And it’s not just the US putting chatbots at commanders’ fingertips; China is commissioning similar tools, according to recent [analysis] by Georgetown University’s Center for Security and Emerging Technology.
需要核查的是，中国是否真的在开发类似的聊天机器人工具，以及这些工具的具体应用情况。
Today’s military personnel might give chatbots a list of potential targets to help decide which to strike first.
这个陈述需要核查的是，目前军事人员是否真的在实战中使用聊天机器人来决定攻击目标。
Keeping a human in the loop may not provide the safeguard people imagine, because the human cannot know the AI's intention before it acts.
这一论点直接挑战了军事AI监管的核心原则，即'人类在回路中'能提供有效保障。作者认为这种监督可能是一种幻觉，因为人类无法在AI行动前理解其真实意图，这违背了人们对人类监督有效性的普遍假设。
Our choice is therefore no longer whether to build such weapons, but only whom to entrust with their responsible use in military affairs.
作者提出了一个惊人的观点：AI技术的扩散已成事实，关键问题不再是是否开发，而是谁应该控制。这反映了从预防到管理的范式转变，暗示技术发展的不可逆性已经超越了传统的伦理讨论框架。
But those raising hue and cry about the government's unsurprising attempt to wield a technology for military purposes that all parties agree will define humanity's fate must at least attempt to justify why they believe someone else deserves that power.
令人惊讶的是：文章质疑那些反对政府将AI技术用于军事目的的人士未能提出替代方案，暗示这种批评缺乏建设性。这一观点挑战了常见的反战立场，提出了关于技术治理权力分配的深刻问题。
Description of AI use by the Israelian miiltary in Gaza. Vgl [[AI begincondities en evolutie 20190715140742]] wrt the difference between AGI evolution beginning in a military or civic setting, and that AI restraints are applied in the civil side, not in military application meaning the likelihood is there not in civil society. This is true in the EU AI Act too that excludes military from scope.