UAS-mito-GFP
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188212
Resource: UAS-mito-GFP
Curator: @maulamb
SciCrunch record: UAS-mito-GFP
UAS-mito-GFP
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188212
Resource: UAS-mito-GFP
Curator: @maulamb
SciCrunch record: UAS-mito-GFP
RRID:WB-STRAIN
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.38675
Resource: (WB Cat# OP50-GFP,RRID:WB-STRAIN:OP50-GFP)
Curator: @Naa003
SciCrunch record: RRID:WB-STRAIN:OP50-GFP
Curator comments: E. Coli. Escherichia Coli WB Cat# OP50-GFP
The host range for three of the plasmids (pBF1, pB7, and pB9) was further investigated by the GFP method described above
Does the host range of transfer go wider than the population where GFP is observed?
This is my idea of distinctive overlapping categories of host range as venn diagrams.
Consequently, the plasmid donor cells do not express gfp
Does the leaky expression not hinder the detecting and quantification of transconjugants in epifluorescence microscopy?
OP50 GFP
Curator: @jcabotaj
Resource used:
RRID:WB-STRAIN:OP50-GFP
SciCrunch record: RRID:CGC_OP50-GFP
Alternate resolvers: SciCrunch xml N2T identifiers.org