4 Matching Annotations
  1. Mar 2026
    1. The Diamond LayerMyelin insulates the nerve fiber and makes the signal reliable. But a strong, reliable signal is not the same as a rich one. The Diamond Layer wraps the myelin with eight additional dimensions that make the synapse not just strong — but context-aware, directional, and time-sensitive. This is where the architecture stops describing connections and starts understanding them.Synapse (the connection exists) → Myelin (the connection is complete) → Diamond (the connection is multidimensional)

      Switching metaphors away from bio, diamond bc of multi-faceted. Adds 8 more aspects. - temporality - direction - valence (subjective ratio of pos/neg emotions etc.) - layer weighting (as a weight stemming from a question asked of the data, not an aspect of the actual connection) - social graph - context dependence (diff roles peers can have) - decay (a measure of temporality, with temporality being a moment, decay the distance to it) - node value, a measure of what a weak tie connects to inverse proportional to alternative routes available. replaceability, which is a overly utilitarian term when applied to peers imo.

    2. Nine layers. Hundreds of data points. If you ask "tell me about Peter Ros" the answer is a rich dossier. Immediately usable.

      the question is, do you need this for the connection to be usable? The example connection is part of Martijn's strong ties, and you already know, have an intuitive picture, without the data at hand. weak ties are of high interest bc of their potential bridging value, the [[Informatiewaarde ligt in verrassing surprisal 20210124072501]] they bring. In the middle ground, my [[Social Distance als ordeningsprincipe 20190612143232]], say the 150+ to 500 is where this weight may be more interesting. You have no mental image strong enough to just know them, they are not far out to have a role in wide flung connectivity, but do serve as a great curation filter for info. Is the weight here a measure of [[Contactivity 20051105150458]], for the middle part.

  2. Oct 2023
    1. I’d say more than 80% of my working as well as social life uses internet-channels at some point.

      March 2006, this is pre-FB (oct 06) and pre-Twitter (I used Jaiku at the time, T from dec 06).

      That 80% now easily is 100%m but it sounds right. I think KB/KM Europe (00-02) BlogTalk (03, 04, 06) and Reboot (from 05) made it so, as those contacts were online first. Previous online interaction from '89-'99 was centered on pre-existing contacts and information more I think. From '00 is when [[Contactivity 20051105150458]] rather than connectivity kicked in for me.