespan assays are quite variable and in some instances contradictory (Fig. S8) across trials, possibly because there are other unaccounted variables we still do not understand. The fecundity assay, in contrast, seems to be a better readout (Fig. 2). Confirming at least the two genes picked for the study (Fig. 5) would be good support for the claim that the proteasome mediates the effects of DR.<br /> - According to the model, the acute effect of DR on gene expression is related to CLOCK protein function. However, I am not sure how this link was established. It is tempting to assume that CLOCK upstream is the reason for having an increase in rhythmic genes under DR, but the experiments did not test this. The tests conducted either assessed the role of clk or the effect of an impaired proteasome on DR-dependent extension of lifespan. Thus, it is difficult to assert the authors' claims on the link between CLK and the changes in cycling genes and to the proteasome upon DR.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors sought to characterize normal placental aging to better understand how the molecular and cellular events that trigger the labor process. An understanding of these mechanisms would not only provide insight into term labor, but also potential triggers of preterm labor, a common pregnancy complication with no effective intervention. Using bulk transcriptomic analysis of mouse and human placenta at different gestational timepoints, the authors determined that stabilization of HIF-1 signaling accompanied by mitochondrial dysfunction and cellular senescence are molecular signatures of term placenta. They also used in vitro trophoblast (choriocarcinoma) and a uterine myocyte culture system to further validate their findings. Lastly, using chemically induced HIF-1 induction in vivo in mice, the authors showed that stabilization of HIF-1 protein in the placenta reduced the gestational length significantly.

The major strength of this study is the use of multiple model systems to address the question at hand. The consistency of findings between mouse and human placenta, and the validation of mechanisms in vitro and in vivo modeling are strong support for their conclusions. The rationale for studying the term placentas to understand the abnormal process of preterm birth is clearly explained. Although the idea that hypoxic stress and placental senescence are triggers for labor is not novel, the comprehensiveness of the approach and idea to study the normal aging process are appreciated.

There are some areas of the manuscript that lack clarity and weaknesses in the methodology worth noting. The rationale for focusing on senescence and HIF-1 is not clearly given that other pathways were more significantly altered in the WGCNA analysis. The placental gene expression data were from bulk transcriptomic analyses, yet the authors do not explicitly discuss the limitations of this approach. Although the reader can assume that the authors attribute the mRNA signature of aging to trophoblasts - of which, there are different types - clarification regarding their interpretation of the data and the relevant cell types would strengthen the paper. Additionally, while the inclusion of human placenta data is a major strength, the differences between mouse and human placental structure and cell types make highlighting the specific cells of interest even more important; although there are correlations between mouse and human placenta, there are also many differences, and the comparison is further limited when considering the whole placenta rather than specific cell populations.

Additional details regarding methods and the reasons for choosing certain readouts are needed. Trophoblasts are sensitive to oxygen tension which varies according to gestational age, and it is unclear if this variable was taken into consideration in this study. Many of the cellular processes examined are well characterized in the literature yet the rationale for choosing certain markers is unclear (e.g., Glb1 for senescence; the transcripts selected as representative of the senescence-associated secretory phenotype; mtDNA lesion rate).

Overall, the findings presented are a valuable contribution to the field. The authors provide a thoughtful discussion that places their findings in the context of current literature and poses interesting questions for future pursuit. Their efforts to be comprehensive in the characterization of placental aging is a major strength; few placental studies attempt to integrate mouse and human data to this extent, and the validation and presentation of a potential mechanism by which fetal trophoblasts signal to maternal uterine myocytes are exciting. Nevertheless, a clear discussion of the methodologic limitations of the study would strengthen the manuscript.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors describe a computational study into the energetics of KcsA inactivation. Using enhanced sampling, a converged free energy landscape of the inactivation process is achieved in two modern molecular mechanics force fields. The obtained profiles confirm the literature finding of too rapid inactivation, in particular in simulations using the CHARMM force field. Interestingly, it is found that selectivity filter collapse does not gradually follow opening of the inner gate, but proceeds rather switch-like. A key role for residue L81 is proposed as opening gateway in this process.

The study is impressive and interesting. However, I have a number of concerns that the authors may wish to address in a revised version of the manuscript.

First, concerning a set of unbiased simulations spawned at different regions of the investigated free energy landscapes, the authors write: "These simulations have the expected stability based on their starting values".<br /> Fig 2.c shows a rather smooth downhill slope in the free energy curve towards the closed state for AMBER , so wouldn't the expected behavior in that case be that all unbiased trajectories end up in the closed state, or at least travel a substantial amount in that direction? However, that is not observed. This should be further investigated.

Second, "This suggests that stabilization of the partially open state by the removal of bound lipids can explain the increase in open probability" is an odd statement, as "stabilization of the partially open state" means almost the same as "increase in open probability".

The statement "both force fields yield inactivation barriers that are orders of magnitude lower than what is expected from electrophysiology experiments" seems inaccurate. Perhaps the authors mean "inactivation rates that are orders of magnitude lower" rather than barriers?

In addition, the assertion "The CHARMM force field, on the other hand, results in landscapes in agreement with the fact that one of the dominant states in activating conditions is the partially open state, as revealed by a combination of ssNMR+MD." seems to hold for the AMBER force field without PG lipids rather than for CHARMM?

Together with the higher barrier towards the inactivated state as well as covering most known x-ray structures along the inactivation pathway, this would seem to point all in the direction that the studied AMBER force field provides a more faithful picture of the inactivation pathway than CHARMM. I, therefore, find the somewhat inconclusive summary as presented in Fig. 5 a bit uninformative, as it suggests that both mechanisms might be equally likely.

Overall, the study would benefit from a follow-up step to become more conclusive. This could be either in the form of the suggested L81 mutation or changing the simulation conditions to inactivating conditions such as low salt, in which case the inactivated state would be expected to become a minimum, which would provide an additional reference point for validation. Either of these would narrow down the spectrum of possible mechanisms.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this paper, the authors seek to identify genes that contribute to gut inflammation by capitalizing on deep phenotyping data in a mouse genetic reference population fed a high-fat or chow diet and then integrating it with human genetic data on gut inflammatory diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC). To achieve this the authors performed genome-wide gene expression in the colon of 52 BXD strains of mice fed either a high-fat or chow diet. From this analysis, they observed significant variation in gene expression related to inflammation among the 52 BXD strains and differential gene expression of inflammatory genes fed a high-fat diet. Overlaying this data with existing mouse and human data of inflammatory gut disease identified a significant enrichment. Using the 52 BXD strains the authors were able to identify specific subsets of strains that were susceptible and resistant to gut inflammation and analysis of gene expression within the colon of these strains was enriched with mouse and human IBD. Furthermore, analysis of cytokine levels of IL-10 and IL-15 were analyzed and found to be increased in resistant BXD strains and increased in susceptible BXD strains.

Using the colon genome-wide gene expression data from the 52 BXD strains, the authors performed gene co-expression analysis and were able to find distinct modules (clusters) of genes that correlated with mouse UC and human IBD datasets. Using the two modules, termed HFD_M28 and HFD_M9 that correlated with mouse UC and human IBD, the authors performed biological interrogation along with transcription factor binding motif analysis to identify possible transcriptional regulators of the module. Next, they performed module QTL analysis to identify potential genetic regulators of the two modules and identified a genome-wide significant QTL for the HFD_M28 on mouse chromosome 16. This QTL contained 552 protein-coding genes and through a deduction method, 27 genes were prioritized. These 27 genes were then integrated with human genetic data on IBD and two candidate genes, EPHA6 and MUC4 were prioritized.

Overall, this paper provides a framework and elegant use of data from a mouse genetic reference population coupled with human data to identify two strong candidate genes that contribute to human IBD and UC diseases. In the future, it will be interesting to perform targeted studies with EPHA6 and MUC4 and understand their role in gut inflammatory diseases.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Jamge et al. set out to delineate the relationship between histone variants, histone modifications and chromatin states in Arabidopsis seedlings and leaves. A strength of the study is its use of multiple types of data: the authors present mass-spec, immunoblotting and ChIP-seq from histone variants and histone modifications. They confirm the association between certain marks and variants, in particular for H2A, and nicely describe the loss of constitutive heterochromatin in the ddm1 mutant.

Overall, this study nicely illustrates that, in Arabidopsis, histone variants (and H2A variants in particular) display specificity in modifications and genomic locations, and correlate with some chromatin sub-states. This encourages future work in epigenomics to consider histone variants with as much attention as histone modifications.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

A key strength is the quantitative approaches all add rigor to what is being attempted. The approach with very different cell culture lines will in principle help identify constitutive genes that vary in a particular and predictable way. To my knowledge, one other study that should be cited posed a similar pan-tissue question using mass spectrometry proteomics instead of gene expression, and also identified a caveolae component (cavin-1, PTRF) that exhibited a trend with stiffness across all sampled tissues. The study focused instead on a nuclear lamina protein that was also perturbed in vitro and shown to follow the expected mechanical trend (Swift et al 2013).

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this study the authors developed a framework to investigate the export rates of Influenza viral RNAs translocating from the nucleus to the cytoplasm. This model suggests that the influenza virus may control gene expression at the RNA export level, namely, the retention of certain transcripts in the nucleus for longer times, allows the generation of other viral encoded proteins that are exported regularly, and only later on do certain mRNAs get exported. These encode proteins that alert the cell to the presence of viral molecules, hence keeping their emergence to very end, might help the virus to avoid detection as late as possible in the infection cycle.

The study is of limited scope. The notion that some mRNAs are retained in the nucleus after transcription is concluded early on from the FISH data. The model does not contribute much to the understanding and is mostly confirming the FISH data. The export rate is an ambiguous number and this part is not elaborated upon. One is left with more questions since no mechanistic knowledge emerges, and no additional experimentation is attempted to try drive to a deeper understanding.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The phenotypic instability of in vitro-induced Treg cells (iTregs) has been discussed for a long time, mainly in the context of the epigenetic landscape of Treg-signature genes; e.g. Treg-specifically CpG-hypomethylated Foxp3 CNS2 enhancer region. However, it has been insufficiently understood the upstream molecular mechanisms, the particularity of intracellular signaling of natural Treg cells, and how they connect to stable/unstable suppressive function.

Huiyun Lv et al. addressed the issue of phenotypic instability of in vitro-induced regulatory T cells (iTregs), which is a different point from the physiological natural Treg cells and an obstacle to the therapeutic use of iTreg cells. The authors focused on the difference between iTreg and nTreg cells from the perspective of their control of store-operated calcium entry (SOCE)-mediated cellular signaling, and they clearly showed that the sustained SOCE signaling in iTreg and nTreg cells led to phenotypic instability. Moreover, the authors pointed the correlation between the incomplete conversion of chromatin configuration and the NFAT-mediated control of effector-type gene expression profile in iTreg cells. These findings potentially cultivate our understanding of the cellular identity of regulatory T cells and may shed light on the therapeutic use of Treg cells in many clinical contexts.

The authors demonstrated the biological contribution of Ca2+ signaling with the variable methods, which ensure the reliability of the results and the claims of the authors. iTreg cells sustained SOCE-signaling upon stimulation while natural Treg cells had lower strength and shorter duration of SOCE-signaling. The result was consistent with the previously-proposed concept; a certain range of optimal strength and duration of TCR-signaling shape the Treg generation and maintenance, and it provides us with further in-depth mechanistic understanding.

In the later section, authors found the incomplete installment of Treg-type open chromatin landscape in some effector/helper function-related gene loci in iTreg cells. These findings propose the significance to focus on not only the "Treg"-associated gene loci but also "Teffector-ness"-associated regions to determine the Treg conversion at epigenetic level.

Limitations and weaknesses;<br /> (1) Some concerns about data processing and statistic analysis.<br /> The authors did not provide sufficient information on statistical data analysis; e.g. lack of detailed descriptions about<br /> -the precise numbers of technical/biological replicates of each experiment<br /> -the method of how the authors analyze data of multiple comparisons... Student t-test alone is generally insufficient to compare multiple groups; e.g. figure 1.<br /> These inappropriate data handlings are ruining the evidence level of the precious findings.

(2) Untransparent data production; e.g. the method of Motif enrichment analysis was not provided.<br /> Thus, we should wait for the author's correction to fully evaluate the significance and reliability of the present study.

(3) Lack of evidence in human cells.<br /> I wonder whether human PBMC-derived iTreg cells are similarly regulated.

(4) NFAT regulation did not explain all of the differences between iTregs and nTregs, as the authors mentioned as a limitation.<br /> Also, it is still an open question whether NFAT can directly modulate the chromatin configuration on the effector-type gene loci, or whether NFAT exploits pre-existing open chromatin due to the incomplete conversion of Treg-type chromatin landscape in iTreg cells. The authors did not fully demonstrate that the distinct pattern of chromatin regional accessibility found in iTreg cells is the direct cause of an effector-type gene expression.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

An important paper that confirms the validity of the initial findings of Chretien et al regarding the hot temperatures at which the mitochondrion is operating. There are certain gaps in the literature covered in its list of cited references and, as a consequence, in the argumentation of the paper - but these can be easily fixed.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this study, Dureux and colleagues show that marmosets are sensitive to the Frith and Happe social illusion. This result is particularly interesting from an evolutionary perspective as rhesus macaques are insensitive to this social illusion.

Although marmosets show sensitivity to the illusion of social interaction between two geometric shapes, behavioural and neuronal evidence also show differences between humans and marmosets.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Associative learning assigns valence to sensory cues paired with reward or punishment. Brain regions such as the amygdala in mammals and the mushroom body in insects have been identified as primary sites where valence assignment takes place. However, little is known about the neural mechanisms that translate valence-specific activity in these brain regions into appropriate behavioral actions. This study identifies a small set of upwind neurons (UpWiNs) in the Drosophila brain that receive direct inputs from two mushroom body output neurons (MBONs) representing opposite valences. Through a series of behavioral, imaging, and electrophysiological experiments, the authors show that UpWiNs are differentially regulated by the two MBONs, i.e., inhibited by the glutamatergic MBON-α1(encoding negative valence) while activated by the cholinergic MBON-α3 (encoding positive valence). They also show that UpWiNs control the wind-directed behavior of flies. Activation of UpWiNs is sufficient to drive flies to orient and move upwind, and inhibition of UpWiNs reduces flies' upwind movement toward the source of reward-predicting odors (CS+). These results, together with existing knowledge about the function of the mushroom body in memory processing, suggest an appealing model in which reward learning decreases and increases the responses of MBON-α1 and MBON-α3 to the CS+ odor, respectively, and these changes cause UpWiNs to respond more strongly to the CS+ odor and drive upwind locomotion. Interestingly, in the final part of the results, the authors reveal a wind-independent function of UpWiNs: increasing the probability that flies will revisit the site where UpWiNs were activated. Thus, UpWiNs guide learned reward-seeking behavior with and without airflow. Although the mushroom body has been extensively studied for its role in learning and memory, the downstream neural circuits that read the information from the mushroom body to guide memory-driven behaviors remain poorly characterized. This study provides an important piece of the puzzle for this knowledge gap.

Strength

1. Memory studies have predominantly relied on binary choice (go or no-go) assays as measures of memory performance. While these assays are convenient and efficient, they fall short of providing a comprehensive understanding of underlying behavioral structures. In an effort to overcome this limitation, the current study used video recording and tracking software to delve deeper into memory-guided behavior. This innovative approach allowed the authors to uncover novel neurons and examine their contribution to behavior with a level of detail not possible with binary choice assays.

2. This study used electron microscopy-based Drosophila hemibrain connectome data to reveal the synaptic connection between UpWiNs and MBON-α1 and MBON-α3. Using this method, the study shows that a single UpWiN receives direct input from both MBON-α1 and MBON- α3, which is confirmed by a functional imaging experiment. The connectome dataset also reveals several neurons downstream of UpWiNs, opening avenues for further research into the neural mechanisms linking memory and behavior.

Weakness

1. The authors repeatedly state in the manuscript that MBON-α1 and MBON-α3 convey appetitive or aversive memories, respectively. This assertion may not be entirely accurate. Evidence from sugar reward conditioning experiments suggests that MBON-α3 is potentiated and required for sugar reward memory retrieval. Therefore, the compartmentalization for appetitive and aversive memories appears not as obvious at the level of MBONs.

2. This study did not conclusively establish the importance of the MBON-α1/α3 to UpWiN pathways in memory-driven behavior. In the experiments shown in Figure 5, flies were trained to associate the activation of reward-related DANs with a specific odor (CS+). After conditioning, UpWiNs were observed to show enhanced responses to the CS+ odor. However, the results should be interpreted with caution because the driver line used to activate DANs (R58E02-LexAp65) labels not only DANs projecting to the MBON-α1 compartment, but all DANs in the protocerebral anterior medial (PAM) cluster. Thus, it remains unclear to what extent the observed enhanced responses are influenced by changes in inhibitory inputs from MBON-α1. While UpWiNs have been shown to play a critical role in the expression of sugar reward memory (Figure 7), it should be noted that UpWiNs receive inputs from multiple upstream neurons, making it difficult to accurately assess the contribution of MBON-α1/α3 to UpWiN pathways in UpWiN recruitment. Further research is needed to fully address this issue.

3. UpWind neurons (UpWiNs) were so named because their activation promotes upwind locomotion. However, when activated in the absence of airflow, flies show increased locomotor speed and an increased probability of revisiting the same location (Figure 7 and Figure 7-figure supplement 1). The revisiting behavior can be observed during the activation of UpWiNs, which is distinct from the local search behavior that typically begins after a reward stimulus is turned off (e.g., Gr64f-GAL4 results in Figure 7-figure supplement 1). Because revisiting a location can also be a consequence of repeated turns, it seems more accurate to describe UpWiNs as controlling the speed and likelihood of turns and promoting upwind movement by integrating with neurons that sense the direction of airflow.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Van der Grinten and De Ruyter van Steveninck et al. present a design for simulating cortical-visual-prosthesis phosphenes that emphasizes features important for optimizing the use of such prostheses. The characteristics of simulated individual phosphenes were shown to agree well with data published from the use of cortical visual prostheses in humans. By ensuring that functions used to generate the simulations were differentiable, the authors permitted and demonstrated integration of the simulations into deep-learning algorithms. In concept, such algorithms could thereby identify parameters for translating images or videos into stimulation sequences that would be most effective for artificial vision. There are, however, limitations to the simulation that will limit its applicability to current prostheses.

The verification of how phosphenes are simulated for individual electrodes is very compelling. Visual-prosthesis simulations often do ignore the physiologic foundation underlying the generation of phosphenes. The authors' simulation takes into account how stimulation parameters contribute to phosphene appearance and show how that relationship can fit data from actual implanted volunteers. This provides an excellent foundation for determining optimal stimulation parameters with reasonable confidence in how parameter selections will affect individual-electrode phosphenes.

Issues with the applicability and reliability of the simulation are detailed below:

1) The utility of this simulation design, as described, unfortunately breaks down beyond the scope of individual electrodes. To model the simultaneous activation of multiple electrodes, the authors' design linearly adds individual-electrode phosphenes together. This produces relatively clean collections of dots that one could think of as pixels in a crude digital display. Modeling phosphenes in such a way assumes that each electrode and the network it activates operate independently of other electrodes and their neuronal targets. Unfortunately, as the authors acknowledge and as noted in the studies they used to fit and verify individual-electrode phosphene characteristics, simultaneous stimulation of multiple electrodes often obscures features of individual-electrode phosphenes and can produce unexpected phosphene patterns. This simulation does not reflect these nonlinearities in how electrode activations combine. Nonlinearities in electrode combinations can be as subtle the phosphenes becoming brighter while still remaining distinct, or as problematic as generating only a single small phosphene that is indistinguishable from the activation of a subset of the electrodes activated, or that of a single electrode.

If a visual prosthesis happens to generate some phosphenes that can be elicited independently, a simulator of this type could perhaps be used by processing stimulation from independent groups of electrodes and adding their phosphenes together in the visual field.

2) Verification of how the simulation renders individual phosphenes based on stimulation parameters is an important step in confirming agreement between the simulation and the function of implanted devices. That verification was well demonstrated. The end use a visual-prosthesis simulation, however, would likely not be optimizing just the appearance of phosphenes, but predicting and optimizing functional performance in visual tasks. Investigating whether this simulator can suggest visual-task performance, either with sighted volunteers or a decoder model, that is similar to published task performance from visual-prosthesis implantees would be a necessary step for true validation.

3) A feature of this simulation is being able to convert stimulation of V1 to phosphenes in the visual field. If used, this feature would likely only be able to simulate a subset of phosphenes generated by a prosthesis. Much of V1 is buried within the calcarine sulcus, and electrode placement within the calcarine sulcus is not currently feasible. As a result, stimulation of visual cortex typically involves combinations of the limited portions of V1 that lie outside the sulcus and higher visual areas, such as V2.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors utilized publicly available datasets to investigate age-related DNA methylation changes in six immune cell types. They identified 350 differentially methylated sites that were changing in the same directions among all cell types, while most of the differentially methylated sites were cell type-specific during aging. Further analyses of enriched pathways and motifs indicate that these DNA methylation changes may be induced by the fluctuations in oxygen availability.

Analyzing cell type-specific DNA methylation data and comparing cross-sectional and longitudinal datasets, the authors are able to identify age-associated DNA methylation sites that may be regulated by a common mechanism in aging. However, sex differences should be considered, and the proposed mechanism could spur future studies to test it.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Insects have long been known to use cuticular hydrocarbons for communication. While the general pathways for hydrocarbon synthesis have been worked out, their specificity and in particular the specificity of the different enzymes involved is surprisingly little understood. Here, the authors convincingly demonstrate that a single fatty acid synthase gene is responsible for a shift in the positions of methyl groups across the entire alkane spectrum of a wasp, and that the wasps males recognize females specifically based on these methyl group positions. The strength of the study is the combination of gene expression manipulations with behavioural observations evaluating the effect of the associated changes in the cuticular hydrocarbon profiles. The authors make sure that the behavioural effect is indeed due to the chemical changes by not only testing life animals, but also dead animals and corpses with manipulated cuticular hydrocarbons.

I find the evidence that the hydrocarbon changes do not affect survival and desiccation resistance less convincing (due to the limited set of conditions and relatively small sample size), but the data presented are certainly congruent with the idea that the methyl alkane changes do not have large effects on desiccation.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Keshav Thapa et al. investigated the role of melanocortin 1 receptor (MC1-R) in cholesterol and bile acid metabolism in the liver. First, they observed that MC1-R is present in the mouse liver and that its expression is reduced in response to a cholesterol-rich diet. To determine the role of MC1-R in the liver, they generated hepatocyte-specific MC1-R KO mice (L-Mc1r-/-). These animals exhibited a significant increase in liver weight, lipid accumulation, triglycerides and cholesterol levels, and fibrosis in comparison with control mice. By performing liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, the authors also found that L-Mc1r-/- mice also have fewer bile acids in the plasma and faeces, but not in the liver. In accordance with these findings, mRNA/protein expression of different genes involved in these processes were altered in L-Mc1r-/- animals.

Secondly, in an attempt to evaluate the underlying mechanisms, they measured the expression of MC1-R in HepG2 cells under different treatments (i.e., palmitic acid, LDL, and atorvastatin). Moreover, they stimulated these cells with the endogenous MC1-R agonist - MSH, where they show that this molecule decreases the free cholesterol content, whereas increasing LDL and HDL uptake, as well as recapitulates some previously observed phenotypes in the proportions of bile acids. These effects were also encountered when using a selective agonist for MC1-R (i.e., LD211), further supporting the specific role of MC1-R. Finally, some experiments indicated that -MSH evokes not one single, but multiple intracellular signalling cascades for which MC1-R activation effects might take place.

Overall, this work provides novel and interesting findings on the role of MC1-R in cholesterol and bile acid metabolism in the liver, which undoubtedly will have some crucial implications for future research. Nevertheless, some experimental details should be better explained for the correct interpretation of the data. Besides, discrepant results exist regarding the molecular mechanisms behind MC1-R action that requires additional experimentation to support the conclusions drawn.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Src is a well-studied non-receptor protein tyrosine kinase (PTK) with broad impacts on many signal transduction pathways. In this manuscript titled, "A Back-Door Insights into the modulation of Src kinase activity by the polyamine spermidine" Rossini et al investigated the mechanism of spermidine, a natural polyamine, in regulating Src tyrosine kinase activity and complex formation with IDO1, a known Src substrate. These data show a direct binding, and an allosteric binding site in the SH2 domain of Src, for spermidine. Interestingly, the manuscript also shows spermidine bound to Src promotes binding to IDO1, as well as its phosphorylation.

Overall, the molecular glue-like property of spermidine is an interesting finding. That Src substrate binding and phosphorylation for Src substrate is regulated by natural metabolites like spermidine is also a new and interesting finding. These discoveries further strengthen the idea to develop potential allosteric modulators for Src/PTK-mediated pathways.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The manuscript has several areas of strength; it functionally explores a mutant that is detected in a portion of pancreatic cancers; it conducts mechanistic investigation and it uses human cell lines to validate the findings based on mouse models. Some areas for improvement are described below.

1) TGF-b is known to act as a tumor suppressor early in carcinogenesis, and as a tumor promoter later. The authors should extend their analysis of mouse models to determine whether the effect of SF3B1K700E is specific to promoting initiation (e.g. more, early acinar ductal metaplasia) or faster progression of PanINs following their formation. Another way to address this could be acinar cultures, to determine whether an increased propensity to ADM exists.

2) Given that the effect of SF3B1K700E expression is more prominent in KC mice, rather than in KPC mice, the authors should explain the rationale for using the latter for RNA sequencing.

3) Given that this mutation is found in about 3% of human pancreatic cancer, it would be interesting to know whether these tumors have any unique feature, and specifically any characteristic that could be harnessed therapeutically.

4) It would be interesting to know whether this mutation mutually exclusive to other mutations affecting response to TGF-b. Further, while the data might not be widely available, it would be interesting to know whether in human patients the mutation occurs in precursor lesions (PanIN might be difficult to assess, but IPMN might be doable) or at later stages.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

A new study by Kimble et al. examines the role of extensive resection in DNA double-strand break repair. Formation of ssDNA at DNA breaks is initiated by Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 and followed by Exo1 or Sgs1/Dna2, which form longer ssDNA. This ssDNA is used to load recombination and DNA damage checkpoint proteins. Some studies suggested that very short ssDNA by MRX complex is sufficient for DSB repair. Here, the authors look carefully at the role of extensive resection in DSB repair by gene conversion. To address this question they have constructed a large number of new recombination assays. They find that sgs1 exo1 mutants that lack extensive resection are capable of DSB repair when recombining loci are present on a single DNA molecule and within 50 kb from each other. When the template for DSB repair is further away on the same molecule or present on a different chromosome, the repair is reduced by 5-10 folds in the absence of extensive resection. The authors present data suggesting that this defect relates to slower repair kinetics between more distant homologous sequences and the need for a Mec1-mediated DNA damage checkpoint that requires extensive resection. The role of the checkpoint response is likely not limited to simple cell cycle arrest but may also be necessary for the mobility of a broken molecule. Partial suppression of the sgs1 exo1 repair defect is accomplished by activating the checkpoint using an artificial system colocalizing checkpoint proteins on a separate chromosome. Altogether the manuscript addresses an important question, is well-written, and presents interesting data.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This represents an important study that demonstrates a high degree of heterogeneity within trailblazer cells in clusters that participate in collective migration. Solid methods highlight this heterogeneity and show that in TNBC cancers, trailblazer cells are defined by vimentin (and not Keratin 14) and are dependent on both TGFbeta and EGFR signaling. Additional, single cell studies would further support this work.

Strengths:

The paper highlights that collective migration, and the nature of trailblazer cells can be highly heterogeneous. This is important as it suggests that the ability to move between states may supersede a singular phenotype.

The paper uses animal models and organoids and in several areas attempts to correlate findings to human tissues.

The experiments are logically described.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The paper by Pomper and coworkers is an elegant neurophysiological study, generally sound from a methodological point of view, which presents extremely relevant data of considerable interest for a broad audience of neuroscientists. Indeed, they shed new light on the mirror mechanism in the primate brain, trying to approach its study with a novel paradigm that successfully controls for some important factors that are known to impact mirror neuron response, particularly the target object. In this work, a rotating device is used to present the very same object to the monkey or the experimenter, in different trials, and neurons are recorded while the monkey (motor response) or the experimenter (visual response) performed a different action (twist, shift, lift) cued by a colored LED.

The results show that there is a small set of neurons with congruent visual and motor selectivity for the observed actions, in line with classical mirror neuron studies, whereas many more cells showed temporally unstable matched or even completely non-matched tuning for the observed and executed actions. Importantly, the population codes allow to accurately decode both executed and observed actions and, to some extent, even to cross-decode observed actions based on the coding principles of the executed ones.

In my view, however, the original hypothesis that an observer understands the actions of others by the activation of his/her motor representations of the observed actions constitutes circular reasoning that cannot be challenged or falsified, as the author may want to claim. Indeed, 1) there is no causal evidence in the paper favoring or ruling out this hypothesis (and there couldn't be), 2) there is no independent definition (neither in this paper nor in the literature) of what "action understanding" should mean (or how it should be measured). Instead, the findings provide important and compelling evidence to the recently proposed hypothesis that observed actions are remapped onto (rather than matched with) motor substrates, and this recruitment may primarily serve, as coherently hypothesized by the authors, to select behavioral responses to others (at least in monkeys).

1) One of the main problems of this manuscript is, in my view, a theoretical one. The authors follow a misleading, though very influential, proposal, advanced since the discovery of mirror neurons: if there are (mirror) neurons in the brain of a subject with an action tuning that is matched between observation and execution contexts, then the subject "understands" the observed action. This is clearly circular reasoning because the "understanding" hypothesis uniquely derives from the neuron firing features, which are what the hypothesis should explain. In fact, there is no independent, operational definition of the term "understanding". Not surprisingly there is no causal evidence about the role of mirror neurons in the monkey, and the human studies that have claimed to provide causal evidence of "action understanding" ended up using, practically, operational definitions of "recognition", "match-to-sample", "categorization", etc. Thus, "action understanding" is a theoretical flaw, and there is no way "to challenge" a theoretical flaw with any methodologically sound experiment, especially when the flaw consists of circular reasoning. It cannot be falsified, by definition: it must simply be abandoned.<br /> On these bases, I strongly encourage the authors to rework the manuscript, from the title to the discussion, by removing any useless attempt to falsify or challenge a circular concept and, instead, constructively shed new light on how mirror neurons may work and which may be their functional role.

2) An important point to be stressed, strictly related to the previous one, concerns the definition of "mirror neuron". I premise that I am perfectly fine with the definition used by the authors, which is in line with the very permissive one adopted in most studies of the last 20 years in this field. However, it does not at all fulfill the very restrictive original criteria of the study in which "action understanding" concept was proposed (see Gallese et al. 1996 Brain): no response to object, no response to pantomimed action or tool actions, activation during execution in the dark and during the observation of another's action. If the idea (which I strongly disagree with) was to simply challenge a (very restrictive) definition of mirroring (a very out-of-date one, indeed, and different from the additional implication of "action understanding"), the original definition of this concept should be at least rigorously applied. In the absence of additional control conditions, only the example neuron in Figure 2A could be considered a mirror neuron according to Gallese et al. 1996. Permissive criteria implies that more "non-mirror" neurons are accepted as "mirror": simply because they are permissively named "mirror", does not imply they are mirroring anything as initially hypothesized (Example neuron in Fig 2B, for example, could be related to mouth, rather than hand, movements, since it responds strongly and similarly around the reward delivery also during the observation task, when the monkey should be otherwise still). Clearly, these concerns impact all the action preference analyses. To practically clarify what I mean, it should be sufficient to note that 74% (reported in this study) is the highest percentage ever reported so far in a study of neurons with "mirror" properties in F5 (see Kilner and Lemon 2013, Curr Biol) and it is similar to the 68% recently reported by these same authors (Pomper et al. 2020 J Neurophysiol) with very similar criteria. Clearly, there is a bias in the classification criteria relative to the original studies: again, no surprise if by rendering most of the recorded neurons "mirror by definition" then they don't "mirror" so much. I suggest keeping the authors' definition but removing the pervasive idea to challenge the (misleading) concept of understanding.

3) It would be useful to provide more information on the task. Panel B in Figure 1 is the unique information concerning the type of actions performed by the monkey and the experimenter. Although I am quite convinced of the generally low visuomotor congruence, there are no kinematics data nor any other evidence of the statement "the experimental monkey was asked to pay attention to the same actions carried out by a human actor". First, although the objects were the same, the same object cannot be grasped or manipulated in the same way by a human and a macaque, even just because of the considerable difference in the size of their hands; this certainly changes the way in which monkeys' and experimenter's hands interact with the same object, and this is a quantifiable (but not quantified) source of visuomotor difference between observed and executed actions and a potential source of reduced congruency. Second, there is little information about monkey's oculomotor behavior in the two conditions, which is known to affect mirror neuron activity when exploratory eye movements are allowed (Maranesi et al. 2013 Eur J Neurosci), potentially influencing the present findings: a {plus minus}7 (vertical) and {plus minus}5 (horizontal) window at 49 cm implies that the monkey could explore a space larger than 10 cm horizontally and 14 cm vertically, which is fine, but certainly leaves considerable freedom to perform different exploratory eye movements, potentially different among observed actions and hence capable to account for different "attention" paid by the monkey to different conditions and hence a source of neural variability, in addition to action tuning.

4) Information about error trials and their relationship with action planning. The monkey cannot really "make errors" because, despite the cue, each object can be handled in a unique way. The monkey may not pay attention to the cue and adjust the movement based on what the object permits once grasped, depending on online object feedback. From the behavioral events and the times reported in Table 1, I initially thought that "shift" action was certainly planned in advance, whereas "lift" and "twist" could in principle be obtained by online adjustments based on object feedback; nonetheless, from the Methods section it appears that these times are not at all informative because they seem to depend on an explicit constraint imposed by the experimenters (in a totally unpredictable way). Indeed, it is stated that "to motivate the monkey even more to use the LED in the execution task, another timeout was active in 30% (rarely up to 100%) of trials for the time period between touch of object to start moving the object: 0.15 (rarely 0.1) for a twist and shift, 0.35 (rarely 0.3s) for a lift". This is totally confusing to me; I don't understand 1) why the monkey needed to be motivated, 2) how can the authors be sure/evaluate that the monkeys were actually "motivated" in this way, and 3) what kind of motor errors the monkey could actually do if any. If there is any doubt that the monkeys did actually select and plan the action in advance based on the cue, there is no way to study whether the activity during action execution truly reflects the planned action goal or a variety of other undetermined factors, that may potentially change during the trials. Please clarify.

5) Classification analysis. There seems to be no statistical criterion to establish where and when the decoding is significantly higher than chance: the classifier performance should be formally analyzed statistically. I would expect that, in this way, both the exe-obs and the obs-exe decoding may be significant. Together with the considerations of the previous point 2 about the permissive inclusion criteria for mirror neurons, this is a remarkable (even quite unexpected) result, which would prove somehow contrary to what the authors claim in the title of the paper. The fact that in any classification the "within task" performance is significantly better than the "between task" performance does not appear in any way surprising, considering both the inclusive selection criteria for "mirror neurons" and the unavoidably huge different sources of input (e.g. proprioceptive, tactile, top-down, etc. afferences) between execution and observation. So, please add a statistical criterion to establish and show in the figures when and where the classifications are significantly above chance.

6) "As the concept of a mirror mechanism posits that the observation performance can be led back to an activation of a motor representation, we restricted this analytical step to a comparison of the exe-obs and the obs-obs discrimination performance". I don't understand the rationale of this choice. The so-called "concept" of mirror mechanism in classical terms posits that mirror neurons have a motor nature and hence their functioning during observation should follow the same principle as during action execution. But this logical consideration has never been demonstrated directly (it is indeed costated by several papers), and when motor neurons are concerned (e.g. pyramidal tract neurons, see Kraskov et al. 2009) their behavior during action observation is by far more complex (e.g. suppression vs facilitation) than that hypothesized for classical "mirror neurons". Furthermore, when across-task decoding for execution and observation code has been used, both in neurophysiological (e.g. Livi et al. 2019, PNAS) and neuroimaging (Fiave et al. 2018 Neuroimage) data, the visual-to-motor direction typical produce better performance than the opposite one. Thus, I don't see any good reason not to show also (if not even just) the obs-exe results. Furthermore, I wonder whether it is considered the possible impact of a rescaling in the single neuron firing rate across contexts, as the observation response is typically less strong than the execution response in basically all brain areas hosting neurons with mirror properties, and this should not impact on the matching if the tuning for the three actions remains the same (e.g. see Lanzilotto et al. 2020 PNAS). The analysis shown in Figures 4 and 5 is, for the rest, elegant and very convincing - somehow surprising to me, as the total number of "congruent" neurons (7.5%) is even greater than in the original study by Gallese et al. (5.4%).

7) The discussion may need quite deep revision depending on the authors' responses and changes following the comments; for sure it should consider more extensively the numerous recent papers on mirror neurons that are relevant to frame this work and are not even mentioned.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This manuscript pulls together a series of integrated genetic and metabolomic data sets to examine the molecular basis for biguanide action in C. elegans. Biguanides such as Metformin are important anti-diabetic drugs as well as being explored as a therapeutic mechanism for increasing human longevity. Understanding the molecular basis of biguanide action is of general interest to those in the ageing and age-related health fields as well as to those studying metabolism and obesity. The work here has been carried out in C. elegans but the work can be picked up by those working in mammalian systems. More could be done to highlight the conserved aspects of the mechanisms involved to assist with this translatability.

The methodology used is in general standard in the field and experiments are reported in detail. The successful use of metabolomics in C. elegans and its associated protocols is helpful as more labs expand to do this type of work.

Strengths: In general all the experiments presented are logical and well executed with the conclusions supported by the data. I am convinced that: 1) Metformin and Phenformin extend C. elegans lifespan (although that has previously been shown), 2) biguanides induce changes in ether lipids, 3) genes required for ether lipid biogenesis are required for the lifespan incurred with biguanide treatment and, in the case of fard-1 oe, can also promote longevity when levels are increased, 4) ether lipid biogenesis is also needed for other specific key longevity processes to extend lifespan, and 5) that some key ageing regulators (skn-1, aak-2 and daf-16) are required for fard-1 oe to extend lifespan.

Weaknesses: I was less convinced by the fat accumulation data and felt that the link between skn-1 gain of function and ether lipid genes was not clear and that the results were more correlative than mechanistic. If age-associated somatic depletion of fat is important for the lifespans seen here then this is interesting and important and identifying an epistatic, genetic link between the implicated genes and fat levels is desirable. Additionally, biguanides are reported to have major effects on the metabolism and growth of bacteria. As C. elegans grows on and eats E. coli, it is important that the biguanides in question do not alter the worm's food source. If bacterial growth is restricted or metabolically altered this would have a major impact on fat metabolism and the other outputs examined here (see Cabreiro et al 2013). Therefore the impact of these biguanide treatments on the C. elegans foods used here should be clearly addressed. Additionally, biguanide treatment is subject to dose dependence. Different concentrations of biguanide are used for different types of experiments to make correlative points e.g. growth inhibition at 160mM metformin, and metformin uptake measured in C. elegans treated with 50mM. It is not clear why, or whether this could impact the results. Can the authors be sure that these different doses do not alter metformin action and/or uptake either by the worms or the way the bacteria metabolise it? I appreciate that it is interesting and important to understand what biguanides are doing in the organism irrespective of whether this is a direct or indirect effect but knowing how the effects are achieved could be important for treatment strategies moving forwards.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Khalil et al. aimed to gain insights into similarities and differences between circuits processing innate and learned threats. For this, they investigated a circuit that is well established to have a critical role in auditory associative threat learning, the projection from the medial geniculate nucleus (MGN) to the basolateral amygdala (BLA), and carried out a side-by-side comparison of its role in conditioned and innate threat.

Although the MGN is part of the main auditory stream, the neurons that project to BLA are multimodal. Khalil et al. took advantage of this to use visual looming stimuli to evoke innate threat. The authors showed that the MGN-BLA pathway processes both innate freezing responses to looming black circles and threat-conditioned freezing responses to tones. The disruption of the pathway impairs freezing in both cases, and the pathway is activated mostly in the presence of freezing. This suggests that the MGN-BLA processes threat independently of the sensory modality and of whether the threat is learnt or not. This further suggests that these different forms of threat may share similar mechanisms.

Nonetheless, the fact that MGN-BLA circuit disruptions were done during the conditioning phase of associative threat learning, and not during the recall phase only, complicates the side-by-side comparison: it could be argued that in this case what is disturbed is the processing of the unconditioned innately aversive stimulus in the task, the foot shock, instead of the learnt threat of the sound. Still, this would go in hand with one of the main conclusions of the study, which is that the MGN-BLA processes innate threats.

There are alternative interpretations of the results though, which are beyond the scope of the study: the circuit might be relevant for processing salient stimuli beyond threatening stimuli, for instance for positive valence stimuli as well; or this circuit might be relevant for processing the freezing response to threat in particular. To target the MGN-BLA circuit, the authors employ viral-vector mediated expression of proteins in mice. This way they delete, inhibit, or image either the activity of the neurons (or the axons) that project from MGN to BLA, or the BLA neurons themselves. They combine this with fiber-photometry and behavioural quantifications. Targeting these small and deep nuclei in the mouse brain bilaterally is challenging, which increases the value of the presented data. Conversely, it is important that the authors support more explicitly the specificity of their targeting methods and quantifications throughout the manuscript.

Overall, the main conclusions of this paper are mostly supported by data, but important methodological aspects need to be clarified, data analysis extended and the interpretation of results discussed further. The question of whether innate and learnt responses to stimuli share common mechanisms is timely. This study places the MGN-BLA pathway as a suitable model circuit to investigate this and paves the way for future work to dig into the implicated mechanisms.

Specific comments (strengths):<br /> a) The authors use two methods to interrupt the MGN-BLA pathway, a reversible one (chemogenetics) and an irreversible one (neuronal deletion via caspase 3 expression), obtaining consistent results that strengthen the evidence supporting their conclusions.<br /> b) The authors demonstrate the efficacy of their MGN-BLA pathway interruption methods with in vivo recordings.<br /> c) The approach of addressing the same behavioural output (freezing) in the two conditions (innate and learnt threat) helps the interpretability of results.

Specific comments (weaknesses):<br /> e) There are not enough analysis and method descriptions to demonstrate the specificity of the targeting approach, which is in some cases neither reflected in the pictures of the main figures. These include quantifications of the extension of expression/deletions in the brain and placement of viral-vector injections. In particular, these should show that i) protein expression does not extend beyond the BLA or MGN; ii) the MGN cells projecting to the striatum (right above the BLA) are not implicated, iii) that neurons in the visual thalamus are not affected by the manipulations. These are critical points that need to be addressed.<br /> f) There is a lack of digging into the mechanisms that could be enhanced with further analysis and discussion. For example, to start addressing this question, the authors administer blockers of beta-adrenergic receptors systemically. This reveals differences between MGN-BLA projecting neurons, BLA neurons, and innate and learnt threat, but the mechanistic implications are not clear and should be discussed. Also, the interpretation of the pathway's role in behaviour and its relation to neuronal activity could be deepened with further analysis.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors of this study investigated the relationship between (under)confidence and the anxious-depressive symptom dimension in a longitudinal intervention design. The aim was to determine whether confidence bias improves in a state-like manner when symptoms improve. The primary focus was on patients receiving internet-based CBT (iCBT; n=649), while secondary aims compared these changes to patients receiving antidepressants (n=82) and a control group (n=88).

The results support the authors' conclusions, and the authors convincingly demonstrated a weak link between changes in confidence bias and anxious-depressive symptoms (not specific to the intervention arm)

The major strength and contribution of this study is the use of a longitudinal intervention design, allowing the investigation of how the well-established link between underconfidence and anxious-depressive symptoms changes after treatment. Furthermore, the large sample size of the iCBT group is commendable. The authors employed well-established measures of metacognition and clinical symptoms, used appropriate analyses, and thoroughly examined the specificity of the observed effects.

However, due to the small effect sizes, the antidepressant and control groups were underpowered, reducing comparability between interventions and the generalizability of the results. The lack of interaction effect with treatment makes it harder to interpret the observed differences in confidence, and practice effects could conceivably account for part of the difference. Finally, it was not completely clear to me why, in the exploratory analyses, the authors looked at the interaction of time and symptom change (and group), since time is already included in the symptom change index.

This longitudinal study informs the field of metacognition in mental health about the changeability of biases in confidence. It advances our understanding of the link between anxiety-depression and underconfidence consistently found in cross-sectional studies. The small effects, however, call the clinical relevance of the findings into question. I would have found it useful to read more in the discussion about the implications of the findings (e.g., why is it important to know that the confidence bias is state-dependent; given the effect size of the association between changes in confidence and symptoms, is the state-trait dichotomy the right framework for interpreting these results; suggestions for follow-up studies to better understand the association).

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This paper explores how minimal active matter simulations can model tissue rheology, with applications to the in vivo situation of zebrafish morphogenesis. The authors explore the idea of active noise, particle softness and size heterogeneity cooperating to give rise to surprising features of experimental tissue rheologies (in particular an increase and then a plateau in viscosity with fluid fraction). In general, the paper is interesting from a theoretical standpoint, by providing a bridge between concepts from jamming of particulate systems and experiments in developmental biology. The idea of exploring a free space picture in this context is also interesting.

However, I'm still unsure right now though of how much it can be applied to the specific system that the authors refer to - which could be fixed either by considering other experimental systems/models reported in the recent literature or by doing the following theoretical checks:

- Take your current simulations and smoothly change the ratio of polydispersity from 8 to 0 to see exactly how much dispersity is needed to explain viscosity plateauing, and at which point the transition occurs.

- Cellular self-propulsion does not seem to play a role in zebrafish blastoderm, see Ref. [14]. Active noise has been proposed to play key roles in other systems and you could check whether such active noise could replace self-propulsion in your model, see for example Kim & Campas, Nat Phys, 2021.

- Could you simulate realistic rheological deformations to see how much they match both your expectation and the data?

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors examine the use of metformin in the treatment of hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury (HIRI) and suggest the mechanism of action is mediated in part by the gut microbiota and changes in hepatic ferroptosis. While the concept is intriguing, the experimental approaches are inadequate to support these conclusions.

The histological and imaging studies were considered a strength and reveal a significant impact of metformin post-HIRI.

Weaknesses largely stem from the experimental design. First, use of the iron chelator DFO would be strengthened using the ferroptosis inhibitor, liproxstatin. Second, the impact of metformin on the microbiota is profound resulting in changes in bile acid, lipid, and glucose homeostasis. Throughout the manuscript no comparisons are made with metformin alone which would better capture the metformin-specific effects. Lastly, the absence of proper controls including germ free mice, metformin treated mice, FMT treated mice, etc make it difficult to understand the outcomes and to properly reproduce the findings in other labs.

Overall, while the concept is interesting and has the potential to better understand the pleiotropic functions of metformin, the limitations with the experimental design and lack of key controls make it challenging to support the conclusions.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This interesting research commendably revealed the association between sleep regularity and mortality. However, as authors acknowledged, the analysis can not accurately identify the cause and effect. In my opinion, the causality is important for this topic, cuz, sleep regularity and health (e.g. chronic disease) were long-term simultaneous status, especially given the participants are older. I suggest that the author could utilize MR analysis to find out for more evidence.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this paper the authors aim to investigate brain-wide activation patterns following administration of the anesthetics ketamine and isoflurane, and conduct comparative analysis of these patterns to understand shared and distinct mechanisms of these two anesthetics.

To this end, they perform Fos immunohistochemistry in perfused brain section to label active nuclei, use a custom pipeline to register images to the ABA framework and quantify Fos+ nuclei, and perform multiple complementary analyses to compare activation patterns across groups.

This is an interesting line of research and a tour de force in brain-wide Fos quantification. However, there are several issues with the analysis, and overall integration that dampen my enthusiasm for the article in its current form.

Major comments:

1- The authors report 987 brain regions in the introduction, but I cannot find any analysis that incorporates these or even which regions they are. Very little rationale is provided for the regions included in any of the analyses and numbers range from 53 in Figure 1, to 201 in Figure 3, to 63 in Figure 6. It would help if the authors could first survey Fos+ counts across all regions to identify a subset that is of interest (significantly changed by either condition compared to control) for follow up analysis.

2- Different data transformations are used for each analysis. One that is especially confusing is the 'normalization' of brain regions by % of total brain activation for each animal prior to PCA analysis in Figures 2 and 3. This would obscure any global differences in activation and make it unlikely to observe decreases in activation (which I think is likely here) that could be identified using the Fos+ counts after normalizing for region size (ie. Fos+ count / mm3) which is standard practice in such Fos-based activity mapping studies. While PCA can be powerful approach to identify global patterns, the purpose of the analysis in its current form is unclear. It would be more meaningful to show that regional activation patterns (measured as counts/mm3) are on separate PCs by group.

3- Critical problem: The authors include a control group for each anesthetic (ketamine vs. saline, isofluorane vs. homecage) but most analyses do not make use of the control groups or directly compare Fos+ counts across the groups. Strictly speaking, they should have compared relative levels of induction by ketamine versus induction by isoflurane using ANOVAs. Instead, each type of induction was separate from the other. This does not account for increased variability in the ketamine versus isoflurane groups. There is no mention in the Statistics section or in Results section that any multiple comparison corrections were used. It appears that the authors only used Students t-test for each region and did not perform any corrections.

4- Figures 4 and 5 show brain regions 'significantly activated' following KET or ISO respectively, but again a subset of regions are shown and the stats seem to be t-tests with no multiple comparisons correction. It would help to show these two figures side by side, include the same regions, and keep the y axis ranges similar so the reader can easily compare the 'activation patterns' across the two treatments. Indeed, it looks like KET/Saline induced activation is an order or magnitude or two higher than ISO/Homecage. I would also recommend that this be the first data figure before any other analyses and maybe further analysis could be restricted to regions that are significantly changed in following KET or ISO here.

5- Analyses in Figure 6 and 7 are interesting but again the choice of regions to include is unclear and makes interpreting the results impossible. For example, in Figure 7 it is unclear why the list of regions in bar graphs showing Degree and Betweenness Centrality are not the same even within a single row?

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors attempt to show that event-related changes in the alpha band, namely a decrease in alpha power over parieto/occipital areas, explain the P300 during an auditory target detection task. The proposed mechanism by which this happens is a baseline-shift, where ongoing oscillations which have a non-zero mean undergo an event-related modulation in amplitude which then mimics a low frequency event-related potential. In this specific case, it is a negative-mean alpha-band oscillation that decreases in power post-stimulus and thus mimics a positivity over parieto-occipital areas, i.e. the P300. The authors lay out 4 criteria that should hold if indeed alpha modulation generates the P300, which they then go about providing evidence for.

Strengths:<br /> - The authors do go about showing evidence for each prediction rigorously, which is very clearly laid out. In particular, I found the 3rd section connecting resting-state alpha BSI to the P300 quite compelling.<br /> - The study is obviously very well-powered.<br /> - Very well-written and clearly laid out. Also, the EEG analysis is thorough overall, with sensible analysis choices made.<br /> - I also enjoyed the discussion of the literature, albeit with certain strands of P300 research missing.

Weaknesses:<br /> In general, if one were to be trying to show the potential overlap and confound of alpha-related baseline shift and the P300, as something for future researchers to consider in their experimental design and analysis choices, the four predictions hold well enough. However, if one were to assert that the P300 is "generated" via alpha baseline shift, even partially, then the predictions either do not hold, or if they do, they are not sufficient to support that hypothesis. This general issue is to be found throughout the review. I will briefly go through each of the predictions in turn:

1. The matching temporal course of alpha and P300 is not as clear as it could be. Really, for such a strong statement as the P300 being generated by alpha modulation, one would need to show a very tight link between the signals temporally. There are many neural and ocular signals which occur over the course of target detection paradigms: P300, alpha decrease, motor-related beta decrease, the LRP, the CNV, microsaccade rate suppression etc. To specifically go above and beyond this general set of signals and show a tighter link between alpha and P300 requires a deeper comparison. To start, it would be a good idea to show the signals overlapping on the same plot to really get an idea of temporal similarity. Also, with the P300-alpha correlation, how much of this correlation is down to EEG-related issues such as skull thickness, cortical folding, or cognitive issues such as task engagement? One could perhaps find another slow wave ERP, e.g. the Lateralised Readiness Potential, and see if there is a similar strength correlation. If there is not, that would make the P300 relationship stand out.

In Figure 3, it is clear that alpha binning does not account for even 50% of the variance of P300 amplitude. Again, if there is such a tight link between the two signals, one would expect the majority of P300 variance to be accounted for by alpha binning. As an aside, the alpha binning clearly creates the discrepancy in the baseline period, with all alpha hitting an amplitude baseline at approx. 500ms. I wonder if could you NOT, in fact, baseline your slow wave ERP signal, instead using an appropriate high pass filter (see "EEG is better left alone", Arnaud Delorme, 2023) and show that the alpha binning creates the difference in ERP at the baseline which then is reinterpreted as a P300 peak difference after baselining.

2. The topographies are somewhat similar in Figure 4, but not overwhelmingly so. There is a parieto-occipital focus in both, but to support the main thesis, I feel one would want to show an exact focus on the same electrode. Showing a general overlap in spatial distribution is not enough for the main thesis of the paper, referring to the point I make in the first paragraph re Weaknesses. Obviously, the low density montage here is a limitation. Nevertheless, one could use a CSD transform to get more focused topographies (see https://psychophysiology.cpmc.columbia.edu/software/csdtoolbox/), which apparently does still work for lower-density electrode setups (see Kayser and Tenke, 2006).

3. Very nice analysis in Figure 6, probably the most convincing result comparing BSI in steady state to P300, thus at least eliminating task-related confounds.

4. Also a good analysis here, wherein there seem to be similar correlation profiles across P300 and alpha modulation. One analysis that would really nail this down would be a mediation analysis (Baron and Kenny, 1986; https://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm), where one could investigate if e.g. the relationship between P300 amplitude and CERAD score is either entirely or partially mediated by alpha amplitude. One could do this for each of the relationships. To show complete mediation of P300 relationship with a cog task via alpha would be quite strong.

One last point, from the methods it appears that the task was done with eyes closed? That is an extremely important point when considering the potential impact of alpha amplitude modulation on any other EEG component due to the well-known substantial increase in alpha amplitude with eyes closed versus open. I wonder, would we see any of these effects with eyes opened?

Overall, there is a mix here of strengths of claims throughout the paper. For example, the first paragraph of the discussion starts out with "In the current study, we provided comprehensive evidence for the hypothesis that the baseline-shift mechanism (BSM) is accountable for the generation of P300 via the modulation of alpha oscillations." and ends with "Therefore, P300, at least to a certain extent, is generated as a consequence of stimulus-triggered modulation of alpha oscillations with a non-zero mean." In the limitations section, it says the current study speaks for a partial rather than exhausting explanation of the P300's origin. I would agree with the first part of that statement, that it is only partial. I do not agree, however, that it speaks to the ORIGIN of the P300, unless by origin one simply means the set of signals that go to make up the ERP component at the scalp-level (as opposed to neural origin).

Again, I can only make these hopefully helpful criticisms and suggestions because the paper is very clearly written and well analysed. Also, the fact that alpha amplitude modulation potentially confounds with P300 amplitude via baseline shift is a valuable finding.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

How organism physiological state modulates establishment and perdurance of memories is a timely question that the authors aimed at addressing by studying the interplay between energy homeostasis and food-related conditioning in Drosophila. Specifically, they studied how starvation modulates the establishment of short-term vs long-term memories and clarified the role of the monoamine Octopamine in food-related conditioning, showing that it is not per se involved in formation of appetitive short-term memories but rather gates memory formation by suppressing LTM when energy levels are high. This work clarifies previously described phenotypes and provides insight about interconnections between energy levels, feeding and formation of short-term and long-term food-related memories. In the absence of population-specific manipulation of octopamine signaling, it however does not reach a circuit-level understanding of how these different processes are integrated.

Strengths<br /> - Previous studies have documented the impact of Octopamine on different aspects of food-related behaviors (regulation of energy homeostasis, feeding, sugar sensing, appetitive memory...), but we currently lack a clear understanding of how these different functions are interconnected. The authors have used a variety of experimental approaches to systematically test the impact of internal energy levels in establishment of appetitive memory and the role of Octopamine in this process.

- The authors have used a range of approaches, performed carefully controlled experiments and produced high quality data.

Weaknesses<br /> 1- In the tbh mutant flies, Tyramine -to- Octopamine conversion is inhibited, resulting not only in a lack of Octopamine, but also in elevated levels of Tyramine. If and how elevated levels of Tyramine contributes to the described phenotypes is unclear. In the current version of the manuscript, only one set of experiments (Figure 2) has been performed using Octopamine agonist. This is particularly important in light of recent published data showing that starvation modifies Tyramine levels.

2- Octopamine (and its precursor Tyramine) have been implicated in numerous processes, complicating the analysis of the phenotypes resulting from a general inhibition of tbh.

3- The manuscript explores various aspects of the impact of energy levels on food-related behaviors and the underlying sensing and effector mechanism, both in wild-type and tbh mutants, making it difficult to follow the flow of the results.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This is a well-written paper using gene expression in tree sparrow as model traits to distinguish between genetic effects that either reinforce or reverse initial plastic response to environmental changes. Tree sparrow tissues (cardiac and flight muscle) collected in lowland and highland populations subject to hypoxia treatment were profiled for gene expression and compared in 1) highland birds; 2) lowland birds under normal conditions to test for differences in directions of changes between initial plastic response and subsequent colonized response.

The authors clarified several points and made revisions according to my comments. It is good to know that the highland and lowland samples were collected and processed at the same time and the previous publication reported part of the data. My concerns regarding the conclusions about reversal versus reinforcement remain even after the additional analyses. Further studies are needed to confirm these results.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors used cutting-edge bio-telemetry technology to decipher the roles of wind speed and wave height on the take-off of albatrosses from the water surface. They revealed that each of these factors contributes to take-off in a unique way with interesting interactions of the two factors. The authors achieved their objectives and their results support their conclusions. This work will set new standards in integrating information about bird movement and environmental conditions experienced by the bird in a comprehensive, integrative and hypothesis-driven framework. The approach of the authors is highly advanced, providing heuristic insights for many additional systems where organisms are influenced by, and respond to small-scale environmental conditions.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This work sheds new light on the growth trajectory of Bonobo and contributes heavily to the discussion of the exclusivity of certain aspects of growth in modern humans. These results are also interesting as long as they are based on the study of the largest sample ever considered in the study of the growth of this species by including morphometric measurements as well as endocrinological factors.

The authors approach the study of the presence of growth spurs (GS) in Bonobo on the basis that GS are exclusive to the growth in modern humans. This idea is fairly widespread, however studies on non-human primates have shown an acceleration of growth during adolescence in several species, these works are recalled, presented and discussed by the authors. The originality of this work lies in highlighting the importance of scaling in studies of growth trajectories. The absence of GS in Bonobo but also in other primate species may result from not considering the conjunction of weight and height in the analysis of growth, because the pronounced changes in the speed of the height are in relation to the speed of changes in weight and this is modified according to the size/age. The authors apply scaling corrections to their results and the GS become evident (or more obvious) in Bonobo. Thus, the exclusivity of GS in growth in modern humans may in fact result only by the application of analytical approach not very appropriate in non-human primates.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Phage satellites are fascinating elements that have evolved to hijack phages for induction, packaging, and transfer, promoting their widespread dissemination in nature. It is remarkable how different satellites use conserved strategies of parasitism, utilising unrelated proteins that perform similar roles in their cognate elements. In the current manuscript, Dr. Seed and coworkers elucidated the mechanism used by one family of satellites, the PLEs, to produce small capsids, a process that inhibits phage reproduction while increasing PLE transmission. The work is presented beautifully, and the results are astonishing. The authors identified the gene responsible for generating the small capsids, characterised its role in the PLE transfer and phage inhibition, and determined the structure of the PLE-sized small capsids. It is a truly impressive piece of work.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This preprint by Pokrovsky and coworkers is a descriptive study reporting on non-breeding itinerant behaviour of an intrapalearctic migratory raptor, the rough-legged buzzard, and relating such non-breeding movements to snow cover across the European non-breeding range. The article is based on long-term GPS tracking data from a relatively large sample of individuals (n=43) that were equipped with state-of-the-art tracking devices in the Russian Arctic during 2013-2019. The results show that, upon breeding, buzzards migrated rapidly to southern non-breeding areas, located in open areas north of the Black and Caspian seas, where they perform continuous directional movements at a slower pace, initially moving SW (Oct to Jan) and then progressively moving NE (Feb to Apr) before embarking on rapid spring migration. It is suggested that such itinerant behaviour follows variation (expansion and retreat) of snow cover across the non-breeding range.

The results are definitely useful for researchers investigating the ecological drivers of bird movement patterns. The paper is generally well-written and the analytical framework is solid. However, there are significant weaknesses in the theoretical framework, unwarranted claiming of novelty, and interpretation of the data. Below are key points that the authors may wish to consider.

1) The authors underemphasize the fact that what they term 'fox-trot' migration is actually a well-known pattern for many other migratory species, both in the Nearctic and in the Afro-Palearctic migration systems. Such behaviour has previously been identified as 'itinerant', involving an alternation of stopovers and movements between different short-term non-breeding residency areas, and it seems that the pattern the authors report for this particular species is perfectly in line with such previous evidence. For instance, this is well-documented among migratory raptors, such as the Montagu's harrier, a lesser kestrel or black kite, that exploit Sahelian savannahs, where large spatio-temporal variation in greenness and hence resource availability occurs. And, besides the mentioned cuckoos and nightingales, there are studies of red-backed shrikes suggesting the same, as well as of tree swallows in the Nearctic. Therefore, the authors should avoid claiming novelty for this study and introducing unnecessary and confusing new terms in the literature (i.e. the 'fox-trot' migration patterns) when these are definitely not strictly needed as they have been previously observed and defined otherwise. Reference to all this previous body of literature is only hinted at and should be considerably expanded. The final sentence of the abstract, involving a general recommendation for future work, is definitely not warranted. Sentences such as 'We used the rough-legged buzzard as a model..." are also similarly unwarranted. This is simply a descriptive study reporting on such behaviour in yet another migratory species. The predictions paragraph is also overlong and could be considerably condensed.

2) The term 'migration' associated to so-called 'fox-trot' movements (see Fig. 1) is also highly confusing and possibly incorrect, as it is not in line with the commonly accepted definition of 'migration' (i.e. mass back and forth movements from the same areas). Apparently, the authors do not provide any evidence that the birds are moving back and forth from the same areas during the non-breeding period (i.e., there is no mention of site fidelity between early and late wintering areas, but judging from fall and spring migration distances it seems this is definitely not the case). 'Non-breeding itinerancy' is clearly a more appropriate term to describe this behaviour. More generally, the reference to 'winter migration', which is often mentioned in the manuscript, is not correct and should be amended.

3) The current title is unnecessarily general (it may recall rather a review or meta-analysis) and not adequately describing the content of the manuscript. It is not at all clear how the terms 'Conservation' and 'Anthropocene' are related to the content of the study (unless one believes that this is because any study of wildlife is aimed at its conservation, which is of course untrue, and that the study has been performed in the Anthropocene, which is the case for all wildlife studies carried out after 1950-1960). In order to be informative, the title should more tightly reflect the content of the article. A valid alternative would be 'Itinerant non-breeding behaviour of an intra-Palaearctic migratory raptor', far more adequate and informative. Although it might be worthwhile mentioning the association between movements and snow cover (or ecological conditions more generally) already in the title, perhaps that link is too indirect as currently reported in the manuscript. There are several possibilities to provide a more direct link between movements and snow cover, such as e.g. performing habitat selection analysis with respect to snow cover. Plotting temporal progression of snow cover (average) against movements (e.g. by showing monthly home ranges against snow cover) would help visualizing the association between snow cover and movement patterns.

4) The text, particularly the Introduction and (even more so) the Discussion, would benefit from profound reframing in light of the above comments. Any link to conservation is too weak and should be removed or considerably toned down. Moreover, the species is not of conservation interest (IUCN = Least Concern), as it has an extremely large range and population size, with largely fluctuating and non-declining populations (whose dynamics are related to Arctic small rodent cycles). Unless the authors are able to make prediction on how these movements will be affected by climate change (e.g. by using species distribution models or similar approaches), the link to the Anthropocene and to conservation is mostly unwarranted. In general, reference to 'winter' should be avoided and replaced with 'non-breeding season', which is a more general term.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The manuscript by Wang et al. follows up on the group's previous publication on KLF1 (EKLF) K47R mice and reduced susceptibility to tumorigenesis and increased life span (Shyu et al., Adv Sci (Weinh). Sep 2022;9(25):e2201409. doi:10.1002/advs.202201409). In the current manuscript, the authors have described the dependence of these phenotypes on age, gender, genetic background, and hematopoietic translation of bone marrow mononuclear cells. Considering the current study is centered on the phenotypes described in the previous study, the novelty is diminished. Further, there are significant conceptual concerns in the study that make the inferences in the manuscript far less convincing. Major concerns are listed below:

1. The authors mention more than once in the manuscript that KLF1 is expressed in range of blood cells including hematopoietic stem cells, megakaryocytes, T cells and NK cells. In the case of megakaryocytes, studies from multiple labs have shown that while EKLF is expressed megakaryocyte-erythroid progenitors, EKLF is important for the bipotential lineage decision of these progenitors, and its high expression promotes erythropoiesis, while its expression is antagonized during megakaryopoiesis. In the case of HSCs, the authors reference to their previous publication for KLF1's expression in these cells- however, in this study nor in the current study, there is no western blot documented to convincingly show that KLF1 protein is expressed at detectable levels in these cells. For T cells, the authors have referenced a study which is based on ectopic expression of KLF1. For NK cells, the authors reference bioGPS: however, upon inspection, this is also questionable.

2. The current study rests on the premise that KLF1 is expressed in HSCs, NK cells and leukocytes, and the references cited are not sufficient to make this assumption, for the reasons mentioned in the first point. Therefore, the authors will have to show both KLF1 mRNA and protein levels in these cells, and also compare them to the expression levels seen in KLF1 wild type erythroid cells along with knockout erythroid cells as controls, for context and specificity.

3. To get to the mechanism driving the reduced susceptibility to tumorigenesis and increased life span phenotypes in EKLF K74R mice, the authors report some observations- However, how these observations are connected to the phenotypes is unclear.<br /> a. For example, in Figure S3, they report that the frequency of NK1.1+ cells is higher in the mutant mice. The significance of this in relation to EKLF expression in these cells and the tumorigenesis and life span related phenotypes are not described. Again, as mentioned in the second point, KLF1 protein levels are not shown in these cells.<br /> b. In Figure 4, the authors show mRNA levels of immune check point genes, PD-1 and PD-l1 are lower in EKLF K74R mice in PB, CD3+ T cells and B220+ B cells. Again, the questions remain on how these genes are regulated by EKLF, and whether and at what levels EKLF protein is expressed in T cells and B cells relative to erythroid cells. Further, while the study they reference for EKLF's role in T cells is based on ectopic expression of EKLF in CD4+ T cells, in the current study, CD3+ T cells are used. Also, there are no references for the status of EKLF in B cells. These details are not discussed in the manuscript.

4. The authors perform comparative proteomics in the leukocytes of EKLF K74R and WT mice as shown in Figure S5. What is the status of EKLF levels in the mutant lysate vs wild type lysates based on this analysis? More clarity needs to be provided on what cells were used for this analysis and how they were isolated since leukocytes is a very broad term.

5. In the discussion the authors make broad inferences that go beyond the data shown in the manuscript. They mention that the tumorigenesis resistance and long lifespan is most likely due to changes in transcription regulatory properties and changes in global gene expression profile of the mutant protein relative to WT leukocytes. And based on reduced mRNA levels of Pd-1 Pd-l1 genes in the CD3+ T cells and B220+ B cells from mutant mice, they "assert" that EKLF is an upstream regulator of these genes and regulates the transcriptomes of a diverse range of hematopoietic cells. The lack of a ChIP assay to show binding of WT EKLF on genes in these cells and whether this binding is reduced or abolished in the mutant cells, make the above statements unsubstantiated.

6. Where westerns are shown, the authors need to show the molecular weight ladder, and where qPCR data are shown for EKLF, it will be helpful to show the absolute levels and compare these levels to those in erythroid cells, along the corresponding EKLF knock out cells as controls.

7. Figure S1D does not have a figure legend. Therefore, it is unclear what the blot in this figure is showing. In the text of the manuscript where they reference this figure, they mention that the levels of the mutant EKLF vs WT EKLF does not change in peripheral blood, while in the figure they have labeled WBCs for the blot, and the mRNA levels shown do seem to decrease in the mutant compared to WT peripheral blood.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors intended to identify a protein signature in extracellular vesicles of serum to distinguish pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from benign pancreatic diseases.

A major strength of the work presented is the valuable profiling of a significant number of patient samples, with a rich cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer, benign pancreatic diseases, and healthy controls. However, despite the strong cohorts presented, the numbers of patient samples for benign pancreatic diseases as well as controls were very limited.

Also, the method used to isolate vesicles, EVTrap, recognizes double bilayers, which means that it can detect cellular debris and apoptotic bodies, which are very common in the circulation of patients that are undergoing chemotherapy. It would be important to identify the patients that are therapy naïve and the ones that are not because of this possible bias. Additionally, the transmission electron microscopy data reflect this heterogeneity of the samples, also with little identification of double bilayered vesicles. It would be important to identify some extracellular vesicles markers in those preparations to strengthen the quality of the samples analysed. What is more, previously published work with this same methodology identifies around 2000 proteins per sample. It would be important to explain why in this study there seems to be a reduction in more than 50% of the amount of proteins identified in the vesicles.

One of the proteins that constantly surges on the analysis is KRT20. It would be important to proceed with the analysis by first filtering out possible contaminants of the proteomics, of which keratins are the most common ones. Finally, none of the 7-extracellular vesicle protein signatures has been validated by other techniques, such as western blot, in extracellular vesicles isolated by other, standard, methods, such as size exclusion chromatography.

A distinct technique for protein analysis was done but not a different method of isolation of these vesicles. This would strengthen the results and the origin of the proteins.

The conclusions that are reached do not fully meet the proposed aims of the identification of a protein signature in circulating extracellular vesicles that could improve early detection of the disease. The authors did not demonstrate the superiority of detection of these proteins in extracellular vesicles versus simply performing an ELISA, nor their superiority with respect to the current standard procedure for diagnosis.

The authors also suggest that profiling of circulating extracellular vesicles provides unique insights into systemic immune changes during pancreatic cancer development. How is this better than a regular hemogram is not clear.

Finally, it would be important to determine how this signature compares with many others described in the literature that have the exact same aim. Why and how would this one be better?

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This manuscript identified a long noncoding RNA, PITAR (p53 Inactivating TRIM28 associated RNA), as an inhibitor of p53. PITAR is highly expressed in glioblastoma (GBM) and glioma stem-like cells (GSC). The authors found that TRIM28 mRNA, which encodes a p53-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase, is a direct target of PITAR. PITAR interaction with TRIM28 RNA stabilized TRIM28 mRNA, which resulted in increased TRIM28 protein levels, enhanced p53 ubiquitination, and attenuated DNA damage response. While PITAR silencing inhibited the growth of WT p53 containing GSCs in vitro and reduced glioma tumor growth in vivo, its overexpression enhanced the tumor growth and promoted resistance to Temozolomide. DNA damage also activated PITAR, in addition to p53, thus creating an incoherent feedforward loop. Together, this study established an alternate way of p53 inactivation and proposed PITAR as a potential therapeutic target.

P53 is a well-established tumor suppressor gene contributing to cancer progression in many human cancers. It plays a vital role in preserving genome integrity and inhibiting malignant transformation. p53 is mutated in more than 50% of human cancers. In cancers that do not carry mutations in p53, the inactivation occurs through other genetic or epigenetic alterations. Therefore, further study of the mechanism of regulation of wt-p53 remains vital in cancer research. This study identified a novel LncRNA PITAR, which is highly expressed in glioblastoma (GBM) and glioma stem-like cells (GSCs) and interacts with and stabilizes TRIM28 mRNA, which encodes a p53-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase. TRIM28 can inhibit p53 through HDAC1-mediated deacetylation and direct ubiquitination in an MDM2-dependent manner. Thus, the overall impact of this study is high because of the identification of a novel mechanism in regulating wt-p53.

The other significant strengths of this manuscript included an apparent research strategy design and a clearly outlined and logically organized research approach. They provided both the in vitro and in vivo studies to evaluate the effect of PITAR. They offered reasonable control of the study by validating the results in cells with mutant p53. They also performed a rescue experiment to confirm the PITAR and TRIM28 relationship regulating p53. The conclusions were all supported by solid results. The overall data presentation is clear and convincing.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

There are four Kv1.2 channel structures reported: the open state, the C-type inactivated state, a dendrotoxin-bound state, and a structure in Na+.

A high-resolution crystal structure of the open state for a chimeric Kv1.2 channel was reported in 2007 and there is no new information provided by the cryoEM structure reported in this study.

The cryo-EM structure of the C-type inactivated state of the Kv1.2 channel was determined for a channel with the W to F substitution in the pore helix. A cryo-EM structure of the Shaker channel and a crystal structure of a chimeric Kv1.2 channel with an equivalent W to F mutation were reported in 2022. Cryo-EM structures of the C-type inactivated Kv1.3 channel are also available. All these previous structures have provided a relatively consistent structural view of the C-type inactivated state and there is no significant new information that is provided by the structure reported in this study.

A structure of the Kv1.2 channel blocked by dendrotoxin is reported. A crystal structure of charybdotoxin and the chimeric Kv1.2 channel was reported in 2013. Density for dendrotoxin could not be clearly resolved due to symmetry issues and so the definitive information from the structure is that dendrotoxin binds, similarly to charybdotoxin, at the mouth of the pore. A potential new finding is that there is a deeper penetration of the blocking Lys residue in dendrotoxin compared to charybdotoxin. It will however be necessary to use approaches to break the symmetry and resolve the electron density for the dendrotoxin molecule to support this claim and to make this structure significant.

The final structure reported is the structure of the Kv1.2 channel in K+ free conditions and with Na+ present. The structure of the KcsA channel by the MacKinnon group in 2001 showed a constricted filter and since then it has been falsely assumed by the K channel community that the lowering of K concentration leads to a construction of the selectivity filter. There have been structural studies on the MthK and the NaK2K channels showing a lack of constriction in the selectivity filter in the absence of K+. These results have been generally ignored and the misconception of filter constriction/collapse in the absence of K+ still persists. The structure of the Kv1.2 channel in Na+ provided a clear example that loss of K+ does not necessarily lead to filter constriction.<br /> The structure in Na+ is significant while the other structures are either merely reproductions of previous reports or are not resolved well enough to make any substantial claims.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

By mapping the sites of the Mcm2-7 replicative helicase loading across the budding yeast genome using high-resolution chromatin endogenous cleavage or ChEC, Bedalov and colleagues find that these markers for origins of DNA replication are much more broadly distributed than previously appreciated. Interestingly, this is consistent with early reconstituted biochemical studies that showed that the ACS was not essential for helicase loading in vitro (e.g. Remus et al., 2009, PMID: 19896182). To accomplish this, they combined the results of 12 independent assays to gain exceptionally deep coverage of Mcm2-7 binding sites. By comparing these sites to previous studies mapping ssDNA generated during replication initiation, they provide evidence that at least a fraction of the 1600 most robustly Mcm2-7-bound sequences act as origins. A weakness of the paper is that the group-based (as opposed to analyzing individual Mcm2-7 binding sites) nature of the analysis prevents the authors from concluding that all of the 1,600 sites mentioned in the title act as origins. The authors also show that the location of Mcm2-7 location after loading are highly similar in the top 500 binding sites, although the mobile nature of loaded Mcm2-7 double hexamers prevents any conclusions about the location of initial loading. Interestingly, by comparing subsets of the Mcm2-7 binding sites, they find that there is a propensity of at least a subset of these sites to be nucleosome depleted, to overlap with at least a partial match to the ACS sequence (found at all of the most well-characterized budding yeast origins), and a GC-skew. Each of which is a characteristic of previously characterized origins of replication.

Overall, this manuscript greatly broadens the number of sites that are capable of loading Mcm2-7 in budding yeast cells and shows that a subset of these additional sites act as replication origins. Although these sites do have a propensity to include a match to the ACS, these studies suggest that the mechanism of helicase loading in yeast and multicellular organisms is more similar than previously thought.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The experiments described in the manuscript are well designed and executed. Most of the data presented are of high quality, convincing, and in general support the conclusions made in the manuscript. This manuscript should be of great interest to the field of mammalian gene regulation and the approaches used here can have broader applications in studying genetic and epigenetic regulations of gene expression. The key finding reported here, the importance of 3D chromatin structure in controlling gene expression, although not unexpected, offers a better understanding of the physiological roles of TADs.

Given the complexity of the data and analysis, some clarification is needed to guide readers to better understand the results.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this manuscript, authors firstly investigated the role of a transcriptional factor BATF in hepatic lipid metabolism both in vivo and in vitro. By using a AAV transfection to overexpress BATF in liver, the mice with overexpression of BATF resisted the high fat diets induced obesity and attenuated the hepatic steatosis. Mechanically, the PD1 mediated its effect on lipid accumulation in hepatocyte and IL-27 mediated its effect on adiposity reduction in vivo.

Strength<br /> 1) This work found the transcription factor BATF was positive to reduce hepatic lipid accumulation and offered a potential target to treat NAFLD.<br /> 2) PD1 antibody is always used to treat cancer, authors here have developed its new function in metabolic disease. PD1 antibody could help mice to combat obesity and hepatic steatosis induced by high fat diets.<br /> 3) Overexpression of BATF in the liver not only decreased the lipid accumulation in the liver but also reduced the fat mass. IL-27 secretion in the liver was enhanced to affect the adipose tissue. The cross talk in liver and adipose tissue was also validated in this paper.

Weakness<br /> 1) BATF protein is also abundantly expressed in control hepatocyte, but the knockdown of BATF had no effect on lipid accumulation. Besides, the expression of BATF was elevated by high fat diets. So it will be interesting to investigate its role in the liver by using its hepatic conditional knockout mice.<br /> 2) The data for the direct regulation of BATF on PD1 and IL-27 is not enough, it is better to carry out CHIP experiment to further confirm it.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Embryonic stem cells extensively proliferate to generate the necessary number of cells that are required for organogenesis, and their proliferation must be timely terminated to allow for proper patterning. Thus, timely termination of stem cell proliferation is critical for proper development. Numerous studies have suggested that cell-extrinsic changes in the surrounding niche environment drive the termination of stem cell proliferation. By contrast, cell-intrinsic mechanisms that terminate stem cell proliferation remain poorly understood. Fruit fly larval brain neuroblasts provide an excellent model for mechanistic investigation of intrinsic control of stem cell proliferation due to the wealth of information on molecular marks, gene functions and lineage hierarchy. Sood et al. conducted a genetic screen to identify genes that are required for the termination of neuroblast proliferation in metamorphosis and found that Notch and its ligand Delta contribute to their exit from cell cycle. They showed that knocking down Notch or delta function in larval neuroblasts allows them to persist into adulthood and remain proliferative when no neuroblasts can be detected in wild-type adult brains. By carrying out a well-designed temperature-shift experiment, the authors showed that Notch is required early during larval development to promote timely exit from cell cycle in metamorphosis. The authors went on to show that attenuating Notch signaling prolongs the expression of temporal identity genes castor and seven-up perturbing the switch from Imp to Syp/E93. Finally, they showed that knocking down Imp function or overexpressing E93 can restore the elimination of neuroblasts in Notch/delta mutant brains.

Overall, the experiments are well conceived and executed, and the data are clear. However, the data reported in this study represent incremental progress in improving our mechanistic understanding of the termination of neuroblast proliferation. Some of the data seem to represent more careful analyses of previously published observations described in the Zacharioudaki et al., Development 2016 paper while others seem to contradict to the results in this study. Gaultier et al., Sci. Adv. 2022 suggested that Grainyhead is required for the termination of neuroblast proliferation in a neuroblast tumor model, and grainyhead is a direct target of Notch signaling. Thus, Grainyhead should be a key downstream effector of Notch signaling in terminating castor and seven-up expression. Identical to Notch signaling, Grainyhead is also expressed through larval development. Grainyhead can function as a classical transcription factor as well as a pioneer factor raising the possibility that temporal regulation of neurogenic enhancer accessibility might be at play in allowing Notch signaling in early larval development to set up termination of castor and seven-up expression in metamorphosis. Diving deeper into how dynamic changes in chromatin in neurogenic enhancers affect the termination of neuroblast proliferation will significantly improve our understanding of termination of stem cell proliferation in diverse developing tissue.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This study provides evidence on the ability of sublethal imidacloprid doses to affect growth and development of honeybee larva. While checking the effect of doses that do not impact survival or food intake, the authors found changes in the expression of genes related to energy metabolism, antioxidant response, and P450 metabolism. The authors also identified cell death in the alimentary canal, and disturbances in levels of ROS markers, molting hormones, weight and growth ratio. The study strengths come from applying these different approaches to investigate the impacts of imidacloprid exposure. The study weaknesses are not providing an in-depth investigation of the mechanisms behind the impacts observed and not bringing the results in light of the current literature. For instance, the authors' hypothesis is based on two main points, the generation of ROS that leads to gut cell death and energy dysfunction, and the increased P450 expression. They propose this increases P450 expression which in turn increases energy consumption and could contribute to developmental retardation. There is however no investigation on the mechanisms of ROS generation (it could be through mitochondrial damage, Nox/ Duox activity, NOS activity, P450s activity, etc). A link between higher P450 expression and increased energy consumption leading to energy deprivation is also missing. It would also be important for the authors to provide a more complete literature review as previous works have investigated imidacloprid sublethal dose impacts in larval stages for bees and other insect models.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This study presents a useful inventory of essential genes from an antibiotic-resistant K. pneumoniae strain to grow in a rich medium. The study also includes a catalogue of genes required to grow/survive in urine and in serum. The former is particularly interesting. The data is analyzed using adequate tools.

The authors leveraged TraDIS to identify essential genes of K. pneumoniae in LB, and those required to survive in urine, and serum. TraDIS is a well-established approach to investigate these aspects, and in fact, has also been already exploited in the case of K. pneumoniae to identify essential genes and those required for serum resistance. The strain used by the team is not probed by many other laboratories, making it difficult to assess the relevance in the context of K. pneumoniae population biology. Nonetheless, the authors have tried to compare their results against other published studies.

The descriptions of the method and analysis of the data are quite detailed; however considering that this work is mostly a bioinformatics one, it would have been interesting to go beyond the Ecl8 strain and make a detailed comparison against the other published data sets as well as consider the genes identified in the wider population structure of K. pneumonaie and other Enterobactericease (particularly E. coli and Salmonella).

The catalogue of genes may spark additional research to provide mechanistic insights into the contribution of the loci to the phenotypes (either urine and/or serum survival). These experiments are not included in the manuscript beyond the validation level achieved by constructing additional mutants using the Red system.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors use a series of elegant methods to describe the nature of the interrelationship among CD8+ T cells and fibrocytes in the airways of COPD patients. They find an increased presence of these interactions in COPD and show that CXCL8-CXCR2 interactions are crucial for this interaction, leading to increased CD8+ T cell proliferation.

Major strengths of the work include the detailed functional experiments used to describe the nature of the CD8+ T cell - fibrocyte interaction. Another key strength is the translational approach of the work, building on clinical data and connecting back to these same clinical data. The conclusions of the authors are supported by the data. The impact of the work is significant and key to our understanding of the interrelationship between inflammation and tissue remodeling in COPD. Understanding this relationship holds strong potential for the identification of new drug targets and for the identification of patients at risk.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors tried to support the hypothesis that early Homo still had a primitive condition of Broca's cap (the region in fossil endocasts corresponding to Broca's area in the brain), being more similar to the condition in chimpanzees than in humans. The evidence from the described individual points to this direction but there are some flaws in the argumentation.

First, only one human and one chimpanzee were used for comparison, although we know that patterns of brain convolutions (and in addition how they leave imprints in the endocranial bones) are very variable.

Second, the evidence from this fossil specimen adds to the evidence of previously describe individuals but still not yet fully prove the hypothesis.

Third, there is a vicious circle in using primitive and derived features to define a fossil species and then using (the same or different) features to argue that one feature is primitive or derived in a given species. In this case, we expect members of early Homo to be derived compared to their predecessors of the genus Australopithecus and that's why it seems intriguing and/or surprising to argue that early Homo has primitive features. However, we should expect that there is some kind of continuum or mosaic in a time in which a genus "evolves into" another genus. This discussion requires far more discussions about the concepts we use, maybe less discussion about what is different between the two groups but more discussion about the evolutionary processes behind them.

Fourth, the data of convolutional imprints presented are rather subjective when identifying which impressions represent which brain convolutions. Not seeing an impression does not necessarily mean that the corresponding brain feature did not exist. Interestingly, the manuscript does not mention and discuss at all the frontoorbital sulcus. This is a sulcus that usually runs from the orbital surface of the frontal lobe up to divide the inferior frontal gyrus in chimpanzees, a condition totally different than in humans who do not have a frontoorbital sulcus. Could such a sulcus be identified, this would provide a far more convincing argument for a primitive condition in this specimen. In Australopithecus sediba, e.g., the condition in this region seems to be a mosaic in which some aspects of the morphology seem to be more modern while one of the sulcual impressions can well be interpreted as a short frontoorbital sulcus. For this specimen, by the way, I would come back to my third point above: some experts in the field might argue that this specimen could belong to Homo rather than Australopithecus...

According to my arguments above, I think that this manuscript might revive interesting discussions about this topic but it is not likely to settle them because the data presented are not strong enough to fully support the hypothesis.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This work by Hannon and Eisen focuses on the sequence and structural features of transcription factors (TFs) that dictate their sub-nuclear localization. The authors test the hypothesis that intrinsically disordered regions (IDRs) in TFs are drivers of subnuclear localization and clustering by first identifying IDRs in the drosophila proteome using a novel approach and then expressing a subset of IDRs from TFs important during the development of an early embryo. The authors then perform an extensive and high-throughput imaging screen in S2 cells and drosophila embryos and find that subnuclear clustering does not occur when IDRs are expressed alone but happens frequently in full-length TFs, even sometimes without the IDRs. A significant strength of the study is the extensive amount of imaging data that support well the conclusions in the paper. A potential weakness is that the conclusions are based on qualitative analysis only; the work would be strengthened considerably if the authors could provide quantification that allows the reader to distinguish clearly between a homogenous distribution and clustering of TFs. The work tackles an important functional question regarding IDRs in TFs and is of high relevance to the field. There is an impressive amount of data that generally support the conclusion of the paper, which is that IDRs are insufficient to drive TF clustering in the nucleus. The manuscript is very well written, pleasing to read, and easy to follow. This work advances the field considerably, providing valuable mechanistic insights into transcription.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors found FOXC2 is mainly expressed in As of mouse undifferentiated spermatogonia (uSPG). About 60% of As uSPG were FOXC2+ MKI67-, indicating that FOXC2 uSPG were quiescent. Similar spermatogonia (ZBTB16+ FOXC2+ MKI67-) were also found in human testis.

The lineage tracing experiment using Foxc2CRE/+;R26T/Gf/f mice demonstrated that all germ cells were derived from the FOXC2+ uSPG. Furthermore, specific ablation of the FOXC2+ uSPGs using Foxc2Cre/+;R26DTA/+ mice resulted in the depletion of all uSPG population. In the regenerative condition created by busulfan injection, all FOXC2+ uSPG survived and began to proliferate at around 30 days after busulfan injection. The survived FOXC2+ uSPGs generated all germ cells eventually. To examine the role of FOXC2 in the adult testis, spermatogenesis of Foxc2f/-;Ddx4-cre mice was analyzed. From a 2-month-old, the degenerative seminiferous tubules were increased and became Sertoli cell-only seminiferous tubules, indicating FOXC2 is required to maintain normal spermatogenesis in adult testes. To get insight into the role of FOXC2 in the uSPG, CUT&Tag sequencing was performed in sorted FOXC2+ uSPG from Foxc2CRE/+;R26T/Gf/f mice 3 days after TAM diet feeding. The results showed some unique biological processes, including negative regulation of the mitotic cell cycle, were enriched, suggesting the FOXC2 maintains a quiescent state in spermatogonia.

Lineage tracing experiments using transgenic mice of the TAM-inducing system was well-designed and demonstrated interesting results. Based on all data presented, the authors concluded that the FOXC2+ uSPG are primitive SSCs, an indispensable subpopulation to maintain adult spermatogenesis. The conclusion of the mouse study is supported by the data presented.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this paper, Budinská et al. consider whether morphological heterogeneity in colorectal cancer (CRC) might impact gene-expression based classifiers typically applied to bulk CRC tissues. To investigate this, the authors generated and analysed whole transcriptome microarrray profiling data from macro-dissected morphotype-specific tumour regions, bulk tumor and surrounding normal and stromal tissues.

The authors make a number of claims based on their analyses. Namely that<br /> (1) morphotype-specific gene expression profiles and active molecular pathways can be identified and that (2) most gene expression-based classifiers make different predictions when applied to different morphotypes within the same tumour and when applied to morphotype-specific tumor regions versus bulk tumor tissue.

Overall, the manuscript provides an interesting histological/morphological framework through which we can consider heterogeneity in colorectal carcinoma and an approach by which we might improve the performance of gene expression-based classifiers in predicting clinical behaviour and/or responses to therapy. Exploration of CRC morphotypes and their differences was quite interesting. However, more work is needed to support the claims made by the authors. While I appreciate that the authors themselves identify limitations of their study within the manuscript, I believe awareness of these limitations is not reflected in some of the claims made in the abstract and at points in the main text when discussing the use of expression-based classifiers.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Early career funding success has an immense impact on later funding success and faculty persistence, as evidenced by well-documented "rich-get-richer" or "Matthew effect" phenomena in science (e.g., Bol et al. 2018, PNAS). Woitowich et al. examined publicly available data on the distribution of the National Institutes of Health's K99/R00 awards - an early career postdoc-to-faculty transition funding mechanism - and showed that although 85% of K99 awardees successfully transitioned into faculty, disparities in subsequent R01 grant obtainment emerged along three characteristics: researcher mobility, gender, and institution. Men who moved to a top-25 NIH funded institution in their postdoc-to-faculty transition experienced the shortest median time to receiving a R01 award, 4.6 years, in contrast to the median 7.4 years for women working at less well-funded schools who remained at their postdoc institutions. This result is consistent with prior evidence of funding disparities by gender and institution type. The finding that researcher mobility has the largest effect on subsequent funding success is key and novel, and enhances previous work showing the relationship between mobility and ones' access to resources, collaborators, or research objects (e.g., Sugimoto and Larivière, 2023, Equity for Women in Science (Harvard University Press)).

These results empirically demonstrate that even after receiving a prestigious early career grant, researchers with less mobility belonging to disadvantaged groups at less-resourced institutions continue to experience barriers that delay them from receiving their next major grant. This result has important policy implications aimed at reducing funding disparities - mainly that interventions that focus solely on early career or early stage investigator funding alone will not achieve the desired outcome of improving faculty diversity.

The authors also highlight two incredible facts: No postdoc at a historically Black college or university (HBCU) has been awarded a K99 since the program's launch. And out of all 2,847 R00 awards given thus far, only two have been made to faculty at HBCUs. Given the track record of HBCUs for improving diversity in STEM contexts, this distribution of awards is a massive oversight that demands attention.

At no fault of the authors, the analysis is limited to only examining K99 awardees and not those who applied but did not receive the award. This limitation is solely due to the lack of data made publicly available by the NIH. If this data were available, this study would have been able to compare the trajectory of winners versus losers and therefore could potentially quantify the impact of the award itself on later funding success, much like the landmark Bol et al. (2018) paper that followed the careers of winners of an early career grant scheme in the Netherlands. Such an analysis would also provide new insights that would inform policy.

Although data on applications versus awards for the K99/R00 mechanism are limited, there exists data for applicant race and ethnicity for the 2007-2017 period, which were made available by a Freedom of Information Act request through the now defunct Rescuing Biomedical Research Initiative: https://web.archive.org/web/20180723171128/http://rescuingbiomedicalresearch.org/blog/examining-distribution-k99r00-awards-race/ These results are not presently discussed in the paper, but are highly relevant given the discussion of K99 award impacts on the sociodemographic composition of U.S. biomedical faculty. From 2007 to 2017, the K99 award rate for white applicants was 31.0% compared to 26.7% for Asian applicants and 16.2% for Black applicants. In terms of award totals, these funding rates amount to 1,384 awards to white applicants, 610 to Asian applicants, and 25 to Black applicants for the entire 2007-2017 period. And in terms of R00 awards, or successful faculty transitions: whereas 77.0% of white K99 awardees received an R00 award, the conversion rate for Asian and Black K99 awardees was lower, at 76.1% and 60.0%, respectively. Regarding this K99-to-R00 transition rate, Woitowich et al. found no difference by gender (Table 2). These results are consistent with a growing body of literature that shows that while there have been improvements to equity in funding outcomes by gender, similar improvements for achieving racial equity are lagging.

The conclusions are well-supported by the data, and limitations of the data and the name-gender matching algorithm are described satisfactorily.

One aspect that the authors should expand or comment on is the change in the rate of K99 to R00 conversions. Since 2016, while the absolute number of K99 and R00 awards has been increasing, the percentage of R00 conversions appears to be decreasing, especially in 2020 and 2021. This observation is not clearly stated or shown in Figure 1 but is an important point - if the effectiveness of the K99/R00 mechanism for postdoc-to-faculty transitions has been decreasing lately, then something is undermining the purpose of this mechanism. This result bears emphasis and potentially discussion for possible reasons for why this is happening.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

DeKraker et al. propose a new method for hippocampal registration using a surface-based approach that preserves the topology of the curvature of the hippocampus and boundaries of hippocampal subfields. The surface-based registration method proved to be more precise and resulted in better alignment compared to traditional volumetric-based registration. Moreover, the authors demonstrated that this method can be performed across image modalities by testing the method with seven different histological samples. While the conclusions of this paper are mostly well supported by data, some aspects of the method need to be clarified. This work has the potential to be a powerful new registration technique that can enable precise hippocampal registration and alignment across subjects, datasets, and image modalities.

Regarding the methodological clarification of the surfaced-based registration method, the last step of the process needs further clarification. Specifically, after creating the averaged 2D template, it is unclear how each individual sample is registered to sample1's space. If I understand correctly, after creating the averaged 2D template, each individual sample is then registered to sample1's space via the transform from each sample to the averaged template and then the inverse transform from the template to sample1's space. Samples included both left and right hemispheres, so were all samples being propagated to left hemisphere sample 1 space? The authors also note that a measure of the subfield labels overlap with that sample's ground-truth subfield definitions was calculated. Is this a measure of overlap, for example, between sample 3 (registered to sample 1 space) and the ground-truth (unfolded, not registered) sample 3 labels? It would be beneficial to provide a full walkthrough of one example sample to clarify the steps. Clarification of this aspect of the method is critical for understanding the evaluation of the method.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Mignerot et al. study variations in egg retention in a large set of wild C. elegans strains using detailed analysis of a subset of these strains to those that these variations in egg retention appear to arise from variations in egg-laying behavior. The authors then take advantage of the advanced genetic technology available in C. elegans, and the fact that the cellular and molecular mechanisms that drive egg-laying behavior in the N2 laboratory strain of C. elegans have been studied intensely for decades. Thus, they demonstrate that variations in multiple genetic loci appear to drive variations in egg laying across species, although they are unable to identify the specific genes that vary other than a potassium channel already identified in a previous study from some of these same authors (Vigne et al., 2021). Mignerot et al. also present evidence that variations in the response of the egg-laying system to the neuromodulator serotonin appear to underlie variations in egg-laying behavior across species. Finally, the authors present a series of studies examining how the retention of eggs in utero affects the fertility and survival of mothers versus the survival of their progeny in a variety of adverse conditions, including limiting food, and the presence of acute environmental insults such as alcohol or acid. The results suggest that variations in egg-laying behavior evolved as a response to adverse environmental conditions that impose a trade-off between survival of the mothers versus their progeny.

Strengths:

The analysis of variations in egg laying by a large set of wild species significantly extends the previous work of Vigne et al. (2021), who focused on just one wild variant strain. Mignerot finds that variations in egg laying are widespread across C. elegans strains and result from changes in multiple genetic loci.

To determine why various strains vary in their egg-laying behavior, the authors take advantage of the genetic tractability of C. elegans and the huge body of previous studies on the cellular and molecular basis of egg-laying behavior in the laboratory N2 strain. Since serotonin is one signal that induces egg laying, the authors subject various strains to serotonin and to drugs thought to alter serotonin signaling, and they also use CRISPR induced gene editing to mutate a serotonin reuptake transporter in some strains. The results are largely consistent with the idea that variations across strains alter how the egg-laying system responds to serotonin.

The final figures in the paper present a far more detailed analysis than Vigne et al. (2021) of how variations in egg retention across species can affect fitness under various environmental stresses. Thus, Mignerot et al. look at competition under conditions of limiting food, and response to acute environmental insults, and compare the ability of adults, in utero eggs, and ex vivo eggs to survive. The results lead to an interesting discussion of how variations in behavior result in a trade-off in survival of mothers versus their progeny. The authors in their Discussion do a good job describing the challenges in interpreting the relevance of these laboratory results to the poorly-understood environmental conditions that C. elegans may experience in the wild. The Discussion also had an excellent section about how the ability of a single species to strongly regulate egg-laying behavior in response to its environment, and how this ability could be adaptive. Overall, these were the strongest and most interesting aspects of Mignerot et al.

Weaknesses<br /> The specific potassium channel variation studied by Vigne et al. (2021) has by far the strongest effect on egg laying seen in the Mignerot et al. study and remains the only genetic variation that has been molecularly identified. So, Mignerot et al. were not able to identify any additional specific genes that vary across species to cause changes in egg laying, and this limited their ability to generate new insights into the specific cellular and molecular mechanisms that have changed across species to result in changes in egg laying behavior.

The authors' use of drug treatments and CRISPR to alter serotonin signaling yielded some insights into mechanistic variations in how the egg-laying system functions across strains, but these experiments only allow very indirect inferences into what is going on. The analysis in Figures 4 and 5 generates a complex set of results that are not easy to interpret. The clearest result seems to be that strains carrying the KCNL-1 point mutation lay eggs poorly and exogenous serotonin inhibits rather than stimulates egg laying in these strains. This basic result was to a large extent reported previously in Vigne et al. 2021.

The analysis of egg-laying behavior in Figure 3 is relatively weak. Whereas the state of the art in analyzing this behavior is to take videos of animals and track exactly when they lay eggs, the authors used a lower-tech method of just examining how many eggs were laid within 5 minute intervals. It is not clear that this allows adequate resolution to determine if the strains examined actually have clusters of egg-laying events (i.e. active phases) or not, so the entire analysis of active and inactive phase intervals seemed dubious. It was unclear that this analysis demonstrated differences in the patterns of egg-laying behavior between strains that could be sufficient to explain the differences in accumulation of unlaid eggs between these strains. In contrast, the variations in Fig 3G and 3H between strains were very strong. It is not clear why the authors did not focus more on these differences as being possibly largely responsible for the differences in egg retention between strains. In the discussion, the authors extensively write about the work of the Collins lab showing that retained eggs stretch the uterus to produce a signal that activates egg-laying muscles. Could it be that really this mechanism is the main one that varies between strains, leading to the observed variations in time to laying the first egg as well as variations in the number of retained eggs throughout adulthood?

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this manuscript, Scheer and Bargmann investigate how behavioral arousal state affects foraging decisions in the nematode C. elegans. Previous work has shown that when placed on a lawn of bacterial food, C. elegans spontaneously switch between two behavioral states, termed roaming and dwelling, during which they exploit or explore the food environment, respectively. It has also been shown that animals spontaneously leave bacterial lawns depending on factors such as food quality or mate availability.

Here, the authors use quantitative behavioral analyses to describe in unprecedented detail the various behavioral choices animals make when encountering the lawn edge. They report that leaving the lawn is a rare outcome compared to other choices such as pausing or reversing back into the lawn. It occurs predominantly out of the roaming state and has a characteristic preceding fast crawling profile. They developed a refined analysis method, the result of which suggests that the arousal state of animals on food can be described by a 4-state behavior (as opposed to the 2-state roaming - dwelling classification); leaving the lawn occurs predominantly from "state 3", which corresponds to the highest level of arousal during roaming. They further show that various manipulations, such as optogenetic inhibition of feeding, stimulation of RIB neurons, or mutations of neuromodulator pathways, all of which have previously been reported to affect crawling speed and/or roaming/dwelling, maintain the coupling between roaming states and leaving, suggesting a dedicated mechanism for coupling leaving to the roaming state. Finally, they use genetics to implicate chemosensory neurons as neuronal circuit elements mediating this coupling.

How arousal states affect decision making is an active area of neuroscience research; therefore, the current manuscript will impact the field beyond the small community of C. elegans researchers. Also, in the past, roaming/dwelling and leaving have been treated as independent behaviors; the current manuscript is very intriguing, demonstrating both the interconnectedness of different behavioral programs and the importance of the animal's behavioral context for specific decisions.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The manuscript examined the behavioural and neural profile of weak and strong fear memories. The data provide strong evidence that weak but not strong fear memories are subject to extinction and reconsolidation disruption. Strong memories also show greater generalization. These differences were echoed in differential neural connectivity with weak fear memories showing greater connectivity between brains areas than strong fear memories.

Strengths:

The findings are of great importance and offer insight into why resistance to extinction and reconsolidation may underlie fear-related psychopathology.<br /> The study uses key behavioural tests to study the durability of weak vs strong memories (extinction and reconsolidation) as well as studies the generalisation of those memories. These behavioural effects nicely dovetail with the neural connectivity analyses that were performed.

The data presented in this paper will be the basis for future hypothesis driven examinations on the causal influence of specific pathways involved in contextual fear.<br /> Excellent use of the open field to control for motor effects.

Weaknesses:

One alternative account to the weak vs. strong memory distinction made in the paper is the opportunity for extinction in the 2S compared to the 10S group. In the 2S group, the last shock occurs in the 3rd minute, leaving 9 minutes of context exposure without reinforcement to follow. This is not the case for the 10S group. If context fear extinction is engaged during this time, then this would mean that two memories (acquisition and extinction) are taking place in the 2S group, weakening the fear memory in this group, setting up the ground for stronger effects of extinction, less generalization and of course potential greater connectivity required for representing and linking these memories. Indeed, the IL, a brain area linked to extinction, is more predominant in the connectivity map of the 2S compared to the 10S group. While testing this alternative is beyond the scope of this paper, it will need to be discussed.<br /> Methodological detail is lacking re the timeline of study, and connectivity analyses.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Mitochondria are essential cellular organelles that generate ATPs as the energy source for maintaining regular cellular functions. However, the degradation of sperm-borne mitochondria after fertilization is a conserved event known as mitophagy to ensure the exclusively maternal inheritance of the mitochondrial DNA genome. Defects on post-fertilization sperm mitophagy will lead to fatal consequences in patients. Therefore, understanding the cellular and molecular regulation of the post-fertilization sperm mitophagy process is critically important. In this study, Zuidema et. al applied mass spectrometry in conjunction with a porcine cell-free system to identify potential autophagic cofactors involved in post-fertilization sperm mitophagy. They identified a list of 185 proteins that might be candidates for mitophagy determinants (or their co-factors). Despite the fact that 6 (out of 185) proteins were further studied, based on their known functions, using a porcine cell-free system in conjunction with immunocytochemistry and Western blotting, to characterize the localization and modification changes these proteins, no further functional validation experiments were performed. Nevertheless, the data presented in the current study is of great interest and could be important for future studies in this field.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Whether and how molecularly defined neuronal groups in the spinal cord process distinct modalities are of great interest. In this study, Boyle et al. characterized roles of inhibitory neurons expressing NPY in adult mice. By using chemogenetic, electrophysiological tools and behavioral measurements, the authors discovered that activating NPY+ interneurons strongly reduced pruritogen-evoked itch and reflexive behaviors (acute nociception or under inflammation / neuropathic pain states). Silencing NPY+ spinal interneurons enhanced spontaneous and chemical itch in a GRPR+ neurons dependent manner. The authors concluded that, unlike previous findings suggesting that these neurons are selective for mechanical itch, adult NPY+ interneurons play dual roles in gating various types of itch and pain.

The authors performed careful characterization and comparisons between development lineage and adult spinal neurons expressing NPY. This lays the foundation of the current study. The behavioral measurements were also well designed with proper controls.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The manuscript describes more fully the relationship between zinc fluxes and calcium oscillations during egg activation by directly manipulating the level of zinc ions inside and outside the cell with chelators and ionophores and then measuring resulting changes in Ca++ oscillations. The authors have provided solid evidence consistent with their hypothesis that zinc ions regulate Ca++ oscillations by directly modulating the gating of the IP3-R which is the main calcium channel responsible for calcium release into the cytoplasm. The authors employ well established methods of calcium measurement along with various chelators, ionophores and a wide variety of methods that cause egg activation to demonstrate that an optimal level of zinc ions are required for Ca++ oscillations to occur.

Helpfully, the authors provide a model to explain their observations in Figure 7. In the model, the increase in zinc during maturation is permissive for later IP3-R gating in response to IP3 generated at fertilization. The experiments with TPEN solidly demonstrate that Zn is required because lowering free zinc, as indicated by Fluozin staining), abrogates Ca++ oscillations. This is true regardless of the method of activation. What is not clearly described in the model or in the manuscript is whether the levels of zinc at MII are simply permissive for IP3-R gating or whether there is a more acute relationship between zinc fluxes and Ca++ oscillations. In the original paper describing the zinc spark (Kim et al., ACS Chem Biol 6:716-723), the authors show that zinc efflux very closely mirrors Ca++ oscillations suggesting a more active relationship such that zinc efflux associate with each calcium spike could be necessary for terminating the Ca spike by depleting cytoplasmic Zn. There is some evidence in the present manuscript to support this. For example, in figure 3B, TPEN appears to acutely terminate a Ca spike. Whether this is repeatable is not known. Conversely, in Figure 5C and 5E, PyT leads to a rapid restoration of Ca oscillations within minutes demonstrating that changes in free Zn can cause rapid changes in Ca++ oscillations. Perhaps, rather than simply a permissive role, the normal Zn fluxes during activation may be acutely changing IP3-R gating sensitivity.

The role of TRPv3 and Trpm7 in Zn homeostasis during egg activation seems to be minor and the results in the dKO oocytes compared to TPEN are a bit confusing. In the dKO oocytes, zinc acquisition was sufficient to make it to MII suggesting Zn transport through these channels is dispensable for maturation. During activation, however, the response to Tg in dKO eggs was opposite that of TPEN, higher cytosolic Ca and increase amplitude (Figure 4G) vs lower cytoplasmic Ca and frequency for TPEN (Figure 4A). Perhaps loss of these two channels changes Ca gating independent of Zinc.

The effect of PyT on the apparent rise in cytoplasmic Ca++ in figure 6 is interpreted as caused by an artifact of high Zn concentrations. However, it is not clear that 0.05 uM PyT would necessarily increase cytoplasmic Zn to the point where FURA-2 fluorescence would increase. A simpler interpretation is that PyT allows sufficient Zn to enter the cell and keeps the IP3-R channels open causing a sustained rise in cytoplasmic Ca and preventing oscillations in Ca++. This interpretation would also preclude inhibitory effects of high Zn concentrations as shown in figure 7 which may or may not be present but are simply speculation.

Overall, this study significantly advances our understanding of egg activation and could lead to better ways of in vitro egg activation in women undergoing assisted reproduction.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The axon initial segment (AIS) is the axonal domain where most neurons integrate inputs and generate action potentials. Though structural and electrophysiological studies have allowed to better understand the mechanisms of assembly and maintenance of this domain, as well as its functions, there is still a need for efficient tools to study its structural organization and plasticity in vivo.

In this article, the authors describe the generation of a knock-in mouse reporter line allowing the conditional expression of a GFP-tagged version of AnkyrinG (Ank-G), which is a major protein of the axon initial segment and the nodes of Ranvier in neurons. This reporter line can in particular be used to study axon initial segment assembly and plasticity, by combining it with mouse lines or viruses expressing the Cre recombinase under the control of a neuronal promoter. Furthermore, the design of the line should allow to preserve the expression of the main Ank-G isoforms observed in neurons and could thus allow to study Ank-G related mechanisms in various neuronal subcompartments.

Some mouse lines allowing the neuronal expression of AIS/node of Ranvier markers coupled to a fluorescent protein exist, however they correspond to transgenic lines leading to potential overexpression of the tagged protein. Depending on the promoter used, their expression can vary and be absent in some neuronal populations (in particular, the Thy-1 promoter can lead to variable expression depending on the transgene insertion locus). Furthermore, these lines do not allow conditional expression of the protein regarding neuronal subtypes nor controlled temporal expression. Finally, a thorough description of the in vivo expression of the tagged protein at the AIS, and its impact on the structural and electrophysiological properties of the AIS are missing for these lines.

The present reporter line is thus definitely of interest, as the authors convincingly show that it can be used to visualize AIS ans Nodes of Ranvier in various contexts (from in vitro to in vivo). It could in particular be useful to study the assembly and plasticity of the domains where Ank-G is expressed. In this work, the authors thoroughly characterize the Ank-G-GFP reporter line generated and show that the structural and electrophysiological properties of the labeled neurons are not altered by the expression of the tagged Ank-G.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In the manuscript entitled "Linking the evolution of two prefrontal brain regions to social and foraging challenges in primates" the authors measure the volume of the frontal pole (FP, related to metacognition) and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC, related to working memory) in 16 primate species to evaluate the influence of socio-ecological factors on the size of these cortical regions. The authors select 11 socio-ecological variables and use a phylogenetic generalized least squares (PGLS) approach to evaluate the joint influence of these socio-ecological variables on the neuro-anatomical variability of FP and DLPFC across the 16 selected primate species; in this way, the authors take into account the phylogenetic relations across primate species in their attempt to discover the influence of socio-ecological variables on FP and DLPF evolution.

The authors run their studies on brains collected from 1920 to 1970 and preserved in formalin solution. Also, they obtained data from the Mussée National d´Histoire Naturelle in Paris and from the Allen Brain Institute in California. The main findings consist in showing that the volume of the FP, the DLPFC, and the Rest of the Brain (ROB) across the 16 selected primate species is related to three socio-ecological variables: body mass, daily traveled distance, and population density. The authors conclude that metacognition and working memory are critical for foraging in primates and that FP volume is more sensitive to social constraints than DLPFC volume.

The topic addressed in the present manuscript is relevant for understanding human brain evolution from the point of view of primate research, which, unfortunately, is a shrinking field in neuroscience. But the experimental design has two major weak points: the absence of lissencephalic primates among the selected species and the delimitation of FP and DLPFC. Also, a general theoretical and experimental frame linking evolution (phylogeny) and development (ontogeny) is lacking.

Major comments.<br /> 1.- Is the brain modular? Is there modularity in brain evolution?: The entire manuscript is organized around the idea that the brain is a mosaic of units that have separate evolutionary trajectories:

"In terms of evolution, the functional heterogeneity of distinct brain regions is captured by the notion of 'mosaic brain', where distinct brain regions could show a specific relation with various socio-ecological challenges, and therefore have relatively separate evolutionary trajectories".

This hypothesis is problematic for several reasons. One of them is that each evolutionary module of the brain mosaic should originate in embryological development from a defined progenitor (or progenitors) domain [see García-Calero and Puelles (2020)]. Also, each evolutionary module should comprise connections with other modules; in the present case, FP and DLPFC have not evolved alone but in concert with, at least, their corresponding thalamic nuclei and striatal sector. Did those nuclei and sectors also expand across the selected primate species? Can the authors relate FP and DLPFC expansion to a shared progenitor domain across the analyzed species? This would be key to proposing homology hypotheses for FP and DLPFC across the selected species. The authors use all the time the comparative approach but never explicitly their criteria for defining homology of the cerebral cortex sectors analyzed.

Contemporary developmental biology has showed that the selection of morphological brain features happens within severe developmental constrains. Thus, the authors need a hypothesis linking the evolutionary expansion of FP and DLPFC during development. Otherwise, the claims form the mosaic brain and modularity lack fundamental support.

Also, the authors refer most of the time to brain regions, which is confusing because they are analyzing cerebral cortex regions.

2.- Definition and delimitation of FP and DLPFC: The precedent questions are also related to the definition and parcellation of FP and DLPFC. How homologous cortical sectors are defined across primate species? And then, how are those sectors parcellated?

The authors delimited the FP:

"...according to different criteria: it should match the functional anatomy for known species (macaques and humans, essentially) and be reliable enough to be applied to other species using macroscopic neuroanatomical landmarks".

There is an implicit homology criterion here: two cortical regions in two primate species are homologs if these regions have similar functional anatomy based on cortico-cortical connections. Also, macroscopic neuroanatomical landmarks serve to limit the homologs across species.

This is highly problematic. First, because similar function means analogy and not necessarily homology [for further explanation see Puelles et al. (2019); García-Cabezas et al. (2022)]. Second, because there are several lissencephalic primate species; in these primates, like marmosets and squirrel monkeys, the whole approach of the authors could not have been implemented. Should we suppose that lissencephalic primates lack FP or DLPFC? Do these primates have significantly more simplistic ways of life than gyrencephalic primates? Marmosets and squirrel monkeys have quite small brains; does it imply that they have not experience the influence of socio-ecological factors on the size of FP, DLPFC, and the rest of the brain?

The authors state that:

"the strong development of executive functions in species with larger prefrontal cortices is related to an absolute increase in number of neurons, rather than in an increase in the ration between the number of neurons in the PFC vs the rest of the brain".

How does it apply to marmosets and squirrel monkeys?

References:<br /> García-Cabezas MA, Hacker JL, Zikopoulos B (2022) Homology of neocortical areas in rats and primates based on cortical type analysis: an update of the Hypothesis on the Dual Origin of the Neocortex. Brain structure & function Online ahead of print. doi:doi.org/10.1007/s00429-022-02548-0

García-Calero E, Puelles L (2020) Histogenetic radial models as aids to understanding complex brain structures: The amygdalar radial model as a recent example. Front Neuroanat 14:590011. doi:10.3389/fnana.2020.590011

Nieuwenhuys R, Puelles L (2016) Towards a New Neuromorphology. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-25693-1

Puelles L, Alonso A, Garcia-Calero E, Martinez-de-la-Torre M (2019) Concentric ring topology of mammalian cortical sectors and relevance for patterning studies. J Comp Neurol 527 (10):1731-1752. doi:10.1002/cne.24650

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Schnell et al. performed two extensive behavioral experiments concerning the processing of objects in rats and humans. To this aim, they designed a set of objects parametrically varying along alignment and concavity and then they used activations from a pretrained deep convolutional neural network to select stimuli that would require one of two different discrimination strategies, i.e. relying on either low- or high-level processing exclusively. The results show that rodents rely more on low-level processing than humans.

Strengths:

1. The results are challenging and call for a different interpretation of previous evidence. Indeed, this work shows that common assumptions about task complexity and visual processing are probably biased by our personal intuitions and are not equivalent in rodents, which instead tend to rely more on low-level properties.<br /> 2. This is an innovative (and assumption-free) approach that will prove useful to many visual neuroscientists. Personally, I second the authors' excitement about the proposed approach, and its potential to overcome the limits of experimenters' creativity and intuitions. In general, the claims seem well supported and the effects sufficiently clear.<br /> 3. This work provides an insightful link between rodent and human literature on object processing. Given the increasing number of studies on visual perception involving rodents, these kinds of comparisons are becoming crucial.<br /> 4. The paper raises several novel questions that will prompt more research in this direction.

Weaknesses:

1. There are a few inconsistencies in the number of subjects reported. Sometimes 45 humans are mentioned and sometimes 50. Probably they are just typos, but it's unclear.<br /> 2. A few aspects mentioned in the introduction and results are only defined in the Methods thus making the manuscript a bit hard to follow (e.g. the alignment dimension), htus I had to jump often from the main text to the methods to get a sense of their meaning.<br /> 3. The choices related to the stimulus design and the network used to categorize them are not fully described and would benefit from some further clarification/justification. The choice of alignment and concavity as baseline properties of the stimuli is not properly discussed. Also, from the low-correlations I got the feeling that AlexNet is just not a good model of rat visual processing. Which indeed can be interpreted as further evidence of what the authors are trying to demonstrate, but it might also be an isolated case.<br /> 4. Many important aspects of the task are not fully described in the Methods (e.g. size of the stimuli, reaction times and basic statistics on the responses).

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The manuscript by Zhu et al explored molecular mechanisms by which Ebola virus (EBOV) evades host innate immune response. EBOV has a number of means to shut down the type I interferon induction (by viral VP35 protein) and block type I interferon action (by viral VP24 protein). This study reported a new mechanism that inclusion body (IB) used for viral replication sequesters IRF3, a key transcription factor involved in the interferon signaling, resulting in blockade of downstream type I interferon gene transcription. This finding is potentially interesting and may provide a new insight into EBOV's evasion of innate immunity. However, there are some flaws in the experimentations and analyses that need to be addressed.

1) Most of experiments were performed by transfection of trVLP plasmids, which is very different from virus infection. The conclusions should be examined and verified in the context of virus infection.

2) Fig 1 - VP35 displayed a classical IB staining only in Panel A, while much less so in Panel C and not in panel B. It seemed that the VP35 staining images were chosen in a way towards the authors' favor. The statistical analysis of co-localization of VP35 and IRF3, TBK1 or IKKe should be performed to draw the conclusion. Another concern is that IKKe is normally lowly expressed under a rest condition and becomes induced only when the interferon signaling is activated. It seemed to be expressed at a high level even when the interferon signaling is blocked in Panel C. The authors should comment on this discrepancy.

3) Fig 2 - Was this experiment done by transfection or infection? The description of result is not consistent with the figure legend. The labeling was also not consistent between panel A and B. I would suggest performing Western blot to analyze the expression level of IRF3.

4) Fig 3 and 4 - As VP35 is well known for its highly efficient blockade of type I interferon activation, how would the authors differentiate the effect of VP35 alone from the sequestration of IRF3 in IBs in these experiments?

5) Fig 3 - PolyIC can activate both RLR and TLR signaling pathways. Can the author comment on which pathway it activates in this experiment?

6) The authors demonstrated that VP35 interacts with STING and recruit the latter to IBs. How would this affect the function of STING given that STING plays essential roles in cGAS/cGAMP pathway?

7) It is difficult to follow the logics of Fig 7. The expression level of each viral protein should be determined. Ideally, a mutation in VP35 that disrupts its ability to antagonize the interferon signaling but still allows for the IB formation can be used to assess the relative contribution of IB sequestering IRF3.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors aimed to connect SIRT-1 to EV-D68 virus release through mediating ER stress. They are successful in robustly connecting these pathways experimentally and show a new role for SIRT-1 in EV-D68 infection. These results extend to additional viruses, suggesting role(s) for SIRT-1 in diverse virus infection.

The authors note that EV-D68 does not significantly impact SIRT-1 protein levels (Fig 1E and F), though this has been described for other picornaviruses (Xander et al., J Immunol 2019; Han et al., J Cell Sci 2016; Kanda et al Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2015). This may be of interest to note in the manuscript.

The data regarding CVB3 (Fig S4) are especially interesting because they show no discernable impact on infection. The manuscript should describe this further and perhaps speculate on potential reasons. Could it be due to inefficient knockdown?

SIRT-1 (and other sirtuins) have been linked to an innate interferon response. Are any of the phenotypes observed here due to IFN responses? The use of H1HeLa cells would suggest this is not the case.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The data presented support and extend some previously published data using Drosophila as a model to unravel the cellular and genetic basis of human Autosomal dominant optic atrophy (DOA). In human, mutations in OPA1, a mitochondrial dynamin like GTPase (amongst others), are the most common cause for DOA. By using a Drosophila loss-of-function mutations, RNAi-mediated knockdown and overexpression, the authors could recapitulate some aspects of the disease phenotype, which could be rescued by the wild-type version of the human gene. Their assays allowed them to distinguish between mutations causing human DOA, affecting the optic system and supposed to be loss-of-function mutations, and those mutations supposed to act as dominant negative, resulting in DOA plus, in which other tissues/organs are affected as well.

Based on the lack of information in the Materials and Methods section and in several figure legends, it was not in all cases possible to follow the conclusions of the authors. Similarly, how the knowledge gained could help to "inform early treatment decisions in patients with mutations in hOPA1" (Line 38) cannot be followed.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors investigate the origin of asexual reproduction through hybridization between species. In loaches, diploid, polyploid, and asexual forms have been described in natural populations. The authors experimentally cross multiple species of loaches and conduct an impressively detailed characterization of gametogenesis using molecular cytogenetics to show that although meiosis arrests early in male hybrids, a subset of cells in females undergo endoreplication before meiosis, producing diploid eggs. This only occurred in hybrids of parental species that were of intermediate divergence. This work supports an expanding view of speciation where asexuality could emerge during a narrow evolutionary window where genomic divergence between species is not too high to cause hybrid inviability, but high enough to disrupt normal meiotic processes.

I enjoyed reading this study and I appreciate the amount of work it takes to conduct these types of cytogenetic experiments. But, my main concern with this study is I was left wondering if the sample sizes are large enough to get a sense how variable endoreplication is in these loach species. Most of the hybrids between species are the result of crosses between 1-2 families. Within males and females, meiocyte observations are limited to a handful of pachytene and diplotene stages. I think it would be helpful to be more transparent about the sample sizes in the main text.

Along these lines, the authors argue against the possibility that endoreplication may be predisposed to occur at a higher rate in some species (line 291). Instead, they suggest that endoreplication is a result of perturbing the cell cycle by combining the genomes of two different species. Their main argument is based on gonocyte counts from parental females in a previous reference. It is essential to include counts from the parents used in this study to make a clear comparison with the F1s.

In the discussion (lines 320-333), the authors postulate the sex-specific clonality they observe could be a result of Haldane's rule. Given these fish do not have known sex chromosomes, I do not find this argument strong. Haldane's rule refers to the exposure of recessive incompatibilities with the sex chromosomes in the hybrid heterogametic sex. This effect would therefore be limited to degenerated sex chromosomes where much of the sequence content on the Y or W has been lost. These species may have homomorphic sex chromosomes, but if this is the case, they likely are not very degenerated. Instead, it seems more plausible that the sex-specific effect the authors observe is due to intrinsic differences of spermatogenesis and oogenesis. Is there any information about sex-specific differences in the fidelity of gametogenesis from other species that would support a higher likelihood of endoreplication?

The final thing I was left wondering about was this missing link between endoreplication and activating embryonic development of the diploid egg. In these loach species, a sperm is required to activate egg development, but the sperm genome is discarded (line 100). What is the mechanism of this and how does it evolve concurrently during hybridization?

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This preprint presents a compelling study examining the relationship between genotypic changes and phenotypic traits in bacteria over an extended period using the Long-Term Evolution Experiment (LTEE) as a model. The primary advances in methodology include employing high-resolution mass spectrometry for comprehensive metabolic profiling and combining it with previous gene expression and DNA sequencing datasets. This approach provides insight into how specific genetic mutations can alter metabolic pathways over 50,000 generations, enabling a deeper understanding of how genetic changes lead to observed differences in evolved bacterial strains. The findings reveal that evolved bacteria possess more diverse metabolic profiles compared to their ancestors, suggesting that these populations have uniquely adapted to their environment. The work also attempts to uncover the molecular basis for this adaptive evolution, demonstrating how specific genetic changes have influenced the bacteria's metabolic pathways.

Overall, this is a significant and well-executed research study. It offers new insights into the complex relationship between genetic changes and observable traits in evolving populations and utilizes metabolomics in the LTEE, a novel approach in combination with RNA-seq and mutation datasets.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this study, the authors used ANM-LD and GNM-based Transfer Entropy to investigate the allosteric communications network of CFTR. The modeling results are validated with experimental observations. Key residues were identified as pivotal allosteric sources and transducers and may account for disease mutations.

The paper is well written and the results are significant for understanding CFTR biology.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Using fNIRS and resting state recordings of brain activity, authors have compared functional network organization in infants with congenital sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) as well as typically developing infants. The manuscript reports a disruption in the development of leftward hemispheric lateralization in SNHL infants as compared to typically developing infants, across several network measures. The study used an adapted methodology for infants, and involved an adequate number of infants for cross-sectional studies and the findings are valuable. However, a number of methodological points and controls need to be taken into account to better explain the results and to remove redundancy. Moreover, the discussion can be improved by a more detailed comparison between the current work and the past literature.

- My major concern is that functional connectivity patterns change importantly depending on the sleep stage (Uchitel et al., 2021 Pediatric Research; Tóth et al., 2017 Human Brain mapping), it is therefore not enough to have all infants sleep, but to have them on the same sleep stage. Therefore, authors need to re-analyze their dataset taking into account sleep stage as a factor, i.e. grouping infants based on the sleep stage (otherwise it can be a confounding factor - as one can imagine that infants with sensorineural hearing loss may enter "quiet sleep" faster in a short recording session - given the environmental noise does not bother them etc.). This could completely change the interpretation of the results. Do authors have a mean in the data or via additional recordings (respiration, EMG, ECG?) to separate the sleep stages?

- Several statistical analyses are performed with redundancy, i.e. several effects are looked at in more than one test: for example one ANOVA analysis with several factors including group (SNHL/typical) as a factor, is followed by two other separate ANOVAs with the same variables as before but redone for each group separately. The latter tests are redundant. This has happened across different sections, making the manuscript unnecessarily long while also reporting effects that are redundant.

- Given the number of statistical comparisons performed, it would be helpful that authors better explain how corrections are performed: number of comparisons for each correction or which tests are considered independent (i.e. across which correction of multiple comparisons are not performed).

- The discussion generally needs to be improved: both for the position of the current study/novelty/strength and its limitations with respect to the previous works (Cui et al 2022- also looking into early functional organization in SNHL, etc) and also in terms of the differences in findings (i.e. associations of functional connectivity measures to hearing loss severity)

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors examine the transport of chemical compounds from a surrounding fluid environment to the surface of the polyp Hydra. They propose that spontaneous contractions of the body, which are known to occur roughly three times per hour, provide a new fluid environment near the body surface and thereby increase the total rate of compound uptake. Experimental measurements and a mathematical model are used to support the main claim. Active probes of the system involve the use of ion channel inhibitors, which can affect the frequency of contractions. But there is a useful feature of Hydra already present which the authors also use for a comparative study, namely the different microbial environments near the Hydra's motionless foot and near its moving head. The evidence which is provided puts the claim on solid footing. The main result represents an important observation about the role of hydrodynamics on organism behavior, in particular in its relation to diffusive chemical transport processes.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors wanted to determine if the mRNA modification m6A is involved in axonal regeneration pathways. They performed a small-scale siRNA screen targeting major components of this pathway to determine if not down if any of these genes would influence axonal regeneration. They identified ALKBH5, an m6A demethylating enzyme, as a gene that represses axonal regeneration after injury, and when knocked down, promotes axonal growth. They identify a putative mRNA target of ALKBH5, Lpin2, which they believe is demethylated by ALKBH5, resulting in higher levels of m6A on this transcript and thus greater mRNA degradation and reduced expression.

This study has major weaknesses. The ALKBH5 knockout mouse is not used. Thus the experiment relies on the selectivity of the siRNA. Many experiments relied on the single siRNA. The knockdown efficiency was relatively poor, with only a small change in ALKBH5 protein levels. The authors never assess whether m6A levels are indeed affected by ALKBH5 depletion using their approach. The results are therefore unconvincing because of not using the appropriate mouse model. Additionally, the authors' attempt to identify a target of ALKBH5 was not done using the appropriate approach, which would involve globally profiling m6A levels in control and ALKBH5 knockout conditions. Since they did not do global profiling of m6A, the authors cannot report how the exact stoichiometry of m6A sites in Lpin2 is affected (and if other mRNAs are affected which might be the true targets of ALKBH5). Attempts by other investigators to identify bona fide targets of ALKBH5 have been difficult, and the authors did not do the appropriate unbiased transcriptome-wide screen but instead used generic gene expression approaches to come to their target. It is not clear if they have a direct or indirect target of ALKBH5 based on the presented data.

Overall, the authors have not achieved their aims and the results do not support the overall conclusions. However, some studies related to Lpin2 overexpression and not down suggest that this gene indeed can influence axonal regeneration in some way. But whether it is a direct target of ALKBH5 and whether ALKBH5 indeed has any role in axonal regeneration is still not clear.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Neutrophils are not known to be the cells responsible for removal of apoptotic cells through efferocytosis. This report provides strong evidence that neutrophils can remove apoptotic hepatocytes in vivo and in vitro. In addition, neutrophils, which are much smaller in size than hepatocytes, can burrow into apoptotic hepatocytes.

Neutrophils are the most abundant circulating leukocytes in human. They play important roles in innate immune responses to infections and tissue injuries. Although they are dept in phagocytosis of microbes, neutrophils are not known to normally conduct efferocytosis or phagocytose host cells including apoptotic cells and play a significant role in apoptotic cell removal. In this report the authors provide evidence to suggest that neutrophils are involved in removal of apoptotic hepatocytes with certain specificity (i.e., they do not remove HEK293 or HUVEC endothelial cells). Moreover, the authors also show that neutrophils can burrow into the target cells and possibly ingest the target cells from the inside. The authors thus term this neutrophil-mediated efferocytosis process as "perforocytosis". Furthermore, evidence is provided to suggest that this neutrophil-mediated efferocytosis process keeps the number of apoptotic cells low in the livers and that defects in the processes may associate with autoimmune liver (AIL) disease phenotypes. Therefore, many of these findings are novel and the study is of important implications in our understanding of the role of neutrophils in autoimmune disease. Overall speaking, as the first report describing this novel finding, the authors have provided reasonably strong evidence for the conclusion that neutrophils burrow into apoptotic hepatocytes to perform "perforocytosis" to eliminate apoptotic hepatocytes. The importance, particularly in vivo significance, of this phenomenon needs to be further substantiated in future studies.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

MotorNet aims to provide a unified interface where the trained RNN controller exists within the same TensorFlow environment as the end effectors being controlled. This architecture provides a much simpler interface for the researcher to develop and iterate through computational hypotheses. In addition, the authors have built a set of biomechanically realistic end effectors (e.g., an 2 joint arm model with realistic muscles) within TensorFlow that are fully differentiable.

MotorNet will prove a highly useful starting point for researchers interested in exploring the challenges of controlling movement with realistic muscle and joint dynamics. The architecture features a conveniently modular design and the inclusion of simpler arm models provides an approachable learning curve. Other state-of-the-art simulation engines offer realistic models of muscles and multi-joint arms and afford more complex object manipulation and contact dynamics than MotorNet. However, MotorNet's approach allows for direct optimization of the controller network via gradient descent rather than reinforcement learning, which is a compromise currently required when other simulation engines (as these engines' code cannot be differentiated through).

The paper could be reorganized to provide clearer signposts as to what role each section plays (e.g., that the explanation of the moment arms of different joint models serves to illustrate the complexity of realistic biomechanics, rather than a novel discovery/exposition of this manuscript). Also, if possible, it would be valuable if the authors could provide more insight into whether gradient descent finds qualitatively different solutions to RL or other non gradient-based methods. This would strengthen the argument that a fully differentiable plant is useful beyond improving training time / computational power required (although this is a sufficiently important rationale per se).

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Summary

The authors conducted a study where participants were perceiving near-threshold touch at either the thumb or ring finger while lying in the MR scanner. Prior to stimulation, a visual cue indicated to them with 80% probability which finger would be touched next (thumb or ring finger), or did not provide meaningful information on which finger would be touched. Subsequently, participants were asked to indicate which finger was actually touched via button press. By showing that 1. participants were more accurate in responding which finger was touched in the congruent compared to the incongruent and neutral conditions, 2. S1 responses were higher in the incongruent compared to the congruent and neutral conditions, 3. decoding accuracies were higher for the congruent compared to incongruent and neutral conditions, and 4. decoding was also successful in the period after cueing and before stimulation, the authors argue that similar to V1, S1 shows decreased BOLD activation in response to expected versus non-expected stimuli, whereas the finger-specific response is more precise for expected versus non-expected stimuli. The authors also argue that behavioral improvement is associated to a tactile stimulus being predicted in location.

Strengths

The manuscript combines a behavioral threshold task that can be analyzed using psychophysics with BOLD responses in S1, providing a rich paradigm to understand the relationship between S1 responsively and tactile perception. The authors combine GLM with both ROI-based and whole-brain searchlight-based decoding analyses, and therefore offer different analyses methods to obtain a comprehensive picture of the S1 responsively during expected versus non-expected touch. It is also a strength of the paper that two different fingers were investigated, hence addressing the aspect of topography.

Weaknesses

The behavioral paradigm that was chosen is not ideal to address the authors' questions on whether or not behavior improves for expected versus non-expected touch. More precisely, in 80% of the cases when it was indicated that the ring finger would be touched, in fact later the ring finger was touched, whereas in 80% of the cases when it was indicated that the thumb would be touched, in fact later the thumb was touched. In the congruent conditions where later the indicated finger was indeed touched, participants showed on average 70% accuracy. Therefore, they could have reached this accuracy level simply by choosing the indicated finger unless they had a strong sensation that indicated to them to respond otherwise. In order to show that the cueing can improve behavioral performance, one would have to choose a tactile task that is not related to finger identity (which was cued), such as frequency detection or spatial acuity.

The correlation between accuracy and decoding accuracies as shown in Figure 3b does not seem to be correct. The decoding accuracies indicate how well the algorithm can differentiate between D1 versus D4 stimulation in the congruent condition, whereas the behavior indicates the difference between congruent and incongruent responses. I think those two measures should not directly be compared, in addition to the general problem that is inherent in the behavioral paradigm, as outlined above. I would therefore treat this correction and the behavioral analyses in general with great caution.

Alternative ways to interpret the data

It is worth noting that the incongruent stimulation condition did not reveal significant D1 versus D4 decoding results neither when ROI-based decoding was used nor when searchlight-based decoding was used (see Figure 3a,c). Therefore, it seems that when the wrong finger was cued, the finger representation of the actually touched finger did not respond. Given the decoding accuracy is even below 50% for the incongruent ROI-based decoding, this seems to indicate that the finger-specific response in S1 to the cued finger is even stronger than the finger-specific response in S1 to the actually touched finger. This may be the major take-home-message of the paper. This hypothesis could be directly tested by showing the the plot in Figure 2c for each finger: The results may show that the higher activation in the incongruent condition is actually due to the fact that in this condition, both the non-touched and finger the touched finger respond, whereas this is not the case for the other conditions.

When discussing this finding, the authors write that "finger representations of congruent vibrotactile stimulations are associated with higher multivariate information content, are more aligned with the somatotropin organization in contralateral S1, and that the enhanced representation of these stimuli is strongly associated with behavioral detection performance." - A better formulation may be that for threshold tactile stimulation, the expectation of finger touch can override the actual finger touch, indicating a strong influence of top-down control on S1 finger maps. This is also supported by the analyses that there is finger-specific activation in the cue-stimulation interval. However, as indicated above, finger- and condition-specific BOLD activation needs to be shown to explore this in more detail.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Olszyński et al. claim that they identified a "new-type" ultrasonic vocalization around 44 kHz that occurs in response to prolonged fear conditioning (using foot-shocks of relatively high intensity, i.e. 1 mA) in rats. Typically, negative 22-kHz calls and positive 50-kHz calls are distinguished in rats, commonly by using a frequency threshold of 30 or 32 kHz. Olszyński et al. now observed so-called "44-kHz" calls in a substantial number of subjects exposed to 10 tone-shock pairings, yet call emission rate was low (according to Fig. 1G around 15%, according to the result text around 7.5%). They also performed playback experiments and concluded that "the responses to 44-kHz aversive calls presented from the speaker were either similar to 22-kHz vocalizations or in-between responses to 22-kHz and 50-kHz playbacks".

Strengths: Detailed spectrographic analysis of a substantial data set of ultrasonic vocalizations recorded during prolonged fear conditioning, combined with playback experiments.

Weaknesses: I see a number of major weaknesses.

While the descriptive approach applied is useful, the findings have only focused importance and scope, given the low prevalence of "44 kHz" calls and limited attempts made to systematically manipulate factors that lead to their emission. In fact, the data presented appear to be derived from reanalyses of previously conducted studies in most cases and the main claims are only partially supported. While reading the manuscript, I got the impression that the data presented here are linked to two or three previously published studies (Olszyński et al., 2020, 2021, 2023). This is important to emphasize for two reasons: 1) It is often difficult (if not impossible) to link the reported data to the different experiments conducted before (and the individual experimental conditions therein). While reanalyzing previously collected data can lead to important insight, it is important to describe in a clear and transparent manner what data were obtained in what experiment (and more specifically, in what exact experimental condition) to allow appropriate interpretation of the data. For example, it is said that in the "trace fear conditioning experiment" both single- and group-housed rats were included, yet I was not able to tell what data were obtained in single- versus group-housed rats. This may sound like a side aspect, however, in my view this is not a side aspect given the fact that ultrasonic vocalizations are used for communication and communication is affected by the social housing conditions. 2) In at least two of the previously published manuscripts (Olszyński et al., 2021, 2023), emission of ultrasonic vocalizations was analyzed (Figure S1 in Olszyński et al., 2021, and Fig. 1 in Olszyński et al., 2023). This includes detailed spectrographic analyses covering the frequency range between 20 and 100 kHz, i.e. including the frequency range, where the "new-type" ultrasonic vocalization, now named "44 kHz" call, occurs, as reflected in the examples provided in Fig. 1 of Olszyński et al. (2023). In the materials and methods there, it was said: "USV were assigned to one of three categories: 50-kHz (mean peak frequency, MPF >32 kHz), short 22-kHz (MPF of 18-32 kHz, <0.3 s duration), long 22-kHz (MPF of 18-32 kHz, >0.3 s duration)". Does that mean that the "44 kHz" calls were previously included in the count for 50-kHz calls? Or were 44 kHz calls (intentionally?) left out? What does that mean for the interpretation of the previously published data? What does that mean for the current data set? In my view, there is a lack of transparency here.

Moreover, whether the newly identified call type is indeed novel is questionable, as also mentioned by the authors in their discussion section. While they wrote in the introduction that "high-pitch (>32 kHz), long and monotonous ultrasonic vocalizations have not yet been described", they wrote in the discussion that "long (or not that long (Biały et al., 2019)), frequency-stable high-pitch vocalizations have been reported before (e.g. Sales, 1979; Shimoju et al., 2020), notably as caused by intense cholinergic stimulation (Brudzynski and Bihari, 1990) or higher shock-dose fear conditioning (Wöhr et al., 2005)" (and I wish to add that to my knowledge this list provided by the authors is incomplete). Therefore, I believe, the strong claims made in abstract ("we are the first to describe a new-type..."), introduction ("have not yet been described"), and results ("new calls") are not justified.

In general, the manuscript is not well written/ not well organized, the description of the methods is insufficient, and it is often difficult (if not impossible) to link the reported data to the experiments/ experimental conditions described in the materials and methods section. For example, I miss a clear presentation of basic information: 1) How many rats emitted "44 kHz" calls (in total, per experiment, and importantly, also per experimental condition, i.e. single- versus group-housed)? 2) Out of the ones emitting "44 kHz" calls, what was the prevalence of "44 kHz" calls (relative to 22- and 50-kHz calls, e.g. shown as percentage)? 3) How did this ratio differ between experiments and experimental conditions? 4) Was there a link to freezing? Freezing was apparently analyzed before (Olszyński et al., 2021, 2023) and it would be important to see whether there is a correlation between "44-kHz" calls and freezing. Moreover, it would be important to know what behavior the rats are displaying while such "44-kHz" calls are emitted? (Note: Even not all 22-kHz calls are synced to freezing.) All this could help to substantiate the currently highly speculative claims made in the discussion section ("frequency increases with an increase in arousal" and "it could be argued that our prolonged fear conditioning increased the arousal of the rats with no change in the valence of the aversive stimuli"). Such more detailed analyses are also important to rule out the possibility that the "new-type" ultrasonic vocalization, the so-called "44 kHz" call, is simply associated with movement/ thorax compression.

The figures currently included are purely descriptive in most cases - and many of them are just examples of individual rats (e.g. majority of Fig. 1, all of Fig. 2 to my understanding, with the exception of the time course, which in case of D is only a subset of rats ("only rats that emitted 44-kHz calls in at least seven ITI are plotted" - is there any rationale for this criterion?)), or, in fact, just representative spectrograms of calls (all of Fig. 3, with the exception of G, all of Fig. 4). Moreover, the differences between Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 are not clear to me. It seems Fig. 5B is included three times - what is the benefit of including the same figure three times? A systematic comparison of experimental conditions is limited to Fig. 7 and Fig. 8, the figures depicting the playback results (which led to the conclusion that "the responses to 44-kHz aversive calls presented from the speaker were either similar to 22-kHz vocalizations or in-between responses to 22-kHz and 50-kHz playbacks", although it remains unclear to me why differences were seen b e f o r e the experimental manipulation, i.e. the different playback types in Fig. 8B).

Related to that, I miss a clear presentation of relevant methodological aspects: 1) Why were some rats single-housed but not the others? 2) Is the experimental design of the playback study not confounded? It is said that "one group (n = 13) heard 50-kHz appetitive vocalization playback while the other (n = 16) 22-kHz and 44-kHz aversive calls". How can one compare "44 kHz" calls to 22- and 50-kHz calls when "44 kHz" calls are presented together with 22-kHz calls but not 50-kHz calls? What about carry-over effects? Hearing one type of call most likely affects the response to the other type of call. It appears likely that rats are a bit more anxious after hearing aversive 22-kHz calls, for example. Therefore, it would not be very surprising to see that the response to "44 kHz" calls is more similar to 22-kHz calls than 50-kHz calls. Of note, in case of the other playback experiment it is just said that rats "received appetitive and aversive ultrasonic vocalization playback" but it remains unclear whether "44 kHz" calls are seen as appetitive or aversive. Later it says that "rats were presented with two 10-s-long playback sets of either 22-kHz or 44-kHz calls, followed by one 50-kHz modulated call 10-s set and another two playback sets of either 44-kHz or 22-kHz calls not previously heard" (and wonder what data set was included in the figures and how - pooled?). Again, I am worried about carry-over effects here. This does not seem to be an experimental design that allows to compare the response to the three main call types in an unbiased manner. Of note, what exactly is meant by "control rats" in the context of fear conditioning is also not clear to me. One can think of many different controls in a fear conditioning experiment. More concrete information is needed.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Oemisch and Seo set out to examine the effects of low-dose ketamine on reinforcement learning, with the idea that alterations in reinforcement learning and/or motivation might inform our understanding of what alterations co-occur with potential antidepressant effects. Macaques performed a reinforced/punished matching pennies task while under effects of saline or ketamine administration and the data were fit to a series of reinforcement learning models to determine which model described behavior under saline most closely and then what parameters of this best-fitting model were altered by ketamine. They found a mixed effect, with two out of three macaques primarily exhibiting an effect of ketamine on processing of losses and one out of three macaques exhibiting an effect of ketamine on processing of losses and perseveration. They found that these effects of ketamine appeared to be dissociable from the nystagmus effects of the ketamine.<br /> The findings are novel and the data suggesting that ketamine is primarily having its effects on processing of losses (under the procedures used) are solid. However, it is unclear whether the connection between processing of losses and the antidepressant effects of ketamine is justified and the current findings may be more useful for those studying reinforcement learning than those studying depression and antidepressant effects. In addition, the co-occurrence of different behavioral procedures with different patterns of ketamine effects, with one macaque tested with different parameters than the other two exhibiting effects of ketamine that were best fit with a different model than the other two macaques, suggests that there may be difficulty in generalizing these findings to reinforcement learning more generally.

1) First, the authors should be more explicit and careful in the connection they are trying to make about the link between loss processing and depression. The authors call their effect a "robust antidepressant-like behavioral effect" but there are no references to support this or discussion of how the altered loss processing would relate directly to the antidepressant effects.<br /> 2) It appears that the monkey P was given smaller rewards and punishers than the other two monkeys and this monkey had an effect of ketamine on perseveration that was not observed in the other two monkeys. Is this believed to be due to the different task, or was this animal given a different task because of some behavioral differences that preceded the experiment? The authors should also discuss what these differences may mean for the generality of their findings. For example, might there be some set of parameters where ketamine would only alter perseveration and not processing of losses?<br /> 3) The authors should discuss whether the plasma ketamine levels they observed are similar to those seen with rapid antidepressant ketamine or are higher or lower.<br /> 4) For Figure 4 or S3, the authors should show the data fitted to model 7, which was the best for one of the animals.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Theta-nested gamma oscillations (TNGO) play an important role in hippocampal memory and cognitive processes and are disrupted in pathology. Deep brain stimulation has been shown to affect memory encoding. To investigate the effect of pulsed CA1 neurostimulation on hippocampal TNGO the authors coupled a physiologically realistic model of the hippocampus comprising EC, DG, CA1, and CA3 subfields with an abstract theta oscillator model of the medial septum (MS). Pathology was modeled as weakened theta input from the MS to EC simulating MS neurodegeneration known to occur in Alzheimer's disease. The authors show that if the input from the MS to EC is strong (the healthy state) the model autonomously generates TNGO in all hippocampal subfields while a single neurostimulation pulse has the effect of resetting the TNGO phase. When the MS input strength is weaker the network is quiescent but the authors find that a single CA1 neurostimulation pulse can switch it into the persistent TNGO state, provided the neurostimulation pulse is applied at the peak of the EC theta. If the MS theta oscillator model is supplemented by an additional phase-reset mechanism a single CA1 neurostimulation pulse applied at the trough of EC theta also produces the same effect. If the MS input to EC is weaker still, only a short burst of TNGO is generated by a single neurostimulation pulse. The authors investigate the physiological origin of this burst and find it results from an interplay of CAN and M currents in the CA1 excitatory cells. In this case, the authors find that TNGO can only be rescued by a theta frequency train of CA1 pulses applied at the peak of the EC theta or again at either the peak or trough if the MS oscillator model is supplemented by the phase-reset mechanism.

The main strength of this model is its use of a fairly physiologically detailed model of the hippocampus. The cells are single-compartment models but do include multiple ion channels and are spatially arranged in accordance with the hippocampal structure. This allows the understanding of how ion channels (possibly modifiable by pharmacological agents) interact with system-level oscillations and neurostimulation. The model also includes all the main hippocampal subfields. The other strength is its attention to an important topic, which may be relevant for dementia treatment or prevention, which few modeling studies have addressed.

The work has several weaknesses. First, while investigations of hippocampal neurostimulation are important there are few experimental studies from which one could judge the validity of the model findings. All its findings are therefore predictions. It would be much more convincing to first show the model is able to reproduce some measured empirical neurostimulation effect before proceeding to make predictions. Second, the model is very specific. Or if its behavior is to be considered general it has not been explained why. For example, the model shows bistability between quiescence and TNGO, however what aspect of the model underlies this, be it some particular network structure or particular ion channel, for example, is not addressed. Similarly for the various phase reset behaviors that are found. We may wonder whether a different hippocampal model of TNGO, of which there are many published (for example [1-6]) would show the same effect under neurostimulation. This seems very unlikely and indeed the quiescent state itself shown by this model seems quite artificial. Some indication that particular ion channels, CAN and M are relevant is briefly provided and the work would be much improved by examining this aspect in more detail. In summary, the work would benefit from an intuitive analysis of the basic model ingredients underlying its neurostimulation response properties. Third, while the model is fairly realistic, considerable important factors are not included and in fact, there are much more detailed hippocampal models out there (for example [5,6]). In particular, it includes only excitatory cells and a single type of inhibitory cell. This is particularly important since there are many models and experimental studies where specific cell types, for example, OLM and VIP cells, are strongly implicated in TNGO. Other missing ingredients one may think might have a strong impact on model response to neurostimulation (in particular stimulation trains) include the well-known short-term plasticity between different hippocampal cell types and active dendritic properties. Fourth the MS model seems somewhat unsupported. It is modeled as a set of coupled oscillators that synchronize. However, there is also a phase reset mechanism included. This mechanism is important because it underlies several of the phase reset behaviors shown by the full model. However, it is not derived from experimental phase response curves of septal neurons of which there is no direct measurement. The work would benefit from the use of a more biologically validated MS model.

[1] Hyafil A, Giraud AL, Fontolan L, Gutkin B. Neural cross-frequency coupling: connecting architectures, mechanisms, and functions. Trends in neurosciences. 2015 Nov 1;38(11):725-40.

[2] Tort AB, Rotstein HG, Dugladze T, Gloveli T, Kopell NJ. On the formation of gamma-coherent cell assemblies by oriens lacunosum-moleculare interneurons in the hippocampus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007 Aug 14;104(33):13490-5.

[3] Neymotin SA, Lazarewicz MT, Sherif M, Contreras D, Finkel LH, Lytton WW. Ketamine disrupts theta modulation of gamma in a computer model of hippocampus. Journal of Neuroscience. 2011 Aug 10;31(32):11733-43.

[4] Ponzi A, Dura-Bernal S, Migliore M. Theta-gamma phase-amplitude coupling in a hippocampal CA1 microcircuit. PLOS Computational Biology. 2023 Mar 23;19(3):e1010942.

[5] Bezaire MJ, Raikov I, Burk K, Vyas D, Soltesz I. Interneuronal mechanisms of hippocampal theta oscillations in a full-scale model of the rodent CA1 circuit. Elife. 2016 Dec 23;5:e18566.

[6] Chatzikalymniou AP, Gumus M, Skinner FK. Linking minimal and detailed models of CA1 microcircuits reveals how theta rhythms emerge and their frequencies controlled. Hippocampus. 2021 Sep;31(9):982-1002.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this study, the researchers employed a recently developed smartphone application to provide 30 days of training on action sequences to both OCD patients and healthy volunteers. The study tested learning and automaticity-related measures and investigated the effects of several factors on these measures. Upon training completion, the researchers conducted two preference tests comparing a learned and unlearned action sequences under different conditions. While the study provides some interesting findings, I have a few substantial concerns:

1. Throughout the entire paper, the authors' interpretations and claims revolve around the domain of habits and goal-directed behavior, despite the methods and evidence clearly focusing on motor sequence learning/procedural learning/skill learning. There is no evidence to support this framing and interpretation and thus I find them overreaching and hyperbolic, and I think they should be avoided. Although skills and habits share many characteristics, they are meaningfully distinguishable and should not be conflated or mixed up. Furthermore, if anything, the evidence in this study suggests that participants attained procedural learning, but these actions did not become habitual, as they remained deliberate actions that were not chosen to be performed when they were not in line with participants' current goals.<br /> 2. Some methodological aspects need more detail and clarification.<br /> 3. There are concerns regarding some of the analyses, which require addressing.

Please see details below, ordered by the paper sections.

Introduction:<br /> It is stated that "extensive training of sequential actions would more rapidly engage the 'habit system' as compared to single-action instrumental learning". In an attempt to describe the rationale for this statement the authors describe the concept of action chunking, its benefits and relevance to habits but there is no explanation for why sequential actions would engage the habit system more rapidly than a single-action. Clarifying this would be helpful.

In the Hypothesis section the authors state: "we expected that OCD patients... show enhanced habit attainment through a greater preference for performing familiar app sequences when given the choice to select any other, easier sequence." I find it particularly difficult to interpret preference for familiar sequences as enhanced habit attainment.

A few notes on the task description and other task components:<br /> It would be useful to give more details on the task. This includes more details on the time/condition of the gradual removal of visual and auditory stimuli and also on the within practice dynamic structure (i.e., different levels appear in the video).

Some more information on engagement-related exclusion criteria would be useful (what happened if participants did not use the app for more than one day, how many times were allowed to skip a day etc.).

According to the (very useful) video demonstrating the task and the paper describing the task in detail (Banca et al., 2020), the task seems to include other relevant components that were not mentioned in this paper. I refer to the daily speed test, the daily random switch test, and daily ratings of each sequence's enjoyment and confidence of knowledge.<br /> If these components were not included in this procedure, then the deviations from the procedure described in the video and Banca al. (2020) should be explicitly mentioned. If these components were included, at least some of them may be relevant, at least in part, to automaticity, habitual action control, formulation of participants' enjoyment from the app etc. I think these components should be mentioned and analyzed (or at least provide an explanation for why it has been decided not to analyze them).<br /> This is also true for the reward removal (extinction) from the 21st day onwards which is potentially of particular relevance for the research questions.

Training engagement analysis:<br /> I find referring to the number of trials including successful and unsuccessful trials as representing participants "commitment to training" (e.g. in Figure legend 2b) potentially inadequate. Given that participants need at least 20 successful trials to complete each practice, more errors would lead to more trials. Therefore, I think this measure may mostly represent weaker performance (of the OCD patients as shown in Figure 2b). Therefore, I find the number of performed practice runs, as used in Figure 2a (which should be perfectly aligned with the number of successful trials), a "clean" and proper measure of engagement/commitment to training.

Also, to provide stronger support for the claim about different diurnal training patterns (as presented in Figure 2c and the text) between patients and healthy individuals, it would be beneficial to conduct a statistical test comparing the two distributions. If the results of this test are not significant, I suggest emphasizing that this is a descriptive finding.

Learning results:<br /> When describing the Learning results (p10) I think it would be useful to provide the descriptive stats for the MT0 parameter (as done above for the other two parameters).

Sensitivity of sequence duration and IKI consistency (C) to reward:<br /> I think it is important to add details on how incorrect trials were handled when calculating ∆MT (or C) and ∆R, specifically in cases where the trial preceding a successful trial was unsuccessful. If incorrect trials were simply ignored, this may not adequately represent trial-by-trial changes, particularly when testing the effect of a trial's outcome on performance change in the next trial.

I have a serious concern with respect to how the sensitivity of sequence duration to reward is framed and analyzed. Since reward is proportional to performance, a reduction in reward essentially indicates a trial with poor performance, and thus even regression to the mean (along with a floor effect in performance [asymptote]) could explain the observed effects. It is possible that even occasional poor performance could lead to a participant demonstrating this effect, potentially regardless of the reward. Accordingly, the reduced improvement in performance following a reward decrease as a function of training length described in Figure 5b legend may reflect training-induced increased performance that leaves less room for improvement after poor trials, which are no longer as poor as before. To address this concern, controlling for performance (e.g., by taking into consideration the baseline MT for the previous trial) may be helpful. If the authors can conduct such an analysis and still show the observed effect, it would establish the validity of their findings."<br /> Another way to support the claim of reward change directionality effects on performance (rather than performance on performance), at least to some extent, would be to analyze the data from the last 10 days of the training, during which no rewards were given (pretending for analysis purposes that the reward was calculated and presented to participants). If the effect persists, it is less unlikely that the effect in question can be attributed to the reward dynamics.<br /> This concern is also relevant and should be considered with respect to the Sensitivity of IKI consistency (C) to reward (even though the relationship between previous reward/performance and future performance in terms of C is of a different structure).<br /> This concern is also relevant and should be considered with respect to the sensitivity of IKI consistency (C) to reward. While the relationship between previous reward/performance and future performance in terms of C is of a different structure, the similar potential confounding effects could still be present.

Another related question (which is also of general interest) is whether the preferred app sequence (as indicated by the participants for Phase B) was consistently the one that yielded more reward? Was the continuous sequence the preferred one? This might tell something about the effectiveness of the reward in the task.

Regarding both experiments 2 and 3:<br /> The change in context in experiment 2 and 3 is substantial and include many different components. These changes should be mentioned in more detail in the Results section before describing the results of experiments 2 and 3.

Experiment 2:<br /> In Experiment 2, the authors sometimes refer to the "explicit preference task" as testing for habitual and goal-seeking sequences. However, I do not think there is any justification for interpreting it as such. The other framings used by the authors - testing whether trained action sequences gain intrinsic/rewarding properties or value, and preference for familiar versus novel action sequences - are more suitable and justified. In support of the point I raised here, assigning intrinsic rewarding properties to the learned sequences and thereby preferring these sequences can be conceptually aligned with goal-directed behavior just as much as it could be with habit.

Experiment 3:<br /> Similar to Experiment 2, I find the framing of arbitration between goal-directed/habitual behavior in Experiment 3 inadequate and unjustified. The results of the experiment suggest that participants were primarily goal-directed and there is no evidence to support the idea that this re-evaluation led participants to switch from habitual to goal-directed behavior.<br /> Also, given the explicit choice of the sequence to perform participants had to make prior to performing it, it is reasonable to assume that this experiment mainly tested bias towards familiar sequence/stimulus and/or towards intrinsic reward associated with the sequence in value-based decision making.

Mobile-app performance effect on symptomatology: exploratory analyses:<br /> Maybe it would be worth testing if the patients with improved symptomatology (that contribute some of their symptom improvement to the app) also chose to play more during the training stage.

Discussion:<br /> Based on my earlier comments highlighting the inadequacy and mis-framing of the work in terms of habit and goal-directed behavior, I suggest that the discussion section be substantially revised to reflect these concerns.

In the sentence "Nevertheless, OCD patients disadvantageously preferred the previously trained/familiar action sequence under certain conditions" the term "disadvantageously" is not necessarily accurate. While there was potentially more effort required, considering the possible presence of intrinsic reward and chunking, this preference may not necessarily be disadvantageous. Therefore, a more cautious and accurate phrasing that better reflects the associated results would be useful.

Materials and Methods:<br /> The authors mention: "The novel sequence (in condition 3) was a 6-move sequence of similar complexity and difficulty as the app sequences, but only learned on the day, before starting this task (therefore, not overtrained)." - for the sake of completeness, more details on the pre-training done on that day would be useful.

Minor comments:<br /> In the section discussing the sensitivity of sequence duration to reward, the authors state that they only analyzed continuous reward trials because "a larger number of trials in each subsample were available to fit the Gaussian distributions, due to feedback being provided on all trials." However, feedback was also provided on all trials in the variable reward condition, even though the reward was not necessarily aligned with participants' performance. Therefore, it may be beneficial to rephrase this statement for clarity.

With regard to experiment 2 (Preference for familiar versus novel action sequences) in the following statement "A positive correlation between COHS and the app sequence choice (Pearson r = 0.36, p = 0.005) further showed that those participants with greater habitual tendencies had a greater propensity to prefer the trained app sequence under this condition." I find the use of the word "further" here potentially misleading.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this study, researchers aim to understand the computational principles behind attention allocation in goal-directed reading tasks. They explore how deep neural networks (DNNs) optimized for reading tasks can predict reading time and attention distribution. The findings show that attention weights in transformer-based DNNs predict reading time for each word. Eye tracking reveals that readers focus on basic text features and question-relevant information during initial reading and rereading, respectively. Attention weights in shallow and deep DNN layers are separately influenced by text features and question relevance. Additionally, when readers read without a specific question in mind, DNNs optimized for word prediction tasks can predict their reading time. Based on these findings, the authors suggest that attention in real-world reading can be understood as a result of task optimization.

The research question pursued by the study is interesting and important. The manuscript was well written and enjoyable to read. However, I do have some concerns.

1. In the first paragraph of the manuscript, it appears that the purpose of the study was to test the optimization hypothesis in natural tasks. However, the cited papers mainly focus on covert visual attention, while the present study primarily focuses on overt attention (eye movements). It is crucial to clearly distinguish between these two types of attention and state that the study mainly focuses on overt attention at the beginning of the manuscript.

2. The manuscript correctly describes attention in DNN as a mechanism to selectively extract useful information. However, eye-movement measures such as gaze duration and total reading time are primarily influenced by the time needed to process words. Therefore, there is a doubt whether the argument stating that attention in DNN is conceptually similar to the human attention mechanism at the computational level is correct. It is strongly suggested that the authors thoroughly discuss whether these concepts describe the same or different things.

EL PROCESO DE APRENDIZAJE: PASOS a) Tener las necesarias condiciones físicas, psicológicas y de planificación que requiere el aprendizaje. b) Definir con claridad lo que hay que aprender (los objetivos). c)Atender de modo selectivo a la información a aprender. d) Comprender y almacenar la información a aprender, se¬leccionada mediante la atención. Esto implica: — La representación mental de los conocimientos. — La organización de esos conocimientos. — La integración de los mismos en sus esquemas cogniti¬vos, asumiéndolos, modificándolos y enriqueciéndolos. si procede. — La transferencia del aprendizaje. — El autocontrol de su aprendizaje — Saber pensar de modo reflexivo y crítico, y ser creativo. e) Memorizar los conocimientos integrados, que supone: — Almacenar comprensiva y significativamente la infor¬mación organizada y elaborada. 1. Andragogía Es la disciplina educativa que trata de comprender al adulto(a), desde todos los componentes humanos, es decir, como un ente psicológico, biológico y social. La praxis andragógica es un conjunto de acciones, actividades y tareas que al ser administradas aplicando principios y estrategias andragógicas adecuadas, sea posible facilitar el proceso de aprendizaje en el adulto. 1. La Andragogía Es el arte y ciencia de ayudar a aprender a los adultos, basándose en suposiciones acerca de las diferencias entre niños y adultos. 1. Elementos Fundamentales de la Andragogía

1) Ambiente 2) Facilitador y participante 3) Trabajo y dinámicas de grupo 4) Sistema semi-presencial. 5) Teoría sinérgica. 6) Comunicación efectiva (Feed-back y escucha activa). 7) Sistema evaluación

Principios de Aprendizaje en el Adulto

La Horizontalidad y la Participación La horizontalidad, significa la igualdad de condiciones entre el facilitador (orientador-acompañante) y los participantes. Igualdad en cuanto a la adultez con experiencias, no así en cuanto a sus roles donde el facilitador acompaña al participante en el proceso de orientación-aprendizaje.

La participación, es el acto de compartir algo, es un dar y recibir, involucrarse en un proyecto común. Es aportar de sus propios conocimientos, de su experiencia, personas activas, críticas y respetuosas dentro de un proceso de orientación-aprendizaje.

Aprendizaje de Adultos PRINCIPIOS DEL APRENDIZAJE DEFINICIÓN Principio del reforzamiento” Todo ser humano aprende las conductas que son recompensadas o aquellas que reportan consecuencias agradables. Principio de la” intencionalidad” Las actividades que se realizan intencionalmente se aprenden mejor que las actividades “no intencionales” Principio de la organización por configuraciones globales El aprendizaje se facilita cuando la persona organiza los elementos de una información, adecuándolos a su propia estructura mental; en esta organización el contexto es el elemento que da a la información gran parte de su significado. Principio de la retroalimentación El conocimiento de los resultados de la propia actividad favorece el aprendizaje.

Características del Alumno Adulto Participación voluntaria: Los adultos aprenden mejor en situaciones donde se vean involucrados. Respeto mutuo: En el proceso de aprendizaje los adultos necesitan sentirse valorados y respetados. Colaboración: Los adultos aprenden mejor en situaciones en las que puedan compartir criterios y así retroalimentarse unos de otros. Acción y Reflexión: Para ser efectivos en las oportunidades de desarrollo profesional. Selección organizativa: Los programas de desarrollo profesional necesitan ser adquiridos y avalados por la institución a su debido tiempo. Alternativos y cambios: Los adultos aprenden mejor cuando se le presentan alternativas para el aprendizaje que los conduzcan al éxito. Motivación: El adulto se involucra en el aprendizaje cuando existe una oportunidad que lo ayuda a mejorar el nivel de vida

Características del Alumno Adulto

Amplitud del saber Amplitud de experiencias: Adaptación de métodos pedagógicos Ejercicio intelectual

Aprendizaje Conceptual

El aprendizaje conceptual involucra el reconocer y asociar características comunes a un grupo de objetos o acontecimientos. Es un proceso activo en el que los educandos construyen nuevas ideas o conceptos basados en el conocimiento. Aprendizaje Apreciativo

Es una corriente psicopedagógica que tiene como objetivo desarrollar la capacidad apreciativa de los alumnos ante un valor.

Aprendizaje Asociativo

Consiste en adquirir tendencias de asociación que aseguren el recuerdo de detalles particulares en una sucesión definida y fija, en el cual se asocian dos o más estímulos, en el aprendizaje no asociativo se modifica la conducta del sujeto por la mera presencia de un solo estímulo, sin que este se asocie a ningún otro.

Aprendizaje Creativo

Es una forma de captar o ser sensible a los problemas, deficiencias, lagunas del conocimiento, elementos pasados por alto, faltas de armonía. Describe un proceso humano natural en cuyas etapas están implicadas fuertes motivaciones.

Aprendizaje innovador:

Es aquel que puede soportar cambios, renovación, reestructuración y reformulación de problemas. Propone nuevos valores en vez de conservar los antiguos.

Aprendizaje Reflexivo

Es el estilo de razonamiento donde predomina la observación y el análisis de los resultados de las experiencias realizadas. Se caracteriza por el deseo de tomar decisiones sin contradicciones de tiempo. Por la importancia del retroceso y de la distancia tomada en relación a las personas y a las cosas. Es marcado por la prudencia y la reflexión profundizada antes de tomar una decisión para actuar, escucha la acumulación exhaustiva de datos antes de dar una opinión.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This study found that MECOM, PAX8, SOX17, and WT1, as the main regulators of high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC), their transcriptional regulation related to the super-enhancer, were reconnected in the process of tumor development. These four TFS are essential for the clonality and survival of HGSC, while the absence of PAX8 and WT1 in non-cancerous fallopian tube secretory epithelium (FTSEC) can impair the survival of cells. These four TFS are only pharmacologically inhibited by transcriptional inhibitors in HGSCs, while not in FTSECs, making them potential targets for tumor-specific therapy.

I am thrilled to see such an exciting and scientific manuscript. The results will significantly impact the basic theory of cancer occurrence and clinical applications.

However, there were some issues with the data presentation. We hope that the author will carefully and rigorously review the data and visualization results. In addition, there is key information missing in the methods section, which does not meet the current requirements for the repeatability of scientific conclusions.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this study the authors confirm that one of the genes classified as essential in a Tn-mutagenesis study in A. baumannii is in fact an essential gene. It is also present in other closely related Gram negative bacteria and the authors designated it Aeg1. Depletion of Aeg1 leads to cell filamentation and it appears that the requirement for Aeg1 can be suppressed by what appear to be activation mutations in various genes. Overall, it appears that Aeg1 is involved in cell division but many of the images suffer from poor quality - it may be due to conversion to PDF. One of the main issues is that depletion of Aeg1 is carried out for such long times (18 hr) (Fig. 2, 4 and 5). Depleting a cell division protein for such long times may have pleiotropic effects on cell physiology. A. baumannii grows quite fast and even with a small inoculum, cells will probably be in stationary phase. If Aeg1 is that essential cells should be quite filamentous 2-3 hours after Ara removal when they are still in exponential phase. Also, it would be better to see the recovery to small cells if cells are not grown such a long time before Ara is added back. Overall, Aeg1 is potentially interesting but studies are needed to define its place in the assembly pathway. What proteins are at the division site when Aeg1 is depleted and what proteins are required for Aeg1 to localize to the division site. These experiments should be done when cell are depleted of proteins for only 1 -2 hours.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In Bolumar, Moncayo-Arlandi et al. the authors explore whether endometrium-derived extracellular vesicles contribute mtDNA to embryos and therefore influence embryo metabolism and respiration. The manuscript combines techniques for isolating different populations of extracellular vesicles, DNA sequencing, embryo culture, and respiration assays performed on human endometrial samples and mouse embryos.

Vesicle isolation is technically difficult and therefore collection from human samples is commendable. Also, the influence of maternally derived mtDNA on the bioenergetics of embryos is unknown and therefore novel. However, several experiments presented in the manuscript fail to reach statistical significance, likely due to the small sample sizes. Additionally, the experiments do not demonstrate a direct effect of mtDNA transfer on embryo bioenergetics. This has the unfortunate consequence of making several of the authors' conclusions speculative.

In my opinion the manuscript supports the following of the authors' claims:

1. Different amounts of mtDNA are shed in human endometrial extracellular vesicles during different phases of the menstrual cycle.<br /> 2. Endometrial microvesicles are more enriched for mitochondrial DNA sequences compared to other types of microvesicles present in the human samples.<br /> 3. Fluorescently labelled DNA from extracellular vesicles derived from an endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line can be incorporated into hatched mouse embryos.<br /> 4. Culture of mouse embryos with endometrial extracellular vesicles can influence embryo respiration and the effect is greater when cultured with isolated exosomes compared to other isolated microvesicles.

My main concerns with the manuscript:

1. The authors demonstrate that microvesicles contain the most mtDNA, however, they also demonstrate that only isolated exosomes influence embryo respiration. These are two separate populations of extracellular vesicles.<br /> 2. mtDNA is not specifically identified as being taken up by embryos only DNA.<br /> 3. The authors do not rule out that other components packaged in extracellular vesicles could be the factors influencing embryo metabolism.

Taken together, these concerns seem to contradict the implication of the title of the manuscript - the authors do not demonstrate that inheritance of maternal mtDNA has a direct causative effect on embryo metabolism.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors of this study levered large-scale genomics data on SARS-CoV2, and extracted non-synonymous mutations of NSP10. The overall frequency was little, compared to other significantly mutating Spike protein. Further they performed stability and binding analysis to report changes in three variants and found modest differences. However, crystallography and simulations study reported almost no changes.

The strength of the work clearly is merging genomics data and reporting quantitative frequencies with high-resolution structural data. Some open ended questions remain. For instance, The DynaMut2 and thermal shift assays point towards less stable variants than wild type, with Tm values slightly lower. On the other hand, the Kd value of variants reported stronger binding of NSP10 with NSP16. How do authors explain this, as the change due to point mutation may not fall within error range?

The crystal structures and the simulations have been under-analysed. For instance, the conformational ensemble could be utilized for docking with NSP16 and NSP14 . There could be a potential alternative pathway for explaining the above changes in Kd. This should be attempted for understanding the role in its functional activity.

Previous extensive EM work on Spike protein variants also displayed subtle differences locally. However, allosteric pathways with D614G have been reported. Therefore, more quantitative analysis is required to explain structural changes. The free energy landscape reported in the paper may not capture rare transition events or slight rearrangements in side chain dynamics, both these could offer better understanding of mutations.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this paper the authors present an existing information theoretic framework to assess the ability of single cells to encode external signals sensed through membrane receptors.

The main point is to distinguish actual noise in the signaling pathway from cell-cell variability, which could be due to differences in their phenotypic state, and to formalize this difference using information theory.

After correcting for this cellular variability, the authors find that cells may encode more information than one would estimate from ignoring it, which is expected. The authors show this using simple models of different complexities, and also by analyzing an imaging dataset of the IGF/FoxO pathway.

The implications of the work are limited because the analysed data is not rich enough to draw clear conclusions. Specifically,<br /> - the authors do not distinguish what could be methodological noise inherent to microscopy techniques (segmentation etc), and actual intrinsic cell state. It's not clear that cell-cell variability in the analyzed dataset is not just a constant offset or normalization factor. Other authors (e.g. Gregor et al Cell 130, 153-164) have re-centered and re-normalized their data before further analysis, which is more or less equivalent to the idea of the conditional information in the sense that it aims to correct for this experimental noise.<br /> - in the experiment, each condition is shown only once and sequentially. This means that the reproducibility of the response upon repeated exposures in a single cell was not tested, casting doubt on the estimate of the response fidelity (estimated as the variance over time in a single response).<br /> - another dataset on the EGF/EGFR pathway is analyzed, but no conclusion can be drawn from it because single-cell information cannot be directly estimated from it. The authors instead use a maximum-entropy Ansatz, which cannot be validated for lack of data.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The authors combine the use of fluorogenic tools with fluorescence bioimaging to visualize how changes in the folding states of the RBPs TDP-43, FUS and TAF15 affect their subcellular localization and recruitment inside nuclear bodies, as well as protein fate. While the development of SNAP-tag substrates coupled with confocal microscopy in living cells (including FLIM) to monitor changes in protein folding states represents an important conceptual and technical advance for the field, I am not convinced that the authors fully achieved their aim. The authors cannot conclude on protein fate only based on the experiments performed here. Showing a correlation between a decrease in TDP-43 levels upon Hsp70 inhibition and colocalization at nuclear bodies with Hsp70 and DNAJA2 is not supporting their conclusion about protein degradation. A number of additional control experiments are needed to support their claims.

Yet, the optimization of these methods has unlimited potential since it may provide new ways to visualize and monitor a large variety of fundamental intracellular processes, including protein aggregation and fate.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Synaptic scaling has long been proposed as a homeostatic mechanism for the regulation for the activity of individual neurons and networks. The question of whether homeostasis is controlled by neuronal spiking or by the activation of specific receptor populations in individual synapses has remained open. In a previous work, the Wenner group had shown that upscaling of glutamatergic transmission is triggered by direct blockade of glutamate receptors rather than by the concomitant reduction in firing rate (Nat Comm 2015). In this manuscript they investigate the mechanisms regulating scaling of GABA-mediated responses in cortical cell cultures using whole-cell recordings to detect GABAergic currents and multielectrode arrays to monitor global firing activity, and find that spiking plays a fundamental role in scaling.

Initially, the authors show that chronic blockade (24 h) of glutamatergic transmission by CNQX first reduces spontaneous spiking (at 2 h), but later (24 h) firing grows back towards higher frequencies, suggesting a compensatory mechanism. Then it is shown that either chronic CNQX treatment or TTX cause a reduction in the amplitude of GABAergic mIPSCs. Effects of CNQX on IPSCs are then reverted by replacing spontaneous network firing by chronic optogenetic stimulation of the entire culture, also indicating that GABAergic transmission is homeostatically regulated by global firing. Enhancing glutamatergic transmission with CTZ increases mIPSC amplitude, while addition of TTX in the presence of CTZ causes the opposite effect. Finally, increasing spiking activity using bicuculline also increases mIPSC amplitude, and the authors conclude that spiking activity rather than neurotransmission control homeostatic GABA scaling. The manuscript shows interesting properties in the regulation of global GABAergic transmission and highlight the important role of spiking activity in triggering GABA scaling. However, it is strongly recommended to address some caveats in order to better support the conclusions presented in the manuscript.

Major points:

1. The reason why CNQX does not completely eliminate spiking is unclear (Fig. 1). What is the circuit mechanism by which spiking continues, although at lower frequency, in the absence of AMPA-mediated transmission and what the mechanism by which spiking frequency grows back after 24h (still in the absence of AMPA transmission)?<br /> Is it possible that NMDA-mediated transmission takes over and triggers a different type of network plasticity?

2. A possible activation of NMDARs should be considered. One would think that experiments involving chronic glutamatergic blockade could have been conducted in the presence of NMDAR blockers. Why this was not the case?

Also, experiments with global ChR2 stimulation with coincident pre and postsynaptic firing might also activate NMDARs and result in additional effects that should be taken into consideration for the global scaling mechanism.

3. Cultures exposed to CTZ to enhance AMPA receptors generated variable results (Fig. 5), somewhat increasing spiking activity in a non-significant manner but, at the same time, strengthening mIPSC amplitude. This result seems to suggest that spiking might be involved in GABAergic scaling, but it does not seem to prove it.

Then, addition of TTX that blocked spiking reduced mIPSC amplitude. It was concluded here that the ability of CTZ to enhance GABAergic currents was primarily due to spiking, rather than the increase in AMPA-mediated currents. However, in addition to blocking action potentials, TTX would also prevent activation of AMPARs in the presence of CTZ due to the lack of glutamatergic release. Therefore, under these conditions, an effect of glutamatergic activation on GABAergic scaling cannot be ruled out.

4. The sample size is not mentioned in any figure. How many cells/culture dishes were used in each condition?

5. Cortical cultures may typically contain about 5-10% GABAergic interneurons and 90-95 % pyramidal cells. One would think that scaling mechanisms occurring in pyramidal cells and interneurons could be distinct, with different impact on the network. Although for whole-cell recordings the authors selected pyramidal looking cells, which might bias recordings towards excitatory neurons, naked eye selection of recording cells is quite difficult in primary cultures. Some of the variability in mIPSC amplitude values (Fig. 2A for example) might be attributed to the cell type? One could use cultures where interneurons are fluorescently labeled to obtain an accurate representation. The issue of the possible differential effects of scaling in pyramidal cells vs. interneurons and the consequences in the network should be discussed.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Maternal infection by Rubella virus (RV) early during pregnancy is a serious threat to the health of the fetus. It can cause brain malformation and later expose the newborn to a constellation of symptoms collectively named Congenital Rubella Syndrome (CRS). In this manuscript, the authors provide novel exciting findings on the pathophysiological mechanisms of RV infection during human brain development. By combining analyses of human fetal brain material and cerebral organoids, Popova and colleagues uncovered a selective tropism of RV for microglial cells. Their results suggest that the infection of microglia by RV relies on the presence of diffusible factors secreted by neighboring brain cells. Moreover, the authors showed that RV infection of human cerebral organoids leads to a strong interferon response and dysregulation of neurodevelopmental genes, which both may contribute to brain malformation. Altogether, these data shed some new light on the cellular tropism and the pathophysiological mechanisms triggered by RV infection in the developing brain. This study also raises the importance of using human cell-based models to further understand the pathophysiological mechanisms of CRS. Identifying the cellular and molecular targets of Rubella virus will also pave the way to develop therapies against CRS.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In their recent manuscript, Broca-Brisson et al. deliver a multidisciplinary approach to investigate creatine transporter deficiency (CTD) using human-derived brain organoids. The authors have provided a compelling CTD human brain organoid model using induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) derived from individuals with CTD. This model shows distinct differences in creatine uptake between organoids originating from CTD patients and their healthy counterparts. Furthermore, the researchers effectively restored creatine uptake by reintroducing the wild-type CRT in the iPSCs.

The team used advanced molecular biology techniques and sophisticated mass spectrometry to identify changes in protein regulation within these CTD brain organoids. They propose an intriguing theory linking reduced creatine uptake to abnormalities in the GSK3β kinase pathway and mitochondrial function, which might underlie intellectual disability seen in CTD patients.<br /> This study is well-structured and easy to follow, with clear and concise explanations of the experiments. The authors present an important idea: a dysfunction in just one protein transporter (CRT) can cause significant biochemical changes in the brain. Their findings are well-presented and backed by high-quality figures and comprehensive data analysis.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this work, the authors found in the mouse line of GABAA a1 subunit KO in thalamic neurons, which was previously reported lacking ocular dominance (OD) plasticity in juvenile V1 and dLGN (Sommeijer et al., 2017), the adult V1 and dLGN OD plasticity was also missing. Through muscimol inhibiting the V1 feedback, thalamic OD plasticity was unaffected in both WT and KO adult mice. However, during the critical period, the thalamic OD plasticity was dependent on V1 feedback in WT mice.

Strengths:

1. The experiments were well designed. The authors used both MD and No MD controls with both WT and KO mice. The authors used in vivo SU recording, which is broadly accepted as the major method for evaluating OD plasticity.

2. The data analysis was solid. The authors used proper statistical tests for non-parametric data set.

Weaknesses:

1. The current work was basically a follow-up of a previous study in juvenile mice, and the results were also very similar to the juvenile results (Sommeijer et al., 2017). One possible interpretation of the results is that the lack of OD plasticity in adult V1 and dLGN was caused by an early blockade of the development of the inhibitory circuit in dLGN, which retains the dLGN in an immature stage till adulthood. The authors indeed claimed in the discussion that the 2-day OD shift is intact in juvenile dLGN and V1 in KO mice, and provided evidence in supplementary figure that GABAergic and cholinergic synapse amount are similar between WT and KO mice. However, the 7-day OD shift is indeed defected in juvenile V1 and dLGN in KO mice (Sommeijer et al., 2017), and it is possible that this early functional deficit didn't induce a structural remodeling in adulthood. To better support the author's claim that the lack of adult V1 OD plasticity is specifically due to reduced dLGN synaptic inhibition, the author should generate conditional KO mice that dLGN synaptic inhibition was only interfered in adulthood.

2. The authors found that in juveniles, dLGN OD shift is dependent on V1 feedback, but not in adults. However, a recent work showed that the effects of V1 silencing on dLGN OD plasticity could differ with various starting points and duration of the V1 silencing and MD (Li et al., 2023). Could the authors provide more details of the MD and V1 silencing for an in-depth discussion?

References<br /> Li, N., Liu, Q., Zhang, Y., Yang, Z., Shi, X., and Gu, Y. (2023). Cortical feedback modulates distinct critical period development in mouse visual thalamus. iScience 26, 105752.<br /> Sommeijer, J.P., Ahmadlou, M., Saiepour, M.H., Seignette, K., Min, R., Heimel, J.A., and Levelt, C.N. (2017). Thalamic inhibition regulates critical-period plasticity in visual cortex and thalamus. Nat Neurosci 20, 1715-1721.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

To characterize the relationship between Na+ and K+ binding to LeuT, the effect of K+ on Na+- dependent [3 H] leucine binding was studied using a scintillation proximity assay. In the presence of K+ the apparent affinity for sodium was reduced but the maximal binding capacity for this ion was unchanged, consistent with a competitive mechanism of inhibition between Na+ and K+.

To obtain a more direct readout of K+ binding to LeuT, tmFRET was used. This method relies on the distance-dependent quenching of a cysteine-conjugated fluorophore (FRET donor) by a transition metal (FRET acceptor). This method is a conformational readout for both ion- and ligand-binding. Along with the effect of K+ on Na+-dependent [3 H] leucine binding, the findings support the existence of a specific K+ binding site in LeuT and that K+ binding to this site induces an outward closed conformation.

It was previously shown that in liposomes inlaid with LeuT by reconstitution, intra-vesicular K+ increases the concentrative capacity of [ 3 H] alanine. To obtain insights into the mechanistic basis of this phenomenon, purified LeuT was reconstituted into liposomes containing a variety of cations, including Na+ and K+ followed by measurements of [ 3 H] alanine uptake driven by a Na+ gradient. The ionic composition of the external medium was manipulated to determine if the stimulation of [3 H] alanine uptake by K+ was due to an outward directed potassium gradient serving as a driving force for sodium-dependent substrate transport by moving in the direction opposite to that of sodium and the substrate. Remarkably it was found that it is the intra-liposomal K+ per se that increases the transport rate of alanine and not a K+ gradient, suggesting that binding of K+ to the intra-cellular face of the transporter could prevent the rebinding of sodium and the substrate thereby reducing their efflux from the cell. These conclusions assume that the measured radioactive transport is via right-side-out liposomes rather than from their inverted counterparts (in case of a random orientation of the transporters in the proteoliposomes). Even though this assumption is likely to be correct, it should be tested.

Since K+- and Na+-binding are competitive and K+ excludes substrate binding, the Authors chose to focus on the Na1 site where the carboxyl group of the substrate serves as one of the groups which coordinate the sodium ion. This was done by the introduction of conservative mutations of the amino acid residues forming the Na1 site. The potassium interaction in these mutants was monitored by sodium dependent radioactive leucine binding. Moreover, the effect the effect of Na+ with and without substrate as well as that of potassium on the conformational equilibria was measured by tmFRET measurements on the mutants introduced in the construct enabling the measurements. The results suggest that K+-binding to LeuT modulates substrate transport and that the K+ affinity and selectivity for LeuT is sensitive to mutations in the Na1 site, pointing toward the Na1 site as a candidate site for facilitating the interaction between K+ in some NSS members.

The data presented in this manuscript are of very high quality. They are a detailed extension of results by the same group (Billesbolle et. al, Ref. 16 from the list) providing more detailed information on the importance of the Na1 site for potassium interaction. Clearly this begs for the identification of the binding site in a potassium bound LeuT structure in the future. Presumably LeuT was studied here because it appears that it is relatively easy to determine structures of many conformational states. Furthermore, convincing evidence showed that the stimulatory effect of K+ on transport is not because of energization of substrate accumulation but is rather due to the binding of this cation to a specific site.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In the present manuscript, Golf et al. investigate the consequences of astrocyte-specific deletion of Neuroligin family cell adhesion proteins on synapse structure and function in the brain. Decades of prior research had shown that Neuroligins mediate their effects at synapses through their role in the postsynaptic compartment of neurons and their transsynaptic interaction with presynaptic Neurexins. More recently, it was proposed for the first time that Neuroligins expressed by astrocytes can also bind to presynaptic Neurexins to regulate synaptogenesis (Stogsdill et al. 2017, Nature). However, several aspects of the model proposed by Stogsdill et al. on astrocytic Neuroligin function conflict with prior evidence on the role of Neuroligins at synapses, prompting Golf et al. to further investigate astrocytic Neuroligin function in the current study. Using postnatal conditional deletion of Neuroligins 1, 2 and 3 specifically from astrocytes, Golf et al. show that virtually no changes in the expression of synaptic proteins or in the properties of synaptic transmission at either excitatory or inhibitory synapses are observed. Moreover, no alterations in the morphology of astrocytes themselves were found. The authors conclude that while Neuroligins are indeed expressed in astrocytes and are hence likely to play some role there, this role does not include any direct consequences on synaptic structure and function, in direct contrast to the model proposed by Stogsdill et al.

Overall, this is a strong study that addresses an important and highly relevant question in the field of synaptic neuroscience. Neuroligins are not only key regulators of synaptic function, they have also been linked to numerous psychiatric and neurodevelopmental disorders, highlighting the need to precisely define their mechanisms of action. The authors take a wide range of approaches to convincingly demonstrate that under their experimental conditions, no alterations in the levels of synaptic proteins or in synaptic transmission at excitatory or inhibitory synapses, or in the morphology of astrocytes, are observed.

One caveat to this study is that the authors do not directly provide evidence that their Tamoxifen-inducible conditional deletion paradigm does indeed result in efficient deletion of all three Neuroligins from astrocytes. Using a Cre-dependent tdTomato reporter line, they show that tdTomato expression is efficiently induced by the current paradigm, and they refer to a prior study showing efficient deletion of Neuroligins from neurons using the same conditional Nlgn1-3 mouse lines but a different Cre driver strategy. However, neither of these approaches directly provide evidence that all three Neuroligins are indeed deleted from astrocytes in the current study. In contrast, Stogsdill et al. employed FACS and qPCR to directly quantify the loss of Nlgn2 mRNA from astrocytes. This leaves the current Golf et al. study somewhat vulnerable to the criticism, however unlikely, that their lack of synaptic effects may be a consequence of incomplete Neuroligin deletion, rather than a true lack of effect of astrocytic Neuroligins.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this manuscript, Scholz et al., adopt a set of tasks to study how brain regions are differentially activated with temporal context clues. In one task, the first item in a two item sequence will dictate the value of the second. In another task, there is no hierarchy in temporal order, though subjects must still maintain information across the delay to add the value of the two presented items. Using univariate analyses, the authors found many regions that showed an interaction between item position and task, including: the mPFC, anterior hippocampus and the left prefrontal and posterior temporal cortices. The results are interpreted as evidence for a dedicated system for understanding hierarchical relationships across domains as various as spatial cognition, music, and language.

The question raised by the authors is important and fMRI may be an appropriate means of studying the neural basis for hierarchical computations. The main limitation of the manuscript, and one that is briefly mentioned and dismissed in the discussion is the task design, which confounds whether or not a hierarchical relationship must be formed, and the content of the information that must be held across working memory (color in the hierarchy task and number in the iterative task).

The authors also report an interesting difference between the activation observed in the head and tail of the hippocampus during the different tasks. However, the authors compare each region independently, show one is significant and the other is not, and then conclude "the effect of hierarchical context representation in the hippocampus is specific to its anterior regions." Such a conclusion requires direct comparison of the regions.

Finally, it isn't clear if the motivating prior work makes a simple univariate prediction. A strong prediction however is that the representational similarity should be very different for objects in the first versus second position in the hierarchy task and much less so in the iterative task. Such a representational similarity analysis would better connect this study to prior research and to the hypothesis that hierarchical processing affects the coding of items in sequence.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The manuscript of Duewell et al has made critical observations that help to understand the mechanisms of activation of the class IA PI3Ks. By using single-molecule kinetic measurements, the authors have made outstanding progress toward understanding how PI3Kbeta is uniquely activated by phosphorylated tyrosine kinase receptors, Gbeta/gamma heterodimers and the small G protein Rac1. While previous studies have defined these as activators of PI3Kbeta, the current manuscript makes clear the quantitative limitations of these previous observations. Most previous quantitative in vitro studies of PI3Kbeta activation have used soluble peptides derived from bis-phosphorylated receptors to stimulate the enzyme. These soluble peptides stimulate the enzyme, and even stimulate membrane interaction. Although these previous studies showed that the release of p85-mediated autoinhibition unmasks an intrinsic affinity of the enzyme for lipid membranes, they ignored what would be the consequence of these peptide sequences being present in the context of intrinsic membrane proteins. The current manuscript shows that the effect of membrane-conjugated peptides on the enzyme activity is profound, in terms of recruiting the enzyme to membranes. In this context, the authors show that G proteins associated with the membranes have an important contribution to membrane recruitment, but they also have a profound allosteric effect on the activity on the membrane, These are observations that would not have been possible with bulk measurements, and they do not simply recapitulate observations that were made for other class IA PI3Ks.

An important observation that the authors have made is that Gbeta/gamma heterodimers and RAc1 alone have almost no ability to recruit PI3Kbeta to the membranes that they are using, and this is central to one of the most profoundly novel activation mechanisms offered by the manuscript. The authors propose that the nSH2- and Gbeta/gamma binding sites partially overlap, so that Gbeta/gamma can only bind once the nSH2 domain releases the p110beta subunit. This mechanism would mean that once the nSH2 is engaged by membrane-congugated pY, the Gbg heterodimer can bind and increase the association of the enzyme with membranes. Indeed, this increased membrane association is observed by the authors. However, the authors also show that this increased recruitment to membranes accounts for relatively little increase in activity, and that the far greater component of activation is due to an allosteric effect of the membrane association on the activity of the enzyme. The proposal for competition between Gbg binding and the nSH2 is consistent with the behavior of an nSH2 mutant that cannot bind to pY and which, consequently, does not vacate the Gbg-binding site. In addition to the outstanding contribution to understanding the kinetics of activation of PI3Kbeta, the authors have offered the first structural interpretation for the kinetics of Gbg activation in synergy with pY activation. The proposal for an overlapping nSH2/Gbg binding site is supported by predictions made by John Burke, using alphafold multimer. Although there is no experimental structure to support this structural model, it is consistent with HDX-MS analyses that were published previously.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Fiedler and colleagues set out to establish an analog-sensitive approach for selective inhibition of the mammalian IP6K isozymes. IP6Ks are inositol hexakisphosphate kinases, and the authors found that the classic glycine and alanine gatekeeper mutation (established by Kevan Shokat as the "bump and hole approach" for various protein kinases) resulted in limited catalytic efficiency. Therefore, the authors decided to use a leucine-to-valine mutation, which did not affect kinase activity, but, unfortunately, was less amenable to any of the well-established analog-sensitive kinase inhibitors such as PP1 and naphthyl-PP1. To overcome this limitation, the authors performed an elegant HT screen and identified a benzimidazole-based mutant-selective small molecule inhibitor. A focused SAR analysis combined with detailed kinetic studies revealed the hit molecule FMP-201300 as an allosteric inhibitor of IP6K mutants. While co-crystallization experiments failed, the authors used high-end HDX-MS measurements to gain insight into the structural and conformational determinants of mutant selectivity.

Overall, this is an excellent study of high quality. The identified FMP-201300 has the potential for further compound and probe development. My only minor comment is that the authors could spend more time discussing the proposed allosteric binding mode of FMP-201300 and provide more detailed figures to highlight the proposed interactions with the protein and the conformational changes that must ultimately take place to accommodate the allosteric modulator. I appreciate that the co-crystallization experiments did not yield bound inhibitor structures, but perhaps the authors could consider MD simulations to complete their study.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Bhanja et al have examined how actin polymerization switch B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling from amplification to attenuation. The authors have examined B cell spreading and contraction using lipid bilayers to assess the molecular regulation of BCR signalling during the contraction phase. Their data provide evidence for that N-WASP activated Arp2/3 generates centripetally moving actin foci and contractile actomyosin from lamellipodia actin networks. This generates BCR dense foci that pushes out both stimulatory kinases and inhibitory phosphatases. The study provides novel insight into how B cells upon activation attenuate BCR signalling by contraction of the actin cytoskeleton and clustering of BCR foci and this dynamic response is mediated by N-WASP and Arp2/3.

Strengths: The manuscript is well written and results, methods, figures and legends described in detail making it easy to follow the experimental setup, analysis, and conclusions. The authors achieved their aims, and the results support their conclusions.

Weaknesses: Minor as listed below. The working hypothesis of molecular crowding as a way to push out signalling molecules from the BCR dense foci is interesting. The authors provide evidence for that this is an active process mediated by N-WASP - Arp2/3 induced actin foci. Another possibility is that BCR dense foci formation is an indirect consequence of lamellipodia retraction. Future works should define the specific role of N-WASP, Arp2/3 and actin in the process to form BCR dense foci, especially as the BCR continue to signal in the cytoplasm.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this manuscript, the authors examined the role of transcription readout and intron retention in increasing transcription of transposable elements during aging in mammals. It is assumed that most transposable elements have lost the regulatory elements necessary for transcription activation. Using available RNA-seq datasets, the authors showed that an increase in intron retention and readthrough transcription during aging contributes to an increase in the number of transcripts containing transposable elements.

Previously, it was assumed that the activation of transposable elements during aging is a consequence of a gradual imbalance of transcriptional repression and a decrease in the functionality of heterochromatin (de repression of transcription in heterochromatin). Therefore, this is an interesting study with important novel conclusion. However, there are many questions about bioinformatics analysis and the results obtained.

Major comments:

1. In Introduction the authors indicated that only small fraction of LINE-1 and SINE elements are expressed from functional promoters and most of LINE-1 are co-expressed with neighboring transcriptional units. What about other classes of mobile elements (LTR mobile element and transposons)?

2. Results: Why authors considered all classes of mobile elements together? It is likely that most of the LTR containing mobile elements and transposons contain active promoters that are repressed in heterochromatin or by KRAB-C2H2 proteins.

3. Fig. 2. A schematic model of transposon expression is not presented clearly. What is the purpose of showing three identical spliced transcripts?

4. The study analyzed the levels of RNA from cell cultures of human fibroblasts of different ages. The annotation to the dataset indicated that the cells were cultured and maintained. (The cells were cultured in high-glucose (4.5mg/ml) DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 15% (vol/vol) fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 1X glutamax (Gibco), 1X non-essential amino acids (Gibco) and 1% (vol/vol) penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco). How correct that gene expression levels in cell cultures are the same as in body cells? In cell cultures, transcription is optimized for efficient division and is very different from that of cells in the body. In order to correlate a result on cells with an organism, there must be rigorous evidence that the transcriptomes match.

5. The results obtained for isolated cultures of fibroblasts are transferred to the whole organism, which has not been verified. The conclusions should be more accurate.

6. The full pipeline with all the configuration files IS NOT available on github (pabisk/aging_transposons).

7. Analysis of transcripts passing through repeating regions is a complex matter. There is always a high probability of incorrect mapping of multi-reads to the genome. Things worsen if unpaired short reads are used, as in the study (L=51). Therefore, the authors used the Expectation maximization algorithm to quantify transposon reads. Such an option is possible. But it is necessary to indicate how statistically reliable the calculated levels are. It would be nice to make a similar comparison of TE levels using only unique reads. The density of reads would drop, but in this case it would be possible to avoid the artifacts of the EM algorithm.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In this research article a new allosteric mechanism for T cell receptor (TCR) triggering upon peptide-MHC complex binding is presented in which conformational change in the TCR facilitates activation by controlling CD3 dynamics around the TCR. The authors find that the Cb FG loop acts as a gatekeeper and Cb connecting peptide acts as a hinge to control TCR flexibility.

As an initial result, the authors set up two sets of simulations - TCR-CD3 and pMHC-TCR-CD3 in POPC bilayers and identified that the CD3e chains exhibit a wider range of mobility in the pMHC-TCR-CD3 system as compared to the TCR-CD3 system. Next, they examined the contacts between all subunits during the course of both simulations and established that CD3g and CD3eg made far fewer contacts with TCRb in the pMHC-TCR-CD3 simulations. Next, they identified that the TCR is extended in the pMHC-TCR-CD3 simulations with larger tilt angle of 150º and FG loop acts as gatekeeper that allows CD3 movements upon pMHC binding. Finally, Mutations in Cb connecting peptide regions indicated rigidified TCR leading to hypersensitive TCR, proved both by simulations and in vitro experiments.

The following major concerns must be addressed.

Major concerns:

1) The simulations were performed with intracellular regions unfolded and free from the membrane. A more complete system should have the intracellular regions embedded in the membrane. An NMR structure of CD3e is available (Xu et al., Cell, 2008) and could have been modeled into the TCR-CD3 system before the simulation. Prakaash et al., (PLoS, Comput Biol, 2021) studied cytoplasmic domain motions during in their simulation experiments.

2) Comparing Fig. 2C and Fig.7C, the movement of CD3eg is more restricted in Fig.7C. Is this because the simulation time is lower in the mutation experiments?

3) Only TCR-CD3 simulation were performed for PP and AA mutants. A simulation with pMHC (pMHC-TCRmutants-CD3) should be performed to show increased CD3 mobility.

4) Using CD3e antibody, OKT3, for activation instead of pMHC as a separate experiment would add more value to this study. They can look at CD3 mobility and TCR elongation in the system with OKT3 antibody and compare it to the CD3 mobility and TCR elongation with the pMHC system. They can also use OKT3 with AA and PP mutants and perform both simulation and in vitro activation experiments.

5) The activation experimental data is rather underwhelming. The difference between WT and PP in 2hr experiment at 0.016 ug/mL looks exceedingly low. A stronger TCR-pMHC system should be considered for the in vitro activation experiments.

6) There is some concern that the scientific work lacks solid experimental functional data and lack of novelty due to earlier TCR-CD3 simulation studies (Pandey et al., 2021, eLife) that already reported flexibility and elongation of the complex.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

• The central component of the Nuclear Pore Complex (NPC) that controls nucleocytoplasmic transport is the assembly of the intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) that line its passageway. Nanopore based mimics functionalized with these IDPs have been an important tool in understanding the mechanisms of protein transport through the NPC. This paper develops a new type of nanopore NPC mimic that acts as Zero Mode Waveguide enabling optical detection of protein translocations on the single molecule level in pores of different diameters. This is a significant improvement over previous mimics, where optical detection was used only for measurement of bulk fluxes, while single molecule detection relied on electrochemical methods that potentially introduce substantial artifacts. Studying the dependence of transport on the pore diameter is interesting because of its important connections to mechanosensitivity of protein partitioning in cells, which can be difficult to directly control and study in live cells.

• The authors study the transport of individual transport proteins in the dilute regime, and compare the transport of the transport proteins that naturally carry cargoes through the NPC with the transport of BSA that serves as a neutral control. The paper confirms the insights of previous work by the same and other authors - IDP functionalized nanopores are selective in a sense that they conduct the transport proteins well while blocking the passage of BSA. As reported in the paper, the selectivity disappears at large pore diameters which become similar to empty pores because the IDPs don't stretch far enough to cover the pore cross-section.

• The authors use one-bead-per-amino acid coarse grained modeling of the IDPs that they developed and validated previously, to model the distribution of the IDPs in the pores. Combining the simulations with the recently developed "void" model of transport through IDP network and phenomenological transport models, they provide an explanation for the observed reduction in the flux of the neutral control proteins compared to that of transport proteins. The translocation of transport proteins is not modeled directly.

• Together, the experimental and the computational results constitute convincing evidence that points toward the correctness of our current understanding of the physical mechanisms of NPC transport.

• The authors study interference between the transport proteins and the neutral control proteins at high concentrations of the latter, where the pore is occupied by multiple transport proteins. The results appear to be different from previous observations (but more study is needed). I think more discussion of how the results seem with the previous work and what are the potential implication for NPC transport would be welcome.

• The authors use simulations and phenomenological models of transport to analyze the crowded regime. It appears there are some inconsistencies in the application of these models in the dilute and crowded regimes, that should be clarified.

• Some details of the experimental system and the appropriateness of the transport models should be explained more - such as the role of the hydrodynamic pressure gradient.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

This paper presents improved, chromosome level assemblies of the hadal snailfish and Tanaka's snailfish. This is an extension and update of previous work from the group on the hadal snailfish genome. The chromosomal assemblies allow comparisons of genome architecture between a shallow water snailfish and the hadal snailfish to aid inference on timing of colonization of trenches and genomic changes that may have been adaptive for that move.

The comparisons in genomic architecture are compelling: genes present in Tanaka's snailfish that are lost in hadal snailfish that involve whole regions of the genome that no longer map even though adjacent regions do map between the species and across a large evolutionary distance to stickleback. Or genes that are duplicated in hadal snailfish but only appear as single copy in other fishes. The paper focuses on genes in the eye, in hearing, in circadian rhythms, and in ROS scavaging. These are all functions that could play a role in adapting to the hadal environment.

The genomic comparisons all seem sound. Stylistically I would prefer if the authors could introduce the gene product and protein function every time they introduce a gene locus. They introduce a gene and general function, but don't usually note what the protein encoded by the gene is and what it's specific function is.

I found the paper generally well written, and the data compelling and creatively displayed. There is room for improvement in places where additional details could be added (e.g. the choice to show expression data as TPMs) and the writing could be clarified.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In the present study, Liu et al present an analysis of benign and HCC liver samples which were subjected to a new technology (LOOP-Seq) and paired WES.  By integrating these data, the authors find isoforms, fusions and mutations which uniquely cluster within HCC samples, such as in the HLA locus, which serve as candidate leads for further investigation.  The main appeal of the study is in the potential of LOOP-Seq as a method to present isoform-resolved data without actually performing long-read sequencing.   While this presents an exciting new method, the current study lacks systematic comparisons with other technologies/data to test the robustness, reproducibility and utility of LOOP-Seq.  Further, this study could be further improved by giving more physiologic context and examples from the analyses, thus providing a new resource to the HCC community.  A few suggestions based on these are below:    

A primary consideration is that this seems to be the first implementation of LOOP-Seq, where the technology, while intriguing, has not been evaluated systematically.  It seems like a standard 10x workflow is performed, where exons are selectively pulled down and amplified.  Subsequent ultra-deep sequencing is assumed to give isoform-resolution of the sc-seq data.  To demonstrate the utility of the approach it would benefit the study to compare the isoform-resolved results with studies where long-read sequencing was actually performed (ex: https://journals.lww.com/hep/Fulltext/2019/09000/Long_Read_RNA_Sequencing_Identifies_Alternative.19.aspx, https://www.jhep-reports.eu/article/S2589-5559(22)00021-0/fulltext,  https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1010342).  Presumably, a fair amount of overlap should occur to justify the usage.  

Related to this point, the sc-seq cell types and benign vs HCC genes should be compared with the wealth of data available for HCC sc-seq  (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-32283-3, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-84693-w).  These seem to be important to benchmark the technology in order to demonstrate that the probe-based selection and subsequent amplification does not bias cell type definition and clustering.  In particular, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03974-6 seems quite relevant to compare mutational landscapes from the data.<br /> <br /> From the initial UMAP clustering, it will be important to know what the identities are of the cells themselves.  Presumably there is quite a bit of immune cells and hepatocytes, but without giving identities, downstream mechanistic interpretation is difficult.  

In general, there are a fair amount of broad analyses, such as comparisons of hierarchical clustering of cell types, but very little physiologic interpretations of what these results mean.  For example, among the cell clusters from Fig 6, knowing the pathways and cell annotations would help to contextualize these results.  Without more biologically-meaningful aspects to highlight, most of the current appeal for the manuscript is dependent on the robustness of LOOP-seq and its implementation.  

Many of the specific analyses are difficult and the methods are brief.  Especially given that this technology is new and the dataset potentially useful, I would strongly recommend the authors set up a git repository, galaxy notebook or similar to maximize utility and reproducibility 

The authors claim that clustering between benign and HCC samples was improved by including isoform & gene (Suppl fig 8).  This seems like an important conclusion if true, especially to justify the use of long-read implementation.  Given that the combination of isoform + gene presents ~double the number of variables on which to cluster, it would be important to show that the improved separation on UMAP distance is actually due to the isoforms themselves and not just sampling more variables from either gene or isoform

SQANTI implementation to identify fusions relevant for the HCC/benign comparison. How do the fusions compare with those already identified for HCC?  These analyses can be quite messy when performed on WES alone so it seems that having such deep RNA-seq would improve the capacity to see which fused genes are strongly expressed/suppressed.  This doesn't seem as evident from current analysis.  There are quite a bit of WES datasets which could be compared:  https://www.nature.com/articles/ng.3252, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03276-y

Figure 4 is fairly unclear.  The matrix graphs showing gene position mutations are tough to interpret and make out.  Usually, gene track views with bars or lollipop graphs can make these results more readily interpretable.  Also, how Figure 4 B infers causal directions from mutations is unclear.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Souaiaia et al. attempt to use sibling phenotype data to infer aspects of genetic architecture affecting the extremes of the trait distribution. They do this by considering deviations from the expected joint distribution of siblings' phenotypes under the standard additive genetic model, which forms their null model. They ascribe excess similarity compared to the null as due to rare variants shared between siblings (which they term 'Mendelian') and excess dissimilarity as due to de-novo variants. While this is a nice idea, there can be many explanations for rejection of their null model, which clouds interpretation of Souaiaia et al.'s empirical results.

The authors present their method as detecting aspects of genetic architecture affecting the extremes of the trait distribution. However, I think it would be better to characterize the method as detecting whether siblings are more or less likely to be aggregated in the extremes of the phenotype distribution than would be predicted under a common variant, additive genetic model.

Exactly how the rareness and penetrance of a genetic variant influence the conditional sibling phenotype distribution at the extremes is not made clear. The contrast between de-novo and 'Mendelian' architectures is somewhat odd since these are highly related phenomena: a 'Mendelian' architecture could be due to a de-novo variant of the previous generation. The fact that these two phenomena are surmised to give opposing signatures in the authors' statistical tests seems suboptimal to me: would it not be better to specify a parameter that characterizes the degree or sharing between siblings of rare factors of large effect? This could be related to the mixture components in the bimodal distribution displayed in Fig 1. In fact, won't the extremes of all phenotypes be influenced by all three types of variants (common, rare, de-novo) to greater or lesser degree? By framing the problem as a hypothesis testing problem, I think the authors are obscuring the fact that the extremes of real phenotypes likely reflect a mixture of causes: common, de-novo, and rare variants (and shared and non-shared environmental factors).

To better enable interpretation of the results of this method, a more comprehensive set of simulations is needed. Factors that may influence the conditional distribution of siblings' phenotypes beyond those considered include: non-normal distribution, assortative mating, shared environment, interactions between genetic and shared environmental factors, and genetic interactions.

In summary, I think this is a promising method that is revealing something interesting about extreme values of phenotypes. Determining exactly what is being revealed is going to take a lot more work, however.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

The manuscript points out that TMB cut-offs are not strong predictors of response to immunotherapy or overall survival. By randomly shuffling TMB values within cohorts to simulate a null distribution of log-rank test p-values, they show that under correction, the statistical significance of previously reported TMB cut-offs for predicting outcomes is questionable. There is a clinical need for a better prediction of treatment response than TMB alone can provide. However, no part of the analysis challenges the validity of the well-known pan-cancer correlation between TMB and immunotherapy response. The failure to detect significant TMB cut-offs may be due to insufficient power, as the examined cohorts have relatively low sample sizes. A power analysis would be informative of what cohort sizes are needed to detect small to modest effects of TMB on immune response.

The manuscript provides a simple model of immunogenicity that is tailored to be consistent with a claimed lack of relationship between TMB and response to immunotherapy. Under the model, if each mutation that a tumor has acquired has a relatively high probability of being immunogenic (~10%, they suggest), and if 1-2 immunogenic mutations is enough to induce an immune response, then most tumors produce an immune response, and TMB and response should be uncorrelated except in very low-TMB tumors. The question then becomes whether the response is sufficient to wipe out tumor cells in conjunction with immunotherapy, which is essentially the same question of predicting response that motivated the original analysis. While TMB alone is not an excellent predictor of treatment response, the pan-cancer correlation between TMB and response/survival is highly significant, so the model's only independent prediction is wrong. Additionally, experiments to predict and validate neoepitopes suggest that a much smaller fraction of nonsynonymous mutations produce immune responses1,2.

A key idea that is overlooked in this manuscript is that of survivorship bias: self-evidently, none of the mutations found at the time of sequencing have been immunogenic enough to provoke a response capable of eliminating the tumor. While the authors suggest that immunoediting "is inefficient, allowing tumors to accumulate a high TMB," the alternative explanation fits the neoepitope literature better: most mutations that reach high allele frequency in tumor cells are not immunogenic in typical (or patient-specific) tumor environments. Of course, immunotherapies sometimes succeed in overcoming the evolved immune evasion of tumors. Higher-TMB tumors are likely to continue to have higher mutation rates after sequencing; increased generation of new immunogenic mutations may partially explain their modestly improved responses to therapy.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

In their manuscript, Keramidioti and co-authors investigate the cellular architecture of the nervous system in the freshwater polyp Hydra. Specifically, the authors attempt to improve the resolution, which is lacking in the previous studies, yet to generate a comprehensive overview of the entire nervous system's spatial organization and to infer communication between cells. To this end, Keramidioti et al. use state-of-the-art imaging approaches, such as confocal microscopy combined with the use of transgenic animals, transmission electron microscopy, and block face scanning electron microscopy. The authors present three major observations: i) A novel hyCADab antibody may be used to detect the entire nervous system of Hydra; ii) Nerve cells in the ectoderm and in the endoderm are organized in two separate nerve nets, which do not interact; iii) Both nerve nets are composed of bundles of overlapping nerve processes.

The manuscript addresses a long-standing and currently intensively studied question in developmental neurobiology biology - it attempts to reveal structural properties and principles that govern the function of the nervous systems in non-bilaterian animals. Hence, this study contributes to understanding the nervous system evolution trajectories. Therefore, the manuscript may represent interest to researchers interested in evolutionary and developmental neurobiology.

The manuscript reports a remarkably meticulous study and presents stunning imaging results. However, the manuscript would benefit from a more thorough presentation of immunochemical and electron microscopy data. The work would also greatly benefit from a more straightforward presentation of truly novel findings and a more concise summary of already-known aspects.

Major comments:

1) The novelty of findings.<br /> The authors present a lot of findings and illustrate them with numerous very impressive images. However, most observations have been actually reported before, and genuinely novel discoveries are obscured. For instance, the findings on the elongated morphology of the endodermal sensory cell (entire passage starting with "Figure 2B shows..."), qualitative ("Figure 3 shows..."), and quantitative estimation of neuronal densities in the different body compartments of Hydra - all these observations do not provide novel insights. Some co-authors of this manuscript or other authors have previously published all these features. A substantial advance would be performing in vivo experiments, addressing directly, for instance, the question of what is the function of sensory neurons reaching into the gastric cavity. What signals do they detect there? If the authors have access to such functional assays, any additional in vivo experiments will substantially improve the study.

2) The utility of the hyCADab as a pan-neuronal antibody.<br /> Most of the analysis in the manuscript relies on immunostaining of fixed polyps with a novel polyclonal antibody. The authors claim that this antibody recognizes a neuron-specific cadherin protein of Hydra and stains all neurons in the nerve net. However, a brief search in the publicly available resources (such as the Hydra Genome Portal: https://research.nhgri.nih.gov/HydraAEP/) indicates that the gene encoding a protein with a sequence similar to the epitope used by Keramidioti and co-authors is, in fact, not a neuron-specific. It is strongly expressed in nematocytes. Furthermore, the cytoplasmic staining hyCADab is puzzling. Given that the target Cadherin protein is a membrane-associated protein, one would anticipate the immunochemical signal to be localized on the cell's periphery, under the surface.

The authors compare the density of neurons related to epithelial cells detected in whole mounts by the antibody with counts on macerates. Perhaps, a more direct and accurate approach would be to stain macerates with the antibody. In this way, one would be able to identify neurons by their morphology and validate whether 100% of them are hyCADab-positive.

The nGreen strain used by the authors is a mosaic one (see Materials and Methods). Hence, not all neurons are, in fact, labeled by GFP. Therefore, the argument that 51/51 GFP-positive cells are also hyCADab-positive is not convincing and insufficient to claim that hyCADab is a pan-neuronal antibody.

Finally, it is truly surprising that transgenic GFP-positive neurons are, in most cases, hyCADab-negative. (It is particularly evident in Fig. 11B. If the hyCADab antibody is indeed a pan-neuronal one, the red signal in the transgenic neurons should be as high as in the surrounding cells, and the cells would appear yellow).

3) The apparent absence of contact between the ectodermal and endodermal nerve nets.<br /> A central claim of the manuscript is that there are no contacts between the nervous networks in the ectoderm and the endoderm. Therefore, the activities of these networks appear to be not coordinated. In support of these claims, the authors provide images of sections from the polyps' body column (Fig. 4). However, the mesoglea itself is not visible in these images.

Another limitation of the study by Keramidioti and co-authors is that they investigate sections only from the gastric region of a polyp. Earlier studies (for instance, Westfall, 1973) using TEM provided compelling evidence for communication between the ectodermal and endodermal nerve networks via neurites that cross the mesoglea. These neurites traversing mesoglea have been detected specifically in the hypostome of Hydra - the region not thoroughly investigated by Keramidioti et al. It is also surprising that transmesogleal bridges between ectodermal and endodermal epithelial cells, abundantly present not only in the hypostome but in the body column as well, can not be detected on any of the images provided by the authors. This suggests that their approach overall might be in general not suitable for addressing the question of connection and communication between the ectodermal and endodermal structures.

4) Formation of neurite bundles<br /> The most intriguing finding of the study by Keramidioti et al. is that neurites of nerve cells often run parallel to each other, forming conspicuous bundles in both ectodermal and endodermal nerve nets. The formation of such bundles per se is not surprising. It has already been documented by Takahashi-Iwanaga et al.,1994 (this study definitely did not escape the authors' attention) in Hydra's body column. Moreover, neurite bundles have been previously described in the hypostomes of other Hydra species (e.g., Davis et al., 1968; Grimmelikhuijzen, 1985; Yaross et al., 1986) and in other cnidarians (e.g., Mackie 1973, 1989; Garm et al., 2007). Hence, this appears to be a common, universal principle of the nervous system architecture in Cnidaria. I agree with the authors that such an organization of the nerve net is surprising and contrasts the neuronal architecture of most Bilateria. Could these observations, taken together, lead to a view of an alternative design of a nerve system? (a recently published description of the syncytial nerve net in Ctenophora is another revolutionary example of a nervous system architecture). The authors might compare the organization of the Hydra nerve plexus with the architecture of the vertebrate enteric nervous system - where bundles of neurites are also highly abundant, stimulating some thoughts on the evolutionary roots of the peripheral NS.

Another aspect worth discussing in this context is whether the nerve system of Hydra can be organized in any other way. Given the architecture of epithelia in Hydra, there's virtually no other way for the neurites to run other than to form bundles - they occupy the narrow spaces between the epithelial cells and between their muscular fibers. The growth of the neurites thus appears constrained.

Finally, the functional implications of such bundle formation appear extremely interesting. Do neurons really form contacts in these bundles? Unfortunately, the authors provide no evidence for synaptic contacts within the bundles. This is somehow surprising given that numerous studies have effectively localized chemical and electric synapses in Hydra cells (e.g., Westfall et al., 1971). Overlapping of neurites may suggest an alternative, non-synaptic mechanism of signal propagation - via ephaptic coupling. It would be beneficial if the authors provided more TEM data on the presence or absence of synapses between neurites in the body column of Hydra. Some experiments, such as the dye coupling approach, may also help probe the existence of synaptic connections between the neurons forming a bundle.

Reviewer #2 (Public Review):

Voda et al examined the role of multiple co-stimulations on gene expression and chromatin accessibility of T cells. They further linked the roles of co-stimulatory proteins to genetic variants associated with IBD. They reported a shared effect of co-stimulatory proteins on gene expression and chromatin accessibility. In particular they reported the induction of genes associated with lysosome production with alternative co-stimulatory proteins. In linking human genetics to the effect of costimulation, they reported the largest enrichment of IBD risk variants in open chromatin regions shared by all costimulatory molecules.

The question that is being investigated in this manuscript is significant considering the requirement of costimulatory proteins in controlling T cell responses. However, the data presented and analyzes performed remain exploratory and it is not clear how it can advance our understanding of the link between IBD risk association and immune responses. At least one locus ( a target of shared/unique costimulatory molecules) should be selected and mechanistic investigation of the locus, transcription factors involved, and perturbation studies for understanding gene regulation should be performed.